Ah but I’m following up the many worlds kind of angle in quantum mechanics. This says that all the options at every event in time and space are actualised. Our personal awareness timeline only follows one track through them but that doesn’t mean the others aren’t actualised - just that we individually have no access to them. I’m not confining my thought experiment to a single universe either but to all universes that are logically possible.I personally disagree with that part. I think we should look at it from a certain darwinist point of view. No necessity, things change, are being born, new, sometimes random and if those things are able to exist they will remain. If not, they disappear. Survival of what is able to remain. Something like that. Uberdarwinism
Ah but I’m following up the many worlds kind of angle in quantum mechanics. This says that all the options at every event in time and space are actualised. Our personal awareness timeline only follows one track through them but that doesn’t mean the others aren’t actualised - just that we individually have no access to them. I’m not confining my thought experiment to a single universe either but to all universes that are logically possible.
Yes - I feel a very strong affinity with this concept in OM. It seems consistent with modern views that see the nature of the physical world as open ended and resting on information rather than hard stuff (which doesn’t exist in the real world in the way we experience it with our senses). I hasten to add that my suggestions in this thread are pure thought experiments - I remain completely agnostic on what happens after death apart from a conviction that we have an existence that persists and lies outside our everyday experience. But it’s fun to play with how the very practical laws of the world could be used to suggest how it might happen in physical terms.I like the sound of that, John. In OM, I call it the domain of "total being" (all possible universes).
Just to continue the thought experiment .....
Well when I stop and think about it, I have serious problems with contingency at the heart of what exists. I can see clearly that ‘Nothing’ is quite reasonable - but clearly that isn’t where we are because we are here so there is Something . But if we say that only some of the things that are possible exist then that seems odd to me - how is the choice made? I think it’s far more likely that everything that is possible exists necessarily in some sense. This has affinities with the ideas behind many worlds approach in quantum mechanics, and with string theory implications. It also has affinities with @Ren ‘s OM, but blurs the boundary between virtual and actualised being.
It would of course mean there’s plenty of places available to continue our existence beyond our current lives - maybe even lots of them simultaneously lol. Obviously it isn’t common experience that we get shifted from one to another of these in the normal course of our lives - but it would clearly be possible in this view of reality.
Ah but I’m following up the many worlds kind of angle in quantum mechanics. This says that all the options at every event in time and space are actualised. Our personal awareness timeline only follows one track through them but that doesn’t mean the others aren’t actualised - just that we individually have no access to them. I’m not confining my thought experiment to a single universe either but to all universes that are logically possible.
Our lives form a 4-dimensional shape through that space-time and this line exists eternally - eternal here doesn't mean for an infinite duration of course, because we are looking at it from outside time and space.
You have some deep thoughts on this. I would have to think about it some more if I can find the time (but intuition tells me something is off, or maybe I simply don't understand ).
Ok, I think I understand what you are saying, but the only conclusion I would make from that, is that we exist in a certain place in a certain time, in a certain universe. But that we already know.
As I said, I will try to understand your thoughts a bit better first.
My personal bottom line - my gut tells me that this world is not all there is for us, and I'm pretty close to @Skarekrow on many of the things he says.
Perhaps, but you put into words what I often fail to, and much more eloquently and mathematically than I can ever muster good Sir.
I'm really exploring ideas here as a way of stretching my imagination to see if the different worlds of science and the possibility of an afterlife can be brought together.
"So, you're deliberately choosing nothing?"
I sense some profound wisdom there
I wouldn't pin "wisdom" on a teenager. The idea of choosing nothing when one believes there are many choices, always stuck with me.
He's a very different person now.
I remain completely agnostic on what happens after death apart from a conviction that we have an existence that persists and lies outside our everyday experience.
I wouldn't pin "wisdom" on a teenager. The idea of choosing nothing when one believes there are many choices, always stuck with me.
He's a very different person now.
Never underestimate the wisdom of a teenager. I have several running around in my house, I know .
I asked him what he believed and he said, "I believe nothing happens."
It's quite a thought-provoking answer, indeed.
Heck, if I could choose, I'd probably pick immortality, eternal youth, and eternal pleasure forever.
By the way, @Asa: you may have said this before, but do you identify as agnostic?
My personal belief is that we're gong through an "experience" to learn things. I don't conform to any religious belief or organisation.
That said I do have a deep religious belief, which for me means loving, and caring about each other, and this world that we live in. I don't understand why that is such a difficult thing for people to say, when its clearly what most people really feel.
As for what happens after death. We're seemingly made of atoms, so our physical body decays and is recycled. But I think after death the essence of us goes through a transition.
Our intuition, is knowing things without knowing how. I think this is maybe how that happens.