- MBTI
- INTJ
While waiting for a Youtube video that convinces everyone, here is some information from the QEG Build Manual. (You can download using the link in the first post.)
Does the QEG violate the laws of physics and why does my
university instructor tell me this technology is impossible?
The QEG is an asymmetrical open system that operates according the laws of nature. It does not violate
the laws of thermodynamics (physics) as these only apply to a closed symmetrical system. Asymmetrical
open systems have been traditionally omitted from higher educational learning programs, so your
university instructor does not know about them and assumes they don’t exist.
In order to alleviate confusion, scientists discuss thermodynamic values in reference to a system or the surroundings. Everything that is not a part of the system constitutes the surroundings. The system and surroundings are separated by a boundary. For example, if the system is one mole of a gas in a container, then the boundary is simply the inner wall of the container itself. Everything outside of the boundary is considered the surroundings, which would include the container itself.
The boundary must be clearly defined, so one can clearly say whether a given part of the world is in the system or in the surroundings. If matter is not able to pass across the boundary, then the system is said to be closed; otherwise, it is open. A closed system may still exchange energy with the surroundings unless the system is an isolated one, in which case neither matter nor energy can pass across the boundary.
Source: Boundless. “The Three Laws of Thermodynamics.” Boundless Chemistry. Boundless, 14 Oct. 2015. Retrieved 02 Feb. 2016 from https://www.boundless.com/chemistry...23/the-three-laws-of-thermodynamics-496-3601/
What about the laws of physics.?
Does the QEG violate the laws of physics and why does my
university instructor tell me this technology is impossible?
The QEG is an asymmetrical open system that operates according the laws of nature. It does not violate
the laws of thermodynamics (physics) as these only apply to a closed symmetrical system. Asymmetrical
open systems have been traditionally omitted from higher educational learning programs, so your
university instructor does not know about them and assumes they don’t exist.
MAXWELL, EDISON, JP MORGAN AND THE LAWS OF PHYSICS
James Clerk Maxwell FRS FRSE (1831–1879) was a Scottish mathematical physicist. His most
prominent achievement was to formulate a set of equations that describe electricity, magnetism, and
optics as manifestations of the same phenomenon, namely the electromagnetic field. His discoveries
helped usher in the era of modern physics, laying the foundation for such fields as special relativity and
quantum mechanics. In his ORIGINAL work: The Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field, Maxwell
identified two separate systems, both of which were completely different from each other:
1)Asymmetrical system - an ‘open’ system that allows the creation of a series of exchange of energy
reaction to our inputs, based on electromagnetic resonance or electromagnetic feedback in every spin (on
a motor), or in every pulse of input in a static coil. One of the first asymmetrical motors was Faraday's
‘Unipolar Motor,’ later modified by Nikola Tesla. These systems generate their own energy and do not
require fossil fuels.
2) Symmetrical system – a ‘closed’ system that cancels the electromagnetic resonance with every spin,
which creates wasted energy in excessive heat and requires an additional energy source to run such as
fossil fuels. These are the "symmetrical obsolete systems" we use every day in all of our electrical
appliances.
One year after Maxwell’s death in 1879, scientists Hendrick Lorentz financed by J.P. Morgan and Thomas
Edison, mutilated Maxwell’s original work and spent the next two decades deleting all knowledge of
asymmetrical systems that would not require the profitable oil industry to operate. They ‘symmetrized’ all
of Maxwell’s equations, and labeled these incomplete theories as the “Laws of Physics”. While the laws of
physics do indeed apply to symmetrical closed systems of energy, there is another set of laws: The Laws
of Nature, which apply to the asymmetrical systems that have been suppressed by the financial interests
of the banking families for the last 130 years.
This knowledge was banned from our educational system, and no physics or electrical engineering school
on our planet would ever teach about asymmetrical systems. Instead, the first and second laws of
thermodynamics, which depend on the consumption of profitable fossil fuels, would conveniently prevail
in our public knowledge base.
THE FLIGHT OF THE BUMBLEBEE AND THE LAWS OF NATURE
The laws of physics tell us that perpetual motion is not possible, yet how does the earth rotate?
Um...red herring much? lolThe lawsof aerodynamics tell us that bumblebees are incapable of flight, yet how do they fly?
