The best comedic characters don't try to be silly- they try to be serious and fail. Then they turn to the audience and ask "Why are you laughing?" which is even funnier than the failing to be serious itself.
@the wow you commenting on my posts is really gaining you a lot of likes. Guess its a good thing I am here.
Men are finally waking up and seeing the bullshit patriarchal systems subject many of them to. Good for you. But don't confuse the problem being that women are now victimizing you by forcing men to die in wars or difficult and dangerous professions (whatever you meant by protection of women.) Women didn't make those rules and set that culture.
Maybe you should look into the sexist bullshit women have to go through to work those dangerous jobs or join the military. I have a female friend who worked for an oil company in a male dominated position. She loved the job and esp the pay but quit because her male co-workers could not deal with a woman doing their job. Nonstop harassment.
But I think in a lot of cases if you're getting screwed it is because you don't have any wealth or power. Not because you are a man or a woman. Male privilege is kind of bullshit unless you are wealthy and not a minority.
You should watch itdocumentaries and sensational news outlets offer a variety of scapegoats
You're a fan of deadpan humor?The best comedic characters don't try to be silly- they try to be serious and fail. Then they turn to the audience and ask "Why are you laughing?" which is even funnier than the failing to be serious itself.
EH is a master of his craft XDYou're a fan of deadpan humor?
You should watch it
A vast amount of statistical and anecdotal evidence that will change the way you think about feminism and MRAs that will make you realize how irreverent everything you've written in your thread has been due to no fault of your own.I trust that you can sum it up for me in a paragraph.
A vast amount of statistical and anecdotal evidence that will change the way you think about feminism and MRAs that will make you realize how irreverent everything you've written in your thread has been due to no fault of your own.
Too much evidence for me to summarize, in fact.
Yes this is usually the case with documentaries, but since it is a counter to a popular narrative it is interesting precisely because it explores an opposite rationale to that which you are familiar with.Documentaries aren't good primary sources because they are just opinion pieces. Cherry-picked evidence doesn't do a lot for me.
A vast amount of statistical and anecdotal evidence that will change the way you think about feminism and MRAs that will make you realize how irreverent everything you've written in your thread has been due to no fault of your own.
Too much evidence for me to summarize, in fact.
Well it isn't one topic, its dozens and dozens of subtopics under the umbrella of feminism and MRAs and the like isn't it? I mean the whole point of the documentary I think is that there's this whole unexplored world that never gets talked about because the feminist narrative is ubiquitous and speaking out against it is so taboo. But that isn't all that it is- the documentary is really also about touching on each of these subtopics in a way that they have not been explored in mainstream thought.More likely that you just don't understand the evidence well enough to summarize it correctly.
How absurd they are depends on what they're trying to accomplish.@Reason With Logic Filling
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal."
-Aristotle
Both Feminists and Men's Rights Activists are absurd; they're cut from the same Egalitarian cloth.
Nature is inherently unfair, shit happens. There will always be more losers than winners.How absurd they are depends on what they're trying to accomplish.
Equality of opportunity? seems quite possible to achieve and laudable to me.
Equality of outcome? might destroy western civilization.
Which part?Impossible.
?There will always be more losers than winners.
who said that life should be fair? the law should be fair- or at least as close to fair as it can beLife is not fair and can't be made so.
Equality of Opportunity is impossible; not everyone is capable of taking advantage of opportunities. That's nature.Which part?
?
The law cannot be fair to everyone because we're not all equal, even in principle.who said that life should be fair? the law should be fair- or at least as close to fair as it can be
I believe you are thinking of equality of outcome. The opportunities should be there for anyone with talent and drive, but some people lack either talent, motivation, or both.Equality of Opportunity is impossible; not everyone is capable of taking advantage of opportunities. That's nature.