Peppermint
Well-known member
- MBTI
- uwot
- Enneagram
- _
Also, the assumption of the discovery being over is debatable.
What are long-term romantic relationships for?
- For me, companionship, friendship, emotional intimacy, love, family
What is enticing about them after the discovery/exploration phase is over?
- The problem with this is assuming that the initial honeymoon phase is the prize. It's the long term committment which matters in this type of relationship, not the initial lovey dovey stuff which the world tends to romanticize or idealize. We're not taught to value the things about a relationship that we should so we impose unrealistic expectations and understandings of what it is which makes many fail. You need to have a long term view and prepare yourself for what it means to sustain it over a long term. It's not just about an initial feeling or spark which lasts for a short time. It's what that spark means and what both expect it to lead to which matters. Considering it something which is simply feelings based on moment to moment satisfaction is not healthy. You will be disappointed. The problem is also focusing on self fulfillment and not how the relationship affects you as a couple. If you're only thinking of you, a long term relationship will not be satisfying because as soon as you begin to feel dissatisfied or bored, then you'll think it's time to leave or find someone new. That's not what a long term relationship is about. It's about learning how to build, not just expect, a good relationship which will last.
What is so exciting about familiarity? Does familiarity not feel like stagnation?
- Depends on who you are. Why does everything have to always be "exciting" to be good and satisfying? Just like anything in life, you have great and very euphoric moments and at other times, not so great moments. We expect way too much from relationships and people in relationships. You can't expect people and relationships to always be everything you want it to be. You can't put these expectations on relationships. That's a recipe for dissatisfaction later on. Because if it's not how you expect or want it to be, you'll write it or pronounce it dead before it's even had the chance to breathe because you're not putting the effort into making it a relationship that's based on sustaining a committment for the long term, especially if it's based on feelings which can go up or down too easily. And many will disagree with this, but although people can make you happy, that's not their job. Although people can help you to enjoy life and make it wonderful, it's not their job to be a perpetual source of joy or excitement for someone. That's not someone's reason for being. If someone's make you feel excited and wonderful that's good but to make their worth or value in a relationship based on what they can give you or whether they make you feel a certain way is relationship that's based more on your personal needs, not on what you have to offer or give each other as a couple. Of course, you want to happy in your relationship and feel personally excited about the person but to make them responsible for all those feelings is unfair and unrealistic. People are people. They can only give what they can give or be who they are. If they naturally bring joy and excitement to your life, then that's great but expecting that this is what they should do or be always for you, is a recipe for unhappiness later. People change and they're not always going to be able to be everything you want. But of course it's great when both people want to make each other happy especially if they enjoy being together and are not doing it out of obligation.
but so much more effort seems to go into the different parts of a lifelong partnership.. and we have multiple friends (most people) vs. 1 long-term partner (most people)..
came here to say this.Also, the assumption of the discovery being over is debatable.
It's a sign of emotional maturity to be able to stay in a relationship past the immature infatuation stage.
I personally have not had one last longer than 8 years, but I'm only 30. We'll see.
Stagnation isn't something I've ever felt, though I realize others do feel it.
care to expound?Is it not a sign of emotional immaturity to only do things that are attempts to signal to others that you are emotionally mature?
Is it not a sign of emotional immaturity to only do things that are attempts to signal to others that you are emotionally mature?
Is it not a sign of emotional immaturity to only do things that are attempts to signal to others that you are emotionally mature? .
Sex not aside but relevant: Enough established trust to try out kinkier stuff in bed.
Continued bonding without the pain and disruption of having to split and go bond with someone new, starting over and abandoning all your hard work and memories.
Someone you work to intertwine your life with, as opposed to friends and family who may follow their own life out of state, overseas, or into the busy world of parenting without you.
I can't imagine it any other way. Sex and casual relationships, like alcohol and staying up past 10 p.m., didn't live up to the hype after I'd had a few tastes.
I don't know if it counts but I suspect it does. I knew a guy who was in a long term relationship for 7 years and has been cheating on his gf ever since. At the same time he talked about a wedding in a not so distant future. The (already ex) gf had no idea, of course. The guy was in denial, I think, and also stated how mature he was because he was 7 years in relationship, etc....... So I guess some people do it. :/But I'm sure some people out there probably do stay in long term relationships just to prove to the world that they are responsible adults, or to save face, make up for emotional immaturity, or something like that.
But I'm sure some people out there probably do stay in long term relationships just to prove to the world that they are responsible adults, or to save face, make up for emotional immaturity, or ...