Are we as a society being kept from discussing the big issues?

Police have now stated they are investigating 1400 VIP's in the british establishment over child abuse (76 of which are politicians)

However the establishment is circling the wagons and the pedos and banking criminals and royals and so on are all protecting each other from justice (whilst they murder and rape the children of the general public)

The corporate media and BBC (lying machine) are now in damage limitation mode, so they keep reporting the abuse as 'historic' to make the public think that it was all in the past and isn't still going on

They have also reported it by saying things like: ''clearly sexual abuse runs through every strata of british society'' so that they try to make the public think that the public is as guilty of it as the establishment

They do this to hide the fact that the child abuse is RITUAL......it is often carried out in a ritual setting as part of a black magick ceremony

Britain is significant globally because it is a convergence point of many leylines on the earths energy grid; this is why there are so many standing stones and stone circles and barrows etc in britain

The leylines affect the earths magnetic field and have an effect on humanity itself

Black magick rituals are carried out on leylines to distort the energy. For example pain, suffering fear, terror and the other negative emotions invoked through black magick ritual all serve to distort the energy field and this has been going on for thousands of years

Rituals are just one way in which the energy field is being distorted. It is also distorted through radiation and Rf frequency hence all the masts and radiation spills on leylines

The aim is to lower the frequency of the public through 'entrainment' by getting us all resonating to the same lowered frequency of the energy grid

This in turn affects our DNA

Our DNA can be altered through these means and parts of our DNA can be switched on or switched off depending on what frequency we are resonating at

This is why not all of our DNA is currently activated...because it is being suppressed

Sound far fetched? Well...give it time....soon even mainstream science will be telling you things about you DNA that make your head spin

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...itician-and-celebrity-child-sex-abuse-inquiry

1,400 investigated in child sex abuse inquiry, including politicians

Officer leading Operation Hydrant inquiry says out of 1,433 alleged offenders 76 were politicians, 43 were from music industry and 135 were from TV, film or radio





Clockwise from top left: Fred Talbot, Gary Glitter, Jimmy Savile, Rolf Harris, Stuart Hall, Max Clifford Photograph: Various/PA/Getty/Wireimage/AFP/Reuters Sandra Laville
Wednesday 20 May 2015 12.42 BST Last modified on Thursday 21 May 2015 00.35 BST


Shares

11k





Police across the country are investigating more than 1,400 men – including 261 high-profile individuals – over allegations of child abuse in the past, a senior officer running the national operation has revealed.
The scale of alleged child abuse across society – both recent and non-recent – was stark, said Ch Const Simon Bailey, who runs Operation Hydrant, the national coordinating team overseeing the various inquiries.
Figures from police forces in England and Wales published on Wednesday reveal that 1,433 men have been identified in reports of alleged abuse by victims, since the operation was set up in 2014.
Of these 216 are dead, 76 are politicians, both national and local figures, 43 are from the music industry, 135 from TV, film or radio and seven from the world of sport. The cases include recent high-profile convictions, including Rolf Harris, Gary Glitter and Max Clifford.
Hundreds of institutions have been identified by victims of non-recent abuse as places where their abuse took place. These include 154 schools, 75 children’s homes, 40 religious institutions, 14 medical establishments, 11 community groups, nine prisons or young offender institutions, nine sports venues and 28 other places including military establishments.
Bailey warned that the number of victims could run into the hundreds of thousands, and called for much more support for survivors of child abuse. He said he believed that the enormous increase in reports of all types of child sexual abuse – which have risen by 71% since 2012 to 116,000 reports this year – was not just down to more victims coming forward.

Advertisement

Instead, Bailey warned that the internet was creating the opportunity for more abuse to take place, and said live-streaming of child abuse on mobile phones was the next challenge facing law enforcers.
Bailey said the number of reports of abuse, both by adults of historical abuse, and by children today, was increasing on a daily basis, and the figures released on Wednesday were just a snapshot of the challenge faced by the police and society as a whole.
He supported calls for much more funding for victims of child abuse. “The government has allocated millions of pounds to provide additional support, but I am not sure that is going to be enough. We are talking about hundreds of thousands of victims,” he said.

Of the 116,000 reports of child sexual abuse this year, 52,446 are allegations of sexual abuse in the past, some involving cases going back decades. This amounts to a 166% increase in reports of non-recent abuse, said Bailey.
Detectives on Operation Hydrant are coordinating the many investigations into non-recent abuse involving both high-profile individuals and institutions, from a hub in Sheffield.
A team from Operation Hydrant is liaising with Justice Goddard to support the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse.
Each of the 1,433 suspects has been put into a major crime database, which is cross referenced to ensure that no inquires are being duplicated and to identify suspects whose offending crossed borders. So far 30 individuals have been identified in one or more of the investigations.
Bailey said the figures were stark. “This year I am anticipating an estimated 116,000 reports of child sexual abuse will be received, that is a 71% increase since 2012, so it gives you some idea of the scale of this.
“What we are seeing is an absolutely unprecedented increase in the number of reports that are coming forward. That has brought about a step-change in the way the police service has had to deal with this. We are rising to and meeting the challenge, this is what Operation Hydrant is about.”
Bailey said the Hydrant team was working to create a database which would try to ensure that the failures of the past – as identified in the Jimmy Savile case – would not be repeated.
During the investigation of the late Radio 1 DJ it emerged that intelligence and information, including reports of abuse, were buried in the system – in some cases to prevent leaks – which meant when individual police forces with their own allegations checked the national police computer database his name did not come up.
“One of our primary objectives is to make sure where we get intelligence and where we get evidence of abuse it is being coordinated so we don’t make those mistakes. That particular case showed mistakes were made and he was able to go on and continue further abusing. The whole idea is that we don’t make those mistakes again,” he said.
Bailey said everyone from teachers, GPs, parents and wider society had a duty to look out for signs of abuse. He said: “We face a massive challenge in terms of resources, time and expertise to balance offering routes of justice for those who suffered in the past while safeguarding and protecting children in a vulnerable position today.”
Sheila Taylor, from the national working group on child sexual exploitation, said a massive public health campaign was needed to address the scale of child abuse within society.
John Brown from the NSPCC said the failure to support victims amount to a public health problem. “That is the issue. We are not helping children and adult victims to recover and there are huge costs to society, there are economic considerations and individual psychiatric costs.”
Tom Watson, the Labour MP whose claims made in the Commons that there was a paedophile network linked to parliament triggered a Scotland Yard investigation, said: “The sheer number of allegations just shows why there should be a dedicated national police response to child abuse inquiries. Intelligence gathering and data sharing will be far easier were there to be a dedicated team comprising of specialists from around the country.

“We are only just beginning to understand how as a country, over many generations, we managed to turn a blind eye to Britain’s child abuse scandal. The survivors deserve justice and future generations require greater protection.”
Gabrielle Shaw, chief executive of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood (Napac), said: “The scale and scope of sexual abuse of children committed in the past can often seem overwhelming. What these figures from the National Police Chiefs’ Council do is to provide some degree of measure of the issue.

“And what a measure it is; prolific offenders from all spheres of society, thinking they were untouchable, abusing children and the most vulnerable in settings where they should have been safest , including schools, care facilities and religious institutions.”
 
Tory politician admitting that when he was a party 'whip' he helped cover up child abuse

A 'whip's' job is to bully party members into towing the line when the party leadership put forward a proposal

The weapons in a whips armoury include blackmail

[video=youtube;EjJeQSfFhj8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjJeQSfFhj8[/video]

So...where were the journalists? Why did no mainstream journalists report what this man was saying?

The answer is that they are scared.....mainstream journalists are now cosy with the political el-ite. they go for lunch with them and they share information with them and if they report anything that embaresses them they no longer get interviews or lunches.

Also in the same way that politicians can be pressured by whips, journalists can be pressured by their editors who in turn answer to the owner ('proprietor') of the newspaper. if the proprietor (a wealthy person who was able to buy a newspaper and is part of the business network) doesn't want a story run then it won't be run

So for journalists to do REAL journalism they have to work outside the mainstream because the mainstream is contained within a box

Sure the mainstream does report insightful things but only after the information has been passed around the internet by bloggers and the 'alternative media'

This forces the mainstream media to then report things but they seek to do things in a way that frames things in a less damaging way for the system

Ex CIA guy saying that bloggers are changing the world:

[video=youtube;ttDF9ATr57E]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttDF9ATr57E[/video]
 
Party whips cover up abuse:

[video=youtube;n2sjUFKpvok]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2sjUFKpvok[/video]
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-32873016

[h=1]Israel ex-PM Ehud Olmert given prison sentence[/h]
  • 25 May 2015
A court in Jerusalem has sentenced the former Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, to eight months in prison for fraud and breach of trust.
He was convicted at a retrial in March of accepting illegal payments from an American businessman while he served as mayor of Jerusalem and trade minister.
Last year, he was sentenced to six years in prison for accepting bribes.
Olmert has denied any wrongdoing and will remain free until his appeals against both convictions are heard.
A Supreme Court decision on the first appeal is expected in the next couple of months.
If he is unsuccessful OImert will become the first former head of government in Israel to be jailed.
[h=2]'Black flag'[/h]Olmert served as prime minister from 2006 to 2009.
He was forced to resign amid a flurry corruption allegations, which ended his political career and disrupted the peace process with the Palestinians.
In 2012, Olmert was acquitted of fraud, concealing fraudulent earnings and breach of trust in connection with donations received from a New York-based financier, Morris Talansky between 1997 and 2005.
However, a retrial was ordered after a former aide, Shula Zaken, accepted a plea bargain and testified against Olmert. Ms Zaken gave prosecutors diary entries and tape recordings of conversations in which Olmert referred to receiving the money.
Olmert was found guilty of fraud and breach of trust in March and on Monday was sentenced to eight months in jail. He was also given a suspended sentence of an additional eight months and fined 100,000 shekels ($25,000; £16,000).
The Jerusalem District Court said the sentence recognised Olmert's contributions to Israeli society, but noted that "a blag flag hovers over his conduct".
Olmert's lawyer Eyal Rozovsky said they were "very disappointed" by the sentence.
The former prime minister has always insisted that he is innocent and has described the allegations against him as "a brutal, ruthless witch-hunt".
The 69-year-old is also appealing against the six-year sentence he was given in May 2014 in connection with a real estate deal at took place when he was mayor of Jerusalem in the 1990s.
He was convicted of accepting bribes in return for speeding up a controversial residential development, known as Holyland, in the heart of the city.
 
