Resonance
Community Member
- MBTI
- INfj
- Enneagram
- 5w6 so/sp
=> thought about this quote again: in the beginning I assumed that it supports only altruistic behavior, now, I think it also implies egoistic behavior, as long as it's not "harmful" to others (however, the right of self-defensiveness isn't considered)."If you can, help others; if you cannot do that, at least do not harm them." (Dalai Lama)
I think it's about goodness.
I thought every village was supposed to have an idiot, and everyone has a different view on who is the idiot.
Assuming there is a God, why did he or she create stupid people? Was that a mistake? I mean even with free will, some men are clearly dumber than others. Some so dumb that they need others to do their thinking for them and they forgo all the free will that God supposedly gave them to be told how they should live their lives. Others are so dumb they think they can control how other people live their lives either by force, coercion, or shame. The dumbest by far are those who think their personal perspective is the universal truth, that they are infallible because of their personal interpretation of what God allegedly has said.
I like the idea of believing in God, I'm just disappointed in God for making stupid people. It is not God's best work.
Because he needed someone to pray to him after he killed their parents, crippled their brother, "blessed" their child with Autism and flooded their home... and blamed it all on that other guy he also created called "The Devil".
You're right about the process, but something seems wrong about this. You have to consider their best interests as well. If they'd be happier doing something else than working with you, then you shouldn't ensnare them. And try to be realistic. I know we all definitely think everyone would be better off with us rather than on their own (mostly) but you have to try and look at it objectively. I'm not perfect, and neither are you - but even if we were, some people get miserable when they feel like they can't reach the level of someone around them.it seem some of us get offended by stupid people, i dont, i make use of their strength that they seem unware of, they have a tendecy to be easily lead and their effortlessly maintained, they also will follow instructions without questions, consequently they make the perfect assistant to personal needs, but take advice from them or acknowlege it, the result would be an emmence dissapointment, as well as reienforment of their stupidity. so a definite "negative" for partenership.
So how do you maintain a stupid peson and keep them under your spell, you would have to demonstrate qualities they feel missing in them self, and appeal to "fairness" in an forceful authoterian stand, from then on you would begin to establish a functional rapport, once you've gained enough acceptance, repetition is a factor but appealing to their fantacies is key, at this point let your supreme creativity roam free. Now you have a lovable(at least from your perpective) assistant ready to take on projects.