So...would you say that wanting to talk to people when you're overwhelmed (not necessarily about the problem) is an extroverted thing, or is that a reaction to try to get the mind off of things?
I would assume that is a distraction as you drop to your secondary function, Fe, as a stress response, especially if you'd rather talk to people about whatever it is other than is overwhelming you. Or, it could be your Ni, or even Ne looking for something to tinker with other than the issue. In any case, it is a normal human reaction to stress.
And that brings me to my epiphany of the day...
Cognitive functions are the basis of thought, but the model that has been created to help explain them does not define them. The human mind does not fit into a nice neat little mold. It never has, and it never will. There are far too many variables, factors, and dynamic parts.
The 8 cognitive functions and 16 types as they've been defined are nothing more than the isolated extremes, personified as symbols. It is very easy for us as Ni and Fe dominant types to want to force everything to suit these notions, because that's inherently how our minds work... sorta. We've also got a T function. In fact, we've got all of the functions. While we tend to be inclined to take certain cognitive paths and approaches, we are by no means constrained by a definition.
The mind is fluid and dynamic. At best, the cognitive functions and types are a crude map to help us navigate the reality of the inner workings of our own minds. At worst, they allow us to presume things that are patently false. Do most types have a large number of similarities that seem like they could be statistical anomalies? Yes. This proves the validity of the explanation. Do all people of a given type share each of them? No. This disproves any assumption of definition.
In my case, the simple fact of the matter is this...
I have a very strong Ni and Fe. Thought patterns associated with these functions are well developed and reflexive to me.
I have a strong Fi, Ti, and Te. Thought patterns associated with these functions are well developed but learned responses for me.
I have an effective Se and Ne. I am convinced that these sorts of thought patterns are reflexive for me, but they're not nearly as well developed as some of the others I have learned to use.
And lastly, my Si ain't too shabby. I could play memory games to try to improve it, but I just don't.
This is a fairly accurate explanation of my thought processes. Does it make me an INFJ, an ENFJ, or even some other type? No. Are these descriptions congruent with the explanations of these types? Pretty much. Therefore, while they do a rather effective job of explaining me, they do not define me.
I am greater than the sum of an assumptive definition. So are all of you. No one is ever going to fit the mold of any given type. I'm not even sure if it is an ideal to strive for. Each of these types presume an inherent cognitive weakness in contrast to their strengths. Why wouldn't a person strive to be all that they could be mentally, and transcend their type, rather than look to it as justification for their shortcomings? Most importantly, why would someone deliberately try to ignore the rest of themselves, not explained by these theories?
Don't get me wrong, I'm fascinated by them. In fact, I'm so fascinated that I frequently lose my perspective, and have to remind myself of what I've just typed. I'm sharing it as part of our collective experience in relation to these the subject at hand - INFJs. And that is why I'm sharing it, in case any of you do the same thing. Our type certainly seems predisposed to do so.
While I have been trying so intently to fit myself into one of these molds, I failed to realize that I fit pretty well into at least three of them. INFJ and ENFJ are almost equally effective descriptions, but INTJ and even ENTJ in some cases are good runner ups, and there is an obvious reason for this. My individual function preferences for each of these types are strong. It is only logical that each of these type descriptions are effective in proportion to my preference with their functions. So what am I? I'm me. What is a good way to explain the way my cognitive functions operate and interact? I am an NFJ. A more accurate way? I am an INFJ, ENFJ, INTJ, with an ENTJ wing. I simply don't fit just one, and I doubt many people do.
And that brings me back to the crux of this thread, but with a lot more perspective. Taking into account that I am best described by IENFTJ, which type best describes me? I still don't know, and am starting to doubt that it really matters. MBTI type is essentially a study of the cognitive parts that comprise them, and I certainly have a strong grasp of my own. My only real curiosity is in which order do I reflexively use them?
When I am exhausted, and when I first wake up, I cannot verbally communicate. I'm just not able. However, I am FULLY aware of everything that is going on, especially what is implied and unspoken, as my mind cascades in a clarity that does not match my lack of acuity to my immediate environment. This is a tell tale sign of Ni dominance. I have some friends who are Fe dominant, and they're 'chirpy' in the morning, more concerned with politenesses than what is or is not going on in their heads, and I have to admit that until I can wake up and get other functions running, it is terribly annoying. I feel obligated to respond, and honor their expectations and feelings, but I just can't. This is probably the most compelling argument I have for Ni dominance and Fe secondary function. I feel how things should be, but my ability to do as well as my ability to make them manifest is in direct proportion to how awake I am. Of course, this could just be low blood sugar. But why do I have low blood sugar? Most likely my dominant Ni function has been burning it like low octane gasoline. Truth be told, I'd rather intuit than invoke my will.
My next point (and please don't take this the wrong way if you're an ENFJ) most of the ENFJs I've ever met are severely lacking in T function preference. In fact, they generally seem completely disinterested in understanding how things work or relate. I've never had an issue with this. I put my feelings and philosophy ahead of reason and logic far more often than I should, but I still use reason and logic. My Ti and Te are pretty solid, and from what I've seen, that tends to be the case with most INFJs, while most ENFJs have a lot of trouble typing, spelling, and composing grammar. Okay, I'll admit that I rely heavily on spell check, but I go to the bother of using it. Most ENFJs don't seem to want to even bother because they know they are getting their point across and don't want to waste the energy.
I know I recently claimed that my Se was stronger than my Ti, but I realized that the truth is that I
wished my Se was stronger than my Ti. It's well developed, but my Ti wins the majority of the time, and my Ni wins all of the time. If I were an ENFJ, my Ni and Se would compete. It's not even close. Sometimes I get so lost in my head, I forget where I am. Actually, that happens a lot more than sometimes. I can pull off some pretty impressive feats of physical prowess, but I can't do them for very long, and most importantly I cheat. I use my Ni constantly when I am fencing, sparring with martial arts, and shooting. It's a ridiculous advantage.
So, while I am fully capable of using several functions as if they were my dominant, I've learned how to adapt them into service situationally. Take me to a party, and I can turn on Fe. Put a puzzle in front of me, and I can turn on Ti and even Te. Ask me to spar with you, and I can turn on Se. But, the one function that I can't turn off is Ni. I can get bored at the party, and I'll go 'hide' from everyone and get lost in my head, aka Ni. I will get tired of trying to logic my way through a problem, and my mind will drift, looking for that 'aha' solution, aka Ni. And, as mentioned, when sparring or paying attention to my surroundings because I feel threatened, I'll rely more on Ni in combination with my Se than not. I have to force myself to live in the 'real world'. My Ni is constantly trying to drag me off to some fantasy that has almost no applicable basis in reality. My Ni beats up my Se on a regular basis and makes it cry.
I guess, when it all boils down, INFJ really is the best description of me, but I have to keep that in perspective with all of my other capacities and faculties.
Sorry this is so long, but I hope this can help anyone out there who is feeling similar.