Then you are both male.
Reproductive parts indicate biological sex, not gender. Him/her and the like are gender distinctions.
If gender is used as grouping of characteristics deemed to be feminine or masculine, which are in themselves social constructs, then there is no point in labeling a person one or the other because they will be to broad to be accurate on a individual basis. However if we use it to refer to the biological distinction between male and female then you have something solid and concrete to base your label on because of physical differences and there are enough physical differences that would make such a label necessary.
That's my concern as well though. In a rather which came first, the chicken or the egg kind of way. Has the father's aggressive behavior towards the mother and child subconsciously influenced the child to feel threatened or deterred from the male gender or is it the other way around as others have suggested? Without more information I suppose we cannot know, but it would be up to the gender therapists to determine and manage either way.
Yes, we know it's problematic when it comes to irritatingly simplified models of phenomena with trillions of variables. I'm bored, so if you must find a solution, I'll help you out: think of trans people as neurologically intersexed. The brain is of one sex, the genitals are the other. Given that, for most people at least, the locus of consciousness seems to be the brain and not the genitals, it stands to reason that 'I' - that is, the conscious entity named Claire - am female. I don't think any trans person will be truly delusional enough to deny their genitals; they might for social reasons.If gender is used as grouping of characteristics deemed to be feminine or masculine, which are in themselves social constructs, then there is no point in labeling a person one or the other because they will be to broad to be accurate on a individual basis. However if we use it to refer to the biological distinction between male and female then you have something solid and concrete to base your label on because of physical differences and there are enough physical differences that would make such a label necessary.
To transgendered members:
Let me take a guess, your parents had an openly bitter divorce/separation while you were young/pre-pubescent in which you viewed the opposing gendered parent as the aggressor/belligerent and sided with the parent of your self-chosen gender?
The brain is of one sex, the genitals are the other.
So does the brain in a transgender person have XX brain DNA and XY body DNA (or the other way around)?
To transgendered members:
Let me take a guess, your parents had an openly bitter divorce/separation while you were young/pre-pubescent in which you viewed the opposing gendered parent as the aggressor/belligerent and sided with the parent of your self-chosen gender?
View attachment 13016
Let me take a guess; you are basing this off of your own experience (watching/reading ridiculously right-winged publications), or maybe a handful of people (at most).
No. Sex is not determined by karyotype alone.
I assert:Do we have different brains?
I assert:
If you specifically wanted to know if our brains are biologically different, I would ask why this is a requirement to any conclusion you might make.
- we all have different brains regarless of gender
- experience (for example: as a female/male) makes us (our brains) different
- hormones makes us different
I would ask why you would ask, but that story most assuredly doesn't interest me.
Why did you say this at all?
I know you're trying to sound condescending and all, but I'd hold off on that until you know what irrelevant means. You being a bitch is irrelevant, and should have nothing to do with this conversation.Obviously, first and foremost, because I wanted to.
Secondly, that's the second irrelevant question you have asked me in as many posts.