The Minimal Facts for the Resurrection of Christ.

The Minimal Facts for the Resurrection of Goats
 
 
The point of my post was that I don't like the fighting, so I chose to post something silly instead of engaging with it. I could have joined the fight and opposed the resurrection, but I chose not to do that. I perhaps have an unconventional way of expressing that I dislike the conflict.

If it were just a "friendly debate" that would be different, but the energy is way off for this to be considered friendly. You don't ask people why they're on the forum in a friendly debate. I think I would rather see unity, as opposed to this. This fight has only created division and tension. No one has been brought together, only pushed further apart.
 
- said:
The point of my post was that I don't like the fighting, so I chose to post something silly instead of engaging with it. I could have joined the fight and opposed the resurrection, but I chose not to do that. I perhaps have an unconventional way of expressing that I dislike the conflict.

If it were just a "friendly debate" that would be different, but the energy is way off for this to be considered friendly. You don't ask people why they're on the forum in a friendly debate. I think I would rather see unity, as opposed to this. This fight has only created division and tension. No one has been brought together, only pushed further apart.
Click to expand...
When someone actively attacks and mocks the dogmas of another religion while using their own faith as a shield, it's only natural to wonder why they are spending their Shabbat posting on a forum instead of reflecting. You don't get to lecture others or hide behind 'friendly debate' when your own actions contradict the exact principles you claim to stand for.

-Giammarco
 
Akar said:
When someone actively attacks and mocks the dogmas of another religion while using their own faith as a shield, it's only natural to wonder why they are spending their Shabbat posting on a forum instead of reflecting. You don't get to lecture others or hide behind 'friendly debate' when your own actions contradict the exact principles you claim to stand for.

-Giammarco
Click to expand...
Absolutely
 
I think that questioning dogma is healthy and essential. We aren't living in George Orwell's 1984. I don't consider that to be some horrible offense, I find it to be ideal. I think I prefer looking at books like the bible as a collection of metaphors and teachings, rather than leaning toward a black-and-white literalist interpretation.

Everyone thinks that they're right, everyone of every faith. They think they have the answer and everyone else is wrong. I am incapable of displaying that same confidence. It feels a little arrogant to me, being so sure that you're right. None of us will truly have the answers until we pass away and get to the other side, if there is one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top