Mostly the classic Monotheistic God, like in Judaism, Islam or Christianity.[MENTION=9401]LucyJr[/MENTION]
I know that you are a Christian, but are using God in a very general sense, such as believing in some creator, or do you mean specifically believing in the Christian God?
I know that atheists today are not ignorant toward other beliefs, but they are ignorant toward their beliefs, which is atheism.
My point was that the only atheist that can logically be valid is nihilistic atheism. That's why I said Nietzche understood the implications of a world whithou God.
Nietzche was in a abys, a nihilistic depression, where everything was black and whithout any meaning. He celebrated in despair the absurd, the blindness, the disorder, the illusion of beauty and values, moral values, the absence of meaning in everything, the absence of a ultimate purpose to all the existence, the vanity and absurdity of all. Its a wonder he kept his sanity for such a long time.
Than he come up with the idea that all what is left in the absence of ideals, values, menaing, morals its the will to power, the fulfiling feeling and state of having as much power as you can. Nietzche theory was not just something merely intelectual, merely a philosophical answer. For him it was everything very real. He wanted to find something to forget about the pain, something to live for. He found the power of will. But I think he knew the truth about this one too.
I am trying to get a clearer understanding of what you mean by this. How are atheists ignorant toward their own beliefs? Would you be able to provide any examples?
His theory I think was more of a response or compesation for the absurdity of life whithout God.
He declared the death of God with despair and crying, terriefied by the meaninglesness of the existence. Nietzche was in a abys, a nihilistic depression, where everything was black and whithout any meaning. He celebrated in despair the absurd, the blindness, the disorder, the illusion of beauty and values, moral values, the absence of meaning in everything, the absence of a ultimate purpose to all the existence, the vanity and absurdity of all. Its a wonder he kept his sanity for such a long time.
Than he come up with the idea that all what is left in the absence of ideals, values, menaing, morals its the will to power, the fulfiling feeling and state of having as much power as you can. Nietzche theory was not just something merely intelectual, merely a philosophical answer. For him it was everything very real. He wanted to find something to forget about the pain, something to live for. He found the power of will. But I think he knew the truth about this one too.
[MENTION=9401]LucyJr[/MENTION] - Please watch this and discuss it with me. Perhaps after you watch it you can speak to a non-believer in a way that will make him believe.
[video=youtube;xIErAz-ZO-I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIErAz-ZO-I[/video]
I think that's very true, Fromm suggests that people are driven to relate to others, he suggests through rational love, and when this is fundamentally blocked then people relate through power and control instead.
He suggests this is a sado-masochistic character structure because anyone who is seeking to control others or have power over them and who wants to objectify them is also dependent upon them in the final instance and does not experience freedom and independence, hence behaviour which escalates to destruction of the object, or even self and object together in a kind of mutually assured destruction.
It is interesting to see the same theorising existing in another form or broadly similar.
Fromm was an atheist but believed in God as a kind of metaphor for the universal or archetypical human. That was his object of devotion and his ethical frame of reference corresponded to it too, which are the two aspects he considered to exist of any religion, including religions with a small r or personal/idiosyncratic belief systems.
The Bible says that God has some ways of making the man humble and weak, in situations where everything and anythink fails to meet the requirements, so that man will turn helpless toward God, and seek Him.Its interesting. I was on youtube today looking for Benny Hill and got Benny Hinn. What I saw reminded me of all the reasons I can say religion is a determent to society. As I watched I became more and more disappointed. Humans, abandoning themselves to the imaginary. Much like the doctor who says, "I have done all that I can do, its in Gods hands now." Total BS, you are leaving it in the hands of an imaginary friend? Really? How about hitting the books a little harder? How about doing some more research or investigation? Leaving it in the hands of God? Bah!
This is a very interesting video, but the last part makes me sad, since it tries to propagate a atheist propaganda.
And its not the fact itself, since I have nothing agaist atheists sharing their views, but it is that I was hoping to be a agnostic video, whithout taking any sides. (except the agnostic side, of course)
But I want to ask you a honest question. Are you a non religious believer because of the lack of evidences, or because you can't see any reasons for believing in a God, or because of great pain and suffering in the world, and mostly because you find something unsitysfing about religion in general? ...or....because you find repulsing the idea of religion, perhaps primitive and silly, and you tend to think that atheism is somehow a better, or a more rational and believable worldview?
How many atheists clearly understand the implications of their own belief system?I am trying to get a clearer understanding of what you mean by this. How are atheists ignorant toward their own beliefs? Would you be able to provide any examples?
Yeah I understand what you mean by the last part. I never saw that until Lark mentioned it. I went back and watched and then I saw it. Its unfortunate this is what people who are religious seem take away from the video.
Why do I not believe in "God." Well I will tell you that I do not rule out the possibility of a supreme consciousness permeating our universe. I do however rule out the God as written of in the bible and other religious texts. Primarily though my main source of study was the God mentioned in the bible because this is the main one I was told about growing up etc. I have been looking for answers to all things most of my life. I have look for the origins of consciousness and a soul though to be fair it first started out with my trying to find my soul along with others. Anyway long story short, I researched even though I did not know that was what I was doing for 20+ years. IN my research I found out things that convinced me "God" was nothing more than a human creation. Then I had the unfortunate incident of getting sick in a way that is quite honestly difficult to describe. I can say that I believe I came close to death and that when I looked for my soul there, when it seemed like there was nothing in the way of my finding it if it was there, I found nothing.
Anyway, it has nothing to do with pain or suffering in the world etc. I just honestly whole heatedly believe the Gods in religious texts are a fully and complete human creation.
Thank you for watching the video by the way. I think its very cool that you did because I think it potentially helps open up a dialog between believers and non-believers.
LucyJr said:How many atheists clearly understand the implications of their own belief system?
Well how is that??? As far as I can tell, when it comes to belief, saying that God does not exist is a purely belief statement, since there is not a single athesit in this world who KNOWS there is no God. Atheists don't know there is no God, they believe there is no God.Misnomer, atheism isn't a belief system.
There are many atheists like this. No, I'm not talking about Daniel Dennett or Sam Harris, those that are 'shinning in glory'. I'm talking about the REAL philosophers, the ones that take it serious. They are probably not even famous, so...The rest of your post is also moot without examples. Please show evidence of these, "depressed and despairing" atheist philosophers.
They believe there is no God.
There are many atheists like this.
Yes, you're right, but I think you missed everything what I had said. You jump at your own conclusions fast. I didn't said anything about not believing in a God, because that's not atheism. Atheism is believing there are no Gods whatsoever, That's faith, my friend, wether you recognise it or not. Just be honest.No. Not believing in a god is not the same as believing there is no god. As for the study logic comment, that was cute.
I don't have missconceptions about logic, as far as I can tell.A common misconception among people is that logic is inherently correct. The problem with logic is its contextul malleability - given the right underlying axioms, anything can be logically proven.
Example: If one accepts the axiom that the bible is the word of god and that the morals expressed within are objectively correct, it is then logical to live and act as though the bible is true.
So then logic as it were, is a rather meaningless concept in and of itself. What is important in logic is not actually in being, "logical" but in using logical axioms - logical axioms arrive from an understanding built through observationally verifiable and empirical evidence. People are far too often skipping this step, and being logical - but completely wrong.
You know what's better than being logical? Being right.
I don't know any famous atheist to give you a example, at least in these days.Yes you said that before. Somewhat paradoxically, there are apparently, "many" atheists like this - but you can't find many of them to give an example.
I guess I could just counter this argument by saying you're wrong and that there's actually more religious people struggling to find purpose. I won't give examples though because *insert excuse here*.
Misnomer, atheism isn't a belief system.
The rest of your post is also moot without examples. Please show evidence of these, "depressed and despairing" atheist philosophers.