For once I'm with you on the implied point. He ought to ban all of them.
Doesn't strike me as accurate though....alt-righters aren't totalitarian, at least I don't think they are.
Racists? The fascist wing?
Should've posted some sexy picture of Sarah PalinNo! You have to go deeper.
Funny.Even though I didn't write it, I'll adopt it as my baby... in addition to all my Hillary-orphan-crybabies.
The accusation that Trump was helped by Putin did nothing to reduce the electoral equivalent of Trump grabbing Clinton by the p***y, and dragging her off stage. Why? Because even Putin would have beaten Clinton in this election.
deliberate diversionary device
US citizens lives don't matter unless they're on US soil?
US citizens lives don't matter unless they're on US soil?
"...U.S. Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford had recently testified that some 500 U.S. troops in total had been killed in Iraq “by Iranian activities.” He pointed out that that accounted for at least 14 percent of U.S. combat fatalities in Iraq."
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...plied-armor-piercing-ieds-killed-least-196-us
It's a critique of the tabluated data, which doesn't indicate threat, but only historical domestic incidents. Animosity and threat isn't gauged comprehensively by examining domestic incidents alone.Not sure how banning the entry of even the people that did it into America would affect what happened in Iraq, though.
*I hate having to spell out stuff*
GrrrrrI don't understand...
All are equal under the law. Nuff said.
US citizens lives don't matter unless they're on US soil?
I'd like to hear more about this. Is it actual policy, misunderstanding of policy or simply error on the part of the agents?
It's not an immagraition ban. Immigration continues to take place in accordance with law.Your logic only applies if Syrians were able to telepathically kill US citizens abroad, but the source of said power was only to be found within the US itself.
That's also the only way the immigration ban makes sense on national defence grounds.