Possible solutions to the worlds problems

I don't know to what extent government is behind those things. There might be some info eg about soya stuff on the natural news website

They are banking on the poorest people eating the GMO's and processed food because they want to cull the population and get rid of the ''useless eaters'': http://rense.com/general78/philo.htm

Have you heard of the georgia guidestones? They are a relatively indestructable set of granite blocks sunk into the ground with various instructions carved on them in different languages

There is also a sun dial to allow a recalibration of time after some sort of catastrophe

It costs millions to construct and was built by a mysterious ''R.C.Christian'' ( Christian Rosenkreuz of the rosicrucians)

pretty creepy but one of the instructions is to keep the human population down below 500,000,000

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

That's super creepy! Who would do that!!?

This is going to sound SOOO stupid - and I can't believe I'm mentioning this - a lot of the concepts you talk about are components of a TV show call 'Supernatural'. I haven't seen it in awhile, but last time I watched it, there was a story arc about these Leviathans putting additives in the food to dumb people down and basically kill them. They also have incorporated a character named Crowley into the show (who is the devil). It seems silly, but some of the things you mention remind me of that show! I'm sure it's the media again trying to convince of that real things are "fictitious"!


I had a question I meant to ask awhile back about the Britney Spears interview. If it's the case that the media and journalists are actively trying to control us through their broadcasts, how do we not know this? It would be wide-spread across so many outlets, and so many people would know...why aren't people coming forward? or are they, and they're just being deemed crazy?
 
Free energy opens up the entire solar system, so these guys going on about population control for the betterment of humanity and Earth are just dumb. If they're in power, they've known for some time that free energy is real. Which leaves several degrees of just plain evil to describe them...
 
That's super creepy! Who would do that!!?

Unbalanced people

This is going to sound SOOO stupid - and I can't believe I'm mentioning this - a lot of the concepts you talk about are components of a TV show call 'Supernatural'. I haven't seen it in awhile, but last time I watched it, there was a story arc about these Leviathans putting additives in the food to dumb people down and basically kill them. They also have incorporated a character named Crowley into the show (who is the devil). It seems silly, but some of the things you mention remind me of that show! I'm sure it's the media again trying to convince of that real things are "fictitious"!

That's not stupid at all

I haven't seen the show but magicians use a method called 'bud will' where they plant an idea into the subconscious so that it then flowers into our reality

This 'reality' is really created by consciousness. So if you affect consciousness then you affect this reality. This is why graham hancock calls this a 'war over consciousness'; his TED talk was removed by TED!

[video=youtube;-b6-0yW7Iaw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b6-0yW7Iaw[/video]

The bud will effect is often spoken about in the alternative media but they call it 'predictive programming'

So on one level it helps bring about a change in reality in a sort of self fulfilling prophecy sort of way but also it prepares people psychologically for certain things to happen. There have been for example strange things appear in films and other popular culture that have referred to but preceded events like 911 or the boston bombin of the shooting at sandy hook

For example sandy hook is mentioned in the batman films as is aurora (where the theatre shooting happened). This is all planting things subconsciously into the collective consciousness.

But one of the most interesting things in the batman film was the jokers speech to two face where he explains that as long as people are prewarrned of disasters they don't panic...as long as there is a plan

Concerning the 'leviathon' that is just the hebrew name for the chaos dragon. Set or satan is chaos. Typhon the black goddess is also chaos. Crowley was in my opinion an expression of unbalnced force; i see him as an agent of chaos, so although many of his followers will argue he wasn't a satanist he is in that current. In fact the satanic bible was really influenced by crowleys work and like crowley (see for example in his confessions) it says it is a social darwinist belief system

Social darwinism believes in stamping out the weak. The 'weak' are basically anyone they don't like. The guys at the top of our society who are the black magicians behind the popular culture industry are social darwinists and the 'weak' to them are the poor. That is who thay are primarily trying to exterminate

Crowley talks about wanting to create a new system based on the old spartan system. But the spartans used to throw any deformed babies off a cliff. They would also give up their children to state run military boarding schools where they would be brutalised (have their emotional empathy removed) and paired up with an older boy who would often use them for sex.

The spartans trained as soldiers so that they didn't need to work. Instead they dominated a slave class of people called the helots who did all the work. This has lead to comparisons being made for example by noam chomsky between modern day israel and its exploitation of the palestineans and ancient sparta and its domination of the helots

But that is basically the mindset of the corporate elite. They see themselves as the spartans and the rest of us as the helots. In fact the chiefs of wallstreet are often called 'the masters of the universe' even in the mainstream media

So it sounds like that programme you are watching is not far off the mark; but the question is: ''are they warning us or are they fictionalising whats real so that people don't believe the truth when they hear it?''. Also is it predictive programming?


