Showing contempt is not a virtueNo wonder aliens don't want to communicate with us.
~ SourceCould we please try not to flood serious topic threads with memes, insults, or other signals which express contempt for topics we might not agree with, or be interested in?
Actually it is.Showing contempt is not a virtue
Your statement is not supported and so remains a simple opinion.Actually it is.
Contempt is part of the virtue of justice, insofar as it seeks to discourage unjust injury.
What is being injured by this topic? The denigration of the human mind's ability to form hypothetical associations between disconnected concepts, by trying to imply something other than an ordinary activity can be conducted through associating random phrases.
It isn't up to the naysayer to prove snake oil doesn't cure cancer. It's up to the huckster peddling his bullshit claims.Your statement is not supported and so remains a simple opinion.
It would be better if you were able to show that the concepts are disconnected.
If the evidence presented causes one to feel 'injured' the virtuous option is to question if the injury is real or driven by emotional attachment to contrary beliefs.
Your posts, which are composed of random phrases are self evident evidence. You're claiming that they're more than what's on the screen. Kind of obvious.The random phases etc generate messages. That is clear enough to the astute reader.
A naysayers opinion is of no consequence, no matter how it is stated.
If you have any evidence to table which supports your contention, table it.
You have asserted without evidence two things.Lets do the science.
Search "Science"
the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.
If we take an empty document and add to that the words "Theodore" and "is" and "a huckster" as so;
Theodore
Is
A huckster
and put that through a list randomizer;
We only have a certain amount of variations which can be shown.
Is
Theodore
a huckster
a huckster
Is
Theodore
Is
a huckster
Theodore
Theodore
a huckster
Is
Theodore
Is
a huckster
Adding more variables to the list, decreases the chances that those three entries will be randomly selected.
Currently my list [ComList] has individual 2515 line entries, many of which contain word-strings which are sentences and even paragraphs, and this is being added to daily.
The 2515 lines of data should mean that there is no way in which coherent messages can be produced randomly.
Since they obviously can, this points to the possibility/probability that we do not exist within a random chaotic universe/reality but something which is organized and mindful.
Add to that evidence for how written human language [sound codified] is able to be mathematically sorted into same-value lists, and the case for us existing in a created reality, increases.
Now I would not expect anyone who has been invested in emergent-theory materialism to want to have to deal with the evidence in any practical ethical manner, but facts are facts nonetheless - so anyone resorting to opinionated ad hominem slurs against me, who is also unsurprisingly unwilling to replicate the science I present in order to thoroughly test it for themselves, can only be regarded as someone who's opinion offers no meaningful challenge to what is being uncovered here.
___________________
You have asserted without evidence two things.
Firstly that the phrases are selected randomly, and secondly that the selections are coherent.
To the first, there is no true random selection, as all "random events" only appear so, but are entirely deterministic and subject to rules, laws, be they natural or artificial (such as computer algorithms).
https://engineering.mit.edu/engage/ask-an-engineer/can-a-computer-generate-a-truly-random-number/
To the second, you assert that the selections possess more coherence than the intrinsic coherence of each phrase. You have not provided any evidence for that either. Acceptable evidence would be that a large sample size of people reading the same selection of phrases all interpret it to have the same meaning.
This would demonstrate that coherence is in the selection, instead of people subjectively trying to make incoherent nonsense coherent to themselves, reflecting the coherence of their reasoning process solely.
Finally, given that you have demonstrated neither true randomness, nor objective coherence, drawing conclusions about chaos and emergent coherence is entirely unjustified.
The Science Of The SoulAs I listen to Callum's reply to me,@ I am aware that he has missed the the science which was involved in the Message Generation Process which Wiremu associates with his Universal Intelligence Communication Devices.
Callum is focused upon the matter of fact that regardless of The Message being able to be interpreted, the interpretations are subject to the bias of the individuals who interpret them. I agree to that Matter of Fact, but get the impression that Callum thinks I claimed that individual interpretation could be proved through scientific method. Rather my claim was that the process could be used to provide evidence that Intelligence is behind - not only the Messages generated in this manner, but indeed, ALL that exists.
Witch Woman of The Cat Realm
Entity
The Taming of The Beast
[source ~ Musing On The Mother - ACT III]I find some clues in The Generated Message while intuiting that most of it is more likely to be understood by Wiremu...I refer to The Book Of Musing On The Mother Act II and find Callum's 7th point...I read it out loud...
Callum: Seventh, I do not think that just because a message can be interpreted in two opposite ways necessarily means it is unreliable. What I said was that a method of communication that relies on a limited list made by the recipient, typing numbers on a keypad (or some other seemingly random procedure) to pick out words/phrases on that list that produces a message that is easily interpreted into two opposing messages does not point to accuracy. There is so much that could go "wrong". That is something that must be overcome (perhaps indirectly) for the method to become a plausible vehicle for meaning to go from one being to another.
It is ...as I tried to explain...allowed, and taken into consideration. It is not about how individuals might find different meaning in any given message, but that they observe the requirement to follow the gist without reading things into it which are obviously not there, such as when Callum interpreted the communication between QueenBee and The Tanager as being about Wiremu, when Wiremu wasn't even mentioned by name. It is that type of interpretation which is best avoided. I did my best to explain step by step how I have found the appropriate manner in which to interpret messages such as these, but Callum didn't want to engage with that.
I suppose these are the barriers which determine suitability between two individuals, and act as the Tabula Rasa which define the Fragmentation of The Realms which make up the Hologram Dimensions. The Tanager wanted to use Callum to attempt to show Wiremu that "All People operate under the Judgmental Algorithm" - or in his own words...
I bring up The Booklet onto The Screen and find Tanagers words...
The Lord God = 108Musing On The Mother Act III
A Vital Purpose
Why?
Having To Learn a Whole Other Language
Is There Really Such a Thing as Random?
Fizzle Out
Welcoming
Hiraeth
~ Crosses Eyes and sticks tongue out ~
=70Deep Mind
Text2Num Doc.
You are