- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 954 so/sx
It would be a depressing world if everything came on a plate nicely presented in one go. The journey’s the destination - always something new to surprise us round the corner lol and thank God!
Hahaha! So true
It would be a depressing world if everything came on a plate nicely presented in one go. The journey’s the destination - always something new to surprise us round the corner lol and thank God!
God: "What again, John!?"
Idk about John, but I'm pretty sure I'm gettin this look 24/7
God 24/7: "What did you do again, Wyote!"
Wyote:
Haha, thanks but this is @John K's original coinage. I'll keep it somewhere if he doesn't mind, though.
Idk about John, but I'm pretty sure I'm gettin this look 24/7
Great reference!That is the correct monkey lol
That is the correct monkey lol
It’s what I ‘see’ looking at OM sometimes so it’s all yours Ren - it’s from your inspiration
I 'wanted to be' a T; in other words it was like an ego imposition overlaid on the core self.
I grasped the concept of Ti very easily...I use Ti extensively to assess what I read and that’s not an easy way into experiencing what Ni means.
I still feel like I don't exactly get Ni.
Essentially it's about taking in information and 'feeling' the idea coalesce subconsciously; feeling the 'whole' take form.
I hate to say this, but I wanted to be a T because I didn't want to be a doormat. I hope that doesn't offend anyone, but that is how I saw myself as an INFJ. Does anyone else fear that?
I teach composition to Highly Gifted students.
I'd like to hear more about this. Ti is hard for me to describe. I understand Te better, and I know how to use it, but I don't always respect it because it reeks of "the committee approved this." Please describe how Ti works for you.
F or T?
A good example of Ti and Ni working in an inspired way together is to look at @Ren 's Open Monism Notebook blog. Ren is developing a new type of philosophy and expressing it as his ideas develop. The vision is firmly rooted in Ni, but the logical foundations, exposition and critique is from Ti. He;s been developing it within the forum since May this year, however, and I'd advise looking at the early chapters rather than diving into the current material. He's also produced a series of videos about this, and other topics and published them on You Tube - you can see Ni/Ti and Fe all working together there!
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSBg6qSVhRUfPVdoyl2EZG5pApnD0DKCh
Wow, thanks for the mention, John! Now I'm blushing.
I would say that Fe is actually in the OM framework too, through this idea that "we are all one" in the immanent openness of being. I think that's an NiFe insight, more than just an Ni one. Ti appears quite prominently in the notes because it's a great function to organize and systematize ideas. Admittedly, though - and this is something that people cannot know just from reading my notes - the Ti parts are always the ones that take me the longest to produce. It's always a battle of sorts, haha.
...look at @Ren 's Open Monism Notebook blog.
For myself - well I did a maths degree many years ago and worked in information systems till I retired. Maths is primarily a thinking discipline... Maths guys are mainly working things out internally so it's almost all Ti...
You could try taking one of your Ni insights and express it accurately in detail in words - this will get your Ti running.
Admittedly, though - and this is something that people cannot know just from reading my notes - the Ti parts are always the ones that take me the longest to produce. It's always a battle of sorts! Which also explains why I favor shorts paragraphs. That way, I can manage and sustain my Ti efforts without tiring myself out. Moving from one paragraph from the next is also a way to "take a break".
These short posts can sound too well crafted for their own good!! I don’t have a pitch perfect answer myself. Perhaps one way of contrasting Ti and Te is comprehension and exposition. The first is an essentially introverted experience and the second takes place in the outer world. Ti evaluates within, using our personal principles as the yardstick. Te is focused on making things happen logically in the outside world.Okee doke. Will do. Thanks for the recommendation.
Working out answers to math problems step by step is Ti? I mistook it for Te because you have to follow axioms and theorems, therefore I thought it was a "system."
Wait. That's what I do all day with students as a writing instructor. That's Ti? Of course, there are templates for writing essays: introduction, transition words, topic sentences, text support, writing devices, conclusion with resolution. Bla, bla, bla. So, again, I thought it was a Te system.
Still not sure what the difference is, in real-life.
Ren, your blog entry listing starts at Chapter 9. How do I find Chapters 1-8?
Watched a number of your videos. The message, to me, was to consider "all the possibilities" that can be reality. That seems Ne -- or what I thought constituted Ne. Perhaps you could call it boundary-less-ness or infinite possiblities. Am I understanding your concept at all? It defies easy definition because the limits don't exactly refer to space or time.
Okay, for example, I once tried to describe what you called immanence. I was at a fundamentalist Christian church, and I got on the wrong side of the women sitting at my table by saying, "This is me," as I picked up a cup of coffee. "This is God," as I held it over a glass of water. Then I poured the coffee in the water.
Didn't go over well.