the climate change scam

Coal ash has radioactive elements...not to mention things like arsenic and other fun poisons.
 
Ren said:
Best oxymoron I've heard in a long time.

You're on a roll, Skare! ♡
Click to expand...

I guess it depends on your personal relationship and view of “poisons” lolol.

"What is food to one man may be fierce poison to others."

~ Lucretius


​
 
Skarekrow said:
I guess it depends on your personal relationship and view of “poisons” lolol.

"What is food to one man may be fierce poison to others."

~ Lucretius


​
Click to expand...

Haha, well, my personal relationship with poisons can be summed up in the fact that I would never have Amanita phalloides for breakfast.
 
Last edited:
Ren said:
Haha, well, my personal relationship with poisons can be summed up in the fact tha I would never have Amanita phalloides for breakfast.
Click to expand...
Yikes!
No, no, no...you don’t want those!

That’s a really terrible and painful death btw.

To remain on topic -

"People living within one mile of unlined coal ash ponds can have a 1 in 50 risk of cancer—more than 2,000 times higher than what the EPA considers acceptable. Coal ash contains arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium, as well as aluminum, barium, boron, and chlorine. All can be toxic.”

"Fly ash or flue ash, also known as pulverised fuel ash in the United Kingdom, is a coal combustion product that is composed of the particulates (fine particles of burned fuel) that are driven out of coal-fired boilers together with the flue gases. Ash that falls to the bottom of the boiler is called bottom ash. In modern coal-fired power plants, fly ash is generally captured by electrostatic precipitators or other particle filtration equipment before the flue gases reach the chimneys. Together with bottom ash removed from the bottom of the boiler, it is known as coal ash. Depending upon the source and composition of the coal being burned, the components of fly ash vary considerably, but all fly ash includes substantial amounts of silicon dioxide (SiO2) (both amorphous and crystalline), aluminium oxide (Al2O3) and calcium oxide (CaO), the main mineral compounds in coal-bearing rock strata.

The minor constituents of fly ash depend upon the specific coal bed composition but may include one or more of the following elements or compounds found in trace concentrations (up to hundreds ppm): arsenic, beryllium, boron, cadmium, chromium, hexavalent chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, mercury, molybdenum, selenium, strontium, thallium, and vanadium, along with very small concentrations of dioxins and PAH compounds.[1][2] It also has unburnt carbon.[3]

In the past, fly ash was generally released into the atmosphere, but air pollution control standards now require that it be captured prior to release by fitting pollution control equipment. In the United States, fly ash is generally stored at coal power plants or placed in landfills.”


Coal Ash Is More Radioactive Than Nuclear Waste
By burning away all the pesky carbon and other impurities, coal power plants produce heaps of radiation
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/



​
 
Skarekrow said:
Yikes!
No, no, no...you don’t want those!

That’s a really terrible and painful death btw.

To remain on topic -

"People living within one mile of unlined coal ash ponds can have a 1 in 50 risk of cancer—more than 2,000 times higher than what the EPA considers acceptable. Coal ash contains arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium, as well as aluminum, barium, boron, and chlorine. All can be toxic.”

"Fly ash or flue ash, also known as pulverised fuel ash in the United Kingdom, is a coal combustion product that is composed of the particulates (fine particles of burned fuel) that are driven out of coal-fired boilers together with the flue gases. Ash that falls to the bottom of the boiler is called bottom ash. In modern coal-fired power plants, fly ash is generally captured by electrostatic precipitators or other particle filtration equipment before the flue gases reach the chimneys. Together with bottom ash removed from the bottom of the boiler, it is known as coal ash. Depending upon the source and composition of the coal being burned, the components of fly ash vary considerably, but all fly ash includes substantial amounts of silicon dioxide (SiO2) (both amorphous and crystalline), aluminium oxide (Al2O3) and calcium oxide (CaO), the main mineral compounds in coal-bearing rock strata.

The minor constituents of fly ash depend upon the specific coal bed composition but may include one or more of the following elements or compounds found in trace concentrations (up to hundreds ppm): arsenic, beryllium, boron, cadmium, chromium, hexavalent chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, mercury, molybdenum, selenium, strontium, thallium, and vanadium, along with very small concentrations of dioxins and PAH compounds.[1][2] It also has unburnt carbon.[3]

In the past, fly ash was generally released into the atmosphere, but air pollution control standards now require that it be captured prior to release by fitting pollution control equipment. In the United States, fly ash is generally stored at coal power plants or placed in landfills.”


Coal Ash Is More Radioactive Than Nuclear Waste
By burning away all the pesky carbon and other impurities, coal power plants produce heaps of radiation
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/



​
Click to expand...

Scary stuff.

By the way, thank you for raising the standard of practice here with regards to use of sources, by sharing an article from a well-established and well-regarded journal. This unfortunately has not been the case very often in this thread.
 
Ren said:
Scary stuff.

By the way, thank you for raising the standard of practice here with regards to use of sources, by sharing an article from a well-established and well-regarded journal. This unfortunately has not been the case very often in this thread.
Click to expand...

That may be the understatement of the year!
Now you’re on a roll Ren!
Thanks.
LOL
 
Last edited:
sprinkles said:
Oooh scary nuclear waste.