I had a question I meant to ask awhile back about the Britney Spears interview. If it's the case that the media and journalists are actively trying to control us through their broadcasts, how do we not know this? It would be wide-spread across so many outlets, and so many people would know...why aren't people coming forward? or are they, and they're just being deemed crazy?

People DO know about it...there is a massed awakening going on where people are becoming aware how centralised control is

The media outlets have all consolidated into a handful of giants eg there was another recent merger of comcast and time warner. The different media outlets have for a long time been owned by the same families but they have been prevented from merging due to the enforcement of anti-trust laws such as the Sherman Anti Trust Act (1890) which were used to break down monopolies for example the rockefellers standard oil trust in 1911 but these families just carried on infiltrating government and the judicial system and the media to such a degree that now no one is enforcing the anti-trust laws anymore allowing 'too big to fail' coporations to grow which basically hold government to ransom

Concerning why it isn't spoken about on the media outlets its because they are all centrally controlled. The presenters are just sock puppets spewing out the scripts they are handed by the cabal. Have a look at this clip to see this:

[video=youtube;Pl7sWtUu1Fc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pl7sWtUu1Fc[/video]

So the reason the central control of the media is not discussed through the mainstream media is because the media is centrally controlled (see analogy of platos cave to understand why the black lodge want to control the flow of information to peopels minds...because to control that is to control perception and to control perception is to control reality)

This is why people have to go to the alternative media to get the truth

CFR control of the mainstream media:

[video=youtube;g7vyIqY3Pb4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7vyIqY3Pb4[/video]

The term 'conspiracy theorist' was created by the CIA after the kennedy assassination as a smear term to be used against anyone who questioned the magic bullet theory. This term was made analogous to insanity by the mainstream media

The ADL uses a similar technique of manipulation by branding anyone who criticises Israeli foreign policy as an 'anti-semite'

The powers that be do not want anyone questioning their actions! Those that have done so will be assassinated or character assassinated or both; they have very cleverly got the masses to police each other and to use these terms to silence each other

Here's a clip about this process:

[video=youtube;Xbp6umQT58A]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbp6umQT58A[/video]

After my next post is a clip of another illuminati pop culture puppet beyonce talking about her alter ego called 'sasha':
 
Last edited:
Free energy opens up the entire solar system, so these guys going on about population control for the betterment of humanity and Earth are just dumb. If they're in power, they've known for some time that free energy is real. Which leaves several degrees of just plain evil to describe them...

Absolutely!

They are trapped in ego hell

Because they have turned their experience here in this reality into a game of power and money accumulation they have made themselves deeply insecure because now they have amassed all that wealth and power they are terrified that others will take it from them!

They are so machiavellian that they believe in their paranoid state that everyone else is as power hungry as them and that the only reason they are at the top is because they are superior!

They then reason that the only way they can make themselves feel safer is to kill people in order to lessen the perceived threat from the masses...see similar purging behaivour from other despots eg stalin

By creating inequality they have created a polarity and polarity is tension. The greater the inequality the greater the tension!
 
Illuminati puppet beyonce talks about her alter ego called 'sasha'

[video=youtube;HNXNxscgMgU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNXNxscgMgU[/video]
 
Family guy episode preceding the boston marathon bombing:

[video=youtube;7WQeqE943Uo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WQeqE943Uo[/video]
 
To me, it would seem reasonable to put a cap on profits from intellectual property. This number could float based on research and development expenditures, and maybe other variables.
 
I've not read the whole of the thread, although I saw Participatory Economics appear along the lines there and it was an idea which interested me at one time, possibly as a form of public services management and delivery in a mixed economy, I think mixed economies are inevitable while one form or another will prevail and this will be largely culturally and materially (class struggles, ie means and mode of production) determined, so you have capitalist societies with fuedalistic traits, fuedal societies with capitalistic traits etc.

The things which have interested me the most lately have been assets based welfare reforms and basic incomes, I personally favour the least complex of these because I do believe a negative legacy of political paternalism in either left or right varieties and welfare states has been an impact upon the publics readiness, willingness or ability to cope with complexity (and also consequential thinking but that may be another topic).

It is an idea which has been criticised by left wingers because it could be simply a welfare reform or fix, rearranging deck chairs on the titanic, which can be a prelude to cuts or easily cut and eliminated itself, especially in any society with a prevailing conservative media and culture which can portray it as just another entitlement upon which tax revenue is squandered by capricious and self-serving politicians. The criticism is fair. The reason being that is precisely what happened in the UK. The government had successfully secured enough terms to introduce what would have been the most radical changes to the welfare state since the idea of a welfare state per se was stumbled upon but an unelected and unelectable coalition of capitalist liberals and fiscal conservatives eradicated it all at a single stroke before the bonds matured and the generation of eighteen year olds who would be entitled to them were able to receive them.

