Kierkagaard
Newbie
- MBTI
- INTP
- Enneagram
- 5w4
religious beliefs are like math, and the 'a' prefix is like a negative sign
let theism = t, where t can not equal 0 (obvs)
therefore, athiesm is -t
therefore atheism is a belief
except there's no distinct variable there for belief. If belief = religion then belief = t how would it follow that -t = t? And even if you were right, this is why I maintain that atheism is a misnomer since the word was constructed back when religion was the only explanation and thus the default position. Religion is no longer the default position so maybe we need a new word for it since atheism is filled with so many different and contradicting definitions.
I maintain that anything you can claim to believe is a belief.
Anything that involves your convixion that something is thus is a belief, even if it's insane or outlandish, even if you have no proof.
So you didn't read anything I wrote since I just said there's no conviction involved. The only belief I maintain are those required for the basic functions of science as well as a belief in a reason and evidenced based system of understanding the universe and its properties. All assertions that I would accept as true (and potentially as beliefs) must fall within those parameters. God claims, having failed to meet its burden of proof do not fall within the scope of my beliefs and I therefore have no belief in them.
To say that I believe I don't believe is a kindergarten level 'self-refuting idea' so I'm not sure how you'd explain that away.