Did you know that hospitals produce nuclear waste? There are caches of it just laying around everywhere.
Click to expand...

i don't think saying that hospitals are also producing waste undermines any concerns over nuclear power plants...

But can you show me the figures of the quantity of radioactive waste produced by hospitals v's the amounts produced by nuclear power plants?
 
Artisan said:
Clearly they didn't store shit properly, its even privately owned which just begs for accidents to happen as privately owned companies always skirt regulation.
Nuclear waste disposal and facilities do need serious oversight. But even so the impact something like Fukushima and Chernobyl had on the environment is negligible compared to the alternative energy sources..
Click to expand...

i'm not sure you are grasping the scale of the ongoing crisis at fukishima

just because the corporate media are not covering it anymore doesn't mean it isn't still spewing out radioactive waste

Fukushima's Nuclear Waste Will Be Dumped Into the Ocean, Japanese Plant Owner Says
By Tom O'Connor On 7/14/17 at 2:31 PM
Takashi Kawamura, chairman of Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), told foreign media that nearly 777,000 tons of water tainted with tritium, a byproduct of the nuclear process that is notoriously difficult to filter out of water, will be dumped into the Pacific Ocean as part of a multibillion-dollar recovery effort following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011.
https://www.newsweek.com/fukushima-nuclear-waste-dumped-ocean-japanese-protests-637108
 
more of the globalist legal framework being put into place by the big money interests ie oligarchic class who want to use manmade carbon dioxide as an excuse to cull the global population and then control the survivors under a technocracy...

in this case they are using MASS immigration as a way to bludgeon populations and smash them apart so that they cannot mount any resistance to the agenda:

The Terrible Truth About the UN Migration Compact

 
kinglear said:
claims have been made backed by studies that coal fly ash is being sprayed as part of geoengineering
Click to expand...
Yeah...and some people also say the fires in CA were from a giant heat ray test...but it doesn’t make it true.
Kooky.
 
Skarekrow said:
Yeah...and some people also say the fires in CA were from a giant heat ray test...but it doesn’t make it true.
Kooky.
Click to expand...

"claims"

drevil_zps8ba10495.png


"made"

drevil_zps8ba10495.png


"backed"

drevil_zps8ba10495.png


"studies"

drevil_zps8ba10495.png
 
88chaz88 said:
What about kinglear's posts makes you think he wouldn't think this was a valid theory?
Click to expand...

Not much theorizing going on.
lol


Here, found the fix!



 
Contrail
ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE
WRITTEN BY:
See Article History
Alternative Titles: condensation trail, vapour trail
Contrail, also called condensation trail or vapour trail, streamer of cloud sometimes observed behind an airplane flying in clear cold humid air. It forms upon condensation of water vapourproduced by the combustion of fuel in airplane engines. When the ambient relative humidity is high, the resulting ice-crystal plume may last several hours. The trail may be distorted by the winds, and sometimes it spreads outward to form a layer of cirrus cloud. On rare occasions, when the air is nearly saturated with water vapour, air circulation at the wing tips of an airplane may cause sufficient pressure and temperature reductions to cause cloud streamers to form.

In the 1990s a popular conspiracy theory arose claiming that long-lasting contrails contained chemicals (“chemtrails”) that were sprayed by governments for purposes such as controlling the weather or dispersing drugs to influence the general population. However, atmospheric scientists have explained that some contrails last longer than others because of factors such as the humidity of the air (which can vary quite sharply over short distances) and the temperature of the airplane’s exhaust.
 
well the 'noise' on the internet as the intelligence services call it is talking about a rothschild owned energy company called PG&E. Some people claim that the wires of that company have started fires

Other things I've heard have been that some SMART meters have gone up in flames and have started house fires

I have also heard the theory you mention about 'lasers' being used to start fires. This would of course involve 'directed energy weapons' and some people are claiming that footage online shows these beams actually striking the earth. A recent claim is that the heat was high enough to melt car wheel hubs

I don't personally know the ins and outs of all that as i've not been giving it my full attention so i just hear bits and pieces

My personal view on the above ideas are that i do believe that smart meters have in some cases gone on fire, but has that happened in any of these fires in california? I dunno but i have seen some pictures of celebrities houses eg anthony hopkins house and it does seem that while ground around some houses is largely unaffected some houses have been completely torched but that proves nothing

Directed energy weapons do of course exist and military contractors have displayed their lasers in action. You could find those clips easily enough on youtube. Does that mean they've been used to start these fires? No it doesn't

so then we get to the energy company idea. Once again i haven't really dug into it enough to give specific information but if anyone here is interested you could easily do some searches into PG&E and see if they have indeed had any culpability in the fires

My personal concern is more around the wider POLITICISATION of climate change by people who have a clear agenda and what the implications of all this will be for all humans
 
Last edited:
Skarekrow said:
Not much theorizing going on.
lol


Here, found the fix!



Click to expand...

It's still missing something that could make it believable to kinglear...

kinglear said:
well the 'noise' on the internet as the intelligence services call it is talking about a rothschild...
Click to expand...

Ah yes, Skarekrow, you forgot to implicate the Jews.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top