[PAX] My Idiot President

you're assuming that the guy was wrong in the things he was saying which of course would mean that all of those people he interviews in the documentary were wrong too

are you saying they are wrong about the things they are saying in that documentary?



i think establishing the source of something is important to take into consideration any bias but then the content of the article can then be assessed for its own merit

the article makes points are there any you disagree with?



i don't think the russians got trump elected

i think israel messes with your elections more than the russians but you seem to be selective in your outrage which is kinda odd



that's why its good to ask people questions which is what i'm doing



sure i mean someone shot seth rich didn't they?

someone shot gary webb

someone shot barry seal

someone shot a whole load of people in the US including some of your presidents!




you never heard of CIA deathsquads or operation COINTELPRO?



they DID stop the documentary

someone had to piece this one together from all the notes

I agree with @Stu

Whatever...
(We disagree and we’re going in circles...it’s boring constantly repeating myself...ciao)
((And the “deathsquad” didn’t take all the interviews and notes? Haha, yeah.))
 
sure i mean someone shot seth rich didn't they?

You got some proof of who shot him?
Factual proof?
It’s all speculation.
 
In fact in the movie a call is made to the clintons at one point to get seal out of a legal issue he was in so even hollywood admits as much

Seems legit. Hollywood is one of our most dedicated and well-respected intelligence agencies.
 
you never heard of CIA deathsquads or operation COINTELPRO?

I have a good friend who was a Psychological Warfare Specialist in the Army and several other internal organizations to which he belonged while I was serving in the US Coast Guard.
(I know a lot more about certain things than you probably do my friend...but that is a guess I admit.)

I have no doubt that we have “hit squads” or have had them in the past.
The idea of using one on some derpy dude making a documentary is just a bit of a stretch and overkill.
Again...it’s all speculation.

However, you seem to believe this wholeheartedly, yet dismiss the shit-ton of evidence that the Trump campaign was in bed with the Russians who did and are still trying to mess with our elections.
So again...

Whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stu
i think establishing the source of something is important to take into consideration any bias but then the content of the article can then be assessed for its own merit

Yeah...unless you know it’s from a known source that is biased against the truth.
;)
 
You got some proof of who shot him?
Factual proof?
It’s all speculation.

he was gunned down in the street

neither his wallet nor his watch were taken

both julian assange and his mother have hinted that he was the source of the leaks and also an ex british ambassador craig murray has also said that he got the information from a source that was not the russians

EXCLUSIVE: Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers
  • Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and associate of Julian Assange, told the Dailymail.com he flew to Washington, D.C. for emails
  • He claims he had a clandestine hand-off in a wooded area near American University with one of the email sources
  • The leakers' motivation was 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the 'tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders'
  • Murray says: 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks'
  • 'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that,' Murray insists
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...termediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html
 
Last edited:

Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offender's jet much more than previously known
By Malia Zimmerman
Published May 13, 2016

Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” -- even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com.

Clinton’s presence aboard Jeffrey Epstein’s Boeing 727 on 11 occasions has been reported, but flight logs show the number is more than double that, and trips between 2001 and 2003 included extended junkets around the world with Epstein and fellow passengers identified on manifests by their initials or first names, including “Tatiana.” The tricked-out jet earned its Nabakov-inspired nickname because it was reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young girls.

“Bill Clinton … associated with a man like Jeffrey Epstein, who everyone in New York, certainly within his inner circles, knew was a pedophile,” said Conchita Sarnoff, of the Washington, D.C. based non-profit Alliance to Rescue Victims of Trafficking, and author of a book on the Epstein case called "TrafficKing." “Why would a former president associate with a man like that?”
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/1...ders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known.html
 

its cool i'm sure you have a perfectly good reason why your boy clinton flew on a convicted pedos private jet many times....
 
upload_2018-9-17_16-49-21.webp
 
upload_2018-9-17_18-21-46.webp
 
upload_2018-9-17_20-8-15.webp
 
The Committee To Destroy The World: The Federal Reserve

by Tyler Durden
Tue, 09/18/2018 - 09:52

It is the powerful Federal Reserve that determines the global economy with its interest rates. President Donald Trump will appoint more Federal Reserve board members than any president since Woodrow Wilson, who actually helped establish the Federal Reserve. While all eyes and attention are on President Trump’s Supreme Court nominees, little attention is being paid to his nominees to the Federal Reserve. However, the effects of these appointments will be felt for decades.

