John K
Donor
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 5W4 549
It's fine to believe that a fetus has a soul or that life begins at conception but your beliefs are just beliefs. So should one person's unverifiable theological beliefs dictate what choices someone else makes concerning their own body? Because in the US, that seems to be the agenda.
Here's my belief: I don't believe it is God's divine plan for adolescent rape victims to get pregnant. I don't think it's God's will that a woman in a nursing home in a vegetative state conceive a child by force of a staff person who should have been caring for and protecting her. I don't think every spontaneous abortion women have and don't even realize they had is part of God's plan. I don't think God intends ectopic pregnancies. I don't think babies with severe genetic defects that are not compatible with life are the result of God's will. Maybe God sets the wheels in motion and lets biology run its course? Or maybe there is no Good. Or maybe there is but you can't prove it and the rest don't want to live under a theocracy.
So whose ideas are correct? Does it even matter? Do unverifiable theological beliefs involving souls and God's will make a sound basis for legislation? In the US our constitution says it should not.
It's a heated topic and I'm not trying to offend but just state my side. You can be offended if I question your faith if you want. Maybe it's a bit offensive that someone's personal beliefs about souls and determination take precedent over my choices.
I think this should up to a point be left to individual conscience. I don't think faith based perspectives should per se dictate this issue, but of course in the West our governments are selected by democratic processes and religiously-oriented voters may well determine the flavour of government in office - but the same is true of other types of social group who can influence other equally controversial issues as well, such as gun control in the US, and immigration just about everywhere in the developed world. Presumably the answer to a tightening of abortion law in the US lies in the ballet box?
Again personally, I don't find your views offensive - a lot of harm has been done through uncritical religious dogmatism in the past, and in too many cases this has only been undone through vigorous confrontation. I respect your views on abortion, but I do hope you can respect those of a different view even if you disagree with them. The awful situations that you point to as justifying abortion have to be set against the deeply held feeling that many have that it involves the deliberate taking of a life, which is also a terrible tragedy for those who feel it that way. There is no easy answer to these equally powerful perspectives imho.
My own perspective is perhaps not only rooted in religious beliefs - are there many for example, religious or not, who would agree with late term abortion under any but the most exceptional circumstances? The issue then becomes a debate about at what stage of development is abortion no longer acceptable - and this is a moving feast because of medical advances, like I said before.