Conflating theories of conspiracy with the farthest out there ideas about God only knows what is double plus Orwell. Conspiracies, large and small, make up politics... the government isn't very transparent, or at least publicized beyond the narrative of being personality driven. When was the last time they talked about lobbyists in the mainstream media? I doubt the corporations/interests spend huge sums expecting/getting nothing in return. At the very least, there's the tip of the iceberg. You don't hear about the inner workings of the bureaucracies which are responsible for most of the things the government does... is it really so far fetched to think that there are things going on behind the scenes? When they act together, which they surely must in order to do whatever, you have yourself a conspiracy. We only know of the ones from before the FOIA had its teeth pulled out. That's not even close to crazy. And, if you think they government hasn't been covering up stuff about ufos, you haven't looked into it. That's not even close to crazy. Again, with so little public information, it wouldn't be unexpected for theories of what's going on to occasionally totally miss the mark. Combine that with disinformation campaigns and you've got so much noise that it's hard to pick out the crazy from the not crazy, and that just might tend to get people crazy. It seems like it should be so simple to just be decent to each other and leave each other be if they're not hurting someone... expecting decency seems to be where all of my political ideas go wrong. *sigh*
Finally a sensible post!
You understand that conspiracies happen all the time and that governments lie all the time
So once we know that...and frankly any adult should know that then it then comes down to assessing each theory that is raised
Some are going to be far out and wrong and others will be spot on
Whats funny is that the naysayers can make a thread attacking the 'psychology' of anyone who questions the government and that is apparently ok
But if a person who questions the government tries to defend their position they are attacked on a personal level whilst themself being accused of trying to 'attack' other posters
lol
Maybe we need to start a thread attacking the psychology of those who blindly believe authority? Why do they do it....is it a lack of intelligence or do they just allow their emotions to prevent rational thought?
For example do they only listen to a person if they like them?
Or another example of allowing emotions to suppress rational thought would be them being afraid to say anything different from the rest of the herd because they are afraid to stand out from the herd
Because they rely on people being ignorant enough to fall for their lies
But basically they only needed to carry the lie for long enough to invade Iraq.....the lie was to justify the invasion
Once the lie is exposed, the news has moved on and so has peoples attention
Sadly a section of the public doesn't seem to learn each time and forgets that their government lies about everything
I don't forget so i get called a 'conspiracy theorist' by that forgetful section of the public who bizarrely like to act as the thought police for the government
Had it occured to you that the media eventually tells us about this stuff because online bloggers like me force their hand by being honest and brave enough to speak out?
Oh, I feel another rant in the works.
Here's an image of how it makes me feel:
I absolutely agree with your last line, which is why so many conspiracies don't add up, because there are too many people who would love to find the smoking gun for these things and would not hesitate to make it public.
Using your 'logic' then why haven't we had people in the mainstream media find the proof to the 911 conspiracy,
or the moon landing, or most of the other conspiracies? Why this one and not the others?
If there are these groups that are as powerful as you say and work in the background and are tied in to the Republicans, then these groups have now somehow mismanaged the Iraq war and the weapons of mass destruction, which to me seems so much simpler to have faked than 911 and the moon landing.
I absolutely agree with your last line, which is why so many conspiracies don't add up, because there are too many people who would love to find the smoking gun for these things and would not hesitate to make it public.
Using your 'logic' then why haven't we had people in the mainstream media find the proof to the 911 conspiracy, or the moon landing, or most of the other conspiracies? Why this one and not the others?
If there are these groups that are as powerful as you say and work in the background and are tied in to the Republicans, then these groups have now somehow mismanaged the Iraq war and the weapons of mass destruction, which to me seems so much simpler to have faked than 911 and the moon landing.
You will find I think that logic falls on deaf ears in this regard. As does reason for that matter. I applaud you for trying though.
I absolutely agree with your last line, which is why so many conspiracies don't add up, because there are too many people who would love to find the smoking gun for these things and would not hesitate to make it public.
Using your 'logic' then why haven't we had people in the mainstream media find the proof to the 911 conspiracy, or the moon landing, or most of the other conspiracies? Why this one and not the others?
If there are these groups that are as powerful as you say and work in the background and are tied in to the Republicans, then these groups have now somehow mismanaged the Iraq war and the weapons of mass destruction, which to me seems so much simpler to have faked than 911 and the moon landing.
There are plenty of whistleblowers who then get ignored and never make it into the mainstream media. muir posted about how there was a list of whistleblowers and witnesses who had suspicious deaths. There are scores and scores of whistleblowers about the ufos, astronauts, intelligence people, politicians, and declassified material, but the media treats it as a joke subject. So, they are there, it's just that people expect that they'll hear about it from the mainstream. There's a culture of telling people what they want to hear or what others want them to say in the media, and like universities, you'll get sacked if you talk about things they don't want to hear... in fact, most jobs are like this in my experience. The truth is that people in the mainstream media aren't looking for the truth, they're looking to entertain people and sell the line to the public to keep and get status. Investigative journalists researching conspiracies also have a history of having bizarre suicides, who aren't in the mainstream anyway.
The Iraq wars are an example of the mainstream media's extensive researching before jumping altogether to declare things facts which turn out to be utterly wrong and poorly investigated. IIRC, it was a single somewhat dubious CIA intel source who pointed at Iraq having WMDs while the rest of the agency said that it looked doubtful that they had any... who did the media report about? Hard evidence was conspicuously missing and it was a bunch of noisy warmongers, but everyone ignored that in a 'patriotic' fervor to go blow some people up. A patriot would have considered that he was sending his countrymen to go die and kill somewhere, and thought carefully about whether or not their lives were worth it. And that's the sort of discomforting truth that people don't like to hear about.
Can people stop putting words in my mouth please.
Leave me out of your little squabbles.
So I learned no MBTI is safe from idiots. I think this was the last topping on that conclusion. Besides insanity being the norm, people living in blocked belief systems, denial, the most primitive and very pathological defense system.
Along with acting out.
MBTI has shown to be more and more irrelevant in people. I think it is the level of development and sanity that matters, I couldn't give 2 damns about the function stack. To think that NTs where less vulnerable to such bs. The world is so close to the dark ages in terms of people's nature. Last time I checked a comedy on dark age mindset, replace 1 word with something of today and it fits perfectly. I have found where sane people are, I'm so glad. Without networks I don't know what is more probable, meeting at-least one or meeting none in your life.
So I learned no MBTI is safe from idiots. I think this was the last topping on that conclusion. Besides insanity being the norm, people living in blocked belief systems, denial, the most primitive and very pathological defense system.
Along with acting out.
MBTI has shown to be more and more irrelevant in people. I think it is the level of development and sanity that matters, I couldn't give 2 damns about the function stack. To think that NTs where less vulnerable to such bs. The world is so close to the dark ages in terms of people's nature. Last time I checked a comedy on dark age mindset, replace 1 word with something of today and it fits perfectly. I have found where sane people are, I'm so glad. Without networks I don't know what is more probable, meeting at-least one or meeting none in your life.
Ok conspiracy theorist!
lol
This really gets my goat, in all chatter that our resident conspiracsist "blogger" has posted, not bothering to vote seems to be the take away message, why should we? there is no recourse other than to accept the overwhelming might of the overlords, hoard some guns, shun vaccines and watch out for chemtrails.[h=2]The 2015 general election and conspiracy theories[/h] Posted on May 1, 2015 by Daniel Jolley
Millions of people in the United Kingdom will head to the polling stations on Thursday (7[SUP]th[/SUP] May) to vote in the 2015 general election. There will however be a large portion of people, whilst eligible, will not cast their vote.
Looking back at the 2010 general election, just 29.7 million out of the 45.6 million people eligible to vote did so. 15.9 million people therefore did not vote.
There may be many reasons for this, such as a disinterest in politics or the election process or competing time commitments. Another key contributor may however be the influence of exposure to conspiracy theories.
Research conducted by Karen Douglas and myself have explored this idea further. We found that when people were exposed to conspiracy theories that argued the government is involved in shady deals and plots, people reported reduced intentions to engage in the political process such as voting. This effect was explained by an increase in feelings of political powerlessness — which is the feeling that one’s action will not impact the political system.
Our research therefore suggests that exposure to government conspiracy theories may increase feelings that one’s action will have little impact, which may lower one’s intention to engage in political behaviours.
People need to vote. If people do not, such disengagement may be detrimental for society and could damage important social systems that are needed for society to function effectively.
Conspiracy theories, with the aid of the Internet, are becoming more popular. Twitter for example, is flourishing with conspiracy theories. This therefore begs the question: Will there be even less people out of the pool of eligible voters going to the polling stations on Thursday than in 2010?