[video=youtube;s1wMkTYjFRk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=157&v=s1wMkTYjFRk[/video]
 
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/...parency-Act-is-Blocked-by-Senate-Republicans#

Fri May 22, 2015 at 12:01 PM PDT
[h=2]TPP Remains Classified after Trade Transparency Act is Blocked by Senate Republicans[/h] by Stephen Benavides

Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Joe Manchin of West Virginia introduced S.1381 on May 19, 2015, which would have required President Obama to de-classify the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement for at least 60 days before being voted on by Congress.


The battle between organized labor, progressive Democrats and President Obama over the Trans Pacific Partnership continued on Thursday when U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Joe Machin filed the Trade Transparency Act, a bill requiring that the public and Congress have at least 60 days to review and debate any trade legislation before being moved to the floor for a vote. The move was intended to highlight the issue many Americans see with continuing to categorize trade negotiations as classified, especially when it effects the personal finances of millions of workers and business owners alike.
Senators are forced to go into a classified viewing room in order to read the full text of the document, but are not allowed to bring in key staff or take notes on what is included in the bill text. Not only this, but as you would assume for classified documents, elected officials are unable to speak to anyone without proper security clearance about the specific details of the trade negotiations without suffering potential criminal legal ramifications. This becomes a serious issue when dealing with complicated and technical negotiations regarding the largest trade deal in American history. It also raises serious questions about the legislative process and democracy generally when the public is unable to view the content of a bill introduced in Congress, but foreign government officials and private corporations are.
S. 1381; the Trade Transparency Bill, was introduced as part of a unanimous consent request, a procedural move intended to limit debate and structure the amendment process depending on the complexity of the circumstances being negotiated and allowing for tailor made agreements traditionally. But even one opposing vote can derail the tactic, and that is exactly what happened when Republican Senator Orrin Hatch of Arizona voted no. In an incredible Orwellian attempt to justify his opposition to government transparency he said "...if senators are concerned about the level of transparency on trade agreements, they should support the current legislation.", referring to TPP itself. Sen. Hatch admitted that he doesn't know exactly what's in the TPP bill, but still decided to kill any effort to bring transparency to the process.
Most Republicans support the trade bill, while a majority of Democrats oppose it.

Later that day the Senate voted 62-38 to end debate on the bill, narrowly gaining the 60 votes needed to proceed. Seen as a victory for President Obama in the march towards winning Trade Promotion Authority, the ability to fast track trade bills without the ability to amend them, he is being forced to team up with Republicans who have opposed such measures as Comprehensive Immigration Reform and appointments to the National Labor Relations Board in an effort to shore up serious opposition from within his own party. This shows that Obama is willing to do whatever it takes to push the agreement through, including alienating unions who have withheld campaign contributions to Democrats in order to re-direct those resources to defeating TPP.
Joe Marchin summarized the stance against TPP by saying, "If this bill is as good for the American worker as proponents have claimed, then the administration and anybody else should not find it objectionable to see the details before Congress is forced to grant the
President trade promotion authority." Warren and Marchin have requested that the content of the bill revealed, which shouldn't be asking to much considering that former President Bush did the same thing with the Free Trade Area for the Americas (FTAA) in the early 2000's. Labor standards and enforcement of those standards should never be kept secret, especially during the negotiation phase.
 
Really interesting interview on the ritchie allen show discussing the reality behind the global economy and how we are moving towards a critical mass of people who are aware that the federal reserve bank is a private entity and is now broke

Also they discuss bitcoin and express their reservations about it

I've never been able to come down heavily on either side over bitcoin but after a few dodgy experiences with crypto currencies and also with all this nwo talk baout 'cashless societies' i think that precious metals are the way to go...for me anyway

[video=youtube;I3Yqkwgy1Es]https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=822&v=I3Yqkwgy1Es[/video]
 
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/...parency-Act-is-Blocked-by-Senate-Republicans#

Fri May 22, 2015 at 12:01 PM PDT
[h=2]TPP Remains Classified after Trade Transparency Act is Blocked by Senate Republicans[/h] by Stephen Benavides

Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Joe Manchin of West Virginia introduced S.1381 on May 19, 2015, which would have required President Obama to de-classify the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement for at least 60 days before being voted on by Congress.


The battle between organized labor, progressive Democrats and President Obama over the Trans Pacific Partnership continued on Thursday when U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Joe Machin filed the Trade Transparency Act, a bill requiring that the public and Congress have at least 60 days to review and debate any trade legislation before being moved to the floor for a vote. The move was intended to highlight the issue many Americans see with continuing to categorize trade negotiations as classified, especially when it effects the personal finances of millions of workers and business owners alike.
Senators are forced to go into a classified viewing room in order to read the full text of the document, but are not allowed to bring in key staff or take notes on what is included in the bill text. Not only this, but as you would assume for classified documents, elected officials are unable to speak to anyone without proper security clearance about the specific details of the trade negotiations without suffering potential criminal legal ramifications. This becomes a serious issue when dealing with complicated and technical negotiations regarding the largest trade deal in American history. It also raises serious questions about the legislative process and democracy generally when the public is unable to view the content of a bill introduced in Congress, but foreign government officials and private corporations are.
S. 1381; the Trade Transparency Bill, was introduced as part of a unanimous consent request, a procedural move intended to limit debate and structure the amendment process depending on the complexity of the circumstances being negotiated and allowing for tailor made agreements traditionally. But even one opposing vote can derail the tactic, and that is exactly what happened when Republican Senator Orrin Hatch of Arizona voted no. In an incredible Orwellian attempt to justify his opposition to government transparency he said "...if senators are concerned about the level of transparency on trade agreements, they should support the current legislation.", referring to TPP itself. Sen. Hatch admitted that he doesn't know exactly what's in the TPP bill, but still decided to kill any effort to bring transparency to the process.
Most Republicans support the trade bill, while a majority of Democrats oppose it.