Lol, evidence please? Magnetic bubble allows it to ignore gravity? These are fundamentally different forces.Conventional scientists from all over the world will make statements such as: “The claim that this is going
to run permanently or indefinitely doesn't seem to hold because the second law of thermodynamics tells
us that this is not possible”
Around the turn-of-the-century eminent British scientist Lord Kelvin said “Radio has no future, heavier-
than-air flying machines are impossible, and x-rays are a hoax” - so much for conventional science.
The laws of nature contain concepts that focus on frequency, resonance, vibration, magnetics and
energy. A perfect example of this can be found in the aerodynamics-law-breaking flight of the bumblebee.
Ralph Ring is an innovative technician who worked with Otis T. Carr, a direct apprentice of Nikola Tesla.
In his presentation at the Breakthrough Energy Movement Conference, Mr. Ring gives an amazing
explanation of the flight of the bumblebee:
“Next to the larynx in the bumblebee’s throat, there is a tiny hollow tube that acts as a resonance cavity
that accumulates frequency. When the bee starts beating its wings, it does this to accumulate frequency
which bounces back and forth in the resonator cavity until it reaches the same frequency of the earth,
known as the Schumann frequency. Once the bee reaches the same frequency as its surroundings it
evens out into what is known as zero point. When anything reaches zero point you can then change the
energy. The bee is now free from the gravitational influence around it, creates its own little magnetic
bubble and hovers around. There are some lizards and hummingbirds that do the same thing.”
If you are freed from the frequency influence of your environment, then why can the bee not travel through solid objects? If everything is a frequency, and all of Earth shares this frequency, then why is the bee selective of what it is effected by? This can't be intentioned.This is how the laws of nature work. When you can tune something to vibrate at the same frequency as
the earth and reach zero point, you are freed from the frequency influence of your environment and can
then change the energy into anything you want including levitation or electrical energy.
This is how the QEG works: Tesla’s design causes it to resonate so that it matches the frequency of the
earth, and in zero point it changes the energy into self-renewing electrical energy.
I agree with [MENTION=8603]Eventhorizon[/MENTION] about the so-called “impossible drive”.
There are tons of links about it, pretty amazing!
Nasa approves 'impossible' space engine design that apparently violates the laws of physics and could revolutionise space travel
Engineers from the space agency managed to produce tiny amounts of thrust using a microwave engine design that could turn space travel on its head
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/s...es-the-laws-of-physics-and-could-9646865.html
I understand the objections to this but have any of you actually tried it? Saying this new science isn't real because it disagrees with old science doesn't seem very scientific to me.
I have come across this a few times now and it seems legit. Its worth trying
Just because it may not be understood where the energy comes from doesn't mean it isn't real
One of Jupiters moons, Io I think, is the most volcanically active place in the solar system due to the huge amount of heat in the planet. For a while it was a total mystery where this heat was coming from. Then they realised it was due to the flexing of the planet caused by its orbit around jupiter. The energy actually comes from Jupiters rotation, slowing it down slightly.
The energy could be coming directly from the magnetic field of the magnet in some way or some other process
I don't doubt that you can build a machine that does something and that it in some way 'works'. The issue is with the technical classification of "free energy". With free energy so loosely defined you can manage to get supposedly free energy by just slapping solar panels on everything, but that is not what free energy is.
The issue is also not only where the energy comes from but also where it is going. Even if you have a very efficient motor, the stuff you are going to power with it is still inefficient.
Meh, if you don't have to pay for it, its free.
So...there is no free energy but, there is energy we dont have to do much to collect. Solar power is an example of this. The impossible drive is thought to work because of energy coming from a currently unknown place, most likely in this case a different dimension. I hope I am alive long enough to see amazing things come from it.
That is not what free energy means in physics terms. Free energy is unlimited energy that doesn't consume a fuel or mass. Solar energy is not free because the sun burns itself up, and heat from Jupiter is also not free if it slows down the rotation of the planet.
Edit:
Also [MENTION=472]Poetic Justice[/MENTION] free energy in the concept of not having to pay money for it is not that special and is not scientifically contested. You don't need some magical quantum device to have that kind of energy and there's no conspiracy to prevent that kind of energy. If there were they would be stopping people from using solar panels and wind turbines.
Who cares if its special if its available? Your objection seems to be that its not weird enough. Personally I don't think that matters. If its abundant, easy to collect and useable then we should be using it