Why havent we fully utilized underground space?

Dragon said:
Does everything have to be idealism if it isn't as shitty as humanly possible?
Click to expand...

No, but if a goal requires people to change, I classify it as idealism.

In the real world, this just doesn't happen unless it happens naturally.

IDK, maybe thinking you can change what people do is an Fe/Te thing. Good luck trying to force everyone to your ideal.
 
o_q said:
No, but if a goal requires people to change, I classify it as idealism.

In the real world, this just doesn't happen unless it happens naturally.
Click to expand...
what causes the real world to change? people.
 
o_q said:
No, but if a goal requires people to change, I classify it as idealism.

In the real world, this just doesn't happen unless it happens naturally.
Click to expand...

People are part of the real world. And what is natural?
 
o_q said:
I'm sorry, but I don't quite infer your point with you stating that people are part of the real world. (try using "therefore")


I will assert a modification "What is more natural?"

The more a process is natural, the less energy is expended disturbing that process.
Click to expand...

whatever you say mr philosophical.... what a waste of a discussion
 
Mole people.
Even if it were economically feasible, there are other factors.
We would have a large number of those living underground dying from the effect of Radon gas exposure.
Then there would be the psychological & physical effects of living in a world devoid of sun light.
Depression, lack of vitamin D.
Naw. Think I'll pass.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top