-
The Place
As an infp now, you gotta step up your outrage game! Also I was just kidding about telling you to frig off. Wasn't malicious but these things don't always translate over the net.
Thanks for all those likes Ren
. Have a great Christmas Eve.
8888 posts! I cannot post again.
Nice is not that nice. Especially when you’re stuck in that tiny airport -_-
I kind of want to try an Audrey Hepburn avi. Would that be weird?
You're not an INTP
Still trying to catch up but you keep adding more!!
Haha...great stuff Ren, I'm not complaining, keep it up!
Hi dear friend! How have you been?
Boo! ≈≈≈≈≈
Ren...drop the anime pound bs...you're more complicated than thatSo basically, I'm open to the idea the laws *are* essential to mass, charge, etc, just that it doesn't seem we know anything about these things besides quantitative info+that there are apparently laws. Any further advance that tells me something *essential* to mass/charge/etc that is concrete/not just quantitative would solve this.In other words, instead of treating them as abstract sets (which have virtually any number of relations among them), we isolate a particular variety called the laws of physics. The difficulty I have with this is that generally (via Hume-style arguments) I don't think we have any reason from physics alone to think the laws of nature are essential to the physics quantities i.e. that they couldn't have been otherwise.I think maybe I've crystallized my understanding even further of the orthodox physicalism issue. I think a way to formulate it is that basically the only non-abstract/purely mathematical notion present in the orthodox varieties is that there are *particular* laws of nature relating the various physical quantities.
I just reached 8'000 posts and this is very aesthetically pleasing, therefore I cannot post againYou might find these guys interesting. https://www.twitch.tv/videos/506343621
Nice avi!
Starting to think ENTPs with well-developed Fe are a terrific match for INFJs -
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…