S
Shai Gar
You're Wrong Sinner!The value of opinions on morality is equal to that of favorites.
I like the colors blue and green the best; what do you think about that?
Green and Silver.
You're Wrong Sinner!The value of opinions on morality is equal to that of favorites.
I like the colors blue and green the best; what do you think about that?
I think that would depend on whether or not you see a lot of credibility in the individual who decides he is speaking for God and this is what God wants."Is something good because god commands it, or does god command it because it is good?"
If we say that something is good because god commands it, then I suppose that all the wars that have been fought for the name of religion are good because that's what god would want.
If we say that god commands it because it is good, then what became the basis to establish something as good or not?
I almost never agree with anything that this guy says about religion, but this time, he may have a point.
The argument is that morality is the problem, not the solution. Would we be better off ignoring questions of right and wrong that do not occur to us naturally?
The only way humans are going to cast away morality is if they evolve out of it. His argument is pretty much the same argument I made long ago. Morality is a memetic control mechanism. The conclusion I came to was at this stage of human evolution, it is still necessary. Moral institutions like religion favor procreation and the family unit because that ensures that they survive. Humans are not going to overcome the natural selection advantage of religion until they can develop a better secular system to compete against it, especially as long as moral institutions can use fear to motivate people to buy into their respective systems.