In part the fault lay with failure to popularise, propagandise or spread support for the ideas ahead of the reforms, not least among the party or public who would have been the most natural supportive base. Or so one would have thought. Consequently the public and party faithful were fighting the last battle, defending older manners of dispensing benefits in traditonal ways.

The ideas are available in some pretty good wikis but I favour the idea of both the bond maturing and being available at eighteen and the monthly or three weekly basic incomes.

The bonds would provide everyone with the freedom which has been the preserve of the rich for some time, so they could choose to study, invest, start a business or simply take gap years and engage in riotious living if they want when they reach the age of majority.

The basic income is a recogition of the right to life, that this shouldnt be dependent upon you finding work and earning money at anothers behest, I know that some capitalists would positively baulk at the idea and attack the likely workshy's exploitation of this but lets be honest its not the purpose of business to provide employment, nor should it be the taxpayers either, I am sure that most enterprises and firms could do better with the option of proper downsizing at their disposal like never before. In any case for a long time I've thought that people need to wise up and be less envious of the people who do choose to drop out, those people dont need to be punished for their lifestyle, they are punished by it for the most part but dont cope on to this. However, while this income should be enough to cover subsistence and be set a high enough level to provide some sort of life beyond mere existence, the option remains of working to supplement it, although you work for whatever the rate is, no minimums for employment/wages.

The point of those reforms is freedom, people can do whatever they want, be lazy, be productive, form autonomous co-operatives or workers councils or fifedoms or business enterprises or communes or residents groups, whatever they want.

I think that opens up radical new directions in terms of public services too, states, in my view, should and could provide less services in kind or direct services in this changed circumstances and statutory obligations to do so should be revised aswell. There are a lot of present health and social services which are riven, positively riven, with contradictions, people enter them to make money without any sort of vocation, rounds of professionalisation and training have barely put a dent in it, there's never been a syncing of public expectation and services capacity and to a great extent services have become sickening for the staff attempting to run them and its not just a resourcing issue. If people are less inclined to try to use public services as a vehicle for earnings perhaps there could be a major change in delivery, a real world version of shitting or getting off the pot.

Its not requisite that it be connected with the assets based welfare and basic income ideas but there are other ideas from market socialists and GDH Cole, a forgotten but major figure in UK socialism, too, John Roemer had an idea about the bond or "inheritence" dispensed being in the form of shares, from which income could be derived, a portion of which could be saleable, which people could choose to cash right away or keep, and a portion which they could trade but could not sell or dispose of, which could give individuals decision making power as shareholders and a stake in or control of the economy, these unsaleable shares could be used to defacto determine public spending outside of elections and politicians or ministerial powers.

Cole's ideas interest me because he was one of the few socialists willing to say that the welfare state, mixed economy etc. was not socialism and wouldnt ever be, his ideas resemble some from georgism or geolibertarianism in that land and rents should become the main means by which the state derives an income, however the aim is not to abolish taxation per se so much as progressively socialise land ownership and change proprietorship norms.
 
To me, it would seem reasonable to put a cap on profits from intellectual property. This number could float based on research and development expenditures, and maybe other variables.

I dont know, provided that the very least in a population is doing well, by which I would mean a lot better than anyone presently in societies like the UK or US which could be described as "the very least", then why worry about those doing best?

Just applying the Rawlsian idea that the society is better which is inequitable but in which the least is more prosperous than anyone in a comparable egalitarian society.

I think that redistribution can be a good idea, especially assets or capital redistribution and especially so in societies were the few possess all the capital and assets but the main possess nothing but wage earning power, but fiscal egalitarianism can be ill conceived to say the least. I say that as a socialist. I know socialists have a reputation for being unthinkingly or instinctively egalitarian but the point with socialism, as I understand it, was always about creating a classless society, in the postive sense of that terminology, or at the very least managing, minimising or mitigating class struggles to the benefits of all individuals involved.
 
Take back your power film coming soon about the fight back against the planned 'smart' grid:

[video=youtube;FDMYc1qlhFY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDMYc1qlhFY#t=91[/video]
 
^Sandy Hook... So sad. So wrong.

I think the first thing to recognize is that governance is an industry. It is simply a form of business that is engineered to make money. It's actually the most profitable and least effective industry on the face of the planet. But it doesn't have to be that way. It can be an entity that serves the people more than itself. We just have to decide its important enough to build. So far, it's bad enough to complain about, but not bad enough to do anything...

The world we have has been given to us through the private interests of countless governance, business, and religious entities. -all vying for more power. At no point in history has humanity stood up on its own accord and built a society they would be proud to live within. What profound BS that is. I've been talking a bit about how to inspire humanity to build a better world in the philosophy section. The religious should feel fortunate, I'm not going to treat governance or corporations with as much courtesy.
 

Yup another false flag...it's all coming out now and the perpetrators of these crimes are being exposed

I actually got infracted for saying these events were false flag attacks...as if it is offencive to tell the truth about what happened to those people...personally i think it does them a grave disservice to not tell the truth about what happened to them

Here's the clip from the website you've posted...its significant because the guy is a professional school saftey inspector...its what he does :

[video=youtube;rEfW9FvLyAg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEfW9FvLyAg[/video]
 
Yup another false flag...it's all coming out now and the perpetrators of these crimes are being exposed

I actually got infracted for saying these events were false flag attacks...as if it is offencive to tell the truth about what happened to those people...personally i think it does them a grave disservice to not tell the truth about what happened to them

Here's the clip from the website you've posted...its significant because the guy is a professional school saftey inspector...its what he does :

[video=youtube;rEfW9FvLyAg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEfW9FvLyAg[/video]

I remember reading a lot about sandy hook when it first happened, and actually felt major guilt for believing some of the fringe theories that were posted. I don't like to think that I would disbelieve the death of someone ...seems very offensive too me.

But at the same time, there was just so much evidence that supports that it was staged. I haven't researched it a whole lot...but did this benefit Obama and the arms laws that he was trying to pass? I know a lot of people were saying that this would help with passing the bill- but did it?
 
the very idea that a mentally unstable person could take a gun and shoot kids proves it was a false flag.

Let's get into the nitty gritty, was there ever a mentally deranged person who shot and killed more than one person that was not a false flag operation?

Was there ever an act of violence against the US or its allies that was not performed by non US agents?

the evidence is clear that every act is orchestrated to make us believe we are under attack when in fact we are not.

My daughter is in 9th grade, her 10th grade "big sister" partner told the class that her best friend had been shot to death. A victim of US urban gun violence....obviously a false flag operation.
 
I don't know to what extent government is behind those things. There might be some info eg about soya stuff on the natural news website

They are banking on the poorest people eating the GMO's and processed food because they want to cull the population and get rid of the ''useless eaters'': http://rense.com/general78/philo.htm

Have you heard of the georgia guidestones? They are a relatively indestructable set of granite blocks sunk into the ground with various instructions carved on them in different languages

There is also a sun dial to allow a recalibration of time after some sort of catastrophe

It costs millions to construct and was built by a mysterious ''R.C.Christian'' ( Christian Rosenkreuz of the rosicrucians)

pretty creepy but one of the instructions is to keep the human population down below 500,000,000

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

And I have no problem with this...
 
And I have no problem with this...

They have to get the population down to those levels though and they are not doing it domocratically they are doing it by subterfuge or to put it another way: murder

Also if they get to decide who lives and dies, being the psychopaths that they are they will likely keep more psychopaths alive which will prove a disaster for the survivors
 
the very idea that a mentally unstable person could take a gun and shoot kids proves it was a false flag.

No all the inconsistencies around the case suggest it was a false flag. The history of these people using false flags suggest it is a false flag

The fact that a school shooting in the UK was used to disarm people here before all this which also saw a whitewash masonic coverup in the wake of the shooting and 100 year gagging orders placed on people involved in the case suggests it was a false flag

The fact that a school shooting in australia was used to clamp down on guns there suggests it is a false flag attack

The fact that many people who are clued up on things like agenda 21 had predicted that they would try to disarm the public before they did suggests it was a false flag and so on

Let's get into the nitty gritty, was there ever a mentally deranged person who shot and killed more than one person that was not a false flag operation?

Getting down to the nitty gritty is talking about the mentally deranged mass murders who are running our corporations and governments...thats the nitty gritty

Was there ever an act of violence against the US or its allies that was not performed by non US agents?

the evidence is clear that every act is orchestrated to make us believe we are under attack when in fact we are not.

People need to learn more so that they can understand the dynamics out there then they will be better placed to discearn which attacks are genuine and which are false flag....these days people need to be savy if they don't want to be duped

My daughter is in 9th grade, her 10th grade "big sister" partner told the class that her best friend had been shot to death. A victim of US urban gun violence....obviously a false flag operation.

I don't know anything about it so i can't comment

But i did look into information surrounding 911, sandy hook, boston bombing and the syria 'gas' attacks

Notice how the new york times has now retracted its claims about the syria attack? So i was right about that as well...i think i was infracted for that as well...not to mention having a self declared member of the israeli military threaten me with gassing and rape
 
Last edited:
Back
Top