Akar
ataraxía- Mifune
- MBTI
- INFJ-ABBA
- Enneagram
- 8w9 - 458
aahhaahhaahahahahahh
loveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
sorry ahahahahahaha
<3 <3 <3
-G
Plato
- Thread starter Akar
- Start date
loveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
sorry ahahahahahaha
<3 <3 <3
-G
John K
Site Supporter
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 5W4 549
Really interesting @Akar <333
I'm not surprised the East would eventually have nothing to do with all this in the West and a split was inevitable as long as the Pope claimed authority over all of Christendom. As far as I can see, the Bishop of Rome was traditionally always first in honour among the patriarchs, but not in authority. It's weird how the circumstances of the two suddenly switched after the fall of Constantinople - since then the Orthodox in many places became politically a subordinate religion to Islam and that has strongly coloured their culture and their relationship with Rome - a reversal of the situation immediately after the fall of Rome. Of course there was also a divergence in ecclesiastical language too, and after a few hundred years of Dark Ages, hardly anyone in the West would understand Greek until the Renaissance.
It's really sad because I can't see any severe doctrinal differences between Orthodox and Catholic - it seems to be more a matter of emphasis. I suspect there is greater difference between the various Orthodox traditions than there is between the main groups and the Catholics. It's a pity that our lot had to mess about with the wording of the Creed without a proper Ecumenical Council to deal with it, which is a legitimate bone of contention on purely religious grounds, I guess.
It's fascinating how state and church became deeply entwined around that time. My opinion is probably worth less than your zero times zero, not least because I have awful retention of what I've read. As far as I can see it, Constantine was looking for a religion that he could use to bind the people of the Empire together heart and soul as well as body. The West was lost eventually because the Empire no longer had resources to sustain and defend it, while at the same time the 'barbarians' were actually becoming more civilised and more capable. It's fascinating how all this impacted on the way the Church developed. In the East it was under the tight control of the emperors until the fall of Constantinople. In the West there was chaos interspersed with volatile kingdoms set up by the invaders. But the one constant in the West was the Christian Church - OK a lot of the invaders brought Arianism with them, but they weren't stable over the centuries. The Western Church in Rome was lucky that it had some very great and pretty crafty patriarchs in Leo the Great before the fall of Rome and Gregory the Great afterwards. The See of Rome found itself at the heart of political as well as spiritual cohesion and continuity, and started building a sort of Church hegemony across the West. It was passive power to a great extent, but the temporal rulers found it expedient to give the Bishop of Rome a kind of ascendency and power that didn't exist for the Eastern patriarchs. I think this more than anything else pushed the Western and Eastern churches apart until the great schism finalised it - the West needed the Pope to have ecclesiastical supremacy because the essential temporal power that went with it was what held societies all across Europe together. The Pope wasn't anything like an emperor of course, but more like a sort of godfather of all the various monarchs concerned.
Could Constantine have had some kind of intuition about all this? I think you're right - whatever he had, it worked as well as anything probably could and better than most of the alternatives. I guess his immediate successors had an up and down relationship with Christianity, from what I remember, but maybe because of his actions it fed the following history of the world for 1500 years, better than perhaps any other strategy would have done.In my opinion, John, Constantine was simply an INFJ who saw centuries of history materialize before his eyes, like a seer.
A good question to ask is how, after the Great Schism of 1054, the Catholic and Orthodox Churches maintained shared ethical-religious boundaries, despite being so different
I'm not surprised the East would eventually have nothing to do with all this in the West and a split was inevitable as long as the Pope claimed authority over all of Christendom. As far as I can see, the Bishop of Rome was traditionally always first in honour among the patriarchs, but not in authority. It's weird how the circumstances of the two suddenly switched after the fall of Constantinople - since then the Orthodox in many places became politically a subordinate religion to Islam and that has strongly coloured their culture and their relationship with Rome - a reversal of the situation immediately after the fall of Rome. Of course there was also a divergence in ecclesiastical language too, and after a few hundred years of Dark Ages, hardly anyone in the West would understand Greek until the Renaissance.
It's really sad because I can't see any severe doctrinal differences between Orthodox and Catholic - it seems to be more a matter of emphasis. I suspect there is greater difference between the various Orthodox traditions than there is between the main groups and the Catholics. It's a pity that our lot had to mess about with the wording of the Creed without a proper Ecumenical Council to deal with it, which is a legitimate bone of contention on purely religious grounds, I guess.
John K
Site Supporter
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 5W4 549
Akar
ataraxía- Mifune
- MBTI
- INFJ-ABBA
- Enneagram
- 8w9 - 458
In my own interpretation of history—which takes your zero and cubes it—there were macroscopic factors that all converged at the same time.
Here is my take: while the Empire in the West was collapsing due to serious structural inefficiencies (lack of manpower/soldiers), the Eastern Empire was proactive in cultural exchange.You’re right when you say the Pope was a 'godfather' in the context of politics and the formation of European monarchies or empires.You have to look at the Pope and the Catholic Church as a multi-millennial structure that various monarchs turned to for strategic advice.
When correlating the differences between the East (Byzantium/Constantinople) and the West (Rome) with the various versions of the New Testament in Greek (not Classical Greek, but Koine Greek) and Latin, I notice that the differences aren't structural, but stylistic.Much like what happened with the two Empires, the differences were capillary at the start, before the schism.
It’s funny that you mention the 'Bishop of Rome'; Monday is a holiday here in Rome—the feast of Saint Peter and Paul
Again, in my opinion, you're right that there are no doctrinal differences, just political-administrative ones between Orthodoxy and Catholicism.Returning to human body metaphors: the arteries are structured the same way (doctrine), but the shape (the capillaries) changes, producing two different yet very similar systems.
Fundamentally, the Latins took Greek culture and modified it to suit their needs (as early as the 3rd century BC); it’s a fault line that hasn't healed since the dawn of time!
Thanks for this magnificent input <3 <3 <3 <3
-G
Here is my take: while the Empire in the West was collapsing due to serious structural inefficiencies (lack of manpower/soldiers), the Eastern Empire was proactive in cultural exchange.You’re right when you say the Pope was a 'godfather' in the context of politics and the formation of European monarchies or empires.You have to look at the Pope and the Catholic Church as a multi-millennial structure that various monarchs turned to for strategic advice.
When correlating the differences between the East (Byzantium/Constantinople) and the West (Rome) with the various versions of the New Testament in Greek (not Classical Greek, but Koine Greek) and Latin, I notice that the differences aren't structural, but stylistic.Much like what happened with the two Empires, the differences were capillary at the start, before the schism.
It’s funny that you mention the 'Bishop of Rome'; Monday is a holiday here in Rome—the feast of Saint Peter and Paul
Again, in my opinion, you're right that there are no doctrinal differences, just political-administrative ones between Orthodoxy and Catholicism.Returning to human body metaphors: the arteries are structured the same way (doctrine), but the shape (the capillaries) changes, producing two different yet very similar systems.Fundamentally, the Latins took Greek culture and modified it to suit their needs (as early as the 3rd century BC); it’s a fault line that hasn't healed since the dawn of time!
Thanks for this magnificent input <3 <3 <3 <3
-G
Akar
ataraxía- Mifune
- MBTI
- INFJ-ABBA
- Enneagram
- 8w9 - 458
The science of forensic linguistics and computational stylometry demonstrates that radically modifying the deep structure of one's writing style is an almost impossible neuro-cognitive undertaking over the long term. Every individual possesses an idiolect, which is a unique, specific, and non-reproducible combination of linguistic habits, syntactic rhythms, lexical choices, and typographical tics. This profile is rooted in the deepest and most unconscious levels of the central nervous system. *1
The core assumption of scientific stylometry lies in the asymmetry between the choice of content (conscious) and the choice of structure (unconscious). When a user writes a post to attack, mislead, or manipulate, their cognitive attention is entirely focused on what to say (the argument, the insinuation, the defense). This cognitive overload saturates the working memory, leaving control over how to structure the text to the automatic processes of the brain.*2
The statistical law governing this distribution is known as Zipf's Law, which postulates that in any linguistic corpus, the frequency of a word is inversely proportional to its rank in the frequency classification. One can deliberately alter keywords (the most obvious nouns or verbs), but it is impossible to manipulate the statistical distribution of background words. This linguistic fingerprint is articulated across five macroscopic analytical levels.*3
II. The Five Levels of Forensic Stylometric Analysis
1. The Lexicometric Level and Function Words
The macroscopic error made by those attempting to camouflage themselves behind a proxy account is focusing on content words (nouns, adjectives, action verbs). The forensic analyst, conversely, isolates and analyzes exclusively the function words (functores): articles, prepositions, conjunctions, pronouns, and adverbs of frequency.
These words lack independent semantic meaning but serve as the structural glue of the text. Their usage is entirely automatic. The vectors of analysis include:
Type-Token Ratio (TTR): The coefficient of lexical richness, calculated as the ratio between the number of unique words (types) and the total number of words (tokens). A proxy attempting to feign being a semi-literate user but possessing a high TTR immediately betrays their actual intellectual background.
