TenorKite
Community Member
- MBTI
- Undisclosed
The only way to beat an ENTP is through DEATH.
*edited*
The only way to beat an ENTP is through DEATH.
Which is why we win.
This isn't arguing semantics, this is arguing subjectivity. There's a slight difference between meanings of words, and meaning of interpretation.
ENTPs would not argue with the ref. There would be no ref in a fight with an ENTP. It would only win if A) The person got knocked out or super injured or B) They got killed. If you go with A than you better run, because the ENTP would just come after you. No matter how many times you beat us we'll just continue to get back up and come after you. Its why ENTPs are known as the challengers. You forgot about our amazing ability to raising above expectations.
I don't see how we're the arrogant ones when we're saying it would be equal and you're saying you'd win.Yeah, very arrogant on our part.
The last point is that your analogy is all wrong. I'm not likely to rain down punches. That be idiotic. It would make you tired fast, and less likely to keep a clear head. I'm more likely to stab you in a vein or manipulate your body using pressure points. Basically, I'd go for the submissions. I also like using my legs.
I'm also likely to hide a knife and stab you just to win.
The problem is that I gave an actual example where it balances out. It's not exactly about getting in your head. Its about finding your patterns. Ni dominates? INTJs INFJs. Notice the J. You always have a pattern, and unlike your Ni that finds the answer quick without knowing how. Us Ne dominates finds the patterns easier. Which is why its balanced like I said.