Then, out of those who will not be voting, could conspiracy theories be playing a role? Research to date is suggesting they may be.
https://www.mentalhelp.net/blogs/paranoia-and-conspiracy-theories/[h=1]Paranoia and Conspiracy Theories[/h]
Dr. Schwartz's Weblog By Allan Schwartz, LCSW, Ph.D. Jun 21, 2013
Allan Schwartz, LCSW, Ph.D. was in private practice for more than thirty years. He is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker in the states ...Read More
The conspiracy theories are many and weird. For example, all of us have heard about the government cover up of visits by extra terrestrial beings to planet earth. Some people claim to have seen flying saucers in the sky while yet others claim to have been kidnapped by these beings, brought to their saucer and submitted to intrusive physical examinations.
One of the more painful theories is that the murder of 18 children in the New town massacre was committed by the government to give them an excuse to take guns away from Americans. In fact, some conspiracists assert that the massacre never occurred. They insist that it was a media event created toward the same goal of taking our guns away.
The horrific 9/11/01 attacks on the World Trade Center have also been blamed on the government as a way to get us into war in Iraq. Another version of this plot is that the Israelis attacked the World Trade Center in order to blame it on the Arabs.
One last example of these theories is that the United States never did land on the moon and that the entire thing was a charade to fool the world during the Cold War.
The list of these theories can go on for some time.
What are the reasons for these beliefs in plots and why do they all involve government cover-ups?
Psychologists have been speculating for some time about this.
First, it’s important to say that conspiracies do happen. In fact, there is a kernel of truth or possibility behind all of these theories. Perhaps that is the reason why so many Americans believe in these theories. Given the national feeling of suspicion towards government at this time, it becomes understandable that there would be a tendency to believe in these conspiracies. Whether it’s the damage Richard Nixon did in our ability to trust government or Ronald Reagan’s assertion that “Government is the problem,” or a cultural aspect of American life that has always distrusted authority, we have an immediate tendency to believe that the government is up to no good.
Then, too, psychopathology is involved in the process of weaving these theories. Psychologists state that those whose personalities tend to be authoritarian are more likely to believe in conspiracies. In need of a sense of control over events, conspiracies provide them with an explanation for those events over which they cannot exert control.
It is also thought that the process of finding conspiracies behind these events is due to a strong sense of individualism. Individualists, if they feel that their independence is threatened find dark forces behind that are threatening to rob them of their freedom. That is why we hear the anti gun control people state that even having back ground checks would result in the government having lists of gun owners who could then be pursued later on, when the government want to remove those guns. In this, there is a sinister belief that the government is all powerful, all controlling and about to swoop down on all of us in order to enslave the American people. That is quite paranoid thinking.
All of this is happening as America tries to function in a world that seems increasingly chaotic and war-like. It will be important for all of us to hold onto some kind of objective way of thinking and not get swept into the paranoia. Remember, we have a democratically elected government. The next presidential elections, as of the writing of this article, will be in 2016 with important congressional elections coming in 2014. It’s important to fight paranoid thinking by reminding ourselves that all we have to do is vote.
Your comments and questions are encouraged.
Allan N. Schwartz, PhD
Keep Reading By Author Allan Schwartz, LCSW, Ph.D.
This really gets my goat, in all chatter that our resident conspiracsist "blogger" has posted, not bothering to vote seems to be the take away message, why should we? there is no recourse other than to accept the overwhelming might of the overlords, hoard some guns, shun vaccines and watch out for chemtrails.
There are plenty of whistleblowers who then get ignored and never make it into the mainstream media. muir posted about how there was a list of whistleblowers and witnesses who had suspicious deaths. There are scores and scores of whistleblowers about the ufos, astronauts, intelligence people, politicians, and declassified material, but the media treats it as a joke subject. So, they are there, it's just that people expect that they'll hear about it from the mainstream. There's a culture of telling people what they want to hear or what others want them to say in the media, and like universities, you'll get sacked if you talk about things they don't want to hear... in fact, most jobs are like this in my experience. The truth is that people in the mainstream media aren't looking for the truth, they're looking to entertain people and sell the line to the public to keep and get status. Investigative journalists researching conspiracies also have a history of having bizarre suicides, who aren't in the mainstream anyway.
The Iraq wars are an example of the mainstream media's extensive researching before jumping altogether to declare things facts which turn out to be utterly wrong and poorly investigated. IIRC, it was a single somewhat dubious CIA intel source who pointed at Iraq having WMDs while the rest of the agency said that it looked doubtful that they had any... who did the media report about? Hard evidence was conspicuously missing and it was a bunch of noisy warmongers, but everyone ignored that in a 'patriotic' fervor to go blow some people up. A patriot would have considered that he was sending his countrymen to go die and kill somewhere, and thought carefully about whether or not their lives were worth it. And that's the sort of discomforting truth that people don't like to hear about.
Edit: I don't mean to single you out with my stronger language.