acd
Well-known member
- MBTI
- infp
- Enneagram
- 9w8 sp/sx
Just Google it.Ok..can you give me a link? I listen to CNN msnbc and fox and I have never heard mention of this.
Just Google it.Ok..can you give me a link? I listen to CNN msnbc and fox and I have never heard mention of this.
So thats a no...Just Google it.
Keep up with the news. It's not my job to spoon feed you information that is easily available to you. If you have no idea what deal was made, it's because you don't want to know.So thats a no...
You made a comment I asked you to back it up.Keep up with the news. It's not my job to spoon feed you information that is easily available to you. If you have no idea what deal was made, it's because you don't want to know.
Or you could just turn on the radio or the news or read a newspaper. Why should I have to link you to a news article that multiple outlets have covered? You should inform yourself before commenting.You made a comment I asked you to back it up.
...........
...........
Hmmm... I dont see it the same way. But if thinking that makes you happy then more power to you.Yo ass got served
If this is in reference to a conversation you have not been a part of.. First let me say I never demanded proof, I simply asked for the location of where these particular stories came from. Also, this isn't about winning nor do I feel as if I have won. I asked for the information because I was interested in it. However, not only was I interested in the information itself but where it came from.I think it is interesting how the internet is used. You feel you know something, and in a regular conversation you wouldn't demand evidence be produced. It's wouldn't be socially acceptable to demand someone leave the party to find a newspaper clipping proving your point. But with the internet you can demand that proof and if it isn't produced you've "won". Even though you could potentially find it yourself. On the other hand it's assumed your opponent should be able to just present it quickly since they must have read it and know the location. But who memorizes hyperlinks?
If this is in reference to a conversation you have not been a part of.. First let me say I never demanded proof, I simply asked for the location of where these particular stories came from. Also, this isn't about winning nor do I feel as if I have won. I asked for the information because I was interested in it. However, not only was I interested in the information itself but where it came from.
Lots of people on defense over this. My question is why?
The last thing that I will say about this is that I googled that for you above. I also posted a link to an article where another Republican criticized the deal. I'm not making this up. You voted for him, you should hold him accountable. Right now, you are getting the bait and switch. He may have promised hefty tariffs on corporations planning to move jobs out of the US, but that is not what took place with this deal. It's not sustainable, either. He can't grant breaks to everyone threatening to leave.Hmmm... I dont see it the same way. But if thinking that makes you happy then more power to you.
@acd still has not provided what I have asked for which simply leads me to believe the information has no validity in the real world. Thats where this has been left.
I should apologize. I saw the Google link and thought it was a smart ass post about how to use google. I see now after watching the whole thing it was more involved than that.The last thing that I will say about this is that I googled that for you above. I also posted a link to an article where another Republican criticized the deal. I'm not making this up. You voted for him, you should hold him accountable. Right now, you are getting the bait and switch. He may have promised hefty tariffs on corporations planning to move jobs out of the US, but that is not what took place with this deal. It's not sustainable, either. He can't grant breaks to everyone threatening to leave.