Thus far, President Trump has appointed Richard Clarida, a moderate Republican, and director at Pacific Investment Management Co., to serve as deputy chairman under Chairman Jerome Powell. Trump’s second appointee is Michelle Bowman, who has served as banking commissioner for the State of Kansas. Both nominees have a long history of dealing with the Federal Reserve and are likely to maintain the status quo of easy credit than challenging it.

The new Federal Reserve appointees will join incoming New York Federal Reserve Bank head John C Williams,the former head of the Federal Reserve in San Francisco. It was during Williams’ tenure that Wells Fargo created over 3 million fake accounts and received a $1 billion fine for deceptive automobile and mortgage insurance contracts.

Wall Street has enthusiastically embraced these Federal Reserve nominees. That is not surprising since they appear predisposed to continue the influx of fiat money and keeping interests artificially low. Commercial banks will remain the primary beneficiary of this policy. This same policy will keep corporate borrowing easy and attractive as companies accumulate an unsustainable level of debt. While large corporations continue to speculate with easy credit, the rest of the population should be wary of the consequences.

The Lehman Bros. crash of 2008 may have disappeared from the rearview mirror when the Federal Reserve spent $16 trillion to bail out struggling financial institutions. The same situation could recur if the mega banks experience another collapse when their borrowers are unable to repay those easy loans. For this reason, President Trump’s appointments to the Federal Reserve Bank are critical and potentially disastrous.

Despite Trump’s tough rhetoric, he has embraced the easy fiat money policy of the past. He has appointedSteve Mnuchin, a former partner at Goldman Sachs, as Treasury secretary.

During the first half of 2018, the economy has been booming and consumer confidence has been strong. But that was the situation in 2007 when an economic collapse seemed unimaginable. Unfortunately, the U.S. national debt has now exceeded $23 trillion. Thanks to easy credit, consumer debt is expected to reach $4 trillion by the end of the year.

At this time, central banks have free reign over the economy. They can, in effect, do whatever they want. This unlimited power could be checked with the reinstitution of the gold standard, which would place the value of the currency at market value instead of artificial central bank whim. To quote economist Murray Rothbard, “[A]bolish the Federal Reserve System, and return to the gold standard, to a monetary system where a market-produced metal, such as gold, serves as the standard money, and not paper tickets printed by the Federal Reserve.”

In a system of gold-backed currency, prices and availability of goods would still fluctuate, but they would be subject to economic circumstances instead of political caprice. And the fluctuation would be significantly less.

President Trump’s Federal Reserve appointees are continuing the mistakes of the past. While all are cheering the economic boom, everyone is averting their eyes from the burgeoning debts that may soon come crashing down. And if it does come crashing, it will create a global chaos the world has not previously experienced.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-18/committee-destroy-world-federal-reserve
 
no that still wouldn't change an objective truth



i don't know where the notes were obtained from

i doubt the guy was making the movie on his own
So then why didn’t they kill everyone involved?
 
he was gunned down in the street

neither his wallet nor his watch were taken

both julian assange and his mother have hinted that he was the source of the leaks and also an ex british ambassador craig murray has also said that he got the information from a source that was not the russians

EXCLUSIVE: Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers
  • Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and associate of Julian Assange, told the Dailymail.com he flew to Washington, D.C. for emails
  • He claims he had a clandestine hand-off in a wooded area near American University with one of the email sources
  • The leakers' motivation was 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the 'tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders'
  • Murray says: 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks'
  • 'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that,' Murray insists
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...termediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html

Okay...it’s still speculation man.
These are not established facts and we don’t have an assassin in custody, not has anyone be indicted or even investigated...so yeah.
 
Back
Top