Ok, now the rhetoric has opened somewhat, and ENFJ may be the outcome. I can see that to an extent. I suppose that understanding how he's pulled off a nearly blanket acceptance of his shifty tactics among the left has made me wonder how he achieved this. He threw over his pastor of twenty years. No one on the left blinked. He lied to McCain about whether he would take public funding. No one on the left blinked. He is using drone strikes and illegal raids to get Al Qaida figureheads. No one on the left seems to care at all. Usually there is a lot of leftist flak even for their own. But Obama is getting almost a free pass from the mainstream Media (with Fox and WSJ attacking him endlessly but without getting much of an echo in the rest of the press). People feel quite uncomfortable it seems if you say anything against him. I suppose the thing about him being gay was just funny to me. I wondered if anyone would comment on it. He is sitting rather close to that guy, isn't he?
I was amused by this in the WSJ this morning on Benghazi. It's from William Kristol, who is a Jewish neo-con. It's a response to his own question: Why Does Obama Continue with the Cover-Up of the Cover-Up?:
"
I was amused by this in the WSJ this morning on Benghazi. It's from William Kristol, who is a Jewish neo-con. It's a response to his own question: Why Does Obama Continue with the Cover-Up of the Cover-Up?:
"
Presumably for two reasons. The first is that the true account of events undercut the president's claim during the campaign that al Qaeda was severely weakened in the aftermath of the killing of Osama bin Laden. The second is that a true account of what happened in Benghazi that night would have revealed that the president and his top national-security advisers did not treat a lethal attack by Islamic terrorists on Americans as a crisis. The commander in chief not only didn't convene a meeting in the Situation Room; he didn't even bother to call his Defense secretary or the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Not a single presidential finger was lifted to help Americans under attack.
This is an embarrassment and a disgrace. Is it too much to hope that President Obama is privately ashamed of his inattention and passivity that night?"
But now here is where this doesn't square with Obama as an ENFJ. If he did feel that he laid out the cover-up wrongly, wouldn't his conscience bother him a lot if he was an NF? Does he have a conscience or doesn't he? If he does, then this must eat at him (not so much that his inaction cost men their lives, but that he is knowingly lying about how it happened). I find this so curious. Most in the typing community see him as an NF. Could he be parading as a sensitive person while not being at all sensitive but being extremely callous? I guess I wish I knew this about him. I wouldn't be able to do this, and would sincerely apologize to all of America and would never have attempted to blame it on a film in the first place. He seems to really care and cultivate public opinion. He dresses very sharply and chooses his words carefully. He is masterful. But if he is knowingly lying and seems to have no compunction to keep the conversation "authentic," then he is also a sociopath of some sort. Or at least not an NF. Perhaps he's actually an SP? I think if he were an NT then he would try hard to get the framework correct. But it seems to me that he just doesn't care about anything except skating on public opinion as long as possible. I don't see him then as ML King, but rather as Kobe Bryant -- the kind of guy that would rape a young woman, and never think about it again. It's your problem if you're still thinking about it.
I find it very disturbing if Obama is an NF. I could see him as an SP or maybe an SJ. Does he really think? Does he really feel? Can anyone who does really get into public office? Something isn't lining up. Everything about this guy seems strange and I just can't peg him at all.
But now here is where this doesn't square with Obama as an ENFJ. If he did feel that he laid out the cover-up wrongly, wouldn't his conscience bother him a lot if he was an NF? Does he have a conscience or doesn't he? If he does, then this must eat at him (not so much that his inaction cost men their lives, but that he is knowingly lying about how it happened). I find this so curious. Most in the typing community see him as an NF. Could he be parading as a sensitive person while not being at all sensitive but being extremely callous? I guess I wish I knew this about him. I wouldn't be able to do this, and would sincerely apologize to all of America and would never have attempted to blame it on a film in the first place. He seems to really care and cultivate public opinion. He dresses very sharply and chooses his words carefully. He is masterful. But if he is knowingly lying and seems to have no compunction to keep the conversation "authentic," then he is also a sociopath of some sort. Or at least not an NF. Perhaps he's actually an SP? I think if he were an NT then he would try hard to get the framework correct. But it seems to me that he just doesn't care about anything except skating on public opinion as long as possible. I don't see him then as ML King, but rather as Kobe Bryant -- the kind of guy that would rape a young woman, and never think about it again. It's your problem if you're still thinking about it.
I find it very disturbing if Obama is an NF. I could see him as an SP or maybe an SJ. Does he really think? Does he really feel? Can anyone who does really get into public office? Something isn't lining up. Everything about this guy seems strange and I just can't peg him at all.
