Why this list? At least I, have already conceded that none of the cases were heard.
I don't even follow CNN or have a Twitter. I make it a point not to follow partisan sources, even leftist ones.
Sure everyone who isn't left of Marx is immediately right wing and thus a bad person, you really do give off a strong vibe of someone who's been in a cult for a very long time perhaps a decade or more.
Everything is propaganda to you as you have no other points just parrot the same lines used to shut down diversity of thought in the universities for the past twenty to thirty years.
I really don't know what bitchute is but I think @FiftySeven asked a really good question when he wondered if this false narrative about Biden is making you question at all any other information you receive from these sites or networks? It should.
I got to laugh a little with this double standard that people like yourself got a free pass for years and the moment those with different views you got fully triggered over a single video.
That is your job not mine, you have all the time you need.
For me, the main bummer is such a film compromises the truth. Folks who either are highly impaired critical thinkers or think themselves too enlightened to bother engaging in critical thought on a specific matter such as the video, will conclude that a misrepresentation invalidates the narrative itself.You will NEVER gain any ground with the use of YOU and then attaching a feeling. Also trying to defend a video that is clearly mis-representative is a fools errand. I point this out because those "mistakes" easily defeats your valid point(s).
That is an important point! I will quibble a bit here however, it has probable been more than 30 years, researching this premise is indeed enlightening. For some reason I am blocking on the better way to present this but, if you used the word YOU then it becomes personal and you are playing the lefts game again and YOU (lol) will lose (always).
This is the kind of truth that is so easily accessed. There were numerous occasions of vote talliy anomalies right on TV. Now, the source of the tally numbers is databases that distribute the data to the networks. No one is typing in numbers, these are feeds from an automated process.
I am unsure if the one I saw months ago was included. But, at one point the Pennsylvania totals for Trump and Biden are shown. The TV then goes to other states and eventually returns to PA. Trump LOST votes. It was something like 14,563 if one simply took the difference between the latest displayed result and the one immediately preceding. And guess what? Bidens total was higher than the immediately preceding one by the exact same total.
In other words, flipping.
Keeping in mind the process is automated and the source of the tally feeds is at the database level.
This site gives 5 examples of flipping right there for all to see on TV on election night.
https://www.sgtreport.com/2020/11/f...v-away-from-president-trump-to-biden-updated/
(Oh, and this is the kind of truth that is censored.)
The election theft took place at the local precinct level and also at the database level. It is known that packets of information traveled to servers in Italy, China, and other countries and returned to the United States. The theft was larger at the automated, database level. The election servers are not supposed to be on-line. But, they were. This has already been established. Dominion is a Venezuelan company and was used in the Chavez election. There is a documentary called Kill Chain that I think aired in 2018.
https://www.hbo.com/documentaries/kill-chain-the-cyber-war-on-americas-elections
Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America's Elections
In advance of the 2020 Presidential Election, Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America’s Elections takes a deep dive into the weaknesses of today’s election technology, an issue that is little understood by the public or even lawmakers.
From directors Simon Ardizzone, Russell Michaels and Sarah Teale, the team behind HBO’s 2006 Emmy-nominated documentary Hacking Democracy, Kill Chain again follows Finnish hacker and cyber security expert Harri Hursti as he travels across the U.S. and around the world to show how our election systems remain unprotected, with very little accountability or transparency. Hursti’s eye-opening journey is supplemented by candid interviews with key figures in the election security community, as well as cyber experts and U.S. senators from both parties who are fighting to secure the integrity of the vote before November 2020.
As the film shows, individuals, foreign states and other bad actors can employ a myriad of techniques to gain access to voting systems at any stage – from voter registration databases to actual election results.
Through this lens, seemingly unrelated or uncoordinated security breaches of the recent past can be seen as part of a “kill chain” – a military doctrine to plot meticulous, long-game attacks, understanding that breaking down trust in voting results is the surest way to undermine democracy. As enlightening as it is disturbing, Kill Chain underscores the fragility of our election process and points to the clear solutions available to protect us against sabotage.
[end of excerpt]
I know Minnesota Rep Amy Klobuchar is in the documentary. I have not seen it, but I was told lack of election integrity was predominantly a concern of the Democratic Party and the documentary reflects that.
But, now, these same Dem's declare the 2020 election pristine. Imagine that.
Meanwhile, virtually every anomaly, such as vote flipping, favors Biden.
Sell me a bridge, ass-face.
The left's game is death
AP and Reuters.I am sincerely curious as to what you do use for a news source.
Prove me wrong bit by little bit from the video, if you can't do that or just simply too lazy to do so then it is all on you bud.
Just watch the Senate hearing for context.For me, the main bummer is such a film compromises the truth. Folks who either are highly impaired critical thinkers or think themselves too enlightened to bother engaging in critical thought on a specific matter such as the video, will conclude that a misrepresentation invalidates the narrative itself.
But, it doesn't. There is enough known to be true to establish that Biden is a tool with respect to racism.
Do you enjoy pissing contest that you lose?I am only doing as what has been done since the Bush administration and is no different from what your lot has been doing for the past five years.
Here's the Snopes article that debunks Roses bullshit:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-n-word-senate/
If you don't like Snopes, maybe we can dig for the hearing video or transcripts in full. Not edited and taken out of context.
Here you go!
https://www.c-span.org/video/?125450-1/william-reynolds-nomination
Chicago Tribune article from 1985:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1985-06-05-8502050148-story,amp.html
This shit isn't hard to find, @Roses In The Vineyard . Either you are completely ignorant and partisan or you have an agenda and know exactly the misinformation you post.
Here's the Snopes article that debunks Roses bullshit:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-n-word-senate/
If you don't like Snopes, maybe we can dig for the hearing video or transcripts in full. Not edited and taken out of context.
Here you go!
https://www.c-span.org/video/?125450-1/william-reynolds-nomination
Chicago Tribune article from 1985:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1985-06-05-8502050148-story,amp.html
This shit isn't hard to find, @Roses In The Vineyard . Either you are completely ignorant and partisan or you have an agenda and know exactly the misinformation you post.