tfg345i4u5lw
On Holiday
- MBTI
- ????
- Enneagram
- None
The babies life has yet to begin
Incorrect.
The babies life has yet to begin
So it's human, but not a person, why?(by your definition, which isn) also why is it necessary?
I also force you adhere to my moral standards when you decide that you'd like to put an end to my life for some inconvenient reason why is that different?
I regard my moral standpoint just as important as you value yours. and no, I do not believe it's up to the government of any country to enforce morals. It's up to the government to protect the people they govern, and I believe that means everyone. It's up to a government to be fair on all people of different beliefs. The government is not forcing people to have abortions. they are an option for those of us who have no issue with them. those who have an issue with them, do not have to have one. but by disallowing them, the government protects the viewpoint of one large group by halming the values of another. The best solution is one that allows both groups to practice their own morals.bove, we live in a world were moral standpoints have to be enforced.
I still think there is a line that can be drawn, no matter how underdeveloped someone is after they are born. this is my opinion and it won't change no matter how much you debate with me, just as I'm sure yours won't.kay, how about someone under developed
s far as I'm concerned if the mother committed to having sex that lead to her having the child, she is at that point responsible for the child.(this does not include abuse, rape, incest or any other form of trauma) If at some point during the pregnancy the mothers life is endangered medically, she then has the option to abort.
I don't think people truely understand what making abortions illegal would do to a country as a whole. If they did understand, they wouldn't like it.
and I don't like the fact at all, but it's something I accept, and I understand that allowing abortions early on in pregnancy is the only way to prevent it.
It is not a baby. It is a fetus.
What if I kill a 1 year old? A one year old is not as cognitive and aware as an adult, so by your reasoning it isn't as bad.
Should a person who kills a 1 year old receive a smaller punishment than a person who kills an adult?
What about victims of rape? We should work harder to prevent it in the first place.
What about teen pregnancy? We should educate more.
What about women who don't have the resources to care for the baby? There should be more resources available and the man should be held more accountable by the law and his peers.
By making abortion casual we are halting the progress of women.
I think we've had at least two or three of these threads since I have been on the forums and it always comes down to the same argument. People differ on whether life begins at birth or conception.
Sorry but all you're saying is that women should be punished for society's failings. For somone who's quoting a feminist that's pretty goddam remarkable.
First off, thats not what i'm saying.
Second, I'm quoting a feminist because there are lots of feminists who see things like I do. Check out this website and it might help you grasp what i'm saying.
http://feministsforlife.org/news/refuse-to-choose.htm
Also there is a facebook group. http://www.facebook.com/FeministsForLife
"When we consider that women are treated as property, it is degrading to women that we should treat our children as property to be disposed of as we see fit."
- Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Heck yes! Feminists For Life
Women are oppressed, abortion is our societies way of saying "there is nothing we can do about it, we should let women abort". The real problem is that in both a cultural and economic sense there is not enough love shown towards women. By allowing abortion to be a casual thing we are accepting the unfair treatment of women and therefor improvement will not be made. There will only be more abortions.
What about victims of rape? We should work harder to prevent it in the first place.
What about teen pregnancy? We should educate more.
What about women who don't have the resources to care for the baby? There should be more resources available and the man should be held more accountable by the law and his peers.
By making abortion casual we are halting the progress of women.
it's the same here too, women certainly aren't told not to do it, but they are given a chance to talk through their options with a councillor and make doubly sure that this is what they want.And since when has abortion been a casual thing? As far as I know (I only have New Zealand to reference,really) you cannot just walk into an abortion clinic off the street, get an abortion then and there, and happily stroll off afterwards. No, there is a process. There are rules to be followed and there are guidelines. Definitely not a casual thing to get an abortion.
Present to me a viable plan to deal with all the unwanted children that would have been aborted and I will agree that it isn't but the plan must not involve forcing the unwilling parent to care for the child or bringing back homes for unwanted children.
education and responsible parenting
I know! How about all the people who believe abortions are wrong should be put onto a roster, and have to care for them since they are the ones who want them to be given a chance.
adoption
Find me a way to deal with these unwanted children that isn't going to necessitate the massive increase of funding for social services and I might be prepared to accept that you have a point. Until that day however, my firm opinion is that abortions are a necessary part of society that prevent the neglect that would otherwise occur.
adoption
Scientists and doctors, for the most part, do not rever to a fetus as a person. It has no gender and one can tell very little about it from the outset.
what if I said no they don't
I'm not really sure what you're argument is here. A fetus cannot tell us how it feels about the matter, and for the most part, children's lives are governed by what their parents believed, at least till they're old enough to assert themselves.
A fetus cannot enforce any views on anyone. for the most part, it has no awareness until it is much more developed. Other than abortion, I do not believe it's right to put an end to anyoen's life.
A mother can't suddenly decide to get rid of her child when he/she becomes inconvenient or problematic how is that any different from abortion that is linked to no external factors.
I regard my moral standpoint just as important as you value yours. and no, I do not believe it's up to the government of any country to enforce morals. It's up to the government to protect the people they govern, and I believe that means everyone. It's up to a government to be fair on all people of different beliefs. The government is not forcing people to have abortions. they are an option for those of us who have no issue with them. those who have an issue with them, do not have to have one. but by disallowing them, the government protects the viewpoint of one large group by halming the values of another. The best solution is one that allows both groups to practice their own morals.
except for the part where we talk about the lives of others, in which case it is the government's Job to protect those whom can't protect themselves.
I still think there is a line that can be drawn, no matter how underdeveloped someone is after they are born. this is my opinion and it won't change no matter how much you debate with me, just as I'm sure yours won't.
you do understand that fetus is just another developmental stage of life, much like being an infant, toddler or teenager
and what about all those one time mistakes, those women who's birth control fails, condoms break and so on and so forth?
fair enough, if for any reason the pregnancy is not inherently the fault of the couple having sex then the mother has the right to abort.
Now I agree that people shouldn't use abortion as a means of contriception, but I also understand, being a woman, how hard some women find it to find the right kind of birth control. I can also understand, why many women with steady partners choose to use condoms regularly rather than take some form of contriception that messes with their system.
let me be abrupt, I don't think we should ban contraceptives or birth control of any nature outside abortion, mainly because it is impractical regardless of the moral implications
So if a women shows that she is not at fault for the pregnancy, she can freely have an abortion.
Wow, seriously? So we should take away women's rights to choose what happens to their body and that will help women progress?
You can't just say "there should be more resources available." You can't just MAKE resources just because you want them to be available.
And since when has abortion been a casual thing? As far as I know (I only have New Zealand to reference,really) you cannot just walk into an abortion clinic off the street, get an abortion then and there, and happily stroll off afterwards. No, there is a process. There are rules to be followed and there are guidelines. Definitely not a casual thing to get an abortion.
Abortions won't cease if they are illegal, but they will get a hell of a lot more dangerous for those who want and need to have one. I think that would be halting the progress of women.
I don't think people truely understand what making abortions illegal would do to a country as a whole. If they did understand, they wouldn't like it.