- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 954 so/sx
Oh I get it. You feel left out! I'm so sorry!A little humility and more compassion please.
Oh I get it. You feel left out! I'm so sorry!
*hugs you too*
*big hug*What does it mean to be enlightened?
*big hug*
Did you know that sloths can swim faster in water than they can move on land?
There you are that much more enlightened (unless you knew that already).
JK
There are numerous definitions, from the spiritual to the religious.
To awaken to the true nature of reality though is the basic definition.
I say it’s all very subjective and to argue one path over another defeats the idea(s) you are trying to attain.
Guys! Where's mine? =(
Also. What does it mean to be enlightened?
*big hug*
Did you know that sloths can swim faster in water than they can move on land?
There you are that much more enlightened (unless you knew that already).
JK
There are numerous definitions, from the spiritual to the religious.
To awaken to the true nature of reality though is the basic definition.
I say it’s all very subjective and to argue one path over another defeats the idea(s) you are trying to attain.
Oh snap.To be enlightened is to be free from delusions, greed and hate.
Even that we are experiencing life subjectively and have subjective opinions of how life functions, that doesn't mean that are no objective truths and infallible natural laws that govern universe. To become enlightened is to first align yourself with natural laws(God's Will) which brings love and tranquility to mind and then penetrate into Ultimate nature of reality which leads to liberation and end of suffering.
Not every path teaches how to achieve this properly so it doesn't make sense to put all paths under same category.
To be enlightened is to be free from delusions, greed and hate.
Even that we are experiencing life subjectively and have subjective opinions of how life functions, that doesn't mean that are no objective truths and infallible natural laws that govern universe. To become enlightened is to first align yourself with natural laws(God's Will) which brings love and tranquility to mind and then penetrate into Ultimate nature of reality which leads to liberation and end of suffering.
Not every path teaches how to achieve this properly so it doesn't make sense to put all paths under same category.
With all due respect, @Dado, but I don't understand a lot of the points you're making.
What's objective about God's will?
Everything you're saying sounds pretty subjective to me.
I dunno...
Nah, enlightenment is only goal worth pursuing, everything other in life only leads to more pain and suffering.
Well, now you're just being rude.This is common sense...
In all honesty I don’t agree but I still respect your viewpoint and passion you have about it.
I DO agree with the freedom from delusion, greed, and hate.
As far as laws governing the universe - we have no clue how the universe works as humans.
We can only register and measure about 4% of what is actually out there...the other 96% is unknown by science other than “dark matter/energy”
That 96% could literally be spirit itself...it could be almost anything.
We have lots of religious texts with instructions on doing this or that - one can find peace and enlightenment on many pathways imho, you don’t have to agree with that.
As far as getting into subjective opinions and objective truths we don’t know anything at all.
I no longer debate religious or spiritual semantics, sorry...each to their own.
I have to agree with you here in your concept.. because there are loads of things that are "palpable intangibles" as someone wise has said. Indeed there are a vast plethora of things in Heaven & Earth, and all that's in between that cannot be proven scientifically. They are not quantitative, tanglible, or logical.. and yet they very much exist.. Loads of things don't "make sense" but that by no means makes them any less real..Well, now you're just being rude.
Are enlightened people rude?
=(
I will leave now.
Main law of universe is cause and effect which is evident in everyones experience.
This is not true though, Dado. Not only is this not evident, but the "law of cause and effect" has been seen as extremely questionable by philosophers since at least the early 20th century.
"The law of causality, I believe, like much that passes muster among philosophers, is a relic of a bygone age, surviving, like the monarchy, only because it is erroneously supposed to do no harm." — Bertrand Russell
What do you think, is killing a man objectively wrong or is it just an subjective thing?
Practising religion can lead to peace, yes. But not all religions teach how to realize Ultimate reality.