say what
I like soft things...so soft!
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 5w4..maybe?
yeah, many fields of study are not scientific. and many are. psychology is not even close of being one of them.
What would you consider the scientific fields?
yeah, many fields of study are not scientific. and many are. psychology is not even close of being one of them.
But is this psychology, or is this the military using psychology?
I won't discount that there are people currently out there misusing psychology- but I believe that it's a smaller percentage than the overall psychologists that are working out there.
Just as there are organizations and governments using chemistry and biochemistry for harm - yet there's also lots of extremely important and positive movements in these fields. But we don't discount them entirely because of the bad apples.
To answer that question you could read the passage i posted above about MKUltra in canada
In it you will see that the military covertly fund mainstream psychiatrists so how do you ever know that your research is military or not?
Also you can be sure that any break through you make will be told to the military
Dr cameron who was putting his patients into comas for months at a time and playing noise or words on a constant loop to them without their consent was after his research made the first chairman of the World Psychiatry Association...i'm going to repeat that...he was made the chairman of the World Psychiatry Association
Psychiatrists again are different.
Also, there are major differences between experimental psychology and counselling psychology. I would believe that there may be issues in experimental psychology. However, in Canada, the ethics that are required (when part of a institution like a university) are so strict that there could never be harm done to an individual.
Psychologists and psychiatrists in the private sector may be doing this stuff- but I don't know. What I can speak to is academic and healthcare institutions that have huge regulatory bodies. Again though, I would say that it's not just 'psychology' that this impacts- physicians, chemists, biologist - these are all people in the private sector that could be conducting unethical work...the point is, it's not the discipline, it's the intentions of the individuals.
A picture of a cock?
Sprinkles, are you currently experiencing repressed memories of a male figure in your life?
The pink and orange colours...do they represent the juxtaposition of yourself as a young child and an older adult?
This 'derp', is this your inner voice coming forth, calling for help?
Did a chicken touch you in one of your 'nono' zones?
I'm writing this all down right now!!!!
But to claim it is "science" is inaccurate. Actually, it's worse than that. It's an attempt to redefine science. Science, redefined, is no longer the empirical analysis of the natural world; instead, it is any topic that sprinkles a few numbers around. This is dangerous because, under such a loose definition, anything can qualify as science. And when anything qualifies as science, science can no longer claim to have a unique grasp on secular truth.
Thought it would be interesting to discuss the credibility of science - as this is a site based on a psychology typology tool.
What is science? How do we define it? How do we measure it?
Does the 'scientific method' employed in psychology match the scientific method for other disciplines?
Can an applied discipline be scientific?
@LucyJr , thought it might be an interesting discussion to have - but didn't want to derail the other thread
Its more an art than a science I think, probably closer to philosophy too.
At least psychology as most people think about it, which I guess is the psychotherapies and social psychology.
Its more an art than a science I think, probably closer to philosophy too.
At least psychology as most people think about it, which I guess is the psychotherapies and social psychology.