Later that day the Senate voted 62-38 to end debate on the bill, narrowly gaining the 60 votes needed to proceed. Seen as a victory for President Obama in the march towards winning Trade Promotion Authority, the ability to fast track trade bills without the ability to amend them, he is being forced to team up with Republicans who have opposed such measures as Comprehensive Immigration Reform and appointments to the National Labor Relations Board in an effort to shore up serious opposition from within his own party. This shows that Obama is willing to do whatever it takes to push the agreement through, including alienating unions who have withheld campaign contributions to Democrats in order to re-direct those resources to defeating TPP.
Joe Marchin summarized the stance against TPP by saying, "If this bill is as good for the American worker as proponents have claimed, then the administration and anybody else should not find it objectionable to see the details before Congress is forced to grant the
President trade promotion authority." Warren and Marchin have requested that the content of the bill revealed, which shouldn't be asking to much considering that former President Bush did the same thing with the Free Trade Area for the Americas (FTAA) in the early 2000's. Labor standards and enforcement of those standards should never be kept secret, especially during the negotiation phase.

The idea of secretly decided laws seems totally contrary to democracy... how can we vote for the right politician if we don't even know what they're discussing legislating? ... I'd be tempted to go on a Johnsonian veto spree, on the principle of the thing, and make such loud noises that people had to pay attention.
 
The idea of secretly decided laws seems totally contrary to democracy... how can we vote for the right politician if we don't even know what they're discussing legislating? ... I'd be tempted to go on a Johnsonian veto spree, on the principle of the thing, and make such loud noises that people had to pay attention.

If politicians are working together in secret to bring in laws that will harm the US, Canadian, australian and european people then that is a CONSPIRACY

This is a proven 'conspiracy theory' except like so many it is not theory it is fact

They are conspiring in secret!

Surely people realise that the reason its being kept secret is because WE WONT LIKE WHAT IS IN IT!!!!!!!!!

When are people going to wake up?
 
Really interesting interview on the ritchie allen show discussing the reality behind the global economy and how we are moving towards a critical mass of people who are aware that the federal reserve bank is a private entity and is now broke

Also they discuss bitcoin and express their reservations about it

I've never been able to come down heavily on either side over bitcoin but after a few dodgy experiences with crypto currencies and also with all this nwo talk baout 'cashless societies' i think that precious metals are the way to go...for me anyway

Agreed. Precious metals backed currency is a good transition step until we can move away from the idea of money.
 
Agreed. Precious metals backed currency is a good transition step until we can move away from the idea of money.

Absolutely!

I also would like to see a world without money eventually but until we're ready for that we have to wrestle control of the money supply off the central bankers

Their next strategy to hold onto their power seems to be to create a 'cashless' society where all money is only recorded electronically

if they achieve that then they can obviously control our access to our money; this is already happening in denmark and israel for example, but obviously it is planned for all the economies under control of the central bankers

But if the public hold precious metals we can always create our own currencies and also we can trade them as our own black market for goods and services thereby bypassing any fascist government system
 
http://www.naturalnews.com/049860_psych_drugs_medical_holocaust_Big_Pharma.html

[h=1]Medical holocaust: Psych drugs have killed more than 5 million people over the last 10 years[/h] Wednesday, May 27, 2015 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer

If every single person currently taking psychotropic medications or antidepressants were to be pulled off these deadly drugs and given a new, safer regimen instead, society would be much better off. This is the larger inference of a new review published in The BMJ (British Medical Journal), which found that more than half a million people in the West die every year from psych meds, which authors found have "minimal" benefits and a multitude of harmful side effects.

Researchers from the Nordic Cochrane Centre, an independent drug safety analysis group based out of Denmark, looked at the data on antidepressant and dementia drugs and found that, in most cases, they could cease to be administered across the board without inflicting any harm on patients. The demonstrated benefits of these widely administered drugs are lacking, researchers found, and many patients are taking them needlessly.

The paper, entitled "Does long term use of psychiatric drugs cause more harm than good?" looked at a series of randomized trials on antidepressant and dementia drugs and found that, contrary to popular belief, virtually none of these studies took an honest look at the drugs' "side" effects. Likewise, patients who took placebo pills during clinical trials fared roughly the same as those who took the actual drugs, suggesting that psych meds don't even work in the first place.

Using a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials in patients with dementia, researchers discovered that more patients die from taking FDA-approved antidepressants than do patients who take no drugs, or who use other unconventional treatment methods. Similarly, the all-cause mortality rate was found to be 3.6% higher among patients who take newly-approved antidepressants compared to patients who take no antidepressants.

"Their [the drugs'] benefits would need to be colossal to justify this, but they are minimal," wrote Peter C. Gotzsche, a Nordic Cochrane Centre professor, about the utter uselessness of psych meds.

[h=1]Industry research on antidepressants heavily manipulated: psych meds kill, and people would be better off without them[/h] Most industry-funded studies favoring psych meds tend to skew the sample groups and test data so much that the results end up becoming meaningless. Underreporting of deaths, according to Nordic, is another major problem in the clinical trial process. The group estimates that the suicide rate among antidepressant users is some 15 times higher than what the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports publicly.

Meanwhile, doctors continue to prescribe psych meds to patients who don't actually need them, contributing to the roughly 5 million deaths that have now occurred from these drugs in the West just in the past decade. Pharmaceutical industry lobbying encourages doctors to prescribe these deadly medicines to patients in exchange for cash bribes, vacations, fancy meals and other lavish perks.

All of this, combined with the fact that patients are often manipulated through industry-funded research to take harmful drugs, blows the lid wide open on the corrupt psych med industry. Psych meds have been proven to destroy the brain, and their only perceived benefit is providing temporary, but never lasting, relief.

"Given their lack of benefit, I estimate we could stop almost all psychotropic drugs without causing harm -- by dropping all antidepressants, ADHD drugs and dementia drugs... and using only a fraction of the antipsychotics and benzodiazepines we currently use," added Gotzsche. "This would lead to healthier and more long-lived populations."

[h=1]Antidepressants don't work, and they often make things much worse for suffering patients[/h] Clearly controversial, Gotzsche's study is both timely and relevant, as antidepressants continue to make headlines for their involvement in school shootings, airplane crashes and other unfortunate events often blamed on terrorists or guns themselves. It makes a strong case for putting an end to the antidepressant racket and helping people recover from being tricked by drug industry sleight of hand.

When all is said and done, the drug industry essentially manufactures fake studies that, by design, are meant to put whatever drug that's being tested into the positive category in terms of safety and efficacy. Upon further analysis, however, it becomes clear that the drugs simply don't work as claimed, and often injure many patients along the way.

"Because psychotropic drugs are immensely harmful when used long term, they should almost exclusively be used in acute situations and always with a firm plan for tapering off, which can be difficult for many patients," finalized the authors.

"We need new guidelines to reflect this. We also need widespread withdrawal clinics because many patients have become dependent on psychiatric drugs, including antidepressants, and need help so that they can stop taking them slowly and safely."

The full study is available for free viewing here:
BMJ.com.

Be sure to check out Gotzsche's book Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime: How Big Pharma Has Corrupted Healthcare here:
Amazon.com.

A free chapter from his book can also be accessed here:
RadcliffeHealth.com.[SUP][PDF][/SUP]

Sources for this article include:

http://www.bmj.com

http://rt.com

http://www.independent.co.uk

http://www.theguardian.com

http://www.arafmi.org[SUP][PDF][/SUP]

http://www.amazon.com

http://www.radcliffehealth.com[SUP][PDF][/SUP]

 
It is possible to hack into airplane controls and then fly them (into tall buildings for example)

http://www.naturalnews.com/049850_hacking_airplanes_terror_threat.html#

[h=1]FBI trying to criminalize white hat hacker who exposed security flaw that says ANY commercial airline can be hijacked electronically[/h] Wednesday, May 27, 2015 by: J. D. Heyes

The federal government says it isn't possible and there is nothing to worry about, but the FBI is nevertheless attempting to punish someone for doing what they have said can't be done: hack into the Wi-Fi of a commercial airliner in flight.

According to the Washington Free Beacon (WFB), federal law enforcement is publically downplaying a recent report that white hat hacker Chris Roberts, a security researcher with One World Labs, recently managed to penetrate the wireless fidelity connection of a commercial airliner while it was in flight. Officially, however, it appears that the FBI is taking the matter seriously enough to pursue a search warrant and potential criminal charges against Roberts.

Wired reports that after getting off a flight in Syracuse, New York, in February, Roberts told the FBI that "he had hacked the in-flight entertainment system, or IFE, on an airplane and overwrote code on the plane's Thrust Management Computer while aboard the flight." In addition, Roberts told the FBI he "was able to issue a climb command and make the plane briefly change course," according to a federal court document[SUP][PDF][/SUP] filed in April.

Prior to Roberts' incident, cyber experts had been warning that the Wi-Fi connections on commercial planes were vulnerable, providing a back door to terrorists and criminal hackers who might want to assume control over a flight while in the air from their seats.

[h=2]Didn't they say there was no danger?[/h]One senior law enforcement official dismissed these repeated warnings by experts as unlikely, the WFB reported.

"While we will not comment on specific allegations, there is no credible information to suggest an airplane's flight control system can be accessed or manipulated from its in flight entertainment system," a senior law enforcement official who was not permitted to speak on the record told the news site recently. "Nevertheless, attempting to tamper with the flight control systems of aircraft is illegal and any such attempts will be taken seriously by law enforcement."

John McAfee, a computer programmer and founder of McAfee, Inc., known for its anti-virus software, said in a recent interview with independent journalist Luke Rudkowski that Roberts managed to boost the thrust of the plane's right engine only briefly. He said had the pilots known that the change had been made, they would have taken over the flight controls manually, which he says did not happen.

"There were no risks to anyone on board," he said.

FBI Special Agent Mark Hurley is investigating Roberts. In his affidavit, he noted, "He stated that he thereby caused one of the airplane engines to climb resulting in a lateral or sideways movement of the plane during one of these flights."

"He also stated that he used Vortex software after comprising/exploiting or 'hacking' the airplane's networks. He used the software to monitor traffic from the cockpit system," he continued.

