So I read Trump's letter to Pelosi yesterday and found it disturbing. It is worth a read, here is the NYT factcheck edition https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/17/us/politics/trump-pelosi-letter.html He even accuses her of....Witchcraft.
View attachment 61481
Not likely, in the battleground states that are always important to win over because they could flip either way (as opposed to being securely in one party's hands) impeachment is unpopular with voters. So some Democrats from these vulnerable areas have already stated they will not vote to impeach. Add that to the Republicans having a majority in the Senate and the odds are extremely remote.Just a question for you guys as a curious yet under-informed European: how likely is it that the impeachment will 'succeed'? Or is it impossible to say at this stage?
Um, he is impeached, the only question is will he be removed after the senate conducts its trial.
Removal is really what I was referring to. Christ, even I get impeachment and removal confused sometimes.Um, he is impeached, the only question is will he be removed
Hey, in this world you can win the argument but lose the election lol.It just kind of naturally follows that it's pointless to impeach without removal.
Technically, they could impeach him as many times as they see fit even if he isn't removed...it's a step beyond censure...especially since our moronic DOJ refuses to indict a sitting POTUS due to some fucking memo that someone wrote in the 70's that isn't actually a law.It just kind of naturally follows that it's pointless to impeach without removal.
Also, I mean... You could alternatively try to sway voters for the next election then he could be gone in a year, but of course that's impossible.
Does it give you any concern that impeachment is seen by some independent voters as partisan? It does seem to many that this is just an attempt at circumventing elections.Technically, they could impeach him as many times as they see fit even if he isn't removed...it's a step beyond censure...especially since our moronic DOJ refuses to indict a sitting POTUS due to some fucking memo that someone wrote in the 70's that isn't actually a law.
If Bill Barr refuses to even investigate/prosecute Trump for being "Individual 1" in his high-priced hooker cover-up plot then it's doubtful he will for anything else.
I mean, his former lawyer M. Cohen basically spelled it out for Congress and all to see that Trump and family has been cheating on his finances big time...not that that is that shocking of a revelation considering who we are talking about...yet it's still being fought for in the courts, the ability to even see his finances and taxes to make sure he isn't cheating...wtf...who is keeping any checks and balances on a person who doesn't care about the law(s) the rest of the country has to abide by?
Ignoring Congressional subpoenas and instructing witnesses to ignore them as well...then his defenders claim no witnesses with first hand knowledge testified...not only is that untrue...but those with further knowledge have been obstructed from the start.
"The Trump administration is already facing several lawsuits for blocking subpoenas from various House committees, including the Oversight and Reform committee, the Ways and Means committee, and the Judiciary committee.
For instance, White House counsel Don McGahn and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin both disregarded previous House-issued subpoenas during the Mueller investigation, as instructed by the White House. The House sued McGahn, as well as Mnuchin and the Treasury Department.
House Democrats voted in June to hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who both ignored House subpoenas during the investigation, in contempt of Congress, though the move was largely symbolic."
Not only that, but Trump and the GOP have been packing the courts as fast as they can with their own nominees no matter how unqualified.
Waiting on the SCOTUS to rule on releasing his fucking tax returns and Deutche Bank records for oversight.
Kneel before your king serf...
lol
Winning the election? That's just what the Tories expected them to do gotta catch em off guardHey, in this world you can win the argument but lose the election lol.
Nothing naturally follows anymore. :/
Does it give you any concern that impeachment is seen by some independent voters as partisan? It does seem to many that this is just an attempt at circumventing elections.
He was supposed to lose in 2016, but he didn't.
The blue wave was supposed to give a Democrat majority in the Senate and House in 2018, but it didn't.
The Democrats don't seem to be winning independent voters back and if this impeachment continues to be done over and over again then I don't see how they possibly could be won back.
What's the backup plan for the Democrats not being able to win an election?
I'm still not convinced that the Democrats have much of a chance, and I think thier candidates are not going to accomplish anything in the next election. I won't speak in certainties because things happen suddenly, an economic collapse tommorow and wether it's Trump's fault, Obama's fault, nobody's fault, it'll change the political climate in an instant. There are a million possible surprises like this which I why I don't like to predict the election outcome, especially this far out.
All I'll say is, it don't look good for the Democrats. They lost a lot of voters in the rust belt and I don't think they're promising the right things to get them back, or at least letting thier promises to them be drowned out by this circus. Just seems like an utterly disasterous blunder to focus on impeachment instead of policies that impress voters.