- MBTI
- IEI
- Enneagram
- 6w5 sp/sx
Yay, lots of replies!
Ah, well, I'm pretty sure the main thing that identifies 4's is what your motivation is (basic fears and desires). 4's are all about their identity and finding personal significance, and they tend to see themselves as different from everyone else (as opposed to 5's, very common for INTPs, which see themselves as just outside observers). So, you could be, but 4's tend to make a big deal about their own feelings rather than just respect them.
I have, but the thing is that logical thinking and analysis comes more or less naturally to me. I actually picked up computer programming quite easily and find it 'fun'. That's not to say that I'd ever want to be a computer programmer though (I consider it more as a backup plan for supporting myself). Not to mention that the last time I insisted I was INFP, people were giving me helpful 'hints' to suggest I'm not. I do feel like I have a pretty strong Fi though (or Fi-analogue), and the INFP description actually fits me very well. One of the first threads I made on this forum (if not the first) was trying to figure out whether MBTI focuses on either preference or ability. If preference, then I'd consider myself an F type. However, I have since decided that it's neither: it's what you use naturally.
Also, I find making decisions purely on logic or purely on feelings as being somewhat silly. Feelings are what I go by mostly, but I use logic quite a bit to make sure that this decision is actually going to give me what I want. Feelings only tell me what I want, not how to get what I want. I've also considered that I am ENTP or INFJ, primarily because I feel like intuition is more clearly 'me' whereas thinking and feeling are in some conflict, but they only seem to move further away from how I actually am.
Thanks for the links. Looks like I'm probably sp/sx, considering I also often type INxJ a lot (and can come off as pretty J-ish). Both descriptions describe me almost equally well (each one having their 'huh?'s too).
The only extent to which I find my emotions 'annoying' is the fact that I have difficulty making arguments when I'm worked up and that people seem to frown upon 'feeling boys'. On occasion, I must admit I dismiss them, but it's usually the case that I retreat by myself and brood on them or release them.
Now this is interesting. Type 4 is based on loss of connection? I thought it was about losing one's identity. Can you tell me where you got this from? If so, that's a pretty strong point against me being a 4. I do get pretty upset when people seem to avoid deeper subjects, and I focused quite a bit on connections at a young age, but I've sense convinced myself I don't 'need' anyone (which is probably somewhat unhealthy). The only time I get jealous is when someone I wanted to be with turns out to be taken by someone I feel 'doesn't deserve her'.
Also, I would have to say that 1 & 2 patterns describe me far better than 8 & 7 patterns, but it usually the case that I just indulge myself under stress.
this is an interesting thread. i'm an intp too but i can identify with alot of what you've said, @KazeCraven: well, not the part about being comfortable with my feelings (definitely not), but about being aware of them and focusing on them. they kind of inspire my thoughts and vice versa. would this make me a 4 also?
Ah, well, I'm pretty sure the main thing that identifies 4's is what your motivation is (basic fears and desires). 4's are all about their identity and finding personal significance, and they tend to see themselves as different from everyone else (as opposed to 5's, very common for INTPs, which see themselves as just outside observers). So, you could be, but 4's tend to make a big deal about their own feelings rather than just respect them.
Have you considered the possibility that you're an INFP with a well developed T? They are very commonly 4s.
This might help with the stackings...
Here are the stackings from that link for 4 sp/sx and 4 sx/sp...
I have, but the thing is that logical thinking and analysis comes more or less naturally to me. I actually picked up computer programming quite easily and find it 'fun'. That's not to say that I'd ever want to be a computer programmer though (I consider it more as a backup plan for supporting myself). Not to mention that the last time I insisted I was INFP, people were giving me helpful 'hints' to suggest I'm not. I do feel like I have a pretty strong Fi though (or Fi-analogue), and the INFP description actually fits me very well. One of the first threads I made on this forum (if not the first) was trying to figure out whether MBTI focuses on either preference or ability. If preference, then I'd consider myself an F type. However, I have since decided that it's neither: it's what you use naturally.
Also, I find making decisions purely on logic or purely on feelings as being somewhat silly. Feelings are what I go by mostly, but I use logic quite a bit to make sure that this decision is actually going to give me what I want. Feelings only tell me what I want, not how to get what I want. I've also considered that I am ENTP or INFJ, primarily because I feel like intuition is more clearly 'me' whereas thinking and feeling are in some conflict, but they only seem to move further away from how I actually am.
Thanks for the links. Looks like I'm probably sp/sx, considering I also often type INxJ a lot (and can come off as pretty J-ish). Both descriptions describe me almost equally well (each one having their 'huh?'s too).
I think VH has a point. I have come across as a T as well. What kind of education do you have? If it is very analytical/mathematical it could be that you are developing these treads but that they are not your dominant ones. The fact that you are in touch with your emotions and don't look at them as undesirable and annoying speaks against you being an INTP
the fear on which type 4 is based is the loss of connection. Is seeking connections your main concern in life? Are you jealous of people who seem to have found someone to have a deep connection with, do you hate it when people remain shallow towards you?
I think you mainly have to decide on being 4w5 or 5w4
how much do you relate on 4's becoming 2 in unhealty state and 1 in a healty state? Does that apply on you too?
The only extent to which I find my emotions 'annoying' is the fact that I have difficulty making arguments when I'm worked up and that people seem to frown upon 'feeling boys'. On occasion, I must admit I dismiss them, but it's usually the case that I retreat by myself and brood on them or release them.
Now this is interesting. Type 4 is based on loss of connection? I thought it was about losing one's identity. Can you tell me where you got this from? If so, that's a pretty strong point against me being a 4. I do get pretty upset when people seem to avoid deeper subjects, and I focused quite a bit on connections at a young age, but I've sense convinced myself I don't 'need' anyone (which is probably somewhat unhealthy). The only time I get jealous is when someone I wanted to be with turns out to be taken by someone I feel 'doesn't deserve her'.
Also, I would have to say that 1 & 2 patterns describe me far better than 8 & 7 patterns, but it usually the case that I just indulge myself under stress.
Last edited: