What you mean is that I am not allowed to do GOOD things in the world with that money, but only petty and selfish things that an insipid little ego can dream up? Then no, and I might kill whomever it was that offered me this deal and simply take their money by force instead, since they are clearly evil and shouldn't be allowed to carry the power of 1,000,000 dollars around and set up puppies for destruction, nor tempt beings into corruption.
But if I had the power to cause 1,000,000 dollars worth of good events in this world merely by extinguishing the bodily life or physical integrity of a being, I would do it in as painless a way as possible since death of the body, IN ITSELF, is not evil. What is evil is SUFFERING and the willingness to cause it and even the willingness to endure it (except when it means that doing otherwise would corrupt one's own spiritual nature...). That suffering
is what is wrong with the world and that is caused by these entropic bodily conditions in the first place. If it were up to me all of this physical realm would be done the favor of being disintegrated so that spiritual sorting processes would accelerate apace and then good beings wouldn't be forced to exist in evil environments and coexist with evil beings in bodies and with material which suits the exploitation of the the good by the evil.
So let's say the conditions were favorable under my interpretation, and there was zero chance for error in this assessment. I would do it the way I say, and then would take that money and do such things with it as make evil men suffer far worse fates than that puppy at my hands, and I know that if that puppy knew what I did it would agree with my actions and the way I spent every single cent. In fact, on that condition I would do anyone the very same favor.
This means I'd have to ensure that there was no suffering in the killed bodily being, nor any suffering as a direct or indirect result of that killing. For moral beings, the only true death is MORAL CORRUPTION. For evil beings such a death is not possible, so they merely fear the loss of physical possessions, bodily comforts, and life of the body simply because it represents a fundamental loss of the other two things. For them pains of that sort are really metaphysical privations of their spiritual health since only by fraudulent transactions involving bodies can they get their nourishment, which means by parasitism upon True and Good beings trapped also in such bodies. For a True Being, who has lived and died MANY times, being out of the body is ALWAYS preferable.
A similar challenge is deciding to amputate a limb in order to save a body, or perhaps many bodies. But at least know this, even if my inclination chills you: Your reaction is based on an egotistical understanding of life which is confined to physical parameters. For beings who know better I offer this other reassurance: Unless I had absolute certainty that such an action caused NO SUFFERING to any TRUE MORAL BEING, then I wouldn't do it. This means that disembodying a True Being would not be chosen as a course of action unless I was absolutely certain beyond any possible doubt that it could not harm that being's SPIRITUAL HEALTH, and that I was certain that no power proceeding from it would dishonor the intention of that act.
Extending this ideation, I know for a fact that I am incapable of such certainty, so I would never entertain such an act in fact, but I am aware of a Being who can and does. That Being is currently disembodying all spiritual beings in this dimension and sorting them in another so that one set is annihilated and the other is preserved and allowed to continue its evolution. That is far more efficient than anything I can ever do with even all the money in the world, so I wouldn't find myself "tempted" if this offer seriously came my way.