Well, I can't disagree with your point either, and rightly so.
So, let's ask that devil in light of what we do know, thus far, how many of that suspect total deaths of 100,000 were already beneath poverty level, and did not have the resources to overcome the virus,(be it medical coverage, lost wages from staying home, or working through symptoms and infecting the unsuspecting patron, or worse yet a compromised heath concern); and by opening the economy without the means in place to somewhat assure the workforce as well as the patron that they will have the ability to trust moving about in public again knowing it's high risk, e.g. public transport and walking in close proximity with others, not to mention hands on services like cosmetology and food services, how many more of the 150,000 slip into the beneath poverty sum and fall ill, yet, those that have returned to employment at minimum wages do not fall into beneath poverty but return living paycheck to pay check yet succumb to the virus in the 4-year window because they are trying to make up the difference in lost resources and debt occurred during the quarantine period?
There definately is much to consider when decision making. Not just for the government bouncing back but everyday individuals as well. The trauma response of some may leave a large portion of the population at home requesting assistance of some sort from the government as they work through the fear of returning to the market place as consumer or workforce. That response would hit an already faltering econonmy hard.
And who goes in first to test the waters to see if returning the entire workforce all at once or in tidbits is the correct solution?? Seems like that would be akin to cannon-balling right into the deep end of a pool of sharks
There is much for our elitely elected officials to consider before opening the States back up, (minding some haven't shutdiwn yet even with the death toll where it is), as my governor refers to it "opening the valve". Trickling in might be a more apt solution rather than taking a blind dive and pouring in millions of people into the pool just as a boost to the economy.
One aspect that needs careful thought is that many laborers and service jobs will have to be restructured before refilling those positions. This will undoubtedly eliminate some jobs while slowly creating different ones. What do we do with the eliminated workers? What of the small businesses that have already closed up with no plans of reopening, where do their workers go?
Another thing that gets overlooked when projecting unemployment here in America is that there are many jobs that are available to work but they are considered menial and dirty. My answer to that has always been too high of standards. No one is going to offer someone $20 to pick peas. Life is dirty, however, if we want to eat over the next 6 months, we may have to get a little dirty.