There is a track-record. If you can prove it w/o getting whacked, let me know. In the meantime, this problem is far from insurmountable.
Vaccines Debate
- Thread starter say what
- Start date
There is a track-record. If you can prove it w/o getting whacked, let me know. In the meantime, this problem is far from insurmountable.
muir
Banned
- MBTI
- INFJ
It already is proven
That stuff is declassified
There are new stories of covert government experimentation coming out all the time. Then there are programs like MKUltra that are probably still running as well as directed energy weapons and nanotechnology
And people think they wouldn't poison them with vaccines!
muir
Banned
- MBTI
- INFJ
http://www.naturalnews.com/049639_ACSH_science_for_sale_pseudoscience.html#
[h=1]Corporations pay American Council on Science and Health big money to push toxic products - Science for sale[/h] Friday, May 08, 2015 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer
A disgruntled faction of establishment scientists who claim to have a corner on scientific truth recently attempted (and failed) to unseat Dr. Mehmet Oz from his position as head of Columbia University's Department of Surgery, maintaining that Dr. Oz shows "disdain for science" and promotes "quackery." What these prideful fools aren't divulging is the fact that they themselves are the true purveyors of quackery and anti-science, blatantly endorsing industry interests for pay under the guise of "science."
As it turns out, four of ten co-signers of an embarrassingly pompous letter calling for Dr. Oz's removal from Columbia are current or past employees of the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH), a corrupt industry front group that is financed by corporations like Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Monsanto. Gilbert Ross, the acting president and executive director of ACSH, is actually a former felon who now has the gall to accuse Dr. Oz of nudging the medical profession towards disrepute.
Ironically, it's ACSH that is shaming the integrity of science with its constant peddling of pseudoscience in flagrant promotion of things like electronic cigarettes, genetically-modified organisms (GMOs), alcohol and vaccines. ACSH claims to be an independent, non-profit group that upholds unbiased science as a beacon of truth in the world, all while quietly accepting huge donations from chemical, pharmaceutical and biotechnology corporations.
This document[SUP][PDF][/SUP] contains leaked ACSH financial records for the 2013 fiscal year. It was never intended to be publicly released, as ACSH guards its financials and the identities of its donors and sponsors under lock and key. They are right to hide such information because it clearly exposes who this sham organization truly works for.
As you'll notice, ACSH had a goal of achieving a $2 million working budget in 2013, and this required petitioning its top donors for large cash infusions. These donors include popular industry names like Chevron, Bayer CropScience, Syngenta, McDonald's, Monsanto, and many others who collectively contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to ACSH.
[h=2]How can an organization that is almost completely funded by drug, vaccine, and chemical interests possibly be unbiased and scientific?[/h] Let's think about this for a moment: if nearly every penny that flows into ACSH comes from corporations that promote junk foods, pharmaceuticals, "fracking," vaccines, cigarettes and alcohol, what kind of "science" do you think ACSH is going to promote? It surely won't be independent science that dares to question the safety or effectiveness of any of these products.
"[The ACSH] platform, invariably, sides with big business, opposing science that claims products or practices are harmful to the public or the environment," reveals the TruthWiki entry for ACSH.
"In a letter to the editor of the Washington Times, Michael Jacobson, the Director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, stated that ACSH is 'a receptacle for payments from pharmaceutical, chemical, biotechnology, food and other companies who appreciate the convenience of having their grantees and former employees serve on government science panels.'"
Also serving on the ACSH Board of Trustees is pro-vaccine quack "Dr." Paul Offit, the infamous jab fanatic from Philadelphia Children's Hospital who says that aluminum is healthy for a developing fetus and that injecting babies with up to 10,000 vaccines at once is completely safe. These are the same folks who, out of the other sides of their mouths, claim to promote only "science-based medicine."
Sources for this article include:
http://www.naturalnews.com/files/acsh-financial-summary.pdf
http://truthwiki.org/The_American_Council_on_Science_and_Health
http://www.washingtontimes.com
http://acsh.org/about-acsh/meet-the-team/
http://www.naturalnews.com
http://www.ageofautism.com
http://www.medscape.com
[h=1]Corporations pay American Council on Science and Health big money to push toxic products - Science for sale[/h] Friday, May 08, 2015 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer
A disgruntled faction of establishment scientists who claim to have a corner on scientific truth recently attempted (and failed) to unseat Dr. Mehmet Oz from his position as head of Columbia University's Department of Surgery, maintaining that Dr. Oz shows "disdain for science" and promotes "quackery." What these prideful fools aren't divulging is the fact that they themselves are the true purveyors of quackery and anti-science, blatantly endorsing industry interests for pay under the guise of "science."
As it turns out, four of ten co-signers of an embarrassingly pompous letter calling for Dr. Oz's removal from Columbia are current or past employees of the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH), a corrupt industry front group that is financed by corporations like Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Monsanto. Gilbert Ross, the acting president and executive director of ACSH, is actually a former felon who now has the gall to accuse Dr. Oz of nudging the medical profession towards disrepute.
Ironically, it's ACSH that is shaming the integrity of science with its constant peddling of pseudoscience in flagrant promotion of things like electronic cigarettes, genetically-modified organisms (GMOs), alcohol and vaccines. ACSH claims to be an independent, non-profit group that upholds unbiased science as a beacon of truth in the world, all while quietly accepting huge donations from chemical, pharmaceutical and biotechnology corporations.
This document[SUP][PDF][/SUP] contains leaked ACSH financial records for the 2013 fiscal year. It was never intended to be publicly released, as ACSH guards its financials and the identities of its donors and sponsors under lock and key. They are right to hide such information because it clearly exposes who this sham organization truly works for.
As you'll notice, ACSH had a goal of achieving a $2 million working budget in 2013, and this required petitioning its top donors for large cash infusions. These donors include popular industry names like Chevron, Bayer CropScience, Syngenta, McDonald's, Monsanto, and many others who collectively contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to ACSH.
[h=2]How can an organization that is almost completely funded by drug, vaccine, and chemical interests possibly be unbiased and scientific?[/h] Let's think about this for a moment: if nearly every penny that flows into ACSH comes from corporations that promote junk foods, pharmaceuticals, "fracking," vaccines, cigarettes and alcohol, what kind of "science" do you think ACSH is going to promote? It surely won't be independent science that dares to question the safety or effectiveness of any of these products.
"[The ACSH] platform, invariably, sides with big business, opposing science that claims products or practices are harmful to the public or the environment," reveals the TruthWiki entry for ACSH.
"In a letter to the editor of the Washington Times, Michael Jacobson, the Director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, stated that ACSH is 'a receptacle for payments from pharmaceutical, chemical, biotechnology, food and other companies who appreciate the convenience of having their grantees and former employees serve on government science panels.'"
Also serving on the ACSH Board of Trustees is pro-vaccine quack "Dr." Paul Offit, the infamous jab fanatic from Philadelphia Children's Hospital who says that aluminum is healthy for a developing fetus and that injecting babies with up to 10,000 vaccines at once is completely safe. These are the same folks who, out of the other sides of their mouths, claim to promote only "science-based medicine."
Sources for this article include:
http://www.naturalnews.com/files/acsh-financial-summary.pdf
http://truthwiki.org/The_American_Council_on_Science_and_Health
http://www.washingtontimes.com
http://acsh.org/about-acsh/meet-the-team/
http://www.naturalnews.com
http://www.ageofautism.com
http://www.medscape.com
muir
Banned
- MBTI
- INFJ
http://vaccineliberationarmy.com/
[h=1]Vaccine Liberation Army[/h] [h=2]Armed with Knowledge[/h]
[h=1]Mission[/h] The student Vaccine Liberation Army Mission: Armed with knowledge, we are committed to articulate, propagate, promulgate, disseminate, and circulate information for the purpose of encouraging critical thinking conversations about: the risks and dangers of vaccines, the risks of prescription drugs, the philosophy of sovereignty of personhood, and liberation through mental clarity and spiritual and physical health – all in such a way that such activities do not disrupt school operations or interfere with the rights of others.
Student Vaccine Liberation Army Motto:
Liberators Armed with Knowledge
[h=2]5 thoughts on “Mission”[/h]
[h=1]Vaccine Liberation Army[/h] [h=2]Armed with Knowledge[/h]
[h=1]Mission[/h] The student Vaccine Liberation Army Mission: Armed with knowledge, we are committed to articulate, propagate, promulgate, disseminate, and circulate information for the purpose of encouraging critical thinking conversations about: the risks and dangers of vaccines, the risks of prescription drugs, the philosophy of sovereignty of personhood, and liberation through mental clarity and spiritual and physical health – all in such a way that such activities do not disrupt school operations or interfere with the rights of others.
Student Vaccine Liberation Army Motto:
Liberators Armed with Knowledge
- the risks and dangers of vaccines
- the risks of prescription drugs
- the philosophy of sovereignty of personhood;
- liberation through mental clarity; spiritual, physical health and wellness
[h=2]5 thoughts on “Mission”[/h]
- Karen Kain February 10, 2014 at 11:37 am My name is Karen Kain, I was a parent of a vaccine injured child in 94 who died in 09. I just finished our life story – A Unique Life Fully Lived. I am an advocate and I travel around the US talking to families living with unique children. HHS never argued about the cause of injury for my daughter Lorrin. She had what is considered at “hot” lot, 30 other kids had seizures or worse and 10 surrounding deaths. I would very much like to share my story with your audience. Please let me know if this is of interest to you.
Karen Kain
KarenKain.com
Lorrinsworld.com
- Christopher Salas November 30, 2014 at 4:42 pm I feel your pain. I am strongly against all vaccines especially forced military vaccines. I saw the documentary Direct Orders and have showed it to several other people. Anyway I’m interested in joining the Navy but I was wondering if you have any advice for me to how I can refuse forced vaccinations without getting kicked out. I’m sure there just has to be a way to join the military without getting vaccinated. Plus I’m a board certified nutritionist and believe me, using the art and science of diet and nutrition to strengthen our immune system is ten times more effective that getting pumped with a bunch of vaccines. Vaccines are the biggest scam in history. Any advice for me I would greatly appreciate it.
- Editor December 5, 2014 at 11:14 am To my knowledge there is no way for you to escape the vaccines. If I were you, I wouldn’t join the navy in exchange for education you can be sick for the rest of your life. It is not worth it.
- Olivera Savic May 1, 2015 at 4:38 pm I am a pediatrtion from Serbia.On 10 th May we have a demostration in Belgrade against forced vaccination .We don’t have a choice becouse of our low ,not to admit the vaccine..
In Slovenia people try to change tho low for 15 years wuthout sucesses.
What is your advice?
Lot’s of regards!
Olivera Savic
- Editor May 7, 2015 at 4:33 pm Olivera: YES, I know about Serbia and the vaccine issue. Australia is now tying child benefits to vaccines….its the law. We have 110 vaccine bills in various states and 3 are neck and neck to pass to stop religious waivers. All I can say is that this is the same cosmic tension that goes on between good and evil so that change, perhaps even extinction happens. I would suggest from a cosmic point of view you watch two youtube series. David Icke…”connect the dots” (series of 9 youtubes) and Matt Kahn…start with Ascension 2015. Here is our 5 minute powerpoint so you can see the “endgame” http://vaccineliberationarmy.com/20...nt-presentation-from-vaccine-liberation-army/
Exactly, who is going to get to that "results" oriented position in the corporation, and how compelled will they be, with their results in mind, to publish studies which show not so good results. People are expected to lie and peddle the whole way through. The results aren't so good.
Last edited:
muir
Banned
- MBTI
- INFJ
If you don't say what they want you to say, you don't get jobs in their corporations or universities, you don't get paid for research and any research you do won't get published in the journals that they control
That's the sad reality and it is how they create an impression in the public perception that their view is a consensus view when in reality they manufactured that consensus through guile, bribery and manipulations
muir
Banned
- MBTI
- INFJ
http://www.naturalnews.com/049654_vaccines_autism_big_pharma.html#
[h=1]New MMR study promoting vaccines was funded by Big Pharma[/h] Saturday, May 09, 2015 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer
The medical-industrial complex is trotting out yet another "study" that it claims proves that vaccines, particularly the MMR vaccine, are not linked to causing autism. However, a closer look at this so-called study reveals that like virtually all of the other medical research purporting that vaccines are safe and effective, it was directly funded by pharmaceutical interests trying to sell more vaccines.
It is an undeniable fact that not a single independent study has ever concluded that vaccines are completely safe and effective. The only ones to make such a claim are a direct product of industry sleight of hand - pseudoscience propaganda, if you will, meant to create the illusion that vaccine safety is fully vested when the exact opposite is actually the case.
The latest study to push this agenda comes from the Lewin Group, a healthcare consulting firm based out of Falls Church, Virginia. The mainstream media is already citing the paper as concrete evidence that vaccines don't cause autism, but what they are failing to tell their readers is that the group behind the study represents a wide range of players in the drugging and jabbing sectors of the medical economy.
[h=2]Organization behind "vaccines don't cause autism" propaganda directly aligned with vaccine industry[/h] As it turns out, the Lewin Group works directly with drug corporations like Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Novo Nordisk, two of which actually manufacture vaccines. The Lewin Group is also in partnership with pharmaceutical associations and organizations like the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), whose "Fact Book" claims that "[g]overnments have reasons to promote vaccination."
This same group advocates for the continued development of new vaccines to address infectious diseases that it claims "remain uncontrolled." This is a clear conflict of interest because it is highly unlikely that PhRMA or any other association that works with the Lewin Group would ever play a part in producing a study that questions the safety or effectiveness of the products it markets and sells.
It is also worth noting that some of the other organizations in partnership with the Lewin Group include the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Heritage Foundation, not to mention a number of other hospitals and healthcare systems that actively promote vaccines as being among the greatest public health achievements of the Twentieth Century.
[h=2]UnitedHealth, which owns the Lewin Group, actively promotes vaccines through its health insurance and vaccination campaigns[/h] The Lewin Group is also aligned with various medical insurance programs like Blue Cross Blue Shield and the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, two corporate entities that just so happen to provide health coverage for vaccines. Both of these insurance groups also consider vaccinations to be "preventive care" and both actively push deadly vaccines like the flu shot and HPV on young children.
Perhaps the biggest red flag with the Lewin Group, though, is its owner: UnitedHealth Group, another major promoter of vaccines. UnitedHealth, as you may recall, is the same entity that lobbied heavily to eliminate a "public option" from Obamacare, which ended up forcibly adding many previously-uninsured customers onto the company's rolls.
"UnitedHealth lobbyists used work provided by the Lewin Group as a basis for its argument that providing a public option would kill the private insurance industry," wrote Brandon Turbeville and Healther Callaghan in a recent piece for Activist Post. "Those few democrats in the U.S. Congress that disagreed were apt to point out the conflict of interest between the Lewin Group's findings and UnitedHealth's desires, referring to the Lewin Group's work as 'so-called analysis' and 'suspect.'"
[h=2]The Lewin Group isn't an independent healthcare consultant; it's a front group for vaccine corporations[/h] If you are not yet convinced, check out the following statement issued by UnitedHealthcare about its "Medicare and Retirement Vaccination Campaign," which admittedly pushes vaccines on adults aged 65 years and older:
"The vaccination campaign uses demographic and regional information with targeted messaging for diverse populations across age, race and ethnicity to increase vaccine rates. This program was designed to increase the influenza and pneumonia vaccination rates in older adults by increasing their awareness of the diseases and promoting convenient access points (e.g. pharmacies)."
This is the same entity that recently published a study claiming that MMR vaccines don't cause autism. Do you see why this is a problem? The Lewin Group is anything but an independent healthcare consultant. It is a disingenuous front group promoting vaccines on behalf of its partners, who stand to lose billions of dollars in revenue if vaccine rejection continues to gain momentum.
"The truth is that there has never been a study proving vaccines safe or effective that was not connected to a pharmaceutical company or a vaccine maker," warns Activist Post. "The mainstream media's recent jaunt has yet to change this fact."
Sources:
http://www.activistpost.com
www.yahoo.com
http://www.phrma.org
http://www.lewin.com
www.ahip.org
http://truthwiki.org/Vaccine_Fanaticism
[h=1]New MMR study promoting vaccines was funded by Big Pharma[/h] Saturday, May 09, 2015 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer
The medical-industrial complex is trotting out yet another "study" that it claims proves that vaccines, particularly the MMR vaccine, are not linked to causing autism. However, a closer look at this so-called study reveals that like virtually all of the other medical research purporting that vaccines are safe and effective, it was directly funded by pharmaceutical interests trying to sell more vaccines.
It is an undeniable fact that not a single independent study has ever concluded that vaccines are completely safe and effective. The only ones to make such a claim are a direct product of industry sleight of hand - pseudoscience propaganda, if you will, meant to create the illusion that vaccine safety is fully vested when the exact opposite is actually the case.
The latest study to push this agenda comes from the Lewin Group, a healthcare consulting firm based out of Falls Church, Virginia. The mainstream media is already citing the paper as concrete evidence that vaccines don't cause autism, but what they are failing to tell their readers is that the group behind the study represents a wide range of players in the drugging and jabbing sectors of the medical economy.
[h=2]Organization behind "vaccines don't cause autism" propaganda directly aligned with vaccine industry[/h] As it turns out, the Lewin Group works directly with drug corporations like Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Novo Nordisk, two of which actually manufacture vaccines. The Lewin Group is also in partnership with pharmaceutical associations and organizations like the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), whose "Fact Book" claims that "[g]overnments have reasons to promote vaccination."
This same group advocates for the continued development of new vaccines to address infectious diseases that it claims "remain uncontrolled." This is a clear conflict of interest because it is highly unlikely that PhRMA or any other association that works with the Lewin Group would ever play a part in producing a study that questions the safety or effectiveness of the products it markets and sells.
It is also worth noting that some of the other organizations in partnership with the Lewin Group include the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Heritage Foundation, not to mention a number of other hospitals and healthcare systems that actively promote vaccines as being among the greatest public health achievements of the Twentieth Century.
[h=2]UnitedHealth, which owns the Lewin Group, actively promotes vaccines through its health insurance and vaccination campaigns[/h] The Lewin Group is also aligned with various medical insurance programs like Blue Cross Blue Shield and the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, two corporate entities that just so happen to provide health coverage for vaccines. Both of these insurance groups also consider vaccinations to be "preventive care" and both actively push deadly vaccines like the flu shot and HPV on young children.
Perhaps the biggest red flag with the Lewin Group, though, is its owner: UnitedHealth Group, another major promoter of vaccines. UnitedHealth, as you may recall, is the same entity that lobbied heavily to eliminate a "public option" from Obamacare, which ended up forcibly adding many previously-uninsured customers onto the company's rolls.
"UnitedHealth lobbyists used work provided by the Lewin Group as a basis for its argument that providing a public option would kill the private insurance industry," wrote Brandon Turbeville and Healther Callaghan in a recent piece for Activist Post. "Those few democrats in the U.S. Congress that disagreed were apt to point out the conflict of interest between the Lewin Group's findings and UnitedHealth's desires, referring to the Lewin Group's work as 'so-called analysis' and 'suspect.'"
[h=2]The Lewin Group isn't an independent healthcare consultant; it's a front group for vaccine corporations[/h] If you are not yet convinced, check out the following statement issued by UnitedHealthcare about its "Medicare and Retirement Vaccination Campaign," which admittedly pushes vaccines on adults aged 65 years and older:
"The vaccination campaign uses demographic and regional information with targeted messaging for diverse populations across age, race and ethnicity to increase vaccine rates. This program was designed to increase the influenza and pneumonia vaccination rates in older adults by increasing their awareness of the diseases and promoting convenient access points (e.g. pharmacies)."
This is the same entity that recently published a study claiming that MMR vaccines don't cause autism. Do you see why this is a problem? The Lewin Group is anything but an independent healthcare consultant. It is a disingenuous front group promoting vaccines on behalf of its partners, who stand to lose billions of dollars in revenue if vaccine rejection continues to gain momentum.
"The truth is that there has never been a study proving vaccines safe or effective that was not connected to a pharmaceutical company or a vaccine maker," warns Activist Post. "The mainstream media's recent jaunt has yet to change this fact."
Sources:
http://www.activistpost.com
www.yahoo.com
http://www.phrma.org
http://www.lewin.com
www.ahip.org
http://truthwiki.org/Vaccine_Fanaticism
muir
Banned
- MBTI
- INFJ
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/05/australia-mandatory-vaccines-and-secret.html
Sunday, May 10, 2015
Australia: mandatory vaccines and the secret treaty
[TABLE="class: tr-caption-container"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: tr-caption, align: center"]Source[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
By Jon Rappoport
“There is never a decay of organized religion. When one church falls, another is built. During the 20th century, the new church was Science—in particular, Medical Science. It was constructed to extract the maximum amount of compliance from the population. This is what all orthodox churches do. So in addition to the countless numbers of diagnoses and drugs, there was the element of mind control: ‘Follow our orders. We know the truth and we are giving it you for your own good; we love you and care about you, unless you rebel; then we consign you to Hell.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
Globalism is the New World Order. There is no mystery about it.
The alliance between mega-corporations, banks, and governments is ever-growing, as they extend their power over populations.
In this article, I use the example of Australia to illustrate a hidden point that applies to nations all over the world:
The medical cartel is “a compliance arm” of the New World Order.
The principle is simple: expand the degree of citizen-obedience in one area, and you expand it in all areas.
You create the core habit of obedience. That habit extends down into the subconscious mind.
Globalism and the New World Order need that obedience, because its methods are often so outrageous only robots would fall into line.
For an example of outrageous lunacy, take the upcoming Globalist treaty, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). When ratified by 12 nations (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States and Vietnam), it will establish the right of corporations to bypass national courts and demand that their products be sold, without tariffs, without concern for workers who are paid slave wages, without concern for poisoning the environment with toxic chemicals.
This is a secret treaty. In Australia, it will be signed by the cabinet before any supporting legislation is considered.
Here is a brief quote from tppaustralia.org:
A secret treaty deeply affecting the lives of all people in those 12 countries, and only a chosen few know exactly what’s in it.
From the Globalist point of view, this means one thing: populations must be rendered into a state of unquestioning obedience. They must go along with the program on what amounts to a hypnotic basis.
Otherwise (if awake) they would rebel en masse. This is what any population would do if they were alert.
“You’re going to ratify a secret treaty that will put us further under the gun of mega-corporations? Not on your life.”
But there are no massive protests in Australia, or in any of the other 12 TPP countries.
Since 1988, when I wrote my first book, AIDS INC., I warned about medical covert ops. At that time, I also began speaking about the overall program of the global medical cartel, the overall goal:
To place every person on the planet into a cradle-to-grave system of diagnosing and drugging. To make every person, first and foremost, a medical patient. To thereby condition every person to obey orders.
Obey.
The doctor knows. Don’t question him. Just do what he tells you to do. Comply. From now until they lower your body into the ground. Take the drugs, and become more debilitated and, therefore, more obedient at a much deeper level.
This is the foremost system of eliciting obedience in the world.
We’ve recently seen the Australian Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, issue a dictum about vaccination. Former exemptions have been canceled. Families receiving government aid will be cut off from that money if they refuse to vaccinate their children. No more freedom.
Obey or else.
When you can get citizens to obey in one area, there is a spillover to other areas. They become accustomed to a life of surrender. They give in. They go along. They yield on one front, so they yield on another.
It’s no accident that, historically, the one family most responsible for the emergence of modern medicine AND the Globalist agenda is: Rockefeller.
Whatever else it is (and I have covered the details in many articles), the system of modern medicine is a mind-control operation designed to create slavish attachment on the part of the patient.
Attachment to the authority of the doctor and whatever he commands. Attachment to the toxic drugs he prescribes. Attachment to the disease-labels he pronounces.
In these and other respects, modern medicine is a secular Church, and the doctors are the priests in white coats. They are everywhere in contemporary societies. They rule. They subject the parishioners (patients) to arbitrary fiats.
The result of this long-term conditioning: the patients develop a deep habit of loyalty to authority. This habit spreads like ink on a blotter. It begins to apply to all areas of life.
Eventually, the government can say: “Look, we’re going to sign a treaty, and you won’t know what’s in it. You’ll be completely in the dark. But it’s a good thing. It’s for the benefit of all. Don’t ask us to disclose the details. Would you ask your doctor to explain, in detail, the pictures he took of your brain? Of course not. It’s beyond you. You’re not equipped to understand. Well, in this treaty, which runs thousands of pages, you’re not equipped to understand the complex economic details, either. But you can rest secure in your (hypnotic) faith that we’re on your side. We want what’s best for you…”
There are various terms for this: brain-entrainment, operant conditioning, brainwashing, programming, mind control.
They all refer to the establishing of habitual behavior, unthinking behavior.
The brilliant hypnotherapist, Jack True, with whom I did research for several years (and who gave up the practice of hypnosis), once wrote to me: “Nine out of ten of my patients walk through the door already convinced that I’m doing some form of medicine. That’s what they want. They want me to tell them what to do, while they’re awake and while they’re in a trance. They’re looking for another doctor. Our whole civilization is under a white-coat trance. It took me several years to get over my astonishment at this fact. This is mass-hypnosis on a grand scale.”
If you’re on the side of freedom, you need to look at a whole society and figure out where the deepest form of conditioning is coming from. You need to find out where the most successful form of hypnosis is coming from. Because that’s where overall mind-control is strongest. In modern society, it’s doctors. This is why governments ally themselves with doctors. It’s a perfect partnership. Someday, we could see a President in a white coat with a stethoscope around his neck and a syringe in his hand. He’ll be able to tell people the sky is the ground and stars are traffic lights, and he’ll be believed. The doctor is the trigger- man for the New World.
On a practical level, we could see secret treaties like the TPP give more global protection to the medical cartel: international exemption from lawsuits against pharmaceutical corporations; exemption from liability stemming from toxic drugs and vaccines; agreements to extend periods of court-ordered lockdowns in psych wards.
The medical cartel and the Globalists walk hand-in-hand into the future.
Maintaining the freedom to refuse medical care is imperative.
The Holy Church of Medicine and its allies and dupes are out in full force these days. They want compliant slaves.
They must not win.
Jon Rappoport is the author of two explosive collections, The Matrix Revealed and Exit From the Matrix, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.
Sunday, May 10, 2015
Australia: mandatory vaccines and the secret treaty
[TABLE="class: tr-caption-container"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
[/TD][/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: tr-caption, align: center"]Source[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
By Jon Rappoport
“There is never a decay of organized religion. When one church falls, another is built. During the 20th century, the new church was Science—in particular, Medical Science. It was constructed to extract the maximum amount of compliance from the population. This is what all orthodox churches do. So in addition to the countless numbers of diagnoses and drugs, there was the element of mind control: ‘Follow our orders. We know the truth and we are giving it you for your own good; we love you and care about you, unless you rebel; then we consign you to Hell.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
Globalism is the New World Order. There is no mystery about it.
The alliance between mega-corporations, banks, and governments is ever-growing, as they extend their power over populations.
In this article, I use the example of Australia to illustrate a hidden point that applies to nations all over the world:
The medical cartel is “a compliance arm” of the New World Order.
The principle is simple: expand the degree of citizen-obedience in one area, and you expand it in all areas.
You create the core habit of obedience. That habit extends down into the subconscious mind.
Globalism and the New World Order need that obedience, because its methods are often so outrageous only robots would fall into line.
This is a secret treaty. In Australia, it will be signed by the cabinet before any supporting legislation is considered.
Here is a brief quote from tppaustralia.org:
It [the TPP] has over 20 chapters which include everything from labour and the environment, to intellectual property and telecommunications. The negotiations have been kept secret even from our own Parliamentarians and Senators, but from leaked drafts of the TPP text, we know that there is legitimate reason for concern.
Did you catch that last part? Australia’s own elected legislators haven’t read the treaty. They’re not permitted to. In the US, legislators have only had access to limited sections. A secret treaty deeply affecting the lives of all people in those 12 countries, and only a chosen few know exactly what’s in it.
From the Globalist point of view, this means one thing: populations must be rendered into a state of unquestioning obedience. They must go along with the program on what amounts to a hypnotic basis.
Otherwise (if awake) they would rebel en masse. This is what any population would do if they were alert.
“You’re going to ratify a secret treaty that will put us further under the gun of mega-corporations? Not on your life.”
But there are no massive protests in Australia, or in any of the other 12 TPP countries.
Since 1988, when I wrote my first book, AIDS INC., I warned about medical covert ops. At that time, I also began speaking about the overall program of the global medical cartel, the overall goal:
To place every person on the planet into a cradle-to-grave system of diagnosing and drugging. To make every person, first and foremost, a medical patient. To thereby condition every person to obey orders.
Obey.
The doctor knows. Don’t question him. Just do what he tells you to do. Comply. From now until they lower your body into the ground. Take the drugs, and become more debilitated and, therefore, more obedient at a much deeper level.
This is the foremost system of eliciting obedience in the world.
We’ve recently seen the Australian Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, issue a dictum about vaccination. Former exemptions have been canceled. Families receiving government aid will be cut off from that money if they refuse to vaccinate their children. No more freedom.
Obey or else.
When you can get citizens to obey in one area, there is a spillover to other areas. They become accustomed to a life of surrender. They give in. They go along. They yield on one front, so they yield on another.
It’s no accident that, historically, the one family most responsible for the emergence of modern medicine AND the Globalist agenda is: Rockefeller.
Whatever else it is (and I have covered the details in many articles), the system of modern medicine is a mind-control operation designed to create slavish attachment on the part of the patient.
Attachment to the authority of the doctor and whatever he commands. Attachment to the toxic drugs he prescribes. Attachment to the disease-labels he pronounces.
In these and other respects, modern medicine is a secular Church, and the doctors are the priests in white coats. They are everywhere in contemporary societies. They rule. They subject the parishioners (patients) to arbitrary fiats.
The result of this long-term conditioning: the patients develop a deep habit of loyalty to authority. This habit spreads like ink on a blotter. It begins to apply to all areas of life.
Eventually, the government can say: “Look, we’re going to sign a treaty, and you won’t know what’s in it. You’ll be completely in the dark. But it’s a good thing. It’s for the benefit of all. Don’t ask us to disclose the details. Would you ask your doctor to explain, in detail, the pictures he took of your brain? Of course not. It’s beyond you. You’re not equipped to understand. Well, in this treaty, which runs thousands of pages, you’re not equipped to understand the complex economic details, either. But you can rest secure in your (hypnotic) faith that we’re on your side. We want what’s best for you…”
There are various terms for this: brain-entrainment, operant conditioning, brainwashing, programming, mind control.
They all refer to the establishing of habitual behavior, unthinking behavior.
The brilliant hypnotherapist, Jack True, with whom I did research for several years (and who gave up the practice of hypnosis), once wrote to me: “Nine out of ten of my patients walk through the door already convinced that I’m doing some form of medicine. That’s what they want. They want me to tell them what to do, while they’re awake and while they’re in a trance. They’re looking for another doctor. Our whole civilization is under a white-coat trance. It took me several years to get over my astonishment at this fact. This is mass-hypnosis on a grand scale.”
If you’re on the side of freedom, you need to look at a whole society and figure out where the deepest form of conditioning is coming from. You need to find out where the most successful form of hypnosis is coming from. Because that’s where overall mind-control is strongest. In modern society, it’s doctors. This is why governments ally themselves with doctors. It’s a perfect partnership. Someday, we could see a President in a white coat with a stethoscope around his neck and a syringe in his hand. He’ll be able to tell people the sky is the ground and stars are traffic lights, and he’ll be believed. The doctor is the trigger- man for the New World.
On a practical level, we could see secret treaties like the TPP give more global protection to the medical cartel: international exemption from lawsuits against pharmaceutical corporations; exemption from liability stemming from toxic drugs and vaccines; agreements to extend periods of court-ordered lockdowns in psych wards.
The medical cartel and the Globalists walk hand-in-hand into the future.
Maintaining the freedom to refuse medical care is imperative.
The Holy Church of Medicine and its allies and dupes are out in full force these days. They want compliant slaves.
They must not win.
Jon Rappoport is the author of two explosive collections, The Matrix Revealed and Exit From the Matrix, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.
muir
Banned
- MBTI
- INFJ
http://www.naturalnews.com/049669_vaccine_injury_depopulation_agenda_deadly_side_effects.html#
[h=1]Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized[/h]
Monday, May 11, 2015
by Mike Adams, the Health Range
Despite the insidious attempts of the corporate-controlled U.S. media to censor the stories about the deadly side effects of vaccines, the truth keeps surfacing. The latest vaccine tragedy to strike has killed two babies in La Pimienta, Mexico and sent 37 more to the hospital with serious reactions to toxic vaccine additives. (Tweet this story)
"...14 children are in serious condition, 22 are stable and one is in critical condition," the Chiapas Health Secretariat said in a statement via Latino.FoxNews.com.
What's especially alarming is that only 52 children were vaccinated in all, meaning that 75% of those receiving the vaccines are now either dead or hospitalized.
The vaccines were administered by the Mexican Social Security Institute, known as IMSS. The IMSS confirmed the deadly reactions occurred after children received injections of vaccines for tuberculosis, rotavirus and hepatitis B -- the same viral strains targeted by vaccines routinely administered to children in the United States.
[h=1]IMSS suspends vaccination pending further investigation[/h]According to Fox News Latino, the IMSS has suspended the vaccines pending the outcome of an investigation into why so many children have been killed and hospitalized.
According to the entire mainstream media in the United States -- which is 100% controlled by corporate interests -- vaccines never harm anyone and are perfectly safe to inject into children in unlimited quantities. This dangerous, inhumane "Vaccine Injury Denialism" is rampant across the corporate-controlled media, which contributes to the deaths of innocent babies and children by refusing to acknowledge the truth that vaccines kill and injure children on a regular basis.
Just recently, in fact, the UK government agreed to pay $90 million to victims of the swine flu vaccine. That vaccine caused permanent brain damage to over 800 children across Europe. The truth is that vaccines regularly harm and even kill innocent children, most likely because of the toxic chemical adjuvants and preservatives they still contain.
As the CDC openly admits, vaccines are still intentionally formulated with mercury, aluminum, MSG and formaldehyde. Some vaccines even use ingredients derived from aborted human fetal tissue. Last year, a CDC scientist blew the whistle on the CDC committing scientific fraud to cover up links between vaccines and autism in young African-American males.
[h=1]Test run for depopulation via vaccines?[/h]As globalists now fully realize, vaccines are by far the best way to cull the human population because most people can be tricked into lining up and asking for them. Thus, there's no need to resort to all the difficulties used by the Nazis to commit genocide in World War II, involving complex logistics of railroad cars, gas chambers, construction of mass graves, prisoner tracking via IBM computing technology, and so on. (Yes, Nazi genocide and prisoner tracking was powered by early IBM computers. See IBM and the Holocaust, the strategic alliance between Nazi Germany and America's most powerful corporation...)
As the vaccine industry has now come to realize, it's so much easier to kill people when they voluntarily comply with the injections. Hence the aggressive media propaganda push to achieve absolute blind obedience to vaccines so that no one will ask questions when sterilization or euthanasia chemicals are used. That's no doubt why vaccines have been routinely tested for depopulation programs via two primary methods:
# 1) Achieve covert sterilizations of targeted populations by combining sterilization chemicals with vaccines. (The "slow kill.")
# 2) Directly kill vaccine recipients by intentionally lacing vaccines with euthanasia chemicals that cause death. (The "fast kill.")
Method #1 has been repeatedly used throughout Africa, Mexico and South America to inflict sterilization upon targeted groups via immunization and vaccination programs. Just last year, in fact, I reported on the discovery of a covert depopulation vaccine program being run in Kenya:
Tetanus vaccines given to millions of young women in Kenya have been confirmed by laboratories to contain a sterilization chemical that causes miscarriages, reports the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, a pro-vaccine organization.
A whopping 2.3 million young girls and women are in the process of being given the vaccine, pushed by UNICEF and the World Health Organization.
"We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen," Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. "They were all laced with HCG."
Method #2 now appears to be under way in Mexico as 75% of those children injected with vaccines are now either dead or hospitalized.
[h=1]Vaccine-induced depopulation was attempted in Mexico in 1974[/h]As Truth Stream Media exhaustively documented, a depopulation exercise was run in Mexico in 1974, using vaccines as the cover story.
The scheme was dreamed up after the release of the National Security Study Memorandum 200 which highlighted the global population problem and urged governments to find ways to reduce the global population.
As TruthStreamMedia.com explains:
Concentration on this "problem" of how to reduce the population was planned for 13 key countries, including India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia. Of those, the document singled out Mexico as having one of the highest (and therefore, most worrisome) growth rates of all. The document read, "Perhaps the most significant population trend from the viewpoint of the United States is the prospect that Mexico’s population will increase from 50 million in 1970 to over 130 million by the year 2000."
To combat this problem, "medical spooks" -- who were almost certainly U.S.-funded depopulation vaccine crews -- began injecting women all across Mexico with anti-fertility drugs disguised as vaccines. If you doubt this, read your history. The U.S. government's National Institutes of Health was caught red-handed running human medical experiments on prisoners in Guatemala. President Obama was even forced to publicly apologize in 2011 after the cover-up collapsed! There is nothing the Nazis did in the 1930s and 40s that the pharmaceutical industry wouldn't be willing to repeat today under the label of "science."
But getting back to Mexico, as the covert depopulation vaccination program spread across Mexico City in 1974, locals began to catch on to the deception, and public resistance grew. As these newspaper clippings reveal, parents began hiding their children in their own homes to avoid them being injected with sterilization chemicals at the public schools. (California, by the way, also targets children at schools in order to avoid parents having the opportunity to say "No!")
Mexico City - Associated Press - Rumors that persons disguised as inoculation teams were giving school children shots that sterilized them forced health authorities to suspend all vaccination drives today and to post police outside Mexico City schools. Thousands of parents stormed various schools in the Mexico City area Tuesday and took their children home.
It's also important to note that these sterilization vaccines were being administered essentially at gunpoint, as police were accompanying the vaccine crews:
Callers told newspapers and TV stations that the sterilization crews were protected by police escorts and that they included white-robed men and women "who looked like foreigners."
This same scenario is now about to be replicated in California, by the way, where SB 277 would criminalize parents of children who are not vaccinated, essentially at gunpoint.
What's even more interesting is that the exact same arguments we hear today about vaccine skeptics -- they're punitively labeled "anti-vaxxers" or "anti-science" -- were also being used in Mexico in 1974. As the following newspaper clipping shows:
The Mexican Medical Association issued statements denying that any kind of inoculation could cause sterility... Officials said superstition and ignorance of preventive health [i.e. "anti-science"] were responsible for the widespread belief that the rumors were true.
In other words, even though sterilization teams were running around Mexico, injecting people with chemicals as part of a depopulation agenda, any person who pointed this out was immediately labeled "anti-science" and derided as "ignorant."
Very little has changed in four decades, it seems: the same tactic is still used today, even while children are being killed or injured every single day due to the toxic ingredients used in vaccines.
[h=1]CDC's intelligence operatives caught running disinfo campaigns[/h]The "science bullying" behind vaccines also allows governments of the world to run sterilization and depopulation programs disguised as public health. Once the population is bullied into accepting vaccines without question -- blind obedience is now demanded almost everywhere -- governments can add any chemicals they want to those vaccines, including chemicals that cause permanent sterilization or even death.
The fact that all vaccine injuries are systematically denied to exist also means that any person harmed or killed by vaccines is immediately wiped from the national memory. Like a criminal mafia, the vaccine industry works hard to hide the bodies and thereby maintain its monopolistic racket on the utterly false premise that vaccines are 100% safe. To further drive home this extraordinary medical propaganda, the CDC uses intelligence operatives like Nurse Hickox who spread disinfo through the mainstream media, which is always happy to comply with the destructive agendas of the vaccine industry.
As Natural News uncovered during the Ebola scare of 2014:
Nurse Kaci Hickox, who has made headlines over the last few days by refusing to quarantine herself after returning from the Ebola front lines in Africa, turns out to have been trained as an "intelligence officer" under a two-year CDC program modeled after the U.S. military.
As you can see from the document below, Hickox graduated from a two-year CDC intelligence officer training program in 2012. This is the same nurse whose LinkedIn page was recently scrubbed to hide her ties to the CDC...
The official intelligence designation granted to Nurse Hickox by the CDC was "Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer," and she is a graduate of the 2012 EIS program according to this CDC document (PDF). (See page 138 - 139 for her name and photo, or view photo below.)
That same year, the CDC graduated 81 such "intelligence officers" whose names and photos are also listed in the public document.
[h=1]Bottom line? Don't trust the vaccine industry[/h]What's the takeaway realization from all this? Vaccines have been and will continue to be used as a cover for forced depopulation programs involving sterilization or euthanasia chemicals.
Obedience to vaccines allows depopulation teams accompanied by armed police to intimidate people into accepting any liquid they want to put in a syringe. That liquid might be a vaccine, or it might be a sterilization chemical or even a euthanasia chemical.
Any population that is indoctrinated into trusting the vaccine industry -- an industry steeped in repeated criminal activity combined with a total disregard for human life -- is ripe for being targeted for depopulation. (See Nigeria Issues Arrest Warrants for Top Pfizer Officials After Drug Experiments Conducted on Children.)
After all, why go through the trouble of building gas chambers and rounding people up for mass extermination when you can achieve the same result without any resistance at all if you simply label the chemicals "vaccines"?
(Click here for hi-res version of the graphic below.)
[h=1]Sources for this article include:
http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/lifestyle/2...
http://www.naturalnews.com/049423_swine_flu_...
http://www.naturalnews.com/037653_vaccine_ad...
http://www.naturalnews.com/038873_childhood_...
http://www.naturalnews.com/047571_vaccines_s...
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/a-mass-ster...
http://truthstreammedia.com/who-attempted-th...
http://schillerinstitute.org/strategic/NSSM2...
http://www.naturalnews.com/033483_guatemalan...
http://www.sb277.org
http://www.naturalnews.com/047444_ebola_quar...
http://www.naturalnews.com/047406_Ebola_quar...
http://www.naturalnews.com/files/PDF-2013-EI...
http://www.naturalnews.com/023654_pfizer_dru...
http://www.naturalnews.com/046630_CDC_whistl...[/h]
[h=1]Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized[/h]
by Mike Adams, the Health Range
Despite the insidious attempts of the corporate-controlled U.S. media to censor the stories about the deadly side effects of vaccines, the truth keeps surfacing. The latest vaccine tragedy to strike has killed two babies in La Pimienta, Mexico and sent 37 more to the hospital with serious reactions to toxic vaccine additives. (Tweet this story)
"...14 children are in serious condition, 22 are stable and one is in critical condition," the Chiapas Health Secretariat said in a statement via Latino.FoxNews.com.
What's especially alarming is that only 52 children were vaccinated in all, meaning that 75% of those receiving the vaccines are now either dead or hospitalized.
The vaccines were administered by the Mexican Social Security Institute, known as IMSS. The IMSS confirmed the deadly reactions occurred after children received injections of vaccines for tuberculosis, rotavirus and hepatitis B -- the same viral strains targeted by vaccines routinely administered to children in the United States.
[h=1]IMSS suspends vaccination pending further investigation[/h]According to Fox News Latino, the IMSS has suspended the vaccines pending the outcome of an investigation into why so many children have been killed and hospitalized.
According to the entire mainstream media in the United States -- which is 100% controlled by corporate interests -- vaccines never harm anyone and are perfectly safe to inject into children in unlimited quantities. This dangerous, inhumane "Vaccine Injury Denialism" is rampant across the corporate-controlled media, which contributes to the deaths of innocent babies and children by refusing to acknowledge the truth that vaccines kill and injure children on a regular basis.
Just recently, in fact, the UK government agreed to pay $90 million to victims of the swine flu vaccine. That vaccine caused permanent brain damage to over 800 children across Europe. The truth is that vaccines regularly harm and even kill innocent children, most likely because of the toxic chemical adjuvants and preservatives they still contain.
As the CDC openly admits, vaccines are still intentionally formulated with mercury, aluminum, MSG and formaldehyde. Some vaccines even use ingredients derived from aborted human fetal tissue. Last year, a CDC scientist blew the whistle on the CDC committing scientific fraud to cover up links between vaccines and autism in young African-American males.
[h=1]Test run for depopulation via vaccines?[/h]As globalists now fully realize, vaccines are by far the best way to cull the human population because most people can be tricked into lining up and asking for them. Thus, there's no need to resort to all the difficulties used by the Nazis to commit genocide in World War II, involving complex logistics of railroad cars, gas chambers, construction of mass graves, prisoner tracking via IBM computing technology, and so on. (Yes, Nazi genocide and prisoner tracking was powered by early IBM computers. See IBM and the Holocaust, the strategic alliance between Nazi Germany and America's most powerful corporation...)
As the vaccine industry has now come to realize, it's so much easier to kill people when they voluntarily comply with the injections. Hence the aggressive media propaganda push to achieve absolute blind obedience to vaccines so that no one will ask questions when sterilization or euthanasia chemicals are used. That's no doubt why vaccines have been routinely tested for depopulation programs via two primary methods:
# 1) Achieve covert sterilizations of targeted populations by combining sterilization chemicals with vaccines. (The "slow kill.")
# 2) Directly kill vaccine recipients by intentionally lacing vaccines with euthanasia chemicals that cause death. (The "fast kill.")
Method #1 has been repeatedly used throughout Africa, Mexico and South America to inflict sterilization upon targeted groups via immunization and vaccination programs. Just last year, in fact, I reported on the discovery of a covert depopulation vaccine program being run in Kenya:
Tetanus vaccines given to millions of young women in Kenya have been confirmed by laboratories to contain a sterilization chemical that causes miscarriages, reports the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, a pro-vaccine organization.
A whopping 2.3 million young girls and women are in the process of being given the vaccine, pushed by UNICEF and the World Health Organization.
"We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen," Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. "They were all laced with HCG."
Method #2 now appears to be under way in Mexico as 75% of those children injected with vaccines are now either dead or hospitalized.
[h=1]Vaccine-induced depopulation was attempted in Mexico in 1974[/h]As Truth Stream Media exhaustively documented, a depopulation exercise was run in Mexico in 1974, using vaccines as the cover story.
The scheme was dreamed up after the release of the National Security Study Memorandum 200 which highlighted the global population problem and urged governments to find ways to reduce the global population.
As TruthStreamMedia.com explains:
Concentration on this "problem" of how to reduce the population was planned for 13 key countries, including India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia. Of those, the document singled out Mexico as having one of the highest (and therefore, most worrisome) growth rates of all. The document read, "Perhaps the most significant population trend from the viewpoint of the United States is the prospect that Mexico’s population will increase from 50 million in 1970 to over 130 million by the year 2000."
To combat this problem, "medical spooks" -- who were almost certainly U.S.-funded depopulation vaccine crews -- began injecting women all across Mexico with anti-fertility drugs disguised as vaccines. If you doubt this, read your history. The U.S. government's National Institutes of Health was caught red-handed running human medical experiments on prisoners in Guatemala. President Obama was even forced to publicly apologize in 2011 after the cover-up collapsed! There is nothing the Nazis did in the 1930s and 40s that the pharmaceutical industry wouldn't be willing to repeat today under the label of "science."
But getting back to Mexico, as the covert depopulation vaccination program spread across Mexico City in 1974, locals began to catch on to the deception, and public resistance grew. As these newspaper clippings reveal, parents began hiding their children in their own homes to avoid them being injected with sterilization chemicals at the public schools. (California, by the way, also targets children at schools in order to avoid parents having the opportunity to say "No!")
Mexico City - Associated Press - Rumors that persons disguised as inoculation teams were giving school children shots that sterilized them forced health authorities to suspend all vaccination drives today and to post police outside Mexico City schools. Thousands of parents stormed various schools in the Mexico City area Tuesday and took their children home.
It's also important to note that these sterilization vaccines were being administered essentially at gunpoint, as police were accompanying the vaccine crews:
Callers told newspapers and TV stations that the sterilization crews were protected by police escorts and that they included white-robed men and women "who looked like foreigners."
This same scenario is now about to be replicated in California, by the way, where SB 277 would criminalize parents of children who are not vaccinated, essentially at gunpoint.
What's even more interesting is that the exact same arguments we hear today about vaccine skeptics -- they're punitively labeled "anti-vaxxers" or "anti-science" -- were also being used in Mexico in 1974. As the following newspaper clipping shows:
The Mexican Medical Association issued statements denying that any kind of inoculation could cause sterility... Officials said superstition and ignorance of preventive health [i.e. "anti-science"] were responsible for the widespread belief that the rumors were true.
In other words, even though sterilization teams were running around Mexico, injecting people with chemicals as part of a depopulation agenda, any person who pointed this out was immediately labeled "anti-science" and derided as "ignorant."
Very little has changed in four decades, it seems: the same tactic is still used today, even while children are being killed or injured every single day due to the toxic ingredients used in vaccines.
[h=1]CDC's intelligence operatives caught running disinfo campaigns[/h]The "science bullying" behind vaccines also allows governments of the world to run sterilization and depopulation programs disguised as public health. Once the population is bullied into accepting vaccines without question -- blind obedience is now demanded almost everywhere -- governments can add any chemicals they want to those vaccines, including chemicals that cause permanent sterilization or even death.
The fact that all vaccine injuries are systematically denied to exist also means that any person harmed or killed by vaccines is immediately wiped from the national memory. Like a criminal mafia, the vaccine industry works hard to hide the bodies and thereby maintain its monopolistic racket on the utterly false premise that vaccines are 100% safe. To further drive home this extraordinary medical propaganda, the CDC uses intelligence operatives like Nurse Hickox who spread disinfo through the mainstream media, which is always happy to comply with the destructive agendas of the vaccine industry.
As Natural News uncovered during the Ebola scare of 2014:
Nurse Kaci Hickox, who has made headlines over the last few days by refusing to quarantine herself after returning from the Ebola front lines in Africa, turns out to have been trained as an "intelligence officer" under a two-year CDC program modeled after the U.S. military.
As you can see from the document below, Hickox graduated from a two-year CDC intelligence officer training program in 2012. This is the same nurse whose LinkedIn page was recently scrubbed to hide her ties to the CDC...
The official intelligence designation granted to Nurse Hickox by the CDC was "Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer," and she is a graduate of the 2012 EIS program according to this CDC document (PDF). (See page 138 - 139 for her name and photo, or view photo below.)
That same year, the CDC graduated 81 such "intelligence officers" whose names and photos are also listed in the public document.
[h=1]Bottom line? Don't trust the vaccine industry[/h]What's the takeaway realization from all this? Vaccines have been and will continue to be used as a cover for forced depopulation programs involving sterilization or euthanasia chemicals.
Obedience to vaccines allows depopulation teams accompanied by armed police to intimidate people into accepting any liquid they want to put in a syringe. That liquid might be a vaccine, or it might be a sterilization chemical or even a euthanasia chemical.
Any population that is indoctrinated into trusting the vaccine industry -- an industry steeped in repeated criminal activity combined with a total disregard for human life -- is ripe for being targeted for depopulation. (See Nigeria Issues Arrest Warrants for Top Pfizer Officials After Drug Experiments Conducted on Children.)
After all, why go through the trouble of building gas chambers and rounding people up for mass extermination when you can achieve the same result without any resistance at all if you simply label the chemicals "vaccines"?
(Click here for hi-res version of the graphic below.)
[h=1]Sources for this article include:
http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/lifestyle/2...
http://www.naturalnews.com/049423_swine_flu_...
http://www.naturalnews.com/037653_vaccine_ad...
http://www.naturalnews.com/038873_childhood_...
http://www.naturalnews.com/047571_vaccines_s...
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/a-mass-ster...
http://truthstreammedia.com/who-attempted-th...
http://schillerinstitute.org/strategic/NSSM2...
http://www.naturalnews.com/033483_guatemalan...
http://www.sb277.org
http://www.naturalnews.com/047444_ebola_quar...
http://www.naturalnews.com/047406_Ebola_quar...
http://www.naturalnews.com/files/PDF-2013-EI...
http://www.naturalnews.com/023654_pfizer_dru...
http://www.naturalnews.com/046630_CDC_whistl...[/h]
- MBTI
- .
- Enneagram
- .
recap, um what does debate mean again?
just making sure we get all thisSunday, May 10, 2015
Australia: mandatory vaccines and the secret treaty
[TABLE="class: cms_table_tr-caption-container"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_tr-caption, align: center"]Source[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
By Jon Rappoport
“There is never a decay of organized religion. When one church falls, another is built. During the 20th century, the new church was Science—in particular, Medical Science. It was constructed to extract the maximum amount of compliance from the population. This is what all orthodox churches do. So in addition to the countless numbers of diagnoses and drugs, there was the element of mind control: ‘Follow our orders. We know the truth and we are giving it you for your own good; we love you and care about you, unless you rebel; then we consign you to Hell.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
Globalism is the New World Order. There is no mystery about it.
The alliance between mega-corporations, banks, and governments is ever-growing, as they extend their power over populations.
In this article, I use the example of Australia to illustrate a hidden point that applies to nations all over the world:
The medical cartel is “a compliance arm” of the New World Order.
The principle is simple: expand the degree of citizen-obedience in one area, and you expand it in all areas.
You create the core habit of obedience. That habit extends down into the subconscious mind.
Globalism and the New World Order need that obedience, because its methods are often so outrageous only robots would fall into line.
For an example of outrageous lunacy, take the upcoming Globalist treaty, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). When ratified by 12 nations (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States and Vietnam), it will establish the right of corporations to bypass national courts and demand that their products be sold, without tariffs, without concern for workers who are paid slave wages, without concern for poisoning the environment with toxic chemicals.
This is a secret treaty. In Australia, it will be signed by the cabinet before any supporting legislation is considered.
Here is a brief quote from tppaustralia.org:It [the TPP] has over 20 chapters which include everything from labour and the environment, to intellectual property and telecommunications. The negotiations have been kept secret even from our own Parliamentarians and Senators, but from leaked drafts of the TPP text, we know that there is legitimate reason for concern.
Did you catch that last part? Australia’s own elected legislators haven’t read the treaty. They’re not permitted to. In the US, legislators have only had access to limited sections.
A secret treaty deeply affecting the lives of all people in those 12 countries, and only a chosen few know exactly what’s in it.
From the Globalist point of view, this means one thing: populations must be rendered into a state of unquestioning obedience. They must go along with the program on what amounts to a hypnotic basis.
Otherwise (if awake) they would rebel en masse. This is what any population would do if they were alert.
“You’re going to ratify a secret treaty that will put us further under the gun of mega-corporations? Not on your life.”
But there are no massive protests in Australia, or in any of the other 12 TPP countries.
Since 1988, when I wrote my first book, AIDS INC., I warned about medical covert ops. At that time, I also began speaking about the overall program of the global medical cartel, the overall goal:
To place every person on the planet into a cradle-to-grave system of diagnosing and drugging. To make every person, first and foremost, a medical patient. To thereby condition every person to obey orders.
Obey.
The doctor knows. Don’t question him. Just do what he tells you to do. Comply. From now until they lower your body into the ground. Take the drugs, and become more debilitated and, therefore, more obedient at a much deeper level.
This is the foremost system of eliciting obedience in the world.
We’ve recently seen the Australian Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, issue a dictum about vaccination. Former exemptions have been canceled. Families receiving government aid will be cut off from that money if they refuse to vaccinate their children. No more freedom.
Obey or else.
When you can get citizens to obey in one area, there is a spillover to other areas. They become accustomed to a life of surrender. They give in. They go along. They yield on one front, so they yield on another.
It’s no accident that, historically, the one family most responsible for the emergence of modern medicine AND the Globalist agenda is: Rockefeller.
Whatever else it is (and I have covered the details in many articles), the system of modern medicine is a mind-control operation designed to create slavish attachment on the part of the patient.
Attachment to the authority of the doctor and whatever he commands. Attachment to the toxic drugs he prescribes. Attachment to the disease-labels he pronounces.
In these and other respects, modern medicine is a secular Church, and the doctors are the priests in white coats. They are everywhere in contemporary societies. They rule. They subject the parishioners (patients) to arbitrary fiats.
The result of this long-term conditioning: the patients develop a deep habit of loyalty to authority. This habit spreads like ink on a blotter. It begins to apply to all areas of life.
Eventually, the government can say: “Look, we’re going to sign a treaty, and you won’t know what’s in it. You’ll be completely in the dark. But it’s a good thing. It’s for the benefit of all. Don’t ask us to disclose the details. Would you ask your doctor to explain, in detail, the pictures he took of your brain? Of course not. It’s beyond you. You’re not equipped to understand. Well, in this treaty, which runs thousands of pages, you’re not equipped to understand the complex economic details, either. But you can rest secure in your (hypnotic) faith that we’re on your side. We want what’s best for you…”
There are various terms for this: brain-entrainment, operant conditioning, brainwashing, programming, mind control.
They all refer to the establishing of habitual behavior, unthinking behavior.
The brilliant hypnotherapist, Jack True, with whom I did research for several years (and who gave up the practice of hypnosis), once wrote to me: “Nine out of ten of my patients walk through the door already convinced that I’m doing some form of medicine. That’s what they want. They want me to tell them what to do, while they’re awake and while they’re in a trance. They’re looking for another doctor. Our whole civilization is under a white-coat trance. It took me several years to get over my astonishment at this fact. This is mass-hypnosis on a grand scale.”
If you’re on the side of freedom, you need to look at a whole society and figure out where the deepest form of conditioning is coming from. You need to find out where the most successful form of hypnosis is coming from. Because that’s where overall mind-control is strongest. In modern society, it’s doctors. This is why governments ally themselves with doctors. It’s a perfect partnership. Someday, we could see a President in a white coat with a stethoscope around his neck and a syringe in his hand. He’ll be able to tell people the sky is the ground and stars are traffic lights, and he’ll be believed. The doctor is the trigger- man for the New World.
On a practical level, we could see secret treaties like the TPP give more global protection to the medical cartel: international exemption from lawsuits against pharmaceutical corporations; exemption from liability stemming from toxic drugs and vaccines; agreements to extend periods of court-ordered lockdowns in psych wards.
The medical cartel and the Globalists walk hand-in-hand into the future.
Maintaining the freedom to refuse medical care is imperative.
The Holy Church of Medicine and its allies and dupes are out in full force these days. They want compliant slaves.
They must not win.
Jon Rappoport is the author of two explosive collections, The Matrix Revealed and Exit From the Matrix, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.​New MMR study promoting vaccines was funded by Big Pharma
Saturday, May 09, 2015 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer
The medical-industrial complex is trotting out yet another "study" that it claims proves that vaccines, particularly the MMR vaccine, are not linked to causing autism. However, a closer look at this so-called study reveals that like virtually all of the other medical research purporting that vaccines are safe and effective, it was directly funded by pharmaceutical interests trying to sell more vaccines.
It is an undeniable fact that not a single independent study has ever concluded that vaccines are completely safe and effective. The only ones to make such a claim are a direct product of industry sleight of hand - pseudoscience propaganda, if you will, meant to create the illusion that vaccine safety is fully vested when the exact opposite is actually the case.
The latest study to push this agenda comes from the Lewin Group, a healthcare consulting firm based out of Falls Church, Virginia. The mainstream media is already citing the paper as concrete evidence that vaccines don't cause autism, but what they are failing to tell their readers is that the group behind the study represents a wide range of players in the drugging and jabbing sectors of the medical economy.
Organization behind "vaccines don't cause autism" propaganda directly aligned with vaccine industry
As it turns out, the Lewin Group works directly with drug corporations like Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Novo Nordisk, two of which actually manufacture vaccines. The Lewin Group is also in partnership with pharmaceutical associations and organizations like the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), whose "Fact Book" claims that "[g]overnments have reasons to promote vaccination."
This same group advocates for the continued development of new vaccines to address infectious diseases that it claims "remain uncontrolled." This is a clear conflict of interest because it is highly unlikely that PhRMA or any other association that works with the Lewin Group would ever play a part in producing a study that questions the safety or effectiveness of the products it markets and sells.
It is also worth noting that some of the other organizations in partnership with the Lewin Group include the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Heritage Foundation, not to mention a number of other hospitals and healthcare systems that actively promote vaccines as being among the greatest public health achievements of the Twentieth Century.
UnitedHealth, which owns the Lewin Group, actively promotes vaccines through its health insurance and vaccination campaigns
The Lewin Group is also aligned with various medical insurance programs like Blue Cross Blue Shield and the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, two corporate entities that just so happen to provide health coverage for vaccines. Both of these insurance groups also consider vaccinations to be "preventive care" and both actively push deadly vaccines like the flu shot and HPV on young children.
Perhaps the biggest red flag with the Lewin Group, though, is its owner: UnitedHealth Group, another major promoter of vaccines. UnitedHealth, as you may recall, is the same entity that lobbied heavily to eliminate a "public option" from Obamacare, which ended up forcibly adding many previously-uninsured customers onto the company's rolls.
"UnitedHealth lobbyists used work provided by the Lewin Group as a basis for its argument that providing a public option would kill the private insurance industry," wrote Brandon Turbeville and Healther Callaghan in a recent piece for Activist Post. "Those few democrats in the U.S. Congress that disagreed were apt to point out the conflict of interest between the Lewin Group's findings and UnitedHealth's desires, referring to the Lewin Group's work as 'so-called analysis' and 'suspect.'"
The Lewin Group isn't an independent healthcare consultant; it's a front group for vaccine corporations
If you are not yet convinced, check out the following statement issued by UnitedHealthcare about its "Medicare and Retirement Vaccination Campaign," which admittedly pushes vaccines on adults aged 65 years and older:
"The vaccination campaign uses demographic and regional information with targeted messaging for diverse populations across age, race and ethnicity to increase vaccine rates. This program was designed to increase the influenza and pneumonia vaccination rates in older adults by increasing their awareness of the diseases and promoting convenient access points (e.g. pharmacies)."
This is the same entity that recently published a study claiming that MMR vaccines don't causeautism. Do you see why this is a problem? The Lewin Group is anything but an independent healthcare consultant. It is a disingenuous front group promoting vaccines on behalf of its partners, who stand to lose billions of dollars in revenue if vaccine rejection continues to gain momentum.
"The truth is that there has never been a study proving vaccines safe or effective that was not connected to a pharmaceutical company or a vaccine maker," warns Activist Post. "The mainstream media's recent jaunt has yet to change this fact."
