- MBTI
- INTJ
Seriously?! I just offered several that you ignored.
So whatever…agree to disagree.
Real solutions. Yeah put them all on trial because that will EVER happen.
Seriously?! I just offered several that you ignored.
So whatever…agree to disagree.
Like I said, very bias and talk about rewriting history.
www.businessinsider.com/how-bill-clintons-balanced-budget-destroyed-the-economy-2012-9
1. Deregulated Wall Street: It was a great time to be a Wall Street executive during the Bush administration.Sweeping financial deregulation helped build the housing bubble and allowed financial institutions to pursue risky trades unchecked. In fact, Bush eliminated the rules that allowed Wall Street to cause the financial crash that plunged the nation into the Great Recession.
2. Cut Taxes For The Wealthy: The Bush tax cuts — over 50 percent of which benefited the richest 5 percent of American taxpayers — cost about $2.5 trillion over the decade after they were enacted. Ten years later, Bush’s tax cuts are still the main driving factor of the national debt:
3. Ran Up A Tab On Two Wars: The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have cost the country trillions of dollars. Combined with Bush’s tax cuts, war spending was a main factor in blowing up the deficit and spending the surplusaccumulated under Clinton. Lawmakers now use the deficit as an excuse for inaction.
4. Left Homeowners In A Lurch: While Bush was happy to help out the banks in the wake of the housing crisis, he didlittle to assist struggling homeowners. Hope For Homeowners, Bush’s proposal to assist those struggling with their mortgages, was a colossal failure; in its first six months, it helped just one homeowner renegotiate his mortgage. Many mortgage holders — 15.7 million or, one in three — are still underwater today.
5. Weakened Workers: Bush weakened worker safety regulations and collective bargaining rights under theOccupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Department of Labor throughout his time in office. Today, corporations are back to making record profits, while workers’ incomes are falling.
Real solutions. Yeah put them all on trial because that will EVER happen.
Instead of being a proud day for America, April 20, 1983, has become a day of shame. The Social Security Amendments of 1983 laid the foundation for 30-years of federal embezzlement of Social Security money in order to use the money to pay for wars, tax cuts and other government programs. The payroll tax hike of 1983 generated a total of $2.7 trillion in surplus Social Security revenue. This surplus revenue was supposed to be saved and invested in marketable U.S. Treasury bonds that would be held in the trust fund until the baby boomers began to retire in about 2010. But not one dime of that money went to Social Security.
The 1983 legislation was sold to the public, and to the Congress, as a long-term fix for Social Security. The payroll tax hike was designed to generate large Social Security surpluses for 30 years, which would be set aside to cover the increased cost of paying benefits when the boomers retired.
- See more at: http://www.fedsmith.com/2013/10/11/...t-social-security-heist/#sthash.VfME3NJG.dpuf
Why not? Call them all out for being beholden to their donors instead of the people.
Once again your history knowledge is lacking.
FDR, stood up to the banks and to Congress and passed the “New Deal” that has slowly been dismantled in the name of greed over the decades.
A real solution is to not regulate the banks? They obviously cannot do it on their own…they are disconnected from the US, and have made many decisions (pushed on Congress and the Presidents by corporate lobbyists) that have shown little to no regard whatsoever for the well being of the US majority.
None of this shit was a problem with the banks until they were deregulated…FDR imposed new regulation laws that protected the money of the people. The banks fought him (as did a good part of Congress and later the Supreme Court) tooth and nail.
Created Social Security which was solvent until
This country will never make it unless drastic changes are made to our economic system.
The Presidents from Reagan on, have all done good, and have all done things that have destroyed the finical regulations that do not keep our economy moving forward and growing.
The average person and the bottom 90% have seen wages stagnate since the early 80’s…so even though inflation has increased exponentially, we have seen the cost of higher education alone has increased 1120% in the past 30 years…the price of food, shelter, cars, healthcare, etc. have all risen…but who benefitted?
Clearly not the bottom 90%.
Why not? Who exactly is going to put them up for trial? Are the lawmakers going to decide "hey yeah, we did some messed up crap, time to put ourselves on trial." Or wait some magical force will materialize and hold them accountable. Or the news stations (you know the ones political motivated) will rally the people to storm the capital and find someone to oversee the trials (maybe the supreme court who is just as politically motivated). Your suggestion in this regard is simply not based in reality. The most anyone could hope to do is turn them against themselves. Even that would fall far short. And as I said even if you did remove them, corruption will seep back in and in 20 years will be knee deep in crap again.
You conveniently ignored everything else I wrote.
I think that in the next few years you will see such a public outcry for our politicians to held accountable to the people and not their donors.
If you don’t feel like we should even bother and it’s beyond fixing then we are done talking Sir.
Nothing is beyond fixing. But courting ideas that cant work is a waste of time.
If we are both alive 20 years from now should I find you and say I told you so?
There are solutions that I alone do not have the ability to implement. Impeachment and then removal seems like the easiest and most likely. Unfortunately it looks like we will have to wait the last two years for removal at this point for some reason. But I dont see the fact he has not been impeached yet as the main problem. The main problem lies in the 42% approval rating. Its like people are asking to have their lives ruined. It makes no sense to me. But I have never been proficient at irrational thinking anyway so I suppose its not a surprise.I have heard you do nothing but complain about Obama and how evil he is…where are your solutions?
At least I have somewhat of a plan in place of things that need to be changed back to how they were or repealed altogether.
If you like I will write you a full on essay about how we can fix our broken country, though I doubt you would read it.
Your “I told you so.” statement is childish.
Show me your solutions Sir?
There are solutions that I alone do not have the ability to implement. Impeachment and then removal seems like the easiest and most likely. Unfortunately it looks like we will have to wait the last two years for removal at this point for some reason. But I dont see the fact he has not been impeached yet as the main problem. The main problem lies in the 42% approval rating. Its like people are asking to have their lives ruined. It makes no sense to me. But I have never been proficient at irrational thinking anyway so I suppose its not a surprise.
Bush is no longer President. Why is it that when people talk of how crappie Obama is as a President Bush is brought up. This has to do with the here and now. Id like to say we as a society learn from past mistakes but thats not even close to true.Dude…good ol GW Bush had a 19% approval rating at one time…your bias once again shows.
He will not be impeached that is silly.
I’m talking long term solutions man.????