"The uprising against Assad's rule began as a peaceful pro-democracy movement in March 2011 but in the face of a crackdown by his forces has turned into an armed insurgency." Reuters
Reuters are owned by the Thompson Corporation....they are part of the corporatocracy
But yes the uprising has to start somewhere and the activists who begin these uprisings are funded and trained by the CIA and by organisations funded by people like George Soros who was behind many of the 'colour revolutions' in Europe
I know someone who is currently being trained as an activist in London by one of these organisations
They run workshops on dissent!
Its an old formula. As Chomsky says in a democracy the power elite is not supposed to dominate the public by force as the public is supposed to believe that it has power. They let us think we have power in the system by letting us vote every 5 years but when we vote we generally choose between two parties (2 party system) which are both ultimately controlled by the corporatocracy but might differ on what are essentially small issues
So as Chomsky says the power elite in a 'democracy' has to instead pursuade the voting public rather than coerce it so it uses the media to 'manufacture consent' from the public
If however the public do challenge the authority of the corporatocracy then you see what the REAL dynamic of power is. Basically if you protest the corporatocracy will use its thugs (the police) to arrest, beat and pepper spray you and thats when you see what the power elite really think of you and your opinions
So the whole game has to played out......there has to be a spark....a 'thesis'.....so the CIA fund and train activists, this then creates the 'antithesis' which is a conflict so that the power elite can then offer their solution...the 'synthesis' which is that they should fly war planes over otehr countries and bomb them in order that they can then impose a puppet government that they can control so that they can then bribe the corrupt officials into giving away that countries natural resources such as oil at drop down prices
Its like a bully in the street. They will never just come up and smack you....they will try to create a justification first....eg they will say 'what you looking at?' before they then start the pushing phase before escalating into a full blown punch up......its done in stages
Look at Libya....that was done in stages
Look at Iraq....that hapened because the US sold slant drilling technology to Kuweit so that they could drill under Iraq and steal its oil threatening it with bankruptcy so it invaded Kuweit which then gave the uS the justification to invade Iraq
Look at Vietnam where the gulf of tonkin incident was created out of nothing (there was no incident!) so that the US president could go on television and tell the US public that 'reluctantly' they were going to have to go to war! He didn't tell the US public that the US already had special forces fighting on the ground in vietnam or that they had been flying air missions as well!
Its all a game justme to deceive the public into thinking that the corporatocracy are the good guys and that everyone else in the world are the bad guys (the 'axis of evil')
Look up 'Operation Northwood' online as this was an operation of the CIA that has leaked out into the public sphere and this oeration basically outlines a plane for the CIA to stage terrorist attacks in the US that could be blamed on Castro to justify an invasion of Cuba
Look up 'operation Gladio' online which was a plan carried out by the CIA after world war 2 which created secret armies across Europe that were to carry out terrorist attacks that were to be blamed on communists! These attacks were still going on in the 1970's and beyond!!!!
The bologna train bombing was part of operation gladio which saw many civilians killed.
Now where have we seen this sort of sophisticated attack recently?
OOOhhh lets think......well there was the madrid train bombing, then there was the London underground bombing..........ask yourself what happened as a result of these attacks?
These attacks justified the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq in a war against some vague abstract thing called 'terror'
A british civil servant called Dr Matthew Kelly bravely spoke out in public and told the british public that the dossier the government had made up claiming that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction was a lie! it was made out of a paper written by a student years before and then 'sexed up' by the government.
Well that brave man was then found dead in the woods near his home. He was a family man with everything to live for but the corporate press said he had 'committed suicide'....a number of doctors have challenged this claim
The head of the BBC, Andrew Gilligan who had interviewed Kelly was sacked
Before 911 a right wing think tank called the Rand Corporation wrote a paper called 'The New American Century' which outlined their plan to ensure that the USA remained the pre-eminant world power in the next century. This plan required the control of the oil fields of the middle east.
In the paper it says that in order for the US government to carry out its plans it needed a 'new pearl harbour' incident which would galvinise public opinion behind the aggressive moves the military were going to make.
Bare in mind that the US lost the vietnam war because it was the first war to be televised.....people were disgusted and shocked by war when they saw what it really involved so there were MASSED DEMONSTRATIONS against the war.
The US government knew that to carry on their war games they would have to make the US public VERY ANGRY and they would need to create a new enemy (extreme islam....which they had actually created by funding groups fighting russia in afghainstan in the 70's)
A year after the rand corporation published that paper they got their new pearl harbour incident.....911
The US public were furious and demanded revenge and the military industrial complex rumbled into action once more. And who has paid for the war? Is it the super rich with all their tax breaks and offshore accounts? NO of course not it is the taxpaying public who are now drowning in debt
Pearl Harbour is another example of thesis, antithesis and synthesis....the commander of the pacific fleet refused to follow out orders to move the fleet to the vulnerable port of pearl harbour so he was relieved from his command. Meanwhile the US was provoking Japan with sanctions!
The power elites have a game plan that they are following through and it is a game plan that basically involves a wholelot of death and destruction and they will profit from it......the people will pay for it in taxes and blood