[h=2]Removing the threat should be a priority[/h]If there is really no risk of hacking into a U.S. airliner, why the prosecution? Is it because it happened just like Roberts says? Is this a security flaw that the government doesn't want the public to be aware of?

Rachel Ehrenfeld, founder and CEO of the American Center for Democracy and the Economic Warfare Institute, noted in December that terrorists could exploit these vulnerabilities, as reported by the WFB.

"A well trained martyr could hack into the plane's computer system, take over all or part of the controls, commandeering its communication, or air system to shut down, etc.," Ehrenfeld wrote during the 2014 holiday travel season.

In a follow-up interview with WFB in recent days, Ehrenfeld did not think the government's cover-up strategy was a good idea.

"Downplaying [the threat] is not very smart. American air carriers are understandably trying to save money. But it shouldn't come on the expense of passengers safety," she said. "Moreover, security should govern air travel. Removing the threat of hacking into the cockpit is a priority."

Sources:

http://freebeacon.com

http://aptn.ca

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2mOSi-IXlE

http://www.wired.com

http://acdemocracy.org/cyberattack-on-civil-aviation/

 
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/09/...e-invisible-government-running-united-states/

[h=1]Former Presidents Warn About the “Invisible Government” Running the United States[/h] September 13, 2013

Ross Pittman, Guest
Waking Times Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.George Santayana
Past presidents of the United States and other high profile political leaders have repeatedly issued warnings over the last 214 years that the U.S. government is under the control of an “invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.”
According to six of our former presidents, one vice-president, and a myriad of other high profile political leaders, an invisible government that is “incredibly evil in intent” has been in control of the U.S. government “ever since the days of Andrew Jackson” (since at least 1836). They “virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties… It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.”
As a result, “we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world—no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.”
The sources for the above quotes (and more) are listed below. All of the quotes in this article have been verified as authentic and have associated links to the source materials. Also included below are statements made by David Rockefeller, Sr, former director of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and Federal Reserve Chairman’s Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke that appear to confirm some of the warnings.
Warnings About the Invisible Government Running the U.S.
The warnings listed below, which appear in chronological order, began with our first president – George Washington. The last president to speak out was JFK, who was assassinated. Read what they and other political leaders have said about the invisible government.
George Washington wrote that the Illuminati want to separate the People from their Government
“It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of seperation). That Individuals of them may… actually had a seperation [sic] of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.” – George Washington, 1st President of the United States (1789–1797), from a letter that Washington wrote on October 24, 1798, which can be found in the Library of Congress. For an analysis of Washington’s warning, see the article “Library of Congress: George Washington Warns of Illuminati
“I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.” —Thomas Jefferson, dent of the United States (1801–1809) and principal author of the United States Declaration of Independence (1776), in a letter written to John Taylor on May 28, 1816

“A power has risen up in the government greater than the people themselves, consisting of many and various powerful interests, combined in one mass, and held together by the cohesive power of the vast surplus in banks.” – John C. Calhoun, Vice President (1825-1832) and U.S. Senator, from a speech given on May 27, 1836
Note that it appears that Washington’s and Jefferson’s concerns regarding bankers and separation of the people from the government was realized by 1836. This fact was confirmed in a letter written by FDR in 1933 (see below) in which he wrote that “a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.” Jackson was the seventh president of the United States (1829-1937). Calhoun served as Jackson’s vice-president from 1829-1832.
“Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.”— Theodore Roosevelt, 26th President of the United States, Theodore Roosevelt, An Autobiography, 1913 (Appendix B)
A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men[W]e have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized worldno longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.” – Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States, The New Freedom, 1913
“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” – Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States, The New Freedom, 1913
“The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation… The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties, … and control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government. It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.” – New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, New York Times, March 26, 1922
“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government board, has cheated the Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt…Mr. Chairman, when the Federal Reserve act was passed, the people of the United States did not perceive that a world system was being set up here… and thatthis country was to supply financial power to an international superstate — a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together toenslave the world for their own pleasure.” – Congressman Louis T. McFadden, from a speech delivered to the House of Representatives on June 10, 1932
“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.” — Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 32nd President of the United States (1933–1945), in a letter to Colonel Edward M House dated November 21, 1933, as quoted in F.D.R.: His Personal Letters, 1928-1945.
“Today the path to total dictatorship in the U.S. can be laid by strictly legal means… We have a well-organized political-action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state… It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our GovernmentThis ruthless power-seeking elite is a disease of our century… This group…is answerable neither to the President, the Congress, nor the courts. It is practically irremovable.” – Senator William Jenner, 1954 speech

“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.” —J. Edgar Hoover, The Elks Magazine, 1956
The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings… Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe… no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only saythat the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent… For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.” — John F Kennedy, 35th President of the United States, from a speech delivered to the American Newspaper Publishers Association on April 27, 1961 and known as the “Secret Society” speech (click here for full transcript and audio).
The Rockefellers and their allies have, for at least fifty years, been carefully following a plan to use their economic power to gain political control of first America, and then the rest of the world. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes, I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.” Congressman Larry P. McDonald, November 1975, from the introduction to a book titled The Rockefeller File.
There exists a shadowy government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.” – Daniel K. Inouye, US Senator from Hawaii, testimony at the Iran Contra Hearings, 1986
[h=3]The Federal Reserve
[/h] “A power has risen up in the government greater than the people themselves…” – John C. Calhoun
… owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.” – Theodore Roosevelt
“… one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank.“ – Louis T. McFadden
In an interview with Jim Lehrer that was aired on PBS’ News Hour on September 18, 2007 that you can watch on YouTube, formal Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said, essentially, that the Federal Reserve was above the law and that no agency of government can overrule their actions:
Jim Lehrer: “What is the proper relationship, what should be the proper relationship between a chairman of the Fed and a president of the United States?”
Alan Greenspan: “Well, first of all, the Federal Reserve is an independent agency, and that means, basically, that there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take. So long as that is in place and there is no evidence that the administration or the Congress or anybody else is requesting that we do things other than what we think is the appropriate thing, then what the relationships are don’t frankly matter.
The fact that the Fed is above the law was demonstrated by current Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke, during his appearance before Congress on March 4, 2009 (as shown in this video). Senator Bernie Sanders asked Bernanke about $2.2 trillion in American tax dollars that was lent out by Federal Reserve. Bernanke refused to provide an answer:

Senator Sanders: “Will you tell the American people to whom you lent $2.2 trillion of their dollars? … Can you tell us who they are?”
Bernanke: “No”
[h=3]David Rockefeller and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)[/h] “We have a well-organized political-action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state…” – William Jenner
The Rockefellers and their allies have, for at least fifty years, been carefully following a plan to use their economic power to gain political control of first America, and then the rest of the world.” – Larry P. McDonald
In 1921 the stockholders of the Federal Reserve financed an organization called the “Council on Foreign Relations” (CFR). A full discussion on the CFR is beyond the scope of this article. Suffice it to say that the CFR likely plays a prominent role in the invisible government that we have been warned about. The CFR is alleged to be the arm of the Ruling Elite in the United States. Most influential politicians, academics and media personalities are members. The CFR uses its influence to push their New World Order agenda on the American people.
David Rockefeller, Sr is the current patriarch of the Rockefeller family. He is the only surviving grandchild of oil tycoon John D. Rockefeller, founder of Standard Oil. Rockefeller began a lifelong association with the CFR when he joined as a director in 1949. In Rockefeller’s 2002 autobiography “Memoirs” he wrote:
“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
James Warburg, son of CFR [Council on Foreign Relations] founder Paul Warburg, delivered blunt testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950:
“We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”
[h=3]Cognitive Dissonance[/h]
The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.” —J. Edgar Hoover

Because of a deep rooted beliefs that the U.S. government is “for the people” and the protector of the free world, many will reject the notion of an evil shadow government. When our beliefs are challenged or when two beliefs are inconsistent, cognitive dissonance is created. It’s human nature to try to hold our beliefs in harmony with our world view and avoid disharmony (or dissonance).

For those of you who having difficulty believing the information presented in this article, I fully understand. For the first 57 years of my life, I would not have believed in the possibility that a shadow government could exist. Three years ago my world view changed. While on vacation in Mount Shasta, I came across a book titled “Global Conspiracy” that seemed strangely out of place in a metaphysical book store. I had never heard of the author before – some guy named David Icke. I scanned through the book and frankly didn’t believe 99% of what I read. But, I saw one thing that caught my attention in that I knew that I could easily verify Icke’s assertion. I did my own research and turned out what Icke had stated was true. That led me down a rabbit hole and many, many hundreds of hours of independent research.
So, keep an open mind, do your own research, and use discernment. Beware that there is a ton of disinformation on the internet, much of which is intentionally placed to confuse the public. At a CFR meeting on geoengineering (see the article “Millions Spent to Confuse Public About Geoengineering“), M. Granger Morgan stated (it’s captured on video for you to see and hear for yourself):
First of all, of course, there is a lot of money getting spent to make sure that a very substantial portion of the public stays totally confused about this. And, I mean, it’s been really quite pernicious. But there’s been literally tens of millions of dollars spent on every little thing that comes along that might, you know, relate to some uncertainty.
[h=3]What Can We Do?[/h] “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” – Margaret Mead
In addition to doing your own research, please spread the word, and get involved. The Thrive Solutions Hub is an excellent place to join with others who are taking positive action steps expose corruption and to create a world in which we can all thrive. You can watch the full Thrive movie on YouTube here.


[h=6]About the Author[/h] Ross Pittman is the Editor of ConsciousLife News, where this article was originally featured.
This article is offered under Creative Commons license. It’s okay to republish it anywhere as long as attribution bio is included and all links remain intact.
 
Transhumanism in the mainstream

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/sci...mans-utterly-defenceless-warns-professor.html

[h=1]Killer robots will leave humans 'utterly defenceless' warns professor[/h] [h=2]Robots, called LAWS – lethal autonomous weapons systems – will be able to kill without human intervention[/h]
terminator_3001397b.jpg


Killer robots in development could leave humans 'uttlery defenceless' a leading academic has warned Photo: Warner Br/Everett/REX

By Sarah Knapton, Science Editor
6:00PM BST 27 May 2015

Killer robots which are being developed by the US military ‘will leave humans utterly defenceless‘, an academic has warned


Two programmes commissioned by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) are seeking to create drones which can track and kill targets even when out of contact with their handlers.

Writing in the journal Nature, Stuart Russell, Professor of Computer Science at the University of California, Berkley, said the research could breach the Geneva Convention and leave humanity in the hands of amoral machines.

