Nope that's why i said i am on a quest for the truth
But what i have done is get together lots of pieces of the puzzle to the point now where i can discearn the outlines of a picture and if you want to know what i can see then i am happy to tell you and i am happy to provide pieces of the puzzle so that you can see it too{/QUOTE]
You see what you want to see. That which you think you see cannot be proven by people like us, only believed in. As for if you are correct, well that's up for interpretation.
You haven't provided any facts to counter what i'm saying...all you have provided is government propaganda....and relying on government propaganda for your info is illogical
Another example of your assumption as to my credibility. I have studied science in several of its forms. That is what my information is based on. Not what you call government propaganda. It's wrong of you to dismiss it as such simply because it disagrees with your perspective. I rarely even watch the news, and when I do it's only local. I never read the newspaper. Anytime I get information about the government, I have to ask other peoples perspectives because I also don't trust myself on political matters (that's probably the area of science I am the most lacking in, I've never found interest in studying it. I'll leave that study up to other people). I have certain people whose perspectives I trust, however I am always skeptical even of their perspectives.
Then put down the governmnt propaganda and LISTEN to what i'm saying
Ask me questions instead of trying to dig around for a piece of government propaganda to throw back at me
You sure like to dismiss my perspective as government propaganda. Notice this is what I and others predicted is a pattern used by conspiracy theorists. Dismissal of another persons perspective because it disagrees with yours. Rationalization of the concept as being a part of the conspiracy. Perhaps those "blanket statements" aren't so unreasonable after all...
Check the information i'm giving you...do your own research into it
I did. I wish you would do the same.
As i say...i have some pieces of the puzzle
A puzzle whose solution you think you already know. You recognize any tidbit of information, no matter its reliability if it agrees with your perspective and dismiss any that disagree. That is bias. Not reliable. That's why I disagree with your perspective.
In the end, whether which one of us is a more reliable source of information, well I guess that's up to interpretation. Personally, I think we rather well represent a common argument on this topic. You, knowing of your conspiracy theories, and me responding with science. Then follows the way each of us responds to the others perspective. If anything, some of the patterns you have shown so far as I have seen support many points made in this thread about conspiracy theorists.