yeah... I was a little bit upset when writing that (note last line of the first paragraph). I don't know if the quran actually says anything to that effect, as I've (sadly) never read it (let me get through the Bhagavad Gita first).Well said. That is a part of it. I would disagree about the men are dogs part but Islam does recognize that men are psychologically and physically different from women and that is all part of it.
I think Fly_Away the problem is not with the Islamic religion but rather the Arabic portrayal of Islam as you have said there is a distinction between the culture and the religion but the converse isn't true for the Arabic culture, as a majority of those whom are Arabic are Islamic and their culture is projected upon the religion.
For worse this is the root of most problems and fears and they have been reaffirmed with actions that have happened. Only takes one person to make it so that we can't have any nice things.
EDIT:
Even in this scope the general idea is that the extremists and the negatives are being examined under a microscope needless to say this paints a terrible portrait and due to modern news' death and suffering sells it is amplified greatly.
In otherwords, racism hiding behind nationalism.OK, to be brutally honest I would have voted in favor of such a law. Now before you shred me to pieces, let me explain a bit...
Muslim situation in Europe is quite different from US. They migrate here in large numbers from Turkey, Africa and the Middle East. And a lot of them do not even try to integrate into the society, they do not become Europeans, instead they just treat it as some kind of promised land that is their's for the taking. Consider this: how would you feel in US if Mexicans that come into your territory would start to treat it as their own and would require the former residents to adapt to their lifestyle? Unfortunately that's what is happening in western Europe. EU officials are tiptoeing around the issue and a lot of people are getting dissatisfied with it. So it's no wonder that laws like this can get popular support from the public. They do not do it because of intolerance to Islam but rather from the concern on their own safety.
The spread of Islamic culture generates a lot of friction because it conflicts with values and traditions of European culture. For example a lot of Muslims believe that religious rulings are of higher order than freedom of speech or even the civil government. Remember the feedback Danes got after publishing those caricatures? Now I consider myself a religious man but I do not have a sudden urge to blow things up every time someone makes fun of the Pope. The officials have legalized some pretty absurd regulations - like officially banning the story of the three piglets from the education system in UK just because it can hurt religious feelings of certain individuals. My personal opinion is that if religion tries to regulate things like that then it deserves certain restrictions itself. I value my freedom more.
So I interpret this law a symbolic call of attention to insecurities and problems that people are experiencing. Of course it would make no sense in a long run.
Nobody should shred you to pieces, you're entitled to an opinion.OK, to be brutally honest I would have voted in favor of such a law. Now before you shred me to pieces, let me explain a bit...
The spread of Islamic culture generates a lot of friction because it conflicts with values and traditions of European culture. For example a lot of Muslims believe that religious rulings are of higher order than freedom of speech or even the civil government. Remember the feedback Danes got after publishing those caricatures?
This reminds me of one of the reasons I like living in the US. I don't think a ban like that would fly over here. We take certain freedoms very seriously.
This just proves you have no god damn clue what you're talking about. You appear to be extremely bigoted.No I am saying its a small small piece of that same pie, the larger piece would be Muslim violence against non Muslims which is pretty pervasive in Islam and everywhere it goes.
Do you suppose the majority of muslims who immigrate to the Europe think like this?Muslim situation in Europe is quite different from US. They migrate here in large numbers from Turkey, Africa and the Middle East. And a lot of them do not even try to integrate into the society, they do not become Europeans, instead they just treat it as some kind of promised land that is their's for the taking. Consider this: how would you feel in US if Mexicans that come into your territory would start to treat it as their own and would require the former residents to adapt to their lifestyle?
The spread of Islamic culture generates a lot of friction because it conflicts with values and traditions of European culture. For example a lot of Muslims believe that religious rulings are of higher order than freedom of speech or even the civil government.
Remember the feedback Danes got after publishing those caricatures? Now I consider myself a religious man but I do not have a sudden urge to blow things up every time someone makes fun of the Pope.
My personal opinion is that if religion tries to regulate things like that then it deserves certain restrictions itself.
I value my freedom more.
So I interpret this law a symbolic call of attention to insecurities and problems that people are experiencing. Of course it would make no sense in a long run.
Banning religious architecture, ridiculous. They're pillars for christ's sake! Now I'd agree to a law about speakers and projecting sound from them, but their physical presence? Just plain stupid.
Well yes, this make some sense, and you're right, where this does happens here in Texas, it is not met with overwhelming appreciation.Muslim situation in Europe is quite different from US. They migrate here in large numbers from Turkey, Africa and the Middle East. And a lot of them do not even try to integrate into the society.
There is a left party that considers going to the European court of human rights in Strassburg to lodge a complaint. Switzerland has a pact with the UN (UNO-Pakt II) and is legally bound to the European human rights convention, both of which are contradicted by the law in question. But there is no way of knowing what the outcome of that would be.Is anybody overthere planning on challenging the law?