So very kind of you! I love discussing different opinions I'm so lucky people here are so open minded and enjoy exploring different ideas and possibilities.Also, @slant. I've missed you and the conversations you bring to the table even when we see things differently.
I agree. We need to come at problems from all different directions to find what works and what works now may not work later and we need to be able to adjust that.I really don't think there is one answer to solve it all. The back and forth and tug of war is what keeps the world on its toes and hopefully eventually we figure out what works and what doesn't. And then, something that works during a period of time later doesn't work at all, so we're always adjusting.
I've become more of a capitalist pig in recent years
People are not machines and these bodies don't last forever, you would know if had done any manual labor jobs and even desk work beyond some point has its own issues once your health goes into decline come old age. Tired of having to work so some sociopathic parasites have more while everyone else has less.I have been exploring the idea that maybe retirement is an outdated concept and we should culturally encourage people not to retire at all.
Retirement itself is a recent concept, from my understanding, it came about in reaction to some Marxist/socialist ideas, it was a bit of a compromise. For most of human history, people "worked" until they died. I am always confused by people's disdain for the idea of working, since working is really just a means to ensure we can eat and have a place to sleep which is what all living creatures have to do. The problem is more being alive and having to satisfy needs then the work system. I think the human work system is pretty cool- you can go to a grocery store in most countries and decide what to eat by using a piece of plastic that represents the labor you have contributed.
Provided there is less labor intensive jobs for people 70+ years old, I think we could benefit from the wisdom and skills a person accumulates over that lifetime of labor. With less young people being born we need to have a stronger older labor force. I don't plan to retire, I will continue to work until I can no longer work and it doesn't make feel upset the way it seems to make others upset. I think it's wonderful to keep busy and provide value to my society.
Indeed, because college was oversold based on the knowledge that the debts could never be cleared in a bankruptcy.There are many grads from college who cannot find jobs good enough to repay their school loans.
Depends on the “we” that is being considered. My sense is no one actually wants that...they want cheap labor, the underclass under the yoke, a lack of options, and beyond that, they donʼt care.Do we really want people to continue working until they die?
I suppose that depends on the job. Also, the 90s had a recession time (end of Bush), an absolutely booming economy (Clinton 1), and the retraction/crash (Clinton 2).I might add that in the nineties, it was easier to find a Mexican to work than to find an American to work.
That didnʼt want to work, or do a given job, and thatʼs how a (not absolute) free market works.They were taking all the jobs from Americans that didn't want to work.
Ironic, given The United States of America is the great melting pot, a nation born of immigrants, and a nation built by immigrants.Now, allow hundreds of thousands of people not even being processed properly into our country. It wouldn't happen if it were MY country under MY leadership.
But they could not vote, and there can be no taxation without representation.In my humble opinion, a work permit would have had them to pay taxes.
A military coups dʼétat? How has that worked out for other nations? Wikipedia has a great list if you want to check it out.If they cannot keep our government running properly, it is our MILITARY that will have that to do until something better is come up with. It wouldn't bother me to see them run it now.
Do we? Name them, please.Good to know we have laws to instill this.
I agree, with laws. Those with wealth do not care, except to the degree that the situation benefits them.Immigrants who formed a government with laws. Guess all the papers were used to wipe their butts with.
I accept that as your judgment and opinion.To say the older mostly do not care, or this and that, is wrong.
Sure. I value a system which values human capital, which includes well-being, over a system which values financial capital, which includes considering a human being as a means to an end.Can you state how you feel in a paragraph without comments? Just curious.
That rise has to do with qualitative easing, and the devaluation of the dollar.We now pay so much more for two Big Mack deals, it makes one wonder if it is helping or hurting more. Who is paying for it? We are, and some businesses are going out of business. The costs of many things now are a curse to many people who just cannot afford it any longer. I call it the ripple effect.
Very fair, and I offer you my apology for careless hyperbole.do not place everyone in your statement. There are those who probably fit into your category, but never everyone.
As a corporate owner twice, they are also treated as businesses; not as people.
This is one of the biggest mistakes this civilization has made thus far.I was referring to the concept of corporate personhood. Here's a reference: "
In most countries, a corporation has the same rights as a natural person to hold property, enter into contracts, and to sue or be sued.
Granting non-human entities personhood is a Western concept applied to corporations."
Corporate personhood - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org