“Autonomous weapons systems select and engage targets without human intervention; they become lethal when those targets include humans,” he said.

“Existing AI and robotics components can provide physical platforms, perception, motor control, navigation, mapping, tactical decision-making and long-term planning. They just need to be combined.

“In my view, the overriding concern should be the probable endpoint of this technological trajectory.
“Despite the limits imposed by physics, one can expect platforms deployed in the millions, the agility and lethality of which will leave humans utterly defenceless. This is not a desirable future.”
ultron-xlarge_3319925b.jpg
[SUP]Some experts say armed killer robots are just a ' small step' away[/SUP]
• Killer robots a small step away and must be outlawed, says UN official
• Britain prepared to develop 'killer robots', minister says

The robots, called LAWS – lethal autonomous weapons systems – are likely to be armed quadcopters of mini-tanks that can decided without human intervention who should live or die.
DARPA is currently working on two projects which could lead to killer bots. One is Fast Lightweight Autonomy (FLA) which is designing a tiny rotorcraft to manoeuvre unaided at high speed in urban areas and inside buildings. The other and Collaborative Operations in Denied Environment (CODE), is aiming to develop teams of autonomous aerial vehicles carrying out “all steps of a strike mission — find, fix, track, target, engage, assess” in situations in which enemy signal-jamming makes communication with a human commander impossible.
Last year Angela Kane, the UN’s high representative for disarmament, said killer robots were just a 'small step' away and called for a worldwide ban. But the Foreign Office has said while the technology had potentially "terrifying" implications, Britain "reserves the right" to develop it to protect troops.

click on link to see video at this point of article


Professor Russell said: "LAWS could violate fundamental principles of human dignity by allowing machines to choose whom to kill — for example, they might be tasked to eliminate anyone exhibiting ‘threatening behaviour’
“Debates should be organized at scientific meetings; arguments studied by ethics committees. Doing nothing is a vote in favour of continued development and deployment.”
The US army tests a killer robot tank
• Future robots will resemble ostriches or dinosaurs, scientists say

However Dr Sabine Hauert, a lecturer in robotics at the University of Bristol said that the public did not need to fear the developments in aritifical intelligence.
“My colleagues and I spend dinner parties explaining that we are not evil but instead have been working for years to develop systems that could help the elderly, improve health care, make jobs safer and more efficient, and allow us to explore space or beneath the ocean,” she said.
 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...nd-must-be-outlawed-says-top-UN-official.html

[h=1]Killer robots a small step away and must be outlawed, says top UN official[/h] [h=2]A senior UN official says battlefield robots that can kill without human control are a 'small step' away and should be banned[/h]
By Ben Farmer, Defence Correspondent
10:00PM BST 27 Aug 2014


Killer robots programmed to open fire without human control are just a “small step” from the battlefield and military powers should agree to outlaw them, a top United Nations official has said.

Angela Kane, the UN’s high representative for disarmament, said governments should be more open about programmes to develop the technology and she favoured a pre-emptive ban before it was too late.

click on link above to view video


She said: “Any weapon of war is terrible, and if you can launch this without human intervention, I think it’s even worse. It compounds the problem and dehumanises it in a way.

“It becomes a faceless war and I think that’s really terrible and so to my mind I think it should be outlawed. The decision is really in the hands of the states who have the capability to develop them."

[h=2]Related Articles[/h]


Ms Kane said there was “a great deal of concern” about the prospect of killer robots being developed that would commit war crimes on the battlefield.
There had also been a great deal of reluctance from major military powers to discuss the issue.
Last year, Alistair Burt, then a Conservative foreign minister, said while the technology had potentially "terrifying" implications, Britain "reserves the right" to develop it to protect troops.
Ms Kane said: “There’s a great deal of concern about the increasing automation that’s going on in general. Just think about these self-driving cars that we hear are being tested on the roads. So that is only just a small step to develop weapons that are going to be activated without human intervention. Warfare in general is becoming increasingly automated.”
She said: “The concern relates specifically to weapons that have the capability of selecting and also attacking targets without human intervention. Who has the responsibility and who has the liability? This is a really big issue in terms of how we are going about this."
The United Nations held its first meeting on the threat from “lethal autonomous weapons” earlier this year. Another summit is planned for the autumn.
She said many developing countries were worried such weapons may be used on their territory, just as remotely piloted drones have been used in recent years.
"I personally believe that there cannot be a weapon that can be fired without human intervention. I do not believe that there should be a weapon, ever, that is not guided and where there is not the accountability clearly established by whoever takes that step to guide it or to launch it. I do not believe that we could have weapons that could be controlled by robots."
Militaries are making increasing use of robots, from bomb disposal machines to armed remotely piloted drones carrying out missile strikes. Israel has experimented with border control robots and American has trialled them in Iraq and Afghanistan. But an expert on military robots said all current machines' weapons are controlled and directed by humans, who make the final decision whether to fire.

video


Huw Williams, Unmanned Systems Editor at IHS Jane’s International Defence Review, said he knew of no programmes to make killer robots and even the most advanced machines had little ability to act on their own.
He said: “Autonomy at the moment is quite limited. You set the task parameters, give it way points and tell it to go and do x, y and z. Then the machine decides: 'How do I get from x to y to z in the most efficient manner and get things done?' But in terms of real thinking, real autonomy, then no."
While it is theoretically possible that a robot could have sensors and fire when it detected something, he said taking human control away had big