Relative frequency of coordinating and subordinating conjunctions: The systematic use of "however" (tuttavia) compared to "but" (però), or the tendency to begin sentences with "anyway" (comunque) or "indeed" (infatti), constitutes a constant subconscious signature.
Hapax Legomena: Words that appear only once within a corpus. The appearance of the same hapax or a rare combination of function words in both the ex-staffer's main account and the proxy's profile seals the formal collapse of the separation of identities.
2. The Syntactic Level and Structural Complexity
Syntax reflects the architecture of the author's thought. Even under camouflage, an author accustomed to complex subordination will find it highly difficult to restrict themselves to short, paratactic sentences without generating detectable inconsistencies.
[Hypotactic Structure - Real Author] ──► Subordinate ──► Coordinate ──► Parenthetical
│ (Contamination)
▼
[Proxy Attempt - Camouflage] ──► Short Sentence ──► Short Sentence ──► Complex Parenthetical
The scientific analysis of syntax relies on rigid metrics:
Mean Length of Utterance (MLU): The average number of words between two periods [full stops]. Each author stabilizes around a specific average value, with a predictable standard deviation.
Syntactic Dependency Tree Depth: The measurement of how many levels of subordination (hypotaxis) are layered before closing the period. Authors with an academic or logical background tend to maintain deep trees even when attempting to write in a casual or slang manner.
Use of Verb Moods and Tenses: The systematic preference for the conditional, the subjunctive, or the tendency toward simplification in the present indicative. The persistence of rare constructs (e.g., compound gerunds or impersonal passives) serves as a high-fidelity diagnostic marker.
3. The Micro-Stylometric Level and Typographical Patterns
The micro-stylometric level analyzes the motor and graphic habits applied to the keyboard. These elements are the most difficult of all to camouflage, as they are linked to muscle memory and visual habits unfiltered by linguistic awareness.
Management of Spaces and Punctuation: The systematic insertion of a space before a question or exclamation mark (e.g., "why do you do that ?"), the use of two consecutive spaces after a period, or the habit of omitting the space after a comma.
Morphology of Ellipses: The strict use of three dots (...), the anomalous extension to four or five (....), or the reduction to two (..).
Use of Graphic Organizers: The adoption of em-dashes (—), en-dashes/hyphens (-), or parentheses to insert meta-textual comments. The positioning and frequency of parentheticals reveal the rhythm of the author's mental breathing during text composition.
4. The Orthographic Level and Error Analysis (Idiosyncrasies)
In forensic linguistics, the error is more informative than the norm. Deviation from the orthographic or grammatical standard provides a unique tracer, manifesting in two categories:
Competence Errors (Systematic): Errors rooted in the author's education or geographic origin (e.g., the incorrect use of homophones, omission of necessary accents, or regional syntactic calques). If a proxy commits the exact same systematic error as the ex-staffer, the probability of coincidence drops geometrically.
Execution Errors (Recurrent Typos): Errors caused by typing speed on the keyboard. The tendency to invert two specific letters (e.g., "tecnio" instead of "tecnico") or to systematically miss double consonants on certain words reveals a specific map of the aggressor's oculo-motor coordination.
5. The Pragmatic Level and Argumentative Strategy
Pragmatics studies how language is used to achieve a goal within a social context. The ex-staff's proxies, despite changing their surface style, maintain their strategic goals and modes of conflictual interaction.
Structure of the Attacking Focus: The obsession with specific thematic cores (e.g., discrediting the target's cognitive stability, appealing to formal rules, seeking subtle provocation).
Management of Deixis: The use of pronouns and spatial/temporal references to distance or draw closer to the interlocutor (e.g., the sudden shift from "you" [singular] to "you all" [plural] or the use of the third person to isolate the target before the audience).
The Paradox of Cognitive Load and the State of "Asynchrony"
Nardi discovered that when a person operates within their dominant function (their flow state), the brain displays a coordinated, harmonic, and low-energy pattern (often a blue-green alpha wave pattern). Conversely, when a subject attempts to falsify their identity, the brain enters a high-energy state of asynchrony.
To avoid overload, the central nervous system implements an offloading strategy: it automatizes low-level tasks (punctuation, function words, syntax), delegating them to native, deep neural circuits.
The stylistic habits isolated by forensic linguistics light up in specific brain regions identified by Nardi. When you analyze the text of a proxy, you are reading the activity of these specific areas:
[F7: Rhetorical Direction / Scripting]
[T3: Syntactic Skeleton] ─────┼───── [F8: Emotional Charge / Values]
[P3: Micro-Typography / Spaces]
The T3 region is the hub of verbal logic, grammatical precision, and linear sentence deconstruction. It is the area that manages the correct placement of function words (functores) and the depth of the syntactic tree.
Nardi maps to F7 the ability to create fluid verbal connections, mirror others, but also to execute mental scripting: the formulation of catchphrases, recurrent idiomatic expressions, and rhetorical manipulation strategies.
The P3 region (Left Parietal) is responsible for integrated conceptual processing, but at a motor level, it controls the precision of visuo-spatial execution, including spacing on the keyboard and the management of text blocks.
"Zen-state Simulation" but in a pathological version (defensive loop):
The text will show a tendency toward abstract synthesis and the removal of contingent facts.
-G
The core assumption of scientific stylometry lies in the asymmetry between the choice of content (conscious) and the choice of structure (unconscious). When a user writes a post to attack, mislead, or manipulate, their cognitive attention is entirely focused on what to say (the argument, the insinuation, the defense). This cognitive overload saturates the working memory, leaving control over how to structure the text to the automatic processes of the brain.*2
The statistical law governing this distribution is known as Zipf's Law, which postulates that in any linguistic corpus, the frequency of a word is inversely proportional to its rank in the frequency classification. One can deliberately alter keywords (the most obvious nouns or verbs), but it is impossible to manipulate the statistical distribution of background words. This linguistic fingerprint is articulated across five macroscopic analytical levels.*3
II. The Five Levels of Forensic Stylometric Analysis
1. The Lexicometric Level and Function Words
The macroscopic error made by those attempting to camouflage themselves behind a proxy account is focusing on content words (nouns, adjectives, action verbs). The forensic analyst, conversely, isolates and analyzes exclusively the function words (functores): articles, prepositions, conjunctions, pronouns, and adverbs of frequency.
These words lack independent semantic meaning but serve as the structural glue of the text. Their usage is entirely automatic. The vectors of analysis include:
Type-Token Ratio (TTR): The coefficient of lexical richness, calculated as the ratio between the number of unique words (types) and the total number of words (tokens). A proxy attempting to feign being a semi-literate user but possessing a high TTR immediately betrays their actual intellectual background.
Relative frequency of coordinating and subordinating conjunctions: The systematic use of "however" (tuttavia) compared to "but" (però), or the tendency to begin sentences with "anyway" (comunque) or "indeed" (infatti), constitutes a constant subconscious signature.
Hapax Legomena: Words that appear only once within a corpus. The appearance of the same hapax or a rare combination of function words in both the ex-staffer's main account and the proxy's profile seals the formal collapse of the separation of identities.
2. The Syntactic Level and Structural Complexity
Syntax reflects the architecture of the author's thought. Even under camouflage, an author accustomed to complex subordination will find it highly difficult to restrict themselves to short, paratactic sentences without generating detectable inconsistencies.
[Hypotactic Structure - Real Author] ──► Subordinate ──► Coordinate ──► Parenthetical
│ (Contamination)
▼
[Proxy Attempt - Camouflage] ──► Short Sentence ──► Short Sentence ──► Complex Parenthetical
The scientific analysis of syntax relies on rigid metrics:
Mean Length of Utterance (MLU): The average number of words between two periods [full stops]. Each author stabilizes around a specific average value, with a predictable standard deviation.
Syntactic Dependency Tree Depth: The measurement of how many levels of subordination (hypotaxis) are layered before closing the period. Authors with an academic or logical background tend to maintain deep trees even when attempting to write in a casual or slang manner.
Use of Verb Moods and Tenses: The systematic preference for the conditional, the subjunctive, or the tendency toward simplification in the present indicative. The persistence of rare constructs (e.g., compound gerunds or impersonal passives) serves as a high-fidelity diagnostic marker.
3. The Micro-Stylometric Level and Typographical Patterns
The micro-stylometric level analyzes the motor and graphic habits applied to the keyboard. These elements are the most difficult of all to camouflage, as they are linked to muscle memory and visual habits unfiltered by linguistic awareness.
Management of Spaces and Punctuation: The systematic insertion of a space before a question or exclamation mark (e.g., "why do you do that ?"), the use of two consecutive spaces after a period, or the habit of omitting the space after a comma.
Morphology of Ellipses: The strict use of three dots (...), the anomalous extension to four or five (....), or the reduction to two (..).
Use of Graphic Organizers: The adoption of em-dashes (—), en-dashes/hyphens (-), or parentheses to insert meta-textual comments. The positioning and frequency of parentheticals reveal the rhythm of the author's mental breathing during text composition.
4. The Orthographic Level and Error Analysis (Idiosyncrasies)
In forensic linguistics, the error is more informative than the norm. Deviation from the orthographic or grammatical standard provides a unique tracer, manifesting in two categories:
Competence Errors (Systematic): Errors rooted in the author's education or geographic origin (e.g., the incorrect use of homophones, omission of necessary accents, or regional syntactic calques). If a proxy commits the exact same systematic error as the ex-staffer, the probability of coincidence drops geometrically.
Execution Errors (Recurrent Typos): Errors caused by typing speed on the keyboard. The tendency to invert two specific letters (e.g., "tecnio" instead of "tecnico") or to systematically miss double consonants on certain words reveals a specific map of the aggressor's oculo-motor coordination.
5. The Pragmatic Level and Argumentative Strategy
Pragmatics studies how language is used to achieve a goal within a social context. The ex-staff's proxies, despite changing their surface style, maintain their strategic goals and modes of conflictual interaction.
Structure of the Attacking Focus: The obsession with specific thematic cores (e.g., discrediting the target's cognitive stability, appealing to formal rules, seeking subtle provocation).
Management of Deixis: The use of pronouns and spatial/temporal references to distance or draw closer to the interlocutor (e.g., the sudden shift from "you" [singular] to "you all" [plural] or the use of the third person to isolate the target before the audience).
The Paradox of Cognitive Load and the State of "Asynchrony"
Nardi discovered that when a person operates within their dominant function (their flow state), the brain displays a coordinated, harmonic, and low-energy pattern (often a blue-green alpha wave pattern). Conversely, when a subject attempts to falsify their identity, the brain enters a high-energy state of asynchrony.
To avoid overload, the central nervous system implements an offloading strategy: it automatizes low-level tasks (punctuation, function words, syntax), delegating them to native, deep neural circuits.
The stylistic habits isolated by forensic linguistics light up in specific brain regions identified by Nardi. When you analyze the text of a proxy, you are reading the activity of these specific areas:
[F7: Rhetorical Direction / Scripting]
[T3: Syntactic Skeleton] ─────┼───── [F8: Emotional Charge / Values]
[P3: Micro-Typography / Spaces]
The T3 region is the hub of verbal logic, grammatical precision, and linear sentence deconstruction. It is the area that manages the correct placement of function words (functores) and the depth of the syntactic tree.
Nardi maps to F7 the ability to create fluid verbal connections, mirror others, but also to execute mental scripting: the formulation of catchphrases, recurrent idiomatic expressions, and rhetorical manipulation strategies.
The P3 region (Left Parietal) is responsible for integrated conceptual processing, but at a motor level, it controls the precision of visuo-spatial execution, including spacing on the keyboard and the management of text blocks.
"Zen-state Simulation" but in a pathological version (defensive loop):
The text will show a tendency toward abstract synthesis and the removal of contingent facts.
-G
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- Sorta 4
Wow, how fascinating!
Akar
ataraxía- Mifune
- MBTI
- INFJ-ABBA
- Enneagram
- 8w9 - 458
like when you build something true <3
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 954 so/sx
Akar
ataraxía- Mifune
- MBTI
- INFJ-ABBA
- Enneagram
- 8w9 - 458
Im just a carpenter
Akar
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 468 sx
You guys have shiny souls and don’t even know it.. which only makes them shinier, ironically.
Never stop sparkling, you guys.
Akar
ataraxía- Mifune
- MBTI
- INFJ-ABBA
- Enneagram
- 8w9 - 458
then you'll need a welding mask while we are around lolYou guys have shiny souls and don’t even know it.. which only makes them shinier, ironically.
Never stop sparkling, you guys.
....especially this winter when I arrive
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 468 sx
then you'll need a welding mask while we are around lol
....especially this winter when I arrive
Can’t wait..
Akar
ataraxía- Mifune
- MBTI
- INFJ-ABBA
- Enneagram
- 8w9 - 458
<3
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 468 sx
It feels amazing to be in a room flooded with love, indeed. Platonic love for Wyote, we have it in spades.
And romantic love for Giammarco, of course, from me. Though perhaps Wyote also fancies him since he’s so damn lovable - who knows.
Love is so much more powerful than hate. Love always wins, in the end. Poor hate, it doesn’t stand a chance.
TomasM
Worn Out 'F5' Key
- MBTI
- INFJ
True statement. ^^