Sources:
http://www.activistpost.com
www.yahoo.com
http://www.phrma.org
http://www.lewin.com
www.ahip.org
http://truthwiki.org/Vaccine_Fanaticism
Maine State Rep Takes Stand Against Vaccine Police
[video=youtube;ZTAeXuJFgxM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=153&v=ZTAeXuJFgxM[/video]
Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized
Monday, May 11, 2015
by Mike Adams, the Health Range
Despite the insidious attempts of the corporate-controlled U.S. media to censor the stories about the deadly side effects of vaccines, the truth keeps surfacing. The latest vaccine tragedy to strike has killed two babies in La Pimienta, Mexico and sent 37 more to the hospital with serious reactions to toxic vaccine additives. (Tweet this story)
"...14 children are in serious condition, 22 are stable and one is in critical condition," the Chiapas Health Secretariat said in a statement via Latino.FoxNews.com.
What's especially alarming is that only 52 children were vaccinated in all, meaning that 75% of those receiving the vaccines are now either dead or hospitalized.
The vaccines were administered by the Mexican Social Security Institute, known as IMSS. The IMSS confirmed the deadly reactions occurred after children received injections of vaccines for tuberculosis, rotavirus and hepatitis B -- the same viral strains targeted by vaccines routinely administered to children in the United States.
IMSS suspends vaccination pending further investigation
According to Fox News Latino, the IMSS has suspended the vaccines pending the outcome of an investigation into why so many children have been killed and hospitalized.
According to the entire mainstream media in the United States -- which is 100% controlled by corporate interests -- vaccines never harm anyone and are perfectly safe to inject into children in unlimited quantities. This dangerous, inhumane "Vaccine Injury Denialism" is rampant across the corporate-controlled media, which contributes to the deaths of innocent babies and children by refusing to acknowledge the truth that vaccines kill and injure children on a regular basis.
Just recently, in fact, the UK government agreed to pay $90 million to victims of the swine flu vaccine. That vaccine caused permanent brain damage to over 800 children across Europe. The truth is that vaccines regularly harm and even kill innocent children, most likely because of the toxic chemical adjuvants and preservatives they still contain.
As the CDC openly admits, vaccines are still intentionally formulated with mercury, aluminum, MSG and formaldehyde. Some vaccines even use ingredients derived from aborted human fetal tissue. Last year, a CDC scientist blew the whistle on the CDC committing scientific fraud to cover up links between vaccines and autism in young African-American males.
Test run for depopulation via vaccines?
As globalists now fully realize, vaccines are by far the best way to cull the human population because most people can be tricked into lining up and asking for them. Thus, there's no need to resort to all the difficulties used by the Nazis to commit genocide in World War II, involving complex logistics of railroad cars, gas chambers, construction of mass graves, prisoner tracking via IBM computing technology, and so on. (Yes, Nazi genocide and prisoner tracking was powered by early IBM computers. See IBM and the Holocaust, the strategic alliance between Nazi Germany and America's most powerful corporation...)
As the vaccine industry has now come to realize, it's so much easier to kill people when they voluntarily comply with the injections. Hence the aggressive media propaganda push to achieve absolute blind obedience to vaccines so that no one will ask questions when sterilization or euthanasia chemicals are used. That's no doubt why vaccines have been routinely tested for depopulation programs via two primary methods:
# 1) Achieve covert sterilizations of targeted populations by combining sterilization chemicals with vaccines. (The "slow kill.")
# 2) Directly kill vaccine recipients by intentionally lacing vaccines with euthanasia chemicals that cause death. (The "fast kill.")
Method #1 has been repeatedly used throughout Africa, Mexico and South America to inflict sterilization upon targeted groups via immunization and vaccination programs. Just last year, in fact, I reported on the discovery of a covert depopulation vaccine program being run in Kenya:
Tetanus vaccines given to millions of young women in Kenya have been confirmed by laboratories to contain a sterilization chemical that causes miscarriages, reports the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, a pro-vaccine organization.
A whopping 2.3 million young girls and women are in the process of being given the vaccine, pushed by UNICEF and the World Health Organization.
"We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen," Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi toldLifeSiteNews. "They were all laced with HCG."
Method #2 now appears to be under way in Mexico as 75% of those children injected with vaccines are now either dead or hospitalized.
Vaccine-induced depopulation was attempted in Mexico in 1974
As Truth Stream Media exhaustively documented, a depopulation exercise was run in Mexico in 1974, using vaccines as the cover story.
The scheme was dreamed up after the release of the National Security Study Memorandum 200which highlighted the global population problem and urged governments to find ways to reduce the global population.
As TruthStreamMedia.com explains:
Concentration on this "problem" of how to reduce the population was planned for 13 key countries, including India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia. Of those, the document singled out Mexico as having one of the highest (and therefore, most worrisome) growth rates of all. The document read, "Perhaps the most significant population trend from the viewpoint of the United States is the prospect that Mexico’s population will increase from 50 million in 1970 to over 130 million by the year 2000."
To combat this problem, "medical spooks" -- who were almost certainly U.S.-funded depopulation vaccine crews -- began injecting women all across Mexico with anti-fertility drugs disguised as vaccines. If you doubt this, read your history. The U.S. government's National Institutes of Health was caught red-handed running human medical experiments on prisoners in Guatemala. President Obama was even forced to publicly apologize in 2011 after the cover-up collapsed! There is nothing the Nazis did in the 1930s and 40s that the pharmaceutical industry wouldn't be willing to repeat today under the label of "science."
But getting back to Mexico, as the covert depopulation vaccination program spread across Mexico City in 1974, locals began to catch on to the deception, and public resistance grew. As these newspaper clippings reveal, parents began hiding their children in their own homes to avoid them being injected with sterilization chemicals at the public schools. (California, by the way, also targets children at schools in order to avoid parents having the opportunity to say "No!")
Mexico City - Associated Press - Rumors that persons disguised as inoculation teams were giving school children shots that sterilized them forced health authorities to suspend all vaccination drives today and to post police outside Mexico City schools. Thousands of parents stormed various schools in the Mexico City area Tuesday and took their children home.
It's also important to note that these sterilization vaccines were being administered essentially at gunpoint, as police were accompanying the vaccine crews:
Callers told newspapers and TV stations that the sterilization crews were protected by police escorts and that they included white-robed men and women "who looked like foreigners."
This same scenario is now about to be replicated in California, by the way, where SB 277 would criminalize parents of children who are not vaccinated, essentially at gunpoint.
What's even more interesting is that the exact same arguments we hear today about vaccine skeptics -- they're punitively labeled "anti-vaxxers" or "anti-science" -- were also being used in Mexico in 1974. As the following newspaper clipping shows:
The Mexican Medical Association issued statements denying that any kind of inoculation could cause sterility... Officials said superstition and ignorance of preventive health [i.e. "anti-science"] were responsible for the widespread belief that the rumors were true.
In other words, even though sterilization teams were running around Mexico, injecting people with chemicals as part of a depopulation agenda, any person who pointed this out was immediately labeled "anti-science" and derided as "ignorant."
Very little has changed in four decades, it seems: the same tactic is still used today, even while children are being killed or injured every single day due to the toxic ingredients used in vaccines.
CDC's intelligence operatives caught running disinfo campaigns
The "science bullying" behind vaccines also allows governments of the world to run sterilization and depopulation programs disguised as public health. Once the population is bullied into accepting vaccines without question -- blind obedience is now demanded almost everywhere -- governments can add any chemicals they want to those vaccines, including chemicals that cause permanent sterilization or even death.
The fact that all vaccine injuries are systematically denied to exist also means that any person harmed or killed by vaccines is immediately wiped from the national memory. Like a criminal mafia, the vaccine industry works hard to hide the bodies and thereby maintain its monopolistic racket on the utterly false premise that vaccines are 100% safe. To further drive home this extraordinary medical propaganda, the CDC uses intelligence operatives like Nurse Hickox who spread disinfo through the mainstream media, which is always happy to comply with the destructive agendas of the vaccine industry.
As Natural News uncovered during the Ebola scare of 2014:
Nurse Kaci Hickox, who has made headlines over the last few days by refusing to quarantine herself after returning from the Ebola front lines in Africa, turns out to have been trained as an "intelligence officer" under a two-year CDC program modeled after the U.S. military.
As you can see from the document below, Hickox graduated from a two-year CDC intelligence officer training program in 2012. This is the same nurse whose LinkedIn page was recently scrubbed to hide her ties to the CDC...
The official intelligence designation granted to Nurse Hickox by the CDC was "Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer," and she is a graduate of the 2012 EIS program according to this CDC document (PDF). (See page 138 - 139 for her name and photo, or view photo below.)
That same year, the CDC graduated 81 such "intelligence officers" whose names and photos are also listed in the public document.
Bottom line? Don't trust the vaccine industry
What's the takeaway realization from all this? Vaccines have been and will continue to be used as a cover for forced depopulation programs involving sterilization or euthanasia chemicals.
Obedience to vaccines allows depopulation teams accompanied by armed police to intimidate people into accepting any liquid they want to put in a syringe. That liquid might be a vaccine, or it might be a sterilization chemical or even a euthanasia chemical.
Any population that is indoctrinated into trusting the vaccine industry -- an industry steeped in repeated criminal activity combined with a total disregard for human life -- is ripe for being targeted for depopulation. (See Nigeria Issues Arrest Warrants for Top Pfizer Officials After Drug Experiments Conducted on Children.)
After all, why go through the trouble of building gas chambers and rounding people up for mass extermination when you can achieve the same result without any resistance at all if you simply label the chemicals "vaccines"?
(Click here for hi-res version of the graphic below.)
Sources for this article include:
http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/lifestyle/2...
http://www.naturalnews.com/049423_swine_flu_...
http://www.naturalnews.com/037653_vaccine_ad...
http://www.naturalnews.com/038873_childhood_...
http://www.naturalnews.com/047571_vaccines_s...
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/a-mass-ster...
http://truthstreammedia.com/who-attempted-th...
http://schillerinstitute.org/strategic/NSSM2...
http://www.naturalnews.com/033483_guatemalan...
http://www.sb277.org
http://www.naturalnews.com/047444_ebola_quar...
http://www.naturalnews.com/047406_Ebola_quar...
http://www.naturalnews.com/files/PDF-2013-EI...
http://www.naturalnews.com/023654_pfizer_dru...
http://www.naturalnews.com/046630_CDC_whistl...
US Government Admits Americans Have Been Overdosed on Fluoride
May 12, 2015
By Dr. MercolaThe US government has finally admitted they've overdosed Americans on fluoride and, for first time since 1962, are lowering its recommended level of fluoride in drinking water.[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP]
About 40 percent of American teens have dental fluorosis,[SUP]4[/SUP] a condition referring to changes in the appearance of tooth enamel—from chalky-looking lines and splotches to dark staining and pitting—caused by long-term ingestion of fluoride during the time teeth are forming.
In some areas, fluorosis rates are as high as 70-80 percent, with some children suffering from advanced forms.
The former recommendation called for a fluoride level of 0.7 to 1.2 milligrams per liter (mg/L) of water. The new upper limit set by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is 0.7 mg/L, to prevent these visible signs of toxic overexposure.
Why Is a Drug Added to Water When the Dose Cannot Be Controlled?
It's quite clear that when you add fluoride to drinking water, you cannot control the dose that people are getting, and fluoride is in fact not only a non-essential mineral but a toxic drug. This alone is one of the reasons why fluoride shouldn't be added to drinking water at any level.
If a doctor somehow managed to force a patient to take a drug with known toxic effects and failed to inform them of the dosage and frequency, and never monitored their health outcome, they would be medically negligent and liable to legal and medical board action.
Yet water utilities administer this drug without a prescription, at the behest of the government, without any idea of who will get what dose and for how long, and without monitoring for side effects.
Fluoride is added to drinking water to, in theory, prevent a disease (tooth decay), and as such becomes a medicine by FDA definition. While proponents claim this is no different than adding vitamin D to milk, fluoride is not an essential nutrient. Moreover, fluoride isn't even approved by the FDA for the prevention of cavities.
We now know that at a limit of 0.7-1.2 mg/L causes a great many people to overdose on the drug. Will an upper limit of 0.7 mg/L protect everyone forced to drink fluoridated water?
Considering the fact that people also get fluoride from toothpaste, dental rinses, processed foods, and beverages, the chances of overexposure are still present, even at this lowered level.
Many Will Still Be at Risk for Overexposure at Lowered Fluoride Level
At the previous level, 40 percent of US teens became "collateral damage." What will the allowable damage be at the new level? The HHS said it will evaluate dental fluorosis rates among children in 10 years to assess whether they were correct about this new level.
Let's say dental fluorosis goes down to 20 percent. Is 20 percent an acceptable level of harm? How about 10 percent? Who decides what the acceptable level of collateral damage is?
Remarkably, the Sacramento Bee[SUP]5[/SUP] reports that: "Recent unpublished federal research found there's no regional differences in the amount of water kids drink. So it makes sense for the same levels to be used everywhere, health officials said."
I'd be very curious to review that study, because I have a hard time imagining that kids everywhere drink the same amount of water!
It's also a ludicrous assumption unless every single child is also exposed to the same amount of fluoride from other sources besides drinking water... and weighs the same... and has the same health status... and we know that's simply not the case.
According to the HHS, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) "uses the 90th percentile of drinking water intake for all age groups to calculate the relative contribution for each fluoride source."
What this means is that if you drink more water than the 90th percentile, you are not protected by this reduced level. People most likely to fall into that category include infants receiving formula mixed with fluoridated water, people working outdoors (especially in hot climates), athletes, and diabetics.
Dental Fluorosis Is NOT the Only Risk of Water Fluoridation
Barbara Gooch, a dentist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) told NPR[SUP]6[/SUP] that "The only documented risk of water fluoridation is fluorosis, and it is primarily a cosmetic risk. Fluorosis in the milder form is not a health risk."
This hints at a really deficient understanding of the available science on fluoride's health effects. Dental fluorosis is the most visible form of fluorosis, but it's far from being "just cosmetic" and of no further concern.
It can also be an indication that the rest of your body, such as your bones and internal organs, including your brain, has been overexposed to fluoride as well.
In other words, if fluoride is having a visually detrimental effect on the surface of your teeth, you can be virtually guaranteed that it's also damaging other parts of your body, such as your bones. Skeletal fluorosis, which isn't visible, is very difficult to distinguish from arthritis. Symptoms indicative of early clinical stage skeletal fluorosis include:
- Burning, prickling, and tingling in your limbs
- Muscle weakness
- Chronic fatigue
- Gastrointestinal disorders
- Reduced appetite and weight loss
The second clinical stage of skeletal fluorosis is characterized by:
- Stiff joints and/or constant pain in your bones; brittle bones; and osteosclerosis
- Anemia
- Calcification of tendons, or ligaments of ribs and pelvis
- Osteoporosis in the long bones
- Bony spurs may also appear on your limb bones, especially around your knee, elbow, and on the surface of tibia and ulna
All of this has been known since the 1930s, so it's rather disingenuous to proclaim that dental fluorosis is the only documented risk of water fluoridation. If 40 percent of American teens have dental fluorosis, how many people suffer from skeletal fluorosis as a result of chronic fluoride overexposure? In one previous study, bone fracture rates also rose sharply with increasing severity of dental fluorosis. Studies have also demonstrated that fluoride toxicity, caused by overexposure, can lead to:
[TABLE="class: cms_table_generic-table"]
[TR]
[TD]Increased lead absorption[/TD]
[TD]Disrupted synthesis of collagen[/TD]
[TD]Hyperactivity and/or lethargy[/TD]
[TD]Muscle disorders[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Bone cancer (osteosarcoma)[/TD]
[TD]Increased tumor and cancer rate[/TD]
[TD]Arthritis[/TD]
[TD]Skeletal fluorosis andbone fractures[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Genetic damage and cell death[/TD]
[TD]Damaged sperm and increased infertility[/TD]
[TD]Inactivation of 62 enzymes and inhibition of more than 100[/TD]
[TD]Inhibited formation of antibodies, and immune system disruptions[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Fluoride Has No Benefit for Teeth When Swallowed
You are beyond naïve if you believe that fluoride somehow selectively goes to your teeth when you swallow it. Rather, it accumulates throughout your body's bones and tissues. What little benefit fluoride may have is achieved through topicalapplication. Both the CDC and the World Health Organization (WHO) have noted that there is no discernible difference in tooth decay between developed countries that fluoridate their water and those that do not.[SUP]7[/SUP]
The decline in tooth decay the US has experienced over the last 60 years, which is often attributed to fluoridated water, has likewise occurred in all developed countries, most of which do not fluoridate their water. So declining rates of dental decay is not in and of itself proof that water fluoridation actually works. It's also worth noting that well over 99 percent of the fluoride added to drinking water never even touches a tooth; it simply runs down the drain, into the environment, where you can be guaranteed it's doing nothing that is beneficial...
[TABLE="class: cms_table, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Source: KK Cheng et al. BMJ 2007.[SUP]8[/SUP] Rates of cavities have declined by similar amounts in countries with and without fluoridation.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
HHS Still Ignores Major Safety Concerns
According to Fluoride Action Network[SUP]9[/SUP] (FAN), in finalizing its new fluoride recommendation, the HHS has whitewashed a number of safety issues, failing to address recent research showing adverse effects ranging from lowered IQ in children (found in no less than 43 studies), underactive thyroid,[SUP]10[/SUP] and ADHD.[SUP]11[/SUP]
For example, one recent study[SUP]12[/SUP] linking fluoridated water to higher prevalence of ADHD created a predictive model showing that every one percent increase in the portion of the US population drinking fluoridated water in 1992 was associated with 67,000 additional cases of ADHD 11 years later, and an additional 131,000 cases 19 years later.
FAN points out that the HHS even "resorted to deceit" when it dismissed research showing reductions in IQ. The HHS stated that "A recent meta-analysis of studies conducted in rural China... identified an association between high fluoride exposure (i.e., drinking water concentrations ranging up to 11.5 mg/L) and lower IQ scores..." First of all, there are in all 43 studies reporting a relationship between fluoride exposure and reduced IQ. The study mentioned by the HHS only looked at 27 of them.
But more importantly, when you seek to protect an entire population you have to look at the lowest level at which harm becomes apparent, not the highest. By noting only the upper level of the fluoride concentrations found in this study, it appears the HHS was trying to offer misleading reassurance that their recommended level is well beneath any level where risk may be present. But the lowest level at which IQ reductions were noted in that study was 0.88 mg/L, which isn't that far from the new recommended upper limit of 0.7 mg/L.
Add fluoride from other sources, and you may very well get into the range of hazard. Interestingly, a number of studies[SUP]13,[/SUP][SUP]14,[/SUP][SUP]15,[/SUP][SUP]16[/SUP] have specifically shown that children who have moderate or severe dental fluorosis score lower on tests measuring cognitive skills and IQ, suggesting that if 40 percent of our kids have fluorosis, the water fluoridation scheme in the US is likely affecting our children's IQ as well. As noted by FAN:"In addition, in toxicology, it is not the concentration of fluoride (mg/liter) that is the relevant parameter but the dose in mg/day (how much you drink), and such a dose has to be compiled from all sources. In the case of the Chinese children in rural villages in these studies, they did not have two sources that US children commonly have: typically they are not bottle-fed and they do not use fluoridated toothpaste.
So, it is likely that some American children are getting higher doses than some of the Chinese children who had their IQ lowered... Because fluoride is an endocrine disruptor and has the potential to lower IQ in children, FAN urges HHS to adopt the Precautionary Principle and end fluoridation now."
They Got It Wrong—HHS Does Not Consider the Fact That Fluoride Is an Endocrine Disruptor...
According to FAN:"HHS also stated in its press release that a report on the toxicology of fluoride by the National Research Council of the National Academies (NRC, 2006[SUP]17[/SUP]) 'found no evidence substantial enough to support effects other than severe dental fluorosis at these levels.'
What HHS failed to state is that the NRC report of 2006 stated[SUP]18[/SUP] for the first time that fluoride is an 'endocrine disruptor,' which means it has the potential to play havoc with the biology and fate of humans and animals. This is far more significant than severe dental fluorosis."
In 2011, FAN submitted a number of concerns to the HHS, and none of them have been adequately addressed, FAN says. These concerns include:
[TABLE="class: cms_table_generic-table"]
[TR]
[TD]Mass medicating the population via the water supply is unethical[/TD]
[TD]The benefit and safety of ingested fluoride has never been proved by accepted medical standards[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Any benefits of fluoride are primarily topical, not systemic[/TD]
[TD]Americans will still be over-exposed to fluoride at 0.7 ppm[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Infants will not be protected. Babies who receive formula made with fluoridated water will still receive 175 times more fluoride than breast-fed infants[/TD]
[TD]African-American children and low-income children will not be protected[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Fluoride as an endocrine disruptor, which the HHS still has not taken into consideration[/TD]
[TD]HHS has not considered or investigated rates of skeletal fluorosis in the US
No matter which scientific studies you examine or which population trends you view, the rational conclusion is that fluoride's health dangers far outweigh the marginal dental benefits it might offer. Dental caries can be effectively prevented with means other than fluoridation, thereby avoiding the adverse effects of fluoride.
