Ren
Seeker at heart
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 146
Of course. Mind you it's one thing to attempt to prove or disprove something using logic, it's another to use logic to determine whether a question is well-defined. I'm very suspicious of attempts to reject the notion of God on the basis of incoherence simply because if there is a God then he is at least in part well beyond the comprehension of humans. I suspect that any success in the endevour would just spotlight a limitation in human intellectual equipment rather than express a truth. By this I don't mean that the logical steps would be flawed, but that logic itself would be unequal to the task set and an inappropriate tool with which to explore the issue.
I think we pretty much agree! I find it interesting how I'm basically like "sure, I probably won't be convinced by said formal argument but it would be fun to have a taste of it anyway", whereas you seem to be more... reserved about that
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png)
Of course, I'm (literally) agnostic when it comes to the topic of God's existence, whereas you are a believer so it's probably easier for me to approach the topic completely neutrally. I might try to have a look at one of those ignostic arguments. They might say something interesting even if they fail.
Last edited: