Answer with a question! (Part 4)

[La Sagna]

Aren't they both?

 

[Wildfire]

Yeah, isn't there a new question within every answer?

 

[CogentPursuit]

How are these new if some have been used before?

 

[Wildfire]

Can't the same question allow for a new answer?

 

[CogentPursuit]

It isn't what you indicated, is that what you intended?

 

[Wildfire]

What do you believe was indicated?

 

[Stu]

Are you questioning that it is?

 

[Eventhorizon]

Is someone ever going to give us the real definition of what is "is"?

 

[Stu]

Are we going existential?

 

[Eventhorizon]

Possibly but is it ok to say I have been wondering ever since Bill Clinton tried to have it defined?

 

[rawr]

does he have his pants down again?

 

[Stu]

Can we agree on what "down" is?

 

[Eventhorizon]

Since we are talking about it, should we ask Monica Lewinsky?

 

[Stu]

which is the bigger crime, inserting one non military member into the potential danger illegally or inserting 255,000 military members into harms way illegally?

 

[Cornerstone]

Which is worse? The Potential Danger or Harms Way?

 

[La Sagna]

Wouldn't it be worse if it were illegal and the illegality be based on whether there is consent, either way?

 

[Stu]

Did the Iraqis kneel?

 

[Eventhorizon]

Was it ever about the Iraqis in the first place?

 

[La Sagna]

Is anything ever about what it appears on the surface?

 

[Stu]

What about a mirror?