Trump will win again

If Maricopa raudit esults are like I think they will be, I wonder if some will insist it's a huge conspiracy.
 
Love this..

cleardot.gif

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/07/12/politics/2020-election-fraud-claims-lawyer-hearing/index.html?__twitter_impression=truemichigan.png
 
larry806q said:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-counted-fulton-county-georgia-2020-election/

It is at least entertaining
Click to expand...
From your source:
https://twitter.com/realLizUSA/stat...-counted-fulton-county-georgia-2020-election/

The fraud is obvious for anyone willing to examine.

By the way, Telegram user @CodeMonkeyZ provided links to image files of absentee ballots in Fulton County:

Quote:
Here are more ways to download the Fulton county ballot images:

https://theatlantajournalconstituti...0379d181/fo8028b0-c150-45f5-911d-f9959144930e

https://twitter.com/markniesse/status/1410574983072526337

https://twitter.com/GAballots/status/1412857654913941507
 
o2b said:
Side by side duplicate ballots. Fulton County, Georgia.

There are a LOT of these.
View attachment 81003
Click to expand...
Is there any legitimate reason that ballots would be duplicated by election officials, say to be able to run them thru the counting machines because the originals mail in ballots were too creased? And might there be a codified system by which ballots are duplicated? Say by having election observers from both parties watching? Could this smocking gun be yet another normal procedure that is being used as "evidence" of wide spread fraud?
 
57,

C'mon, have some objectivity. The first question I would ask of duplicate ballots is if who was voted for is random.

There are also examples of falsified tally sheets containing 100 ballots with summarized results of the tally where the results are Biden:100 and Trump:0. But, the count of the actual ballots in the envelopes is akin to Biden:56 and Trump:44.

But, you are not interested in the truth. That much is obvious.
tally_sheets.jpg
 
upload_2021-7-17_0-49-51.png
https://mobile.twitter.com/DennisConroy16/status/1415211745434427393
ps @o2b it took me a while to find that tweet, and even then I didn't find it but a related one [perhaps it was taken down by the author because it was specious...or the leftists at twitter chucked it], please, be like @larry806q and provide a link...thanks and btw that account is a like a fire hose of "information" with no links, not back up data, no evidence.... You seem like a good reader, what gives?
 
o2b said:
It's a bloodbath, as I knew it was, but anyway, this is funnny.

Lauren Boebert
In case you were wondering how the #AZAudit hearing went, YouTube already took the video down. That tells you all you need to know.

https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1415998955347927040?s=20
Click to expand...

Ah yes the ever popular open discussion of opposite views! NOT. And the folks on the left here will somehow manage to defend the "censoring" (no it is not the Government however, that appears to be going to court as well).
 
larry806q said:
Ah yes the ever popular open discussion of opposite views! NOT. And the folks on the left here will somehow manage to defend the "censoring" (no it is not the Government however, that appears to be going to court as well).
Click to expand...
I think social media should be considered a portion of what is often referred to as The Commons. Like roads and bridges. It is so obviously tied to the concept of speech which should be free.

It is data like this (the censorship of a video of an actual hearing) that I find compelling in its implications and that others think is some triviality. These data points point in the same direction.

It's huge.
 
larry806q said:
Duhhhhhhh
Click to expand...

https://www.azcentral.com/story/new...unning-ballots-under-uv-light-why/4880548001/

Yet another clearly objective article (not). The best line is the printer saying they/he did not use Laser printers that leave the steno mark (I am paraphrasing) to print the ballots. So of course there would not be any steno marks on "the" (which should read his) ballots. Uh YEH! 1. No one in their "right mind" "prints" a few thousand ballots on a laser printer as a commercial premise that cost would be astronomical. 2. On the other hand if "individuals" needed a few thousand ballots quickly cost would not be an object so Laser PRINTERS could do the job.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top