Ren said:I think ultimately what separates our approaches is that yours seems largely selfless (i.e. thinking of everything fundamental that can be said on a subject, for its own sake) while mine is ultimately quite selfish (i.e. absorbing information for my project, for my own sake). I'm overplaying things a bit, but in this distinction we may find traces of the Type 4 versus Type 6 distinction - and there you go, back to Enneagram
totally makes sense; and this is plausibly also related to the sense in which I feel having a third-feeling-function is very fitting to me. I tend to be, as I've said, a little noncommittal on value and meaning questions....more interested in exhausting every angle, including the most fantastical...without really having an agenda that's more selective than this