It's important to realize that fluoride is a cumulative toxin, which over time can lead to serious health concerns, from hypothyroidism to skeletal fluorosis and much more. The neurological effects are particularly disconcerting. Even scientists from the EPA's National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory have classified fluoride as a "chemical having substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity."
Water fluoridation needs to stop. The question is how. Despite all the evidence, getting fluoride out of American water supplies has been exceedingly difficult. After all, the US government has promoted it for over half a century. Were it to admit that they were wrong all along, and have in fact been poisoning everyone all this time, the ramifications could be enormous. It's not impossible to abolish water fluoridation, however, as evidenced in areas that have successfully done it.
According to the late Jeff Green, national director of Citizens for Safe Drinking Water, a repeated theme in the cases where communities successfully removed fluoride from their water supply is the shifting of the burden of proof.
Rather than citizens taking on the burden of proving that fluoride is harmful and shouldn't be added, a more successful strategy has been to hold those making claims, and the elected officials who rely on them, accountable for delivering proof that the specific fluoridation chemical being used fulfills their health and safety claims, and is in compliance with all regulations, laws, and risk assessments already required for safe drinking water. To learn more, please see this previous article, which discusses these strategies more in-depth.
The Fluoride Action Network has a game plan to end water fluoridation not only in the US, but worldwide, but they need your support to succeed. Clean pure water is a prerequisite to optimal health. Industrial chemicals, drugs, and other toxic additives really have no place in our water supplies. So, please, protect your drinking water and support the fluoride-free movement by making a tax-deductible donation to the Fluoride Action Network today.
Recent Victories in the Fight Against Water Fluoridation
There have been a number of recent victories in the fight against water fluoridation that are worth celebrating, including the following:
- Clarksburg, West Virginia[SUP]19[/SUP]—Water Board members voted 2-1 in April to end fluoridation due to the growing number of studies showing negative side effects. The decision by the Clarksburg board end fluoridation for over 25,000 citizens, including residents of Bridgeport and a number of other smaller communities[SUP]20[/SUP].
- Oneida, New York[SUP]21[/SUP]—On May 5th the Common Council voted 5-1 to reject fluoridation for the third time since 2002. For months, the council has held public hearings and debates on fluoridation, listening to an array of experts on both sides of the issue, including FAN’s Dr. Paul Connett and NY Dept. of Health’s Dental Representative Jay Kumar, who is a long-time promoter of fluoridation. Despite an aggressive lobbying campaign by the fluoride-lobby, the council and community couldn’t be tricked into believing that the practice was safe, effective, or necessary. The decision will protect the water for over 21,000 residents.
- Kingsville, Ontario[SUP]22[/SUP]—This Canadian City Council, representing over 20,000 citizens, passed a motion in April reaffirming its stance in opposition to fluoridation. The issue was raised by the former Deputy Mayor, who urged the council to pass the motion to send a message to the provincial government, which is considering mandating the practice. The community of Lakeshore, Ontario[SUP]23[/SUP] also recently publicized their opposition to fluoridation, and will be sending a letter to provincial officials opposing a mandate.
- Carl Junction, Missouri[SUP]24[/SUP]—Councilors voted to end fluoridation in April after considering a number of concerns they had regarding the effectiveness and safety of the practice. The community, which is home to approximately 8,000 residents, started fluoridating the water supply in 2005 after voters approved the use of the additive. Carl Junction isn’t alone in making this decision. According to a recent article,[SUP]25[/SUP] “over the past five years, [at least] seven cities and towns in Missouri have removed fluoride from their municipal water systems, and a half-dozen more have put the matter to vote.”
- Bennington, Vermont[SUP]26[/SUP]--Despite aggressive campaigning by a well-organized and well-funded pro-fluoridation coalition, in March residents of this community of 16,000 voted 1,539 to 1,117 in opposition to fluoridation in an advisory referendum vote. This is at least the fifth time Bennington residents have voted down fluoridation since the 1960s.
- Gilford, Pennsylvania[SUP]27[/SUP]--Gilford Water Authority officials have decided to end fluoridation after more than 60 years of practicing it. The authority sent a letter to water customers stating, “We believe we should not put anything into the water that is not required by regulation to maintain the potability and pH balance of your water.”
- Sonoma City, California[SUP]28[/SUP]--In March, City Councilors voted 3-2 to oppose a proposal by the County government to add fluoride to the city’s drinking water. The council will be sending a letter of opposition to the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors.
Help End the Practice of Fluoridation
There's no doubt about it: fluoride should not be ingested. Even scientists from the EPA's National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory have classified fluoride as a "chemical having substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity.” Furthermore, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 41 percent of American adolescents now have dental fluorosis—unattractive discoloration and mottling of the teeth that indicate overexposure to fluoride. Clearly, children are being overexposed, and their health and development put in jeopardy.Why?
The only real solution is to stop the archaic practice of water fluoridation in the first place. Fortunately, the Fluoride Action Network has a game plan to END water fluoridation worldwide. Clean pure water is a prerequisite to optimal health. Industrial chemicals, drugs, and other toxic additives really have no place in our water supplies. So, please, protect your drinking water and support the fluoride-free movement by making a tax-deductible donation to the Fluoride Action Network today.
Internet Resources Where You Can Learn More
I encourage you to visit the website of the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) and visit the links below:
- Like FAN on Facebook, follow on Twitter, and sign up for campaign alerts.
- 10 Facts About Fluoride: Attorney Michael Connett summarizes 10 basic facts about fluoride that should be considered in any discussion about whether to fluoridate water. Also see 10 Facts Handout (PDF).
- 50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation: Learn why fluoridation is a bad medical practice that is unnecessary and ineffective. Download PDF.
- Health Effects Database: FAN's database sets forth the scientific basis for concerns regarding the safety and effectiveness of ingesting fluorides. They also have a Study Tracker with the most up-to-date and comprehensive source for studies on fluoride's effects on human health.
Together, Let's Help FAN Get the Funding They Deserve
In my opinion, there are very few NGOs that are as effective and efficient as FAN. Its small team has led the charge to end fluoridation and will continue to do so with our help!
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Last edited:
muir
Banned
- MBTI
- INFJ
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...gn=20150512Z1&et_cid=DM74659&et_rid=949456747
US Government Admits Americans Have Been Overdosed on Fluoride
May 12, 2015
[video=youtube;GX0s-4AyWfI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GX0s-4AyWfI[/video]
By Dr. Mercola
According to FAN:
[TABLE="class: generic-table"]
[TR]
[TD]Mass medicating the population via the water supply is unethical[/TD]
[TD]The benefit and safety of ingested fluoride has never been proved by accepted medical standards[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Any benefits of fluoride are primarily topical, not systemic[/TD]
[TD]Americans will still be over-exposed to fluoride at 0.7 ppm[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Infants will not be protected. Babies who receive formula made with fluoridated water will still receive 175 times more fluoride than breast-fed infants[/TD]
[TD]African-American children and low-income children will not be protected[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Fluoride as an endocrine disruptor, which the HHS still has not taken into consideration[/TD]
[TD]HHS has not considered or investigated rates of skeletal fluorosis in the US
Help End the Practice of Fluoridation
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
US Government Admits Americans Have Been Overdosed on Fluoride
May 12, 2015
[video=youtube;GX0s-4AyWfI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GX0s-4AyWfI[/video]
By Dr. Mercola
The US government has finally admitted they've overdosed Americans on fluoride and, for first time since 1962, are lowering its recommended level of fluoride in drinking water.[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP]
About 40 percent of American teens have dental fluorosis,[SUP]4[/SUP] a condition referring to changes in the appearance of tooth enamel—from chalky-looking lines and splotches to dark staining and pitting—caused by long-term ingestion of fluoride during the time teeth are forming.
In some areas, fluorosis rates are as high as 70-80 percent, with some children suffering from advanced forms.
The former recommendation called for a fluoride level of 0.7 to 1.2 milligrams per liter (mg/L) of water. The new upper limit set by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is 0.7 mg/L, to prevent these visible signs of toxic overexposure.
Why Is a Drug Added to Water When the Dose Cannot Be Controlled?About 40 percent of American teens have dental fluorosis,[SUP]4[/SUP] a condition referring to changes in the appearance of tooth enamel—from chalky-looking lines and splotches to dark staining and pitting—caused by long-term ingestion of fluoride during the time teeth are forming.
In some areas, fluorosis rates are as high as 70-80 percent, with some children suffering from advanced forms.
The former recommendation called for a fluoride level of 0.7 to 1.2 milligrams per liter (mg/L) of water. The new upper limit set by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is 0.7 mg/L, to prevent these visible signs of toxic overexposure.
It's quite clear that when you add fluoride to drinking water, you cannot control the dose that people are getting, and fluoride is in fact not only a non-essential mineral but a toxic drug. This alone is one of the reasons why fluoride shouldn't be added to drinking water at any level.
If a doctor somehow managed to force a patient to take a drug with known toxic effects and failed to inform them of the dosage and frequency, and never monitored their health outcome, they would be medically negligent and liable to legal and medical board action.
Yet water utilities administer this drug without a prescription, at the behest of the government, without any idea of who will get what dose and for how long, and without monitoring for side effects.
Fluoride is added to drinking water to, in theory, prevent a disease (tooth decay), and as such becomes a medicine by FDA definition. While proponents claim this is no different than adding vitamin D to milk, fluoride is not an essential nutrient. Moreover, fluoride isn't even approved by the FDA for the prevention of cavities.
We now know that at a limit of 0.7-1.2 mg/L causes a great many people to overdose on the drug. Will an upper limit of 0.7 mg/L protect everyone forced to drink fluoridated water?
Considering the fact that people also get fluoride from toothpaste, dental rinses, processed foods, and beverages, the chances of overexposure are still present, even at this lowered level.
Many Will Still Be at Risk for Overexposure at Lowered Fluoride LevelIf a doctor somehow managed to force a patient to take a drug with known toxic effects and failed to inform them of the dosage and frequency, and never monitored their health outcome, they would be medically negligent and liable to legal and medical board action.
Yet water utilities administer this drug without a prescription, at the behest of the government, without any idea of who will get what dose and for how long, and without monitoring for side effects.
Fluoride is added to drinking water to, in theory, prevent a disease (tooth decay), and as such becomes a medicine by FDA definition. While proponents claim this is no different than adding vitamin D to milk, fluoride is not an essential nutrient. Moreover, fluoride isn't even approved by the FDA for the prevention of cavities.
We now know that at a limit of 0.7-1.2 mg/L causes a great many people to overdose on the drug. Will an upper limit of 0.7 mg/L protect everyone forced to drink fluoridated water?
Considering the fact that people also get fluoride from toothpaste, dental rinses, processed foods, and beverages, the chances of overexposure are still present, even at this lowered level.
At the previous level, 40 percent of US teens became "collateral damage." What will the allowable damage be at the new level? The HHS said it will evaluate dental fluorosis rates among children in 10 years to assess whether they were correct about this new level.
Let's say dental fluorosis goes down to 20 percent. Is 20 percent an acceptable level of harm? How about 10 percent? Who decides what the acceptable level of collateral damage is?
Remarkably, the Sacramento Bee[SUP]5[/SUP] reports that: "Recent unpublished federal research found there's no regional differences in the amount of water kids drink. So it makes sense for the same levels to be used everywhere, health officials said."
I'd be very curious to review that study, because I have a hard time imagining that kids everywhere drink the same amount of water!
It's also a ludicrous assumption unless every single child is also exposed to the same amount of fluoride from other sources besides drinking water... and weighs the same... and has the same health status... and we know that's simply not the case.
According to the HHS, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) "uses the 90th percentile of drinking water intake for all age groups to calculate the relative contribution for each fluoride source."
What this means is that if you drink more water than the 90th percentile, you are not protected by this reduced level. People most likely to fall into that category include infants receiving formula mixed with fluoridated water, people working outdoors (especially in hot climates), athletes, and diabetics.
Dental Fluorosis Is NOT the Only Risk of Water FluoridationLet's say dental fluorosis goes down to 20 percent. Is 20 percent an acceptable level of harm? How about 10 percent? Who decides what the acceptable level of collateral damage is?
Remarkably, the Sacramento Bee[SUP]5[/SUP] reports that: "Recent unpublished federal research found there's no regional differences in the amount of water kids drink. So it makes sense for the same levels to be used everywhere, health officials said."
I'd be very curious to review that study, because I have a hard time imagining that kids everywhere drink the same amount of water!
It's also a ludicrous assumption unless every single child is also exposed to the same amount of fluoride from other sources besides drinking water... and weighs the same... and has the same health status... and we know that's simply not the case.
According to the HHS, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) "uses the 90th percentile of drinking water intake for all age groups to calculate the relative contribution for each fluoride source."
What this means is that if you drink more water than the 90th percentile, you are not protected by this reduced level. People most likely to fall into that category include infants receiving formula mixed with fluoridated water, people working outdoors (especially in hot climates), athletes, and diabetics.
Barbara Gooch, a dentist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) told NPR[SUP]6[/SUP] that "The only documented risk of water fluoridation is fluorosis, and it is primarily a cosmetic risk. Fluorosis in the milder form is not a health risk."
This hints at a really deficient understanding of the available science on fluoride's health effects. Dental fluorosis is the most visible form of fluorosis, but it's far from being "just cosmetic" and of no further concern.
It can also be an indication that the rest of your body, such as your bones and internal organs, including your brain, has been overexposed to fluoride as well.
In other words, if fluoride is having a visually detrimental effect on the surface of your teeth, you can be virtually guaranteed that it's also damaging other parts of your body, such as your bones. Skeletal fluorosis, which isn't visible, is very difficult to distinguish from arthritis. Symptoms indicative of early clinical stage skeletal fluorosis include:
[TABLE="class: generic-table"]
[TR]
[TD]Increased lead absorption[/TD]
[TD]Disrupted synthesis of collagen[/TD]
[TD]Hyperactivity and/or lethargy[/TD]
[TD]Muscle disorders[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Bone cancer (osteosarcoma)[/TD]
[TD]Increased tumor and cancer rate[/TD]
[TD]Arthritis[/TD]
[TD]Skeletal fluorosis and bone fractures[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Genetic damage and cell death[/TD]
[TD]Damaged sperm and increased infertility[/TD]
[TD]Inactivation of 62 enzymes and inhibition of more than 100[/TD]
[TD]Inhibited formation of antibodies, and immune system disruptions[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Fluoride Has No Benefit for Teeth When SwallowedThis hints at a really deficient understanding of the available science on fluoride's health effects. Dental fluorosis is the most visible form of fluorosis, but it's far from being "just cosmetic" and of no further concern.
It can also be an indication that the rest of your body, such as your bones and internal organs, including your brain, has been overexposed to fluoride as well.
In other words, if fluoride is having a visually detrimental effect on the surface of your teeth, you can be virtually guaranteed that it's also damaging other parts of your body, such as your bones. Skeletal fluorosis, which isn't visible, is very difficult to distinguish from arthritis. Symptoms indicative of early clinical stage skeletal fluorosis include:
- Burning, prickling, and tingling in your limbs
- Muscle weakness
- Chronic fatigue
- Gastrointestinal disorders
- Reduced appetite and weight loss
- Stiff joints and/or constant pain in your bones; brittle bones; and osteosclerosis
- Anemia
- Calcification of tendons, or ligaments of ribs and pelvis
- Osteoporosis in the long bones
- Bony spurs may also appear on your limb bones, especially around your knee, elbow, and on the surface of tibia and ulna
[TABLE="class: generic-table"]
[TR]
[TD]Increased lead absorption[/TD]
[TD]Disrupted synthesis of collagen[/TD]
[TD]Hyperactivity and/or lethargy[/TD]
[TD]Muscle disorders[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Bone cancer (osteosarcoma)[/TD]
[TD]Increased tumor and cancer rate[/TD]
[TD]Arthritis[/TD]
[TD]Skeletal fluorosis and bone fractures[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Genetic damage and cell death[/TD]
[TD]Damaged sperm and increased infertility[/TD]
[TD]Inactivation of 62 enzymes and inhibition of more than 100[/TD]
[TD]Inhibited formation of antibodies, and immune system disruptions[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
You are beyond naïve if you believe that fluoride somehow selectively goes to your teeth when you swallow it. Rather, it accumulates throughout your body's bones and tissues. What little benefit fluoride may have is achieved through topical application. Both the CDC and the World Health Organization (WHO) have noted that there is no discernible difference in tooth decay between developed countries that fluoridate their water and those that do not.[SUP]7[/SUP]
The decline in tooth decay the US has experienced over the last 60 years, which is often attributed to fluoridated water, has likewise occurred in all developed countries, most of which do not fluoridate their water. So declining rates of dental decay is not in and of itself proof that water fluoridation actually works. It's also worth noting that well over 99 percent of the fluoride added to drinking water never even touches a tooth; it simply runs down the drain, into the environment, where you can be guaranteed it's doing nothing that is beneficial...
[TABLE="align: center"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Source: KK Cheng et al. BMJ 2007.[SUP]8[/SUP] Rates of cavities have declined by similar amounts in countries with and without fluoridation.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
HHS Still Ignores Major Safety ConcernsThe decline in tooth decay the US has experienced over the last 60 years, which is often attributed to fluoridated water, has likewise occurred in all developed countries, most of which do not fluoridate their water. So declining rates of dental decay is not in and of itself proof that water fluoridation actually works. It's also worth noting that well over 99 percent of the fluoride added to drinking water never even touches a tooth; it simply runs down the drain, into the environment, where you can be guaranteed it's doing nothing that is beneficial...
[TABLE="align: center"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Source: KK Cheng et al. BMJ 2007.[SUP]8[/SUP] Rates of cavities have declined by similar amounts in countries with and without fluoridation.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
According to Fluoride Action Network[SUP]9[/SUP] (FAN), in finalizing its new fluoride recommendation, the HHS has whitewashed a number of safety issues, failing to address recent research showing adverse effects ranging from lowered IQ in children (found in no less than 43 studies), underactive thyroid,[SUP]10[/SUP] and ADHD.[SUP]11[/SUP]
For example, one recent study[SUP]12[/SUP] linking fluoridated water to higher prevalence of ADHD created a predictive model showing that every one percent increase in the portion of the US population drinking fluoridated water in 1992 was associated with 67,000 additional cases of ADHD 11 years later, and an additional 131,000 cases 19 years later.
FAN points out that the HHS even "resorted to deceit" when it dismissed research showing reductions in IQ. The HHS stated that "A recent meta-analysis of studies conducted in rural China... identified an association between high fluoride exposure (i.e., drinking water concentrations ranging up to 11.5 mg/L) and lower IQ scores..." First of all, there are in all 43 studies reporting a relationship between fluoride exposure and reduced IQ. The study mentioned by the HHS only looked at 27 of them.
But more importantly, when you seek to protect an entire population you have to look at the lowest level at which harm becomes apparent, not the highest. By noting only the upper level of the fluoride concentrations found in this study, it appears the HHS was trying to offer misleading reassurance that their recommended level is well beneath any level where risk may be present. But the lowest level at which IQ reductions were noted in that study was 0.88 mg/L, which isn't that far from the new recommended upper limit of 0.7 mg/L.
Add fluoride from other sources, and you may very well get into the range of hazard. Interestingly, a number of studies[SUP]13,[/SUP][SUP]14,[/SUP][SUP]15,[/SUP][SUP]16[/SUP] have specifically shown that children who have moderate or severe dental fluorosis score lower on tests measuring cognitive skills and IQ, suggesting that if 40 percent of our kids have fluorosis, the water fluoridation scheme in the US is likely affecting our children's IQ as well. As noted by FAN:
They Got It Wrong—HHS Does Not Consider the Fact That Fluoride Is an Endocrine Disruptor...For example, one recent study[SUP]12[/SUP] linking fluoridated water to higher prevalence of ADHD created a predictive model showing that every one percent increase in the portion of the US population drinking fluoridated water in 1992 was associated with 67,000 additional cases of ADHD 11 years later, and an additional 131,000 cases 19 years later.
FAN points out that the HHS even "resorted to deceit" when it dismissed research showing reductions in IQ. The HHS stated that "A recent meta-analysis of studies conducted in rural China... identified an association between high fluoride exposure (i.e., drinking water concentrations ranging up to 11.5 mg/L) and lower IQ scores..." First of all, there are in all 43 studies reporting a relationship between fluoride exposure and reduced IQ. The study mentioned by the HHS only looked at 27 of them.
But more importantly, when you seek to protect an entire population you have to look at the lowest level at which harm becomes apparent, not the highest. By noting only the upper level of the fluoride concentrations found in this study, it appears the HHS was trying to offer misleading reassurance that their recommended level is well beneath any level where risk may be present. But the lowest level at which IQ reductions were noted in that study was 0.88 mg/L, which isn't that far from the new recommended upper limit of 0.7 mg/L.
Add fluoride from other sources, and you may very well get into the range of hazard. Interestingly, a number of studies[SUP]13,[/SUP][SUP]14,[/SUP][SUP]15,[/SUP][SUP]16[/SUP] have specifically shown that children who have moderate or severe dental fluorosis score lower on tests measuring cognitive skills and IQ, suggesting that if 40 percent of our kids have fluorosis, the water fluoridation scheme in the US is likely affecting our children's IQ as well. As noted by FAN:
"In addition, in toxicology, it is not the concentration of fluoride (mg/liter) that is the relevant parameter but the dose in mg/day (how much you drink), and such a dose has to be compiled from all sources. In the case of the Chinese children in rural villages in these studies, they did not have two sources that US children commonly have: typically they are not bottle-fed and they do not use fluoridated toothpaste.
So, it is likely that some American children are getting higher doses than some of the Chinese children who had their IQ lowered... Because fluoride is an endocrine disruptor and has the potential to lower IQ in children, FAN urges HHS to adopt the Precautionary Principle and end fluoridation now."
So, it is likely that some American children are getting higher doses than some of the Chinese children who had their IQ lowered... Because fluoride is an endocrine disruptor and has the potential to lower IQ in children, FAN urges HHS to adopt the Precautionary Principle and end fluoridation now."
According to FAN:
"HHS also stated in its press release that a report on the toxicology of fluoride by the National Research Council of the National Academies (NRC, 2006[SUP]17[/SUP]) 'found no evidence substantial enough to support effects other than severe dental fluorosis at these levels.'
What HHS failed to state is that the NRC report of 2006 stated[SUP]18[/SUP] for the first time that fluoride is an 'endocrine disruptor,' which means it has the potential to play havoc with the biology and fate of humans and animals. This is far more significant than severe dental fluorosis."
In 2011, FAN submitted a number of concerns to the HHS, and none of them have been adequately addressed, FAN says. These concerns include:What HHS failed to state is that the NRC report of 2006 stated[SUP]18[/SUP] for the first time that fluoride is an 'endocrine disruptor,' which means it has the potential to play havoc with the biology and fate of humans and animals. This is far more significant than severe dental fluorosis."
[TABLE="class: generic-table"]
[TR]
[TD]Mass medicating the population via the water supply is unethical[/TD]
[TD]The benefit and safety of ingested fluoride has never been proved by accepted medical standards[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Any benefits of fluoride are primarily topical, not systemic[/TD]
[TD]Americans will still be over-exposed to fluoride at 0.7 ppm[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Infants will not be protected. Babies who receive formula made with fluoridated water will still receive 175 times more fluoride than breast-fed infants[/TD]
[TD]African-American children and low-income children will not be protected[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Fluoride as an endocrine disruptor, which the HHS still has not taken into consideration[/TD]
[TD]HHS has not considered or investigated rates of skeletal fluorosis in the US
No matter which scientific studies you examine or which population trends you view, the rational conclusion is that fluoride's health dangers far outweigh the marginal dental benefits it might offer. Dental caries can be effectively prevented with means other than fluoridation, thereby avoiding the adverse effects of fluoride.
It's important to realize that fluoride is a cumulative toxin, which over time can lead to serious health concerns, from hypothyroidism to skeletal fluorosis and much more. The neurological effects are particularly disconcerting. Even scientists from the EPA's National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory have classified fluoride as a "chemical having substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity."
Water fluoridation needs to stop. The question is how. Despite all the evidence, getting fluoride out of American water supplies has been exceedingly difficult. After all, the US government has promoted it for over half a century. Were it to admit that they were wrong all along, and have in fact been poisoning everyone all this time, the ramifications could be enormous. It's not impossible to abolish water fluoridation, however, as evidenced in areas that have successfully done it.
According to the late Jeff Green, national director of Citizens for Safe Drinking Water, a repeated theme in the cases where communities successfully removed fluoride from their water supply is the shifting of the burden of proof.
Rather than citizens taking on the burden of proving that fluoride is harmful and shouldn't be added, a more successful strategy has been to hold those making claims, and the elected officials who rely on them, accountable for delivering proof that the specific fluoridation chemical being used fulfills their health and safety claims, and is in compliance with all regulations, laws, and risk assessments already required for safe drinking water. To learn more, please see this previous article, which discusses these strategies more in-depth.
The Fluoride Action Network has a game plan to end water fluoridation not only in the US, but worldwide, but they need your support to succeed. Clean pure water is a prerequisite to optimal health. Industrial chemicals, drugs, and other toxic additives really have no place in our water supplies. So, please, protect your drinking water and support the fluoride-free movement by making a tax-deductible donation to the Fluoride Action Network today.
Recent Victories in the Fight Against Water FluoridationIt's important to realize that fluoride is a cumulative toxin, which over time can lead to serious health concerns, from hypothyroidism to skeletal fluorosis and much more. The neurological effects are particularly disconcerting. Even scientists from the EPA's National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory have classified fluoride as a "chemical having substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity."
According to the late Jeff Green, national director of Citizens for Safe Drinking Water, a repeated theme in the cases where communities successfully removed fluoride from their water supply is the shifting of the burden of proof.
Rather than citizens taking on the burden of proving that fluoride is harmful and shouldn't be added, a more successful strategy has been to hold those making claims, and the elected officials who rely on them, accountable for delivering proof that the specific fluoridation chemical being used fulfills their health and safety claims, and is in compliance with all regulations, laws, and risk assessments already required for safe drinking water. To learn more, please see this previous article, which discusses these strategies more in-depth.
The Fluoride Action Network has a game plan to end water fluoridation not only in the US, but worldwide, but they need your support to succeed. Clean pure water is a prerequisite to optimal health. Industrial chemicals, drugs, and other toxic additives really have no place in our water supplies. So, please, protect your drinking water and support the fluoride-free movement by making a tax-deductible donation to the Fluoride Action Network today.
There have been a number of recent victories in the fight against water fluoridation that are worth celebrating, including the following:
- Clarksburg, West Virginia[SUP]19[/SUP]—Water Board members voted 2-1 in April to end fluoridation due to the growing number of studies showing negative side effects. The decision by the Clarksburg board end fluoridation for over 25,000 citizens, including residents of Bridgeport and a number of other smaller communities[SUP]20[/SUP].
- Oneida, New York[SUP]21[/SUP]—On May 5th the Common Council voted 5-1 to reject fluoridation for the third time since 2002. For months, the council has held public hearings and debates on fluoridation, listening to an array of experts on both sides of the issue, including FAN’s Dr. Paul Connett and NY Dept. of Health’s Dental Representative Jay Kumar, who is a long-time promoter of fluoridation. Despite an aggressive lobbying campaign by the fluoride-lobby, the council and community couldn’t be tricked into believing that the practice was safe, effective, or necessary. The decision will protect the water for over 21,000 residents.
- Kingsville, Ontario[SUP]22[/SUP]—This Canadian City Council, representing over 20,000 citizens, passed a motion in April reaffirming its stance in opposition to fluoridation. The issue was raised by the former Deputy Mayor, who urged the council to pass the motion to send a message to the provincial government, which is considering mandating the practice. The community of Lakeshore, Ontario[SUP]23[/SUP] also recently publicized their opposition to fluoridation, and will be sending a letter to provincial officials opposing a mandate.
- Carl Junction, Missouri[SUP]24[/SUP]—Councilors voted to end fluoridation in April after considering a number of concerns they had regarding the effectiveness and safety of the practice. The community, which is home to approximately 8,000 residents, started fluoridating the water supply in 2005 after voters approved the use of the additive. Carl Junction isn’t alone in making this decision. According to a recent article,[SUP]25[/SUP] “over the past five years, [at least] seven cities and towns in Missouri have removed fluoride from their municipal water systems, and a half-dozen more have put the matter to vote.”
- Bennington, Vermont[SUP]26[/SUP]--Despite aggressive campaigning by a well-organized and well-funded pro-fluoridation coalition, in March residents of this community of 16,000 voted 1,539 to 1,117 in opposition to fluoridation in an advisory referendum vote. This is at least the fifth time Bennington residents have voted down fluoridation since the 1960s.
- Gilford, Pennsylvania[SUP]27[/SUP]--Gilford Water Authority officials have decided to end fluoridation after more than 60 years of practicing it. The authority sent a letter to water customers stating, “We believe we should not put anything into the water that is not required by regulation to maintain the potability and pH balance of your water.”
- Sonoma City, California[SUP]28[/SUP]--In March, City Councilors voted 3-2 to oppose a proposal by the County government to add fluoride to the city’s drinking water. The council will be sending a letter of opposition to the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors.
Help End the Practice of Fluoridation
There's no doubt about it: fluoride should not be ingested. Even scientists from the EPA's National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory have classified fluoride as a "chemical having substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity.” Furthermore, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 41 percent of American adolescents now have dental fluorosis—unattractive discoloration and mottling of the teeth that indicate overexposure to fluoride. Clearly, children are being overexposed, and their health and development put in jeopardy. Why?
The only real solution is to stop the archaic practice of water fluoridation in the first place. Fortunately, the Fluoride Action Network has a game plan to END water fluoridation worldwide. Clean pure water is a prerequisite to optimal health. Industrial chemicals, drugs, and other toxic additives really have no place in our water supplies. So, please, protect your drinking water and support the fluoride-free movement by making a tax-deductible donation to the Fluoride Action Network today.
Internet Resources Where You Can Learn MoreThe only real solution is to stop the archaic practice of water fluoridation in the first place. Fortunately, the Fluoride Action Network has a game plan to END water fluoridation worldwide. Clean pure water is a prerequisite to optimal health. Industrial chemicals, drugs, and other toxic additives really have no place in our water supplies. So, please, protect your drinking water and support the fluoride-free movement by making a tax-deductible donation to the Fluoride Action Network today.
I encourage you to visit the website of the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) and visit the links below:
Together, Let's Help FAN Get the Funding They Deserve- Like FAN on Facebook, follow on Twitter, and sign up for campaign alerts.
- 10 Facts About Fluoride: Attorney Michael Connett summarizes 10 basic facts about fluoride that should be considered in any discussion about whether to fluoridate water. Also see 10 Facts Handout (PDF).
- 50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation: Learn why fluoridation is a bad medical practice that is unnecessary and ineffective. Download PDF.
- Health Effects Database: FAN's database sets forth the scientific basis for concerns regarding the safety and effectiveness of ingesting fluorides. They also have a Study Tracker with the most up-to-date and comprehensive source for studies on fluoride's effects on human health.
In my opinion, there are very few NGOs that are as effective and efficient as FAN. Its small team has led the charge to end fluoridation and will continue to do so with our help!
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
muir
Banned
- MBTI
- INFJ
More lies from the same corporate network that brings you the vaccines.....
http://naturalsociety.com/sued-clas...-help-break-monsanto-for-making-false-claims/
Those claims that Monsanto made – that glyphosate was harmless to humans – well, the company is about to pay for that ‘false advertising’ in the form of a class action lawsuit put forth by the offices of T. Matthew Phillips in Los Angeles, California.
In the lawsuit filed in California, Monsanto is accused of:
The deliberate falsification to conceal the fact that glyphosate is harmful to humans and animals.
The class action lawsuit (Case No: BC 578 942) was filed in Los Angeles County, California against biotechnology giant Monsanto. It alleges that Monsanto is guilty of false advertising by claiming that glyphosate, the active ingredient in their best-selling herbicide, Roundup, “targets an enzyme only found in plants and not in humans or animals.” You can see this statement marked clearly on some of Monsanto’s products sold in the state.
The lawsuit attests that the enzyme in question, EPSP synthase, is found in the microbiota that reside in our intestinal tracts, and therefore the enzyme is “found in humans and animals.” Due to the disruption of gut flora by glyphosate, Monsanto’s chemicals do indeed affect humans.
Why is Monsanto being sued? Because their product kills off our healthy gut-flora. Specifically:
Victory: German Retail Giant Removes Glyphosate from 250 Stores
Countries around the world are demanding that Roundup be banned, at least until ‘further research’ on its harmful affects can be completed. But even an Environmental Protection Agency memo classified glyphosate as a possible carcinogen in 1985. Later in 1991, when the agency randomly changed the classification to ‘not carcinogenic,’ three scientists involved in the study refused to sign, and one wrote “do not concur.”
The document which will be presented in court contains data that clearly shows a statistically significant increase in tumors in laboratory animals treated with glyphosate. Monsanto was only able to make the claim that tumors in rats could not be related to glyphosate because there were not more tumors in rats who were given higher doses.
This lawsuit is likely the long-awaited tipping point for millions of people who are tired of being poisoned by Big Ag and biotech greed, irreverence for human life and the environment, and utter disdain for our legal system which is meant to protect the innocent.
Along with this lawsuit is another filed against the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture just weeks ago, by Beijing resident Yang Xiao-lu. It requests disclosure of a toxicology report which was submitted to Chinese officials for the herbicide’s registration in China.
Chinese citizens asked for this toxicology report once before, but the Ministry of Agriculture denied them. The Ministry said that they had to protect “trade secrets” of Monsanto and other biotech bullies.
Likely the only thing that needed to be protected was Monsanto’s reputation when the recipe for their toxic products are already known the world over.
Attorney T. Matthew Phillips says:
Residents of California can become members of the class in this action by contacting T. Matthew Phillips. Phillips has indicated that he hopes other attorneys in other states will follow suit [pun intended].
4/22/2015: Case number was added.
4/23/2015: The lawsuit can be downloaded from http://www.monsantoclassaction.org/
Residents of California can add their names to the class. Plaintiffs are soliciting funds to help cover litigation costs: http://www.gofundme.com/monsantolawsuit
4/25/2015: T. Matthew Phillips will ask the court to compel the Defendant to reimburse donors, with interest.
Support natural health: checkout the new Natural Society Natural Health Clothing Line today and fund the message of organic living through our exclusive new designs!
[TABLE="class: author_bio"]
[TR]
[TD] About Christina Sarich:
Christina Sarich is a humanitarian and freelance writer helping you to Wake up Your Sleepy Little Head, and See the Big Picture. Her blog is Yoga for the New World. Her latest book is Pharma Sutra: Healing the Body And Mind Through the Art of Yoga.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[h=3]Other Popular Stories:[/h]
http://naturalsociety.com/sued-clas...-help-break-monsanto-for-making-false-claims/
Those claims that Monsanto made – that glyphosate was harmless to humans – well, the company is about to pay for that ‘false advertising’ in the form of a class action lawsuit put forth by the offices of T. Matthew Phillips in Los Angeles, California.
In the lawsuit filed in California, Monsanto is accused of:
The deliberate falsification to conceal the fact that glyphosate is harmful to humans and animals.
The class action lawsuit (Case No: BC 578 942) was filed in Los Angeles County, California against biotechnology giant Monsanto. It alleges that Monsanto is guilty of false advertising by claiming that glyphosate, the active ingredient in their best-selling herbicide, Roundup, “targets an enzyme only found in plants and not in humans or animals.” You can see this statement marked clearly on some of Monsanto’s products sold in the state.
The lawsuit attests that the enzyme in question, EPSP synthase, is found in the microbiota that reside in our intestinal tracts, and therefore the enzyme is “found in humans and animals.” Due to the disruption of gut flora by glyphosate, Monsanto’s chemicals do indeed affect humans.
Why is Monsanto being sued? Because their product kills off our healthy gut-flora. Specifically:
“. . . glyphosate is linked to stomach and bowel problems, indigestion, ulcers, colitis, gluten intolerance, sleeplessness, lethargy, depression, Crohn’s Disease, Celiac Disease, allergies, obesity, diabetes, infertility, liver disease, renal failure, autism, Alzheimer’s, endocrine disruption, and the W.H.O. recently announced glyphosate is ‘probably carcinogenic’.”
The International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the World Health Organization (WHO), last month declared that glyphosate is a Group 2A carcinogen. The American Cancer Society quickly followed suit, also listing glyphosate as a Group 2A carcinogen.
Victory: German Retail Giant Removes Glyphosate from 250 Stores
Countries around the world are demanding that Roundup be banned, at least until ‘further research’ on its harmful affects can be completed. But even an Environmental Protection Agency memo classified glyphosate as a possible carcinogen in 1985. Later in 1991, when the agency randomly changed the classification to ‘not carcinogenic,’ three scientists involved in the study refused to sign, and one wrote “do not concur.”
The document which will be presented in court contains data that clearly shows a statistically significant increase in tumors in laboratory animals treated with glyphosate. Monsanto was only able to make the claim that tumors in rats could not be related to glyphosate because there were not more tumors in rats who were given higher doses.
This lawsuit is likely the long-awaited tipping point for millions of people who are tired of being poisoned by Big Ag and biotech greed, irreverence for human life and the environment, and utter disdain for our legal system which is meant to protect the innocent.
Along with this lawsuit is another filed against the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture just weeks ago, by Beijing resident Yang Xiao-lu. It requests disclosure of a toxicology report which was submitted to Chinese officials for the herbicide’s registration in China.
The case has been accepted and the collegiate panel of the court has informed the plaintiff that, considering that Monsanto is a stakeholder to the case, they have added Monsanto as an involved party.Chinese citizens asked for this toxicology report once before, but the Ministry of Agriculture denied them. The Ministry said that they had to protect “trade secrets” of Monsanto and other biotech bullies.
Likely the only thing that needed to be protected was Monsanto’s reputation when the recipe for their toxic products are already known the world over.
Attorney T. Matthew Phillips says:
“The defendant intentionally misleads consumers by misrepresenting and concealing the true and correct facts concerning glyphosate. We are not trying to prove that Roundup is harmful or carcinogenic, we are merely pointing out that Monsanto is lying about the enzymes that Roundup targets. Roundup kills the weeds in your backyard and the weeds in your stomach.”
Judgment is sought against Monsanto to prohibit the company from continuing to make the claim that glyphosate targets an enzyme not found in humans and for compensation to the plaintiffs, including attorney fees.
Residents of California can become members of the class in this action by contacting T. Matthew Phillips. Phillips has indicated that he hopes other attorneys in other states will follow suit [pun intended].
4/22/2015: Case number was added.
4/23/2015: The lawsuit can be downloaded from http://www.monsantoclassaction.org/
Residents of California can add their names to the class. Plaintiffs are soliciting funds to help cover litigation costs: http://www.gofundme.com/monsantolawsuit
4/25/2015: T. Matthew Phillips will ask the court to compel the Defendant to reimburse donors, with interest.
Support natural health: checkout the new Natural Society Natural Health Clothing Line today and fund the message of organic living through our exclusive new designs!
[TABLE="class: author_bio"]
[TR]
[TD] About Christina Sarich:
Christina Sarich is a humanitarian and freelance writer helping you to Wake up Your Sleepy Little Head, and See the Big Picture. Her blog is Yoga for the New World. Her latest book is Pharma Sutra: Healing the Body And Mind Through the Art of Yoga.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[h=3]Other Popular Stories:[/h]
- Monsanto’s Best-Selling Herbicide Roundup Linked to Infertility
- Experts Ask World to Help Ban Monsanto’s Cancer-Linked Glyphosate
- Chinese Government Sued over Monsanto Causing Cancer
- New Study: Monsanto’s #1 Herbicide Directly Linked to Chronic Disease Spike
- Roundup Chemicals Linked to Cancer of the Lymph System
- Will Monsanto’s Roundup Herbicide Soon Be Banned?
muir
Banned
- MBTI
- INFJ
http://www.naturalnews.com/049797_V...e_syndrome_cognitive_impairment_mercury.html#
[h=1]Vaccines suppress your brain! Vaccine-Induced Brain Damage Syndrome (VIBDS) mirrors cognitive impairment caused by chemotherapy (Chemo Brain)[/h]
Thursday, May 21, 2015
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Vaccine-Induced Brain Damage Syndrome (VIBDS) is the phenomenon of impaired cognitive function caused by the brain-damaging toxic additives found in vaccines. It mirrors the well-documented cognitive impairment caused by chemotherapy, known across the medical establishment as Post-Chemotherapy Cognitive Impairment (PCCI).
The unmistakable evidence that vaccines cause permanent brain damage is found in the obviously suppressed cognition of those who take them. According to nearly every pro-vaccine parent who routinely takes vaccines, their vaccinated children -- who are therefore immune to infectious disease -- are endangered by unvaccinated children who they claim might be carrying infectious disease.
But hold on a second. If your own children have immunity, then they have nothing to fear from other children that might be carrying infectious disease. The very definition of immunity means a child can be exposed to the disease and not "catch" it. Not to belabor the point, but "immunity" means to "be immune." Somehow, this simple, rational point escapes the cognitive capacity of every single person demanding mandatory vaccines for all children.
After all, immunity to chicken pox means you can be exposed to chicken pox and not be afflicted by it. Immunity to measles means you can be exposed to measles and not "get" the measles. Immunity to the mumps means that you can be exposed to the mumps and not catch the mumps. I hope this isn't new information to anybody, because these statements simply affirm the fundamental truths of immunology.
If immunity doesn't grant protection from infectious disease, then why should anyone get vaccinated in the first place?
A person who believes that unvaccinated children pose a risk to vaccinated (immunized) children must either:
1) Be too uneducated to understand the meaning of the word "immune."
or
2) Suffer from brain damage and therefore be unable to grasp the logic that immune children have nothing to fear from non-immunized children.
[h=1]Inability to grasp logic signifies deeper cognitive damage caused by vaccines[/h]Cognitive suppression can be caused by things like sniffing glue or undergoing chemotherapy treatments. The phenomenon of "chemo brain" is widely recognized and well documented in the medical literature. Patients undergoing chemotherapy routinely exhibit suppressed cognition, reduced problem-solving skills and a loss of social skills.
The medical establishment has even come up with a name for it: Post-chemotherapy cognitive impairment (PCCI). Even the pro-industry website CancerCare.org explains the reality of chemo brain in this fact sheet which states that chemotherapy causes:
- Memory loss
- Trouble paying attention
- Trouble finding the right word
- Difficulty with new learning
- Difficulty managing daily activities
Astonishingly, the cancer industry still cannot figure out that chemo brain is caused by chemotherapy! Even when it's named "chemo brain," they still can't connect the dots... possibly because they are often victims of chemo brain themselves (merely handling chemotherapy drugs causes an increased risk of cancer and chemo brain).
As the CancerCare.org website hilariously explains:
Researchers are uncertain of the exact causes of these difficulties, but they are currently studying this problem in order to find ways to both treat and prevent it. The causes of long-lasting chemobrain (more than one year after treatment) are not known.
It has apparently never occurred to these people that chemo brain is caused by chemotherapy.
[h=1]People brain-damaged by vaccines remain unaware of their diminished cognitive function[/h]Similarly, people who are brain-damaged by vaccines are not aware that their brains are being damaged by vaccines. What exactly causes brain damage from vaccines? The vaccine ingredients, of course: aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, MSG, antibiotic drugs, etc. Each one of these is openly admitted by the CDC to still be used in vaccines, and each one is also exhaustively documented as a neurotoxin.
For those who are too brain-damaged by vaccines to understand the word, "neurotoxin" means it's toxic to nerve cells. Your brain is made largely of nerve cells. So if something is a "neurotoxin," and you inject it, you will suffer damage to your brain. I wish I had a way to explain this more easily for those who are victims of vaccine damage. The following medical chart from Idiocracy may suffice:
If your brain cells don't function well, you can be easily manipulated by the vaccine industry to believe any sort of irrational non-logic, including the fallacies routinely pushed by paid vaccine publicists who fake like they're "concerned parents." The No. 1 fallacy that's repeated across the mainstream media is the one described here: the idea that unvaccinated children can pose a risk to vaccinated children who, we are told, have achieved immunity.
In reality, the truth is exactly the opposite. Unvaccinated children tend to have far stronger immune systems, making them far less likely to acquire or transmit infectious diseases that might be circulating in any population. Vaccinated children, on the other hand, often "shed" viruses in the hours and days following vaccination. They become contagious carriers due to the mere fact that they were just vaccinated, and if real science determined public policy on this issue, vaccinated children should be banned from public school for a few days until their viral shedding phase passes and they are no longer a risk to other children.
The Disneyland measles outbreak, it turns out, may have been caused by vaccinated children, not unvaccinated children.
But real logic plays absolutely no role at the CDC or with state health officials who are also too brain-damaged by vaccines to grasp this issue with anything resembling clarity. Because they are cognitively damaged, all their conclusions are spoon-fed to them by someone else. They are incapable of original thought and incapable of logical skepticism. It has never occurred to them to ask, for example, "Why do most infectious disease outbreaks occur among children who were already vaccinated?"
Even further, they could never arrive at the cognitive milestone required to ask even more advanced question such as those detailed below.
What else is interesting is that the very same people who are so brain-damaged to believe that vaccines are safe also insist that glyphosate, radiation, mercury, fluoride and GMOs are safe, too. In other words, once the brain has been poisoned enough by one of these chemicals, that brain will fail to grasp the dangers present across ALL chemicals.
[h=1]Serious questions that vaccine-damaged adults are too far gone to even contemplate[/h]• If vaccines never harm anyone, then why did Congress create the National Vaccine Injury Compensation program, which has paid out nearly $3 billion in financial awards to families of vaccine-damaged children?
• We are told that vaccines never damage anyone in the United States, even though vaccines routinely cause brain damage, comas and deaths in other countries. Just recently in one small town in Mexico, 75% of the children who received vaccines ended up hospitalized or dead. Are we to believe that the USA a magical place where vaccines are uniquely exempted from the laws of biological cause and effect? If so, how does that magic work? (And who is waving the magic wand?)
• If vaccines are the only way children can survive the treacherous world of viruses, then how did the human species survives for hundreds of thousands of years without any vaccines at all? Viruses are not new to Earth. They've been around far longer than humans...
• If vaccines are so safe, then why did the U.S. Congress have to grant vaccine companies absolute legal immunity? If their products cause no harm, then they would have no lawsuits to worry about in the first place, right?
• What incentive is there for the vaccine industry to make safer products when they have no liability for faulty products that harm their customers? If an automobile manufacturer were granted absolute immunity from all liability, consumer safety groups would cry foul! So why does the vaccine industry get a pass on the issue of safety?
[h=1]"Vaccines good! Hulk smash!"[/h]When you ask these questions to any adult who has been routinely vaccinated, you're usually met with a blank stare. That's the logic gap phenomenon that occurs when the areas of the brain responsible for higher-level cognition have been damaged by vaccines. Because their higher-level functions have been damaged, they resort to low-level animalistic (or even "reptilian") urges to determine their behaviors and preferences. "Vaccines good. Measles bad."
This is the limit of their cognitive reach. Nothing beyond simplistic, false memes can be processed by their brains. Remember: The vaccinated brain is a damaged brain, and that's precisely why so many vaccinated people cannot process the logic of how immunization really works.
The bigger concern here, of course, is not merely the widespread presence of large numbers of vaccinated brains in society, but the realization that all these vaccinated brains retain the power to vote in elections. There is presently no requirement whatsoever -- anywhere in America -- that people who vote are of sound mind.
People can vote if they are schizophrenic, manic, misinformed or clinically insane. They can vote if they suffer from the very real "chemo brain" of chemotherapy, too. They can even vote if they are taking mind-altering psychiatric drugs.
This is precisely how sociopathic bureaucrats get elected in America today: via the votes of brain-damaged victims of the medical, vaccine and psychiatric industries. It's also why the bureaucrats they elect into office think they have to run the country like a nanny state, telling you when to wear your bike helmet, limiting the size of your soda, forcing you to save for retirement via Social Security theft of your wages, and so on. The bureaucrats treat the voters like a population of brain-damaged imbeciles. And in frighteningly large number of cases, that's not inaccurate, due to the widespread epidemic of Vaccine-Induced Brain Damage Syndrome (VIBDS).
[h=1]How to survive in a world full of brain-damaged victims of the vaccine industry[/h]The real challenge is to figure out how to live as an intelligent, informed person when surrounded by a population of brain-damaged vaccine victims. The task is made even more difficult by the realization that those who are brain-damaged don't yet realize it. It's sort of like Neo walking around in the Matrix, trying to save the very people who are defending the Matrix because they haven't yet awakened to reality. Any time you interact with an individual who has been brain-damaged by a vaccine, you may be trying to inform them, awaken them and save them, but they will resist your efforts because they are often already too damaged to realize just how deeply they've already been victimized.
Therein lies the evil brilliance of the vaccine narrative: The more people the vaccine industry can brain damage with vaccines, the more will go along with the vaccine narrative and pressure others to also obey. Mathematically, this is very much like a "zombie pandemic" effect, whereby people become infected with a zombie virus and then attack others, infecting them with the same zombie virus that also turns them into a carrier. The toxic chemicals in vaccines cause just enough brain damage to deactivate higher cognition in humans while maintaining the lower level functions of speech and social interaction that allow vaccine-damaged humans to spread the damage to others.
This is why the level of neurotoxic substances in vaccines is intentionally kept to low levels, but never reduced to zero. Vaccines are dosed with just enough toxins to render humans cognitively impaired, but not enough to make them mentally feeble. (Otherwise, someone might notice.)
[h=1]The importance of annual vaccine dosing to maintain cognitive impairment[/h]In observing the vaccine industry, you'll notice there is an extremely aggressive push for annual flu shots.
It is no coincidence that flu shots still contain the neurotoxic heavy metal mercury which causes permanent damage to brain cells.
It's also no coincidence that both "chemo brain" (PCCI) and vaccine-induced brain damage syndrome (VIBDS) may fade to some degree over time as the brain attempts to recover its lost functions. After one year, some chemo brain victims actually recover a significant portion of their cognition, for example.
Similarly, people who avoid vaccines for many years tend to "wake up" and come to their senses about vaccines. Their brains are achieving partial recoveries from the vaccine damage, and at some threshold, a sufficient level of cognitive function is restored to allow the partial restoration of critical thinking.
The CDC and the vaccine industry desperately attempt to prevent any person from going more than one year between doses of brain-damaging vaccines. This is accomplished with the annual flu shot push, which consists of the CDC predictably stating how horrible the flu will be this season while ordering everyone to get a flu shot.
The flu shots are intentionally formulated with mercury. In my atomic spectrometry lab, I tested a flu shot from GlaxoSmithKline and found it to contain over 50,000 ppb mercury. (Testing conducted via ICP-MS with sensitivity down to parts per billion). The purpose of this mercury is to keep you in the Matrix and prevent you from awakening from your vaccine-induced stupor.
Hence the irrationally aggressive push for annual flu shots, even when the flu shot strain is totally worthless. As the CDC openly admitted last flu season, the available flu shots missed the mark and didn't cover the predominant flu strains circulating in the wild. Taking the flu shot, in other words, was medically useless. Yet the CDC and the mainstream media dutifully promoted the flu shot anyway, claiming without any scientific basis whatsoever that even though the flu was the wrong strain, it might somehow "reduce the severity" of any other flu you caught. (This is what it sounds like when the CDC just makes up whatever it wants out of thin air, then promotes that fiction as fact.)
The real purpose of the flu shot push was not to promote flu immunity but to re-dose the population with another year's supply of brain-damaging mercury.
The proof is self-evident: Who dutifully lined up for this medically useless flu shot? The very same people who take the flu shot every year! In other words, the flu shot is sought out by those who are cognitively damaged with sufficient severity to be mindlessly obedient to the propaganda demands broadcast by apparent medical authority figures.
The flu shot, in other words, is the world's soma.
[h=1]Vaccine-induced brain damage and our Brave New World[/h]Soma is the central mind control drug in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. The drug was used by government authorities to keep the population in a never-ending state of mindless obedience. Just like vaccines, soma had to be repeatedly dosed to make sure the populace remained compliant. Individuals who refused to take soma were depicted as undesirable elements who opposed the order of civilized society.
Today we see precisely the same tactic used against those who refuse to take vaccines. They are vilified by the brain-damaged masses, and pressured to join in the mindlessness of total medical obedience. From the book:
"I don't understand anything," she said with decision, determined to preserve her incomprehension intact. "Nothing. Least of all," she continued in another tone "why you don't take soma when you have these dreadful ideas of yours. You'd forget all about them. And instead of feeling miserable, you'd be jolly. So jolly..."
Elsewhere in the book, the description of soma describes the drug as a perfect metaphor for vaccines in America today... a "holiday from the facts":
And if ever, by some unlucky chance, anything unpleasant should somehow happen, why, there's always soma to give you a holiday from the facts. And there's always soma to calm your anger, to reconcile you to your enemies, to make you patient and long-suffering. In the past you could only accomplish these things by making a great effort and after years of hard moral training. Now, you swallow two or three half-gramme tablets, and there you are. Anybody can be virtuous now. You can carry at least half your morality about in a bottle. Christianity without tears-that's what soma is."
Indeed, anybody can be "virtuous now" in the modern-day world of totalitarian science pushing brain-damaging vaccines. By taking a shot (or two, or three) each year, you too can join the club of the cognitively deranged masses, the withering souls who once could express original thought or critical thinking but now can only find purpose in conformity and compliance.
Vaccines are your soma, your pharmacist is your dealer, and the CDC is your master. Why bother to think about any of it when mindless obedience is so much easier?
Sources for this article include:
http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/05/19...
http://www.cancercare.org/publications/72-co...
http://www.naturalnews.com/037653_vaccine_ad...
http://www.naturalnews.com/048940_measles_ou...
http://www.naturalnews.com/048519_vaccines_m...
http://www.naturalnews.com/048928_vaccines_a...
http://www.naturalnews.com/048819_vaccine_in...
http://www.naturalnews.com/049423_swine_flu_...
http://www.naturalnews.com/049669_vaccine_in...
http://www.naturalnews.com/045418_flu_shots_...
http://www.naturalnews.com/047890_flu_vaccin...
[h=1]Vaccines suppress your brain! Vaccine-Induced Brain Damage Syndrome (VIBDS) mirrors cognitive impairment caused by chemotherapy (Chemo Brain)[/h]
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Vaccine-Induced Brain Damage Syndrome (VIBDS) is the phenomenon of impaired cognitive function caused by the brain-damaging toxic additives found in vaccines. It mirrors the well-documented cognitive impairment caused by chemotherapy, known across the medical establishment as Post-Chemotherapy Cognitive Impairment (PCCI).
The unmistakable evidence that vaccines cause permanent brain damage is found in the obviously suppressed cognition of those who take them. According to nearly every pro-vaccine parent who routinely takes vaccines, their vaccinated children -- who are therefore immune to infectious disease -- are endangered by unvaccinated children who they claim might be carrying infectious disease.
But hold on a second. If your own children have immunity, then they have nothing to fear from other children that might be carrying infectious disease. The very definition of immunity means a child can be exposed to the disease and not "catch" it. Not to belabor the point, but "immunity" means to "be immune." Somehow, this simple, rational point escapes the cognitive capacity of every single person demanding mandatory vaccines for all children.
After all, immunity to chicken pox means you can be exposed to chicken pox and not be afflicted by it. Immunity to measles means you can be exposed to measles and not "get" the measles. Immunity to the mumps means that you can be exposed to the mumps and not catch the mumps. I hope this isn't new information to anybody, because these statements simply affirm the fundamental truths of immunology.
If immunity doesn't grant protection from infectious disease, then why should anyone get vaccinated in the first place?
A person who believes that unvaccinated children pose a risk to vaccinated (immunized) children must either:
1) Be too uneducated to understand the meaning of the word "immune."
or
2) Suffer from brain damage and therefore be unable to grasp the logic that immune children have nothing to fear from non-immunized children.
[h=1]Inability to grasp logic signifies deeper cognitive damage caused by vaccines[/h]Cognitive suppression can be caused by things like sniffing glue or undergoing chemotherapy treatments. The phenomenon of "chemo brain" is widely recognized and well documented in the medical literature. Patients undergoing chemotherapy routinely exhibit suppressed cognition, reduced problem-solving skills and a loss of social skills.
The medical establishment has even come up with a name for it: Post-chemotherapy cognitive impairment (PCCI). Even the pro-industry website CancerCare.org explains the reality of chemo brain in this fact sheet which states that chemotherapy causes:
- Memory loss
- Trouble paying attention
- Trouble finding the right word
- Difficulty with new learning
- Difficulty managing daily activities
Astonishingly, the cancer industry still cannot figure out that chemo brain is caused by chemotherapy! Even when it's named "chemo brain," they still can't connect the dots... possibly because they are often victims of chemo brain themselves (merely handling chemotherapy drugs causes an increased risk of cancer and chemo brain).
As the CancerCare.org website hilariously explains:
Researchers are uncertain of the exact causes of these difficulties, but they are currently studying this problem in order to find ways to both treat and prevent it. The causes of long-lasting chemobrain (more than one year after treatment) are not known.
It has apparently never occurred to these people that chemo brain is caused by chemotherapy.
[h=1]People brain-damaged by vaccines remain unaware of their diminished cognitive function[/h]Similarly, people who are brain-damaged by vaccines are not aware that their brains are being damaged by vaccines. What exactly causes brain damage from vaccines? The vaccine ingredients, of course: aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, MSG, antibiotic drugs, etc. Each one of these is openly admitted by the CDC to still be used in vaccines, and each one is also exhaustively documented as a neurotoxin.
For those who are too brain-damaged by vaccines to understand the word, "neurotoxin" means it's toxic to nerve cells. Your brain is made largely of nerve cells. So if something is a "neurotoxin," and you inject it, you will suffer damage to your brain. I wish I had a way to explain this more easily for those who are victims of vaccine damage. The following medical chart from Idiocracy may suffice:
If your brain cells don't function well, you can be easily manipulated by the vaccine industry to believe any sort of irrational non-logic, including the fallacies routinely pushed by paid vaccine publicists who fake like they're "concerned parents." The No. 1 fallacy that's repeated across the mainstream media is the one described here: the idea that unvaccinated children can pose a risk to vaccinated children who, we are told, have achieved immunity.
In reality, the truth is exactly the opposite. Unvaccinated children tend to have far stronger immune systems, making them far less likely to acquire or transmit infectious diseases that might be circulating in any population. Vaccinated children, on the other hand, often "shed" viruses in the hours and days following vaccination. They become contagious carriers due to the mere fact that they were just vaccinated, and if real science determined public policy on this issue, vaccinated children should be banned from public school for a few days until their viral shedding phase passes and they are no longer a risk to other children.
The Disneyland measles outbreak, it turns out, may have been caused by vaccinated children, not unvaccinated children.
But real logic plays absolutely no role at the CDC or with state health officials who are also too brain-damaged by vaccines to grasp this issue with anything resembling clarity. Because they are cognitively damaged, all their conclusions are spoon-fed to them by someone else. They are incapable of original thought and incapable of logical skepticism. It has never occurred to them to ask, for example, "Why do most infectious disease outbreaks occur among children who were already vaccinated?"
Even further, they could never arrive at the cognitive milestone required to ask even more advanced question such as those detailed below.
What else is interesting is that the very same people who are so brain-damaged to believe that vaccines are safe also insist that glyphosate, radiation, mercury, fluoride and GMOs are safe, too. In other words, once the brain has been poisoned enough by one of these chemicals, that brain will fail to grasp the dangers present across ALL chemicals.
[h=1]Serious questions that vaccine-damaged adults are too far gone to even contemplate[/h]• If vaccines never harm anyone, then why did Congress create the National Vaccine Injury Compensation program, which has paid out nearly $3 billion in financial awards to families of vaccine-damaged children?
• We are told that vaccines never damage anyone in the United States, even though vaccines routinely cause brain damage, comas and deaths in other countries. Just recently in one small town in Mexico, 75% of the children who received vaccines ended up hospitalized or dead. Are we to believe that the USA a magical place where vaccines are uniquely exempted from the laws of biological cause and effect? If so, how does that magic work? (And who is waving the magic wand?)
• If vaccines are the only way children can survive the treacherous world of viruses, then how did the human species survives for hundreds of thousands of years without any vaccines at all? Viruses are not new to Earth. They've been around far longer than humans...
• If vaccines are so safe, then why did the U.S. Congress have to grant vaccine companies absolute legal immunity? If their products cause no harm, then they would have no lawsuits to worry about in the first place, right?
• What incentive is there for the vaccine industry to make safer products when they have no liability for faulty products that harm their customers? If an automobile manufacturer were granted absolute immunity from all liability, consumer safety groups would cry foul! So why does the vaccine industry get a pass on the issue of safety?
[h=1]"Vaccines good! Hulk smash!"[/h]When you ask these questions to any adult who has been routinely vaccinated, you're usually met with a blank stare. That's the logic gap phenomenon that occurs when the areas of the brain responsible for higher-level cognition have been damaged by vaccines. Because their higher-level functions have been damaged, they resort to low-level animalistic (or even "reptilian") urges to determine their behaviors and preferences. "Vaccines good. Measles bad."
This is the limit of their cognitive reach. Nothing beyond simplistic, false memes can be processed by their brains. Remember: The vaccinated brain is a damaged brain, and that's precisely why so many vaccinated people cannot process the logic of how immunization really works.
The bigger concern here, of course, is not merely the widespread presence of large numbers of vaccinated brains in society, but the realization that all these vaccinated brains retain the power to vote in elections. There is presently no requirement whatsoever -- anywhere in America -- that people who vote are of sound mind.
People can vote if they are schizophrenic, manic, misinformed or clinically insane. They can vote if they suffer from the very real "chemo brain" of chemotherapy, too. They can even vote if they are taking mind-altering psychiatric drugs.
This is precisely how sociopathic bureaucrats get elected in America today: via the votes of brain-damaged victims of the medical, vaccine and psychiatric industries. It's also why the bureaucrats they elect into office think they have to run the country like a nanny state, telling you when to wear your bike helmet, limiting the size of your soda, forcing you to save for retirement via Social Security theft of your wages, and so on. The bureaucrats treat the voters like a population of brain-damaged imbeciles. And in frighteningly large number of cases, that's not inaccurate, due to the widespread epidemic of Vaccine-Induced Brain Damage Syndrome (VIBDS).
[h=1]How to survive in a world full of brain-damaged victims of the vaccine industry[/h]The real challenge is to figure out how to live as an intelligent, informed person when surrounded by a population of brain-damaged vaccine victims. The task is made even more difficult by the realization that those who are brain-damaged don't yet realize it. It's sort of like Neo walking around in the Matrix, trying to save the very people who are defending the Matrix because they haven't yet awakened to reality. Any time you interact with an individual who has been brain-damaged by a vaccine, you may be trying to inform them, awaken them and save them, but they will resist your efforts because they are often already too damaged to realize just how deeply they've already been victimized.
Therein lies the evil brilliance of the vaccine narrative: The more people the vaccine industry can brain damage with vaccines, the more will go along with the vaccine narrative and pressure others to also obey. Mathematically, this is very much like a "zombie pandemic" effect, whereby people become infected with a zombie virus and then attack others, infecting them with the same zombie virus that also turns them into a carrier. The toxic chemicals in vaccines cause just enough brain damage to deactivate higher cognition in humans while maintaining the lower level functions of speech and social interaction that allow vaccine-damaged humans to spread the damage to others.
This is why the level of neurotoxic substances in vaccines is intentionally kept to low levels, but never reduced to zero. Vaccines are dosed with just enough toxins to render humans cognitively impaired, but not enough to make them mentally feeble. (Otherwise, someone might notice.)
[h=1]The importance of annual vaccine dosing to maintain cognitive impairment[/h]In observing the vaccine industry, you'll notice there is an extremely aggressive push for annual flu shots.
It is no coincidence that flu shots still contain the neurotoxic heavy metal mercury which causes permanent damage to brain cells.
It's also no coincidence that both "chemo brain" (PCCI) and vaccine-induced brain damage syndrome (VIBDS) may fade to some degree over time as the brain attempts to recover its lost functions. After one year, some chemo brain victims actually recover a significant portion of their cognition, for example.
Similarly, people who avoid vaccines for many years tend to "wake up" and come to their senses about vaccines. Their brains are achieving partial recoveries from the vaccine damage, and at some threshold, a sufficient level of cognitive function is restored to allow the partial restoration of critical thinking.
The CDC and the vaccine industry desperately attempt to prevent any person from going more than one year between doses of brain-damaging vaccines. This is accomplished with the annual flu shot push, which consists of the CDC predictably stating how horrible the flu will be this season while ordering everyone to get a flu shot.
The flu shots are intentionally formulated with mercury. In my atomic spectrometry lab, I tested a flu shot from GlaxoSmithKline and found it to contain over 50,000 ppb mercury. (Testing conducted via ICP-MS with sensitivity down to parts per billion). The purpose of this mercury is to keep you in the Matrix and prevent you from awakening from your vaccine-induced stupor.
Hence the irrationally aggressive push for annual flu shots, even when the flu shot strain is totally worthless. As the CDC openly admitted last flu season, the available flu shots missed the mark and didn't cover the predominant flu strains circulating in the wild. Taking the flu shot, in other words, was medically useless. Yet the CDC and the mainstream media dutifully promoted the flu shot anyway, claiming without any scientific basis whatsoever that even though the flu was the wrong strain, it might somehow "reduce the severity" of any other flu you caught. (This is what it sounds like when the CDC just makes up whatever it wants out of thin air, then promotes that fiction as fact.)
The real purpose of the flu shot push was not to promote flu immunity but to re-dose the population with another year's supply of brain-damaging mercury.
The proof is self-evident: Who dutifully lined up for this medically useless flu shot? The very same people who take the flu shot every year! In other words, the flu shot is sought out by those who are cognitively damaged with sufficient severity to be mindlessly obedient to the propaganda demands broadcast by apparent medical authority figures.
The flu shot, in other words, is the world's soma.
[h=1]Vaccine-induced brain damage and our Brave New World[/h]Soma is the central mind control drug in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. The drug was used by government authorities to keep the population in a never-ending state of mindless obedience. Just like vaccines, soma had to be repeatedly dosed to make sure the populace remained compliant. Individuals who refused to take soma were depicted as undesirable elements who opposed the order of civilized society.
Today we see precisely the same tactic used against those who refuse to take vaccines. They are vilified by the brain-damaged masses, and pressured to join in the mindlessness of total medical obedience. From the book:
"I don't understand anything," she said with decision, determined to preserve her incomprehension intact. "Nothing. Least of all," she continued in another tone "why you don't take soma when you have these dreadful ideas of yours. You'd forget all about them. And instead of feeling miserable, you'd be jolly. So jolly..."
Elsewhere in the book, the description of soma describes the drug as a perfect metaphor for vaccines in America today... a "holiday from the facts":
And if ever, by some unlucky chance, anything unpleasant should somehow happen, why, there's always soma to give you a holiday from the facts. And there's always soma to calm your anger, to reconcile you to your enemies, to make you patient and long-suffering. In the past you could only accomplish these things by making a great effort and after years of hard moral training. Now, you swallow two or three half-gramme tablets, and there you are. Anybody can be virtuous now. You can carry at least half your morality about in a bottle. Christianity without tears-that's what soma is."
Indeed, anybody can be "virtuous now" in the modern-day world of totalitarian science pushing brain-damaging vaccines. By taking a shot (or two, or three) each year, you too can join the club of the cognitively deranged masses, the withering souls who once could express original thought or critical thinking but now can only find purpose in conformity and compliance.
Vaccines are your soma, your pharmacist is your dealer, and the CDC is your master. Why bother to think about any of it when mindless obedience is so much easier?
Sources for this article include:
http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/05/19...
http://www.cancercare.org/publications/72-co...
http://www.naturalnews.com/037653_vaccine_ad...
http://www.naturalnews.com/048940_measles_ou...
http://www.naturalnews.com/048519_vaccines_m...
http://www.naturalnews.com/048928_vaccines_a...
http://www.naturalnews.com/048819_vaccine_in...
http://www.naturalnews.com/049423_swine_flu_...
http://www.naturalnews.com/049669_vaccine_in...
http://www.naturalnews.com/045418_flu_shots_...
http://www.naturalnews.com/047890_flu_vaccin...
muir
Banned
- MBTI
- INFJ
http://www.bolenreport.com/autism/antivaccine yes8.htm
Merck's "Mandatory Vaccine" Program Backfiring Nationwide... California, However, is, As Yet, Screwed Up...
California "NO on SB277" Groups Grinding Away...
Welcome to the 2015 Democratic Party. No wonder voters, all over the US, threw these assholes from the bus in the mid-presidential-term elections.
Even before Pan got elected to the California Senate, records show, the plan to make Merck, and Big Pharma, even richer was in the works. That plan was, most likely what sewed up the gargantuan contributions for a state Senate race. It was obvious that Senate Bill 277, with Pan and fifteen other Senator authors (fifteen authors?) was written LONG before Pan was elected, probably by the lobbyists shown in the video attached to my last article.
[/FONT]
Arghhh! They strew red flower petals through the capitol buildings.
Despite the fact that there a a whole lot of brilliant people working to stop SB277 there are significant problems with organized leadership. To my way of thinking there are two groups involved that should just go home. They are in the way. (1) The first, who I mention constantly are the Health Choice/Canary Party, emphasis on “Party.” For those of you who have just tuned in, please take the time to read about them by clicking here - [url]http://www.bolenreport.com/autism/autism%20infighting16.htm[/URL]. They are to me, all about the grand gesture, being seen in front, deciding who they will include, or not include, in their group - like a badly run Junior High Prom Queen project. They are about "being in charge" and "partying." They have a ZERO success rate. They should just put their panties back on and go home.
(2) The other group is being run by what appeared to be avatars - for they will not identify who they are. A FaceBook group, calling itself "Our Kids Our Choice" came into question because of considerable "Controlled Opposition" tactics. Frankly, this group looks to me like they are being run by the SB277 bill's author Richard Pan MD, and/or his associates. And, I have no reason to think differently, even after a fairly thorough investigation.
The group "Our Kids Our Choice" turns out to be run by a person, I traced, called Kristen Hundsley who claims (snort here) that she has a SECRET GROUP of advisors guiding her. (snort again). She gives out daily "Action Items," which, uhmmmm, are pretty much stupid and useless.
After a research effort, I wrote to Hundley, who had contacted me, via email complaining. My email to her is to the right. It is self-explanatory. She did not respond to me personally. But, she did make a video...
In Hundley's grainey video she explains, to my astonishment, that she has a secret team of advisors. You can see this short video, by clicking here.
My thinking - Hundley was HIRED by someone to do this "Our Kids, Our Choice" thing. Her FaceBook page, I suspect, grew quickly because whomever hired her populated it quickly.
In short, from the reports I am getting , anyone who had a good idea, and posted it on "Our Kids, Our Choice" was banned immediately and their posts were erased. Anyone who inquired about people and posts disappearing, were banned, and THEIR posts erased, immediately.
So, readers, what do YOU think is going on here?
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too.
Make No Mistake...
Make no mistake - THERE WERE, and ARE, definitely honest, competent groups working on this problem, some centered around the five thousand (5,000) member "California Coalition For Vaccine Choice," and the "AWAKE California" FaceBook page. It is just that OTHERS, it looks to me, were attempting to DOMINATE the project and EXCLUDE those that knew what to do, and when.
But, things ARE getting done DESPITE these two groups. In fact, DEFINITE progress is being made. The SB277 bill, itself, is being whittled down because of the COMPETENT group efforts. For instance, the home school people have a very powerful presence. Their nose-to-nose approach with Pan resulted, early-on, with an "author amendment" to the bill, making it clear that "home schoolers" were exempt. POWER talks - even to the sleazy California Democratic Party leadership. More, in Judiciary, two more "author amendments" were added, grandfathering existing holders of exemptions, and eliminating future additions of vaccines.
New alliances have been, and are being, formed in California...
I hope they are in time.
Stay tuned.
Tim Bolen - Consumer Advocate
- See more at: http://www.bolenreport.com/autism/antivaccine yes8.htm#sthash.cQaaOUuC.dpuf
Merck's "Mandatory Vaccine" Program Backfiring Nationwide... California, However, is, As Yet, Screwed Up...
California "NO on SB277" Groups Grinding Away...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
Friday, May 1st, 2015
Sleazy Drug Lord Merck, through it's cash strewing lobbying teams nationwide, set out the same "Mandatory Vaccine" legislation in about twenty States. Now they are suffering the consequences. Backlash.
Never before has there been such a worldwide "anti-vaccination" campaign, extolling the horrors of vaccines. The Vaccine Construction, made up of Merck, the Center for Disease Control (CDC), State Public Health agencies, are, suddenly getting much more deserved scrutiny then ever before.
The cutting-edge media doesn't miss a day, revealing, and analyzing, the fake claims that "Vaccines are Safe and Effective." Vaccines are, as everyone knows, neither safe nor effective. I think we are well on our way to shutting the whole vaccine hoax down - once, and for all.
I am very pleased...
The Good Part...
There is so much going on nationwide, and worldwide, on the anti-vaccine issue it is hard to find a place to start describing it. FaceBook, and Twitter are alive with it. It is becoming THE ISSUE - the one that encapsulates the problems in America,
| Mayday! Mayday - Radio Broadcast |
| Start Time EDT 8:00AM – Introduction 8:30AM – Susan’s Story 9:00AM – Walter Kyle, JD 9:30AM – Freda Burell / N. Erikson 10:30AM – Sarah Shoens MD 11:30AM – April Boden 12:30PM – Majid Katme, MD 13:30PM – Adam Crabb / Gen. Lee Maddox 14:30PM – Sherri Tenpenny, DO 15:30PM – Dr. Viera Schreibner 16:3PM – Catherine Frompovich 17:30 PM – Tim Bolen 18:00PM – Lawyer’s Hour 19:00PM – Vinny Eastwood 20:00PM – Desiree Rover 21:00PM – Susanne Posel 22:00PM – Mike Adams 23:00PM – Round table |
California, I am disappointed to say, is far behind - not because of the people, but because of the "leadership" running the "No On SB277" campaign. There is a VERY good chance we could lose here. There are TWO good reasons for that which I will describe below.
As a GOOD example - One of the things happening is happening today. It is an event called the "MayDay! Vaccine Truth Internet Talk Radio Marathon." It is sponsored on the Veterans Truth Network and the American Freedom Network. They have joined forces with the Natural Solutions Foundation and the Vaxx Truth Movement. It will run from Noon to midnight.
The guest speakers, for this marathon, are from around the world. They include: Rima Laibow MD (Chile), Mike Adams (Republic of Texas), Tim Bolen (California), Jim Turner JD (Washington DC), Veira Scheibner, PhD (Australia), Michael Innes, MD (Australia), Vinny Eastwood (New Zealand), Sherrie Tenpenny, DO (US), Freda Burrell (Scotland), Norma Erikson (US), Ralph Fucetola JD (US).
And more. You can listen in by going here. Click on this link. Then scroll down and select a radio network to use. To the right is the schedule.
But this is just ONE THING. The world is coming alive with it.
Good.
But then there is California...
Admittedly, California presents its own problems as a political entity. Republicans, here, represent only 26% of the eligible voters. In California, the Democratic Party leadership has built an empire around serving special interest. It will go down in the history books being compared to other historical Democratic Party corruption schemes. The Washington Times wrote an article last year titled "Culture of Corruption II: Scandals taint Democratic Party in tough election year." The article barely touched the surface checking the reality of Democratic party politics, both nationwide, and in California. They said:
"In a week Democrats won’t soon forget, the Democrat-dominated California Senate took the unprecedented step Friday of voting 28-1 to suspend with pay three state senators in their own party accused or convicted of criminal conduct.
State Sen. Leland Yee was arrested Wednesday on federal gun trafficking and corruption charges. Sen. Ron Calderon pleaded not guilty Feb. 24 to charges of influence-peddling, and Sen. Roderick Wright was convicted Jan. 28 of perjury and voter fraud.
None of the state senators has resigned from office, although Mr. Yee has pulled out of the race for California secretary of state."
[FONT=Open Sans, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif] So, let's ask the questions "What happened? Did the California Senate clean up their act?" Nope - business as usual continued - corruption on a grand scale California style. More, it got worse. They had the election... We do know that now-Senator Richard Pan MD had a hard fight to get elected. He was up against another Democrat, who was also well funded by OTHER special interests. Pan, close to election time, had 4.6 million dollars poured into his campaign by PACs. The contest had NOTHING to do with the interests of the voters and constituents. It was a special interest duel. it was Big Environmentalist versus Big Pharma. Big Pharma won.... More money...Welcome to the 2015 Democratic Party. No wonder voters, all over the US, threw these assholes from the bus in the mid-presidential-term elections.
Even before Pan got elected to the California Senate, records show, the plan to make Merck, and Big Pharma, even richer was in the works. That plan was, most likely what sewed up the gargantuan contributions for a state Senate race. It was obvious that Senate Bill 277, with Pan and fifteen other Senator authors (fifteen authors?) was written LONG before Pan was elected, probably by the lobbyists shown in the video attached to my last article.
[/FONT]
So, with all this so very obvious, what do the "No On SB277" teams do to combat the Pro-Vaxxers?
Did you need me to repeat that because you are still sitting there aghast?
OK - "They strew red flower petals through the capitol buildings." I guess it was a show of civil disobedience - littering. I'm sure the janitorial staff got the message...
They've been through three Senate hearings so far, and have lost them all - Health, Education and Judiciary. But, don't worry, there is one hearing left - Appropriations, and for that, they are pulling out ALL of the stops. They are going to get everyone to give up Starbucks for the WHOLE HEARING day. More, a smaller, insider group is cutting off those "Do Not Remove" tags on their pillows and mattresses and anonymously mailing them to the Senators on the Appropriations Committee. A show of outright lawlessness. "V" right here in California. (sarcasm intended).
OK - I was being facetious about the "Starbucks" and the "Do Not Remove" tags just to illustrate my point.
My Point?
Despite the fact that there a a whole lot of brilliant people working to stop SB277 there are significant problems with organized leadership. To my way of thinking there are two groups involved that should just go home. They are in the way.
| The email to Kristen Hundley... |
| Kristen Hundley: Let me make a guess... You graduated from Analy High School in 1981 as Kristen Elizabeth Hanson. You married Greg Hundley. You now live with a room mate named Jolie Bullock at 385 Murphy Ave Apt 404 in Sebastopol, CA, Your phone number is 707-917-1242. You are unemployed. You Kristen, are also, the Elizabeth Hanson on your group. You offer your services on elance - https://www.elance.com/s/kshundley/ Your company Families Naturally LLC failed. Your website peacelovinvegan.com is failing. You haven’t made an entry since last year. You have no expertise in the vaccine issue world. You put this together to try and get your life back together. Close, right? Let’s talk. I’m not your enemy. But YOU are making enemies fast. Tim Bolen |
The group "Our Kids Our Choice" turns out to be run by a person, I traced, called Kristen Hundsley who claims (snort here) that she has a SECRET GROUP of advisors guiding her. (snort again). She gives out daily "Action Items," which, uhmmmm, are pretty much stupid and useless.
After a research effort, I wrote to Hundley, who had contacted me, via email complaining. My email to her is to the right. It is self-explanatory. She did not respond to me personally. But, she did make a video...
In Hundley's grainey video she explains, to my astonishment, that she has a secret team of advisors. You can see this short video, by clicking here.
My thinking - Hundley was HIRED by someone to do this "Our Kids, Our Choice" thing. Her FaceBook page, I suspect, grew quickly because whomever hired her populated it quickly.
In short, from the reports I am getting , anyone who had a good idea, and posted it on "Our Kids, Our Choice" was banned immediately and their posts were erased. Anyone who inquired about people and posts disappearing, were banned, and THEIR posts erased, immediately.
So, readers, what do YOU think is going on here?
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too.
Make No Mistake...
Make no mistake - THERE WERE, and ARE, definitely honest, competent groups working on this problem, some centered around the five thousand (5,000) member "California Coalition For Vaccine Choice," and the "AWAKE California" FaceBook page. It is just that OTHERS, it looks to me, were attempting to DOMINATE the project and EXCLUDE those that knew what to do, and when.
But, things ARE getting done DESPITE these two groups. In fact, DEFINITE progress is being made. The SB277 bill, itself, is being whittled down because of the COMPETENT group efforts. For instance, the home school people have a very powerful presence. Their nose-to-nose approach with Pan resulted, early-on, with an "author amendment" to the bill, making it clear that "home schoolers" were exempt. POWER talks - even to the sleazy California Democratic Party leadership. More, in Judiciary, two more "author amendments" were added, grandfathering existing holders of exemptions, and eliminating future additions of vaccines.
New alliances have been, and are being, formed in California...
I hope they are in time.
Stay tuned.
Tim Bolen - Consumer Advocate
- See more at: http://www.bolenreport.com/autism/antivaccine yes8.htm#sthash.cQaaOUuC.dpuf
muir
Banned
- MBTI
- INFJ
The links are to articles that can then support peoples claims
There are too many people pushing their uninformed opinions across the internet
Opinions are NOT FACT
So a person should be able to explain why they hold their opinion
The links i am posting are to provide information and evidence that support my position
j654dgj7
Please delete this account.
- MBTI
- XXXX
I don't mean to be a dick, but you're debating yourself. It's enough. Time to pack it up.
muir
Banned
- MBTI
- INFJ
Do you have any idea what is going on right now across the 'west'?
Are you aware that the countries under the control of the central banking system are now pushing to make vaccines mandatory?
As well as passing laws to force needles carrying toxic substances into children they are also passing various 'anti-terrorist' legislation aimed at taking away the rights and freedoms of any members of the public who challenge the authority of the government
and yet some people are still talking about these things as being 'conspiracy theories'!
No...i think while there are still some people who might consider pumping poison into their kid because a pedophile protecting government tells them to it is necessary for people to share information about the harmful nature of these substances
if you are not interested then perhaps you should focus on threads that do interest you
But there have been plenty of hits on this thread because many people ARE interested in this topic at this critical time
And its not just people from this forum community because internet searches can pull up this thread. The thread is now an ongoing gold mine of information for anyone out there interested in it
j654dgj7
Please delete this account.
- MBTI
- XXXX
I get that, but you're just linking to stuff people have already published. People would find it through a Google search anyways. Have you considered making a website to create material for? I'm sure that people would be interested in it.
I don't know what to say to the rest. You're a highly intelligent guy. You're most likely smarter than me in every way imaginable. However, you do strike me as a paranoid individual. Have you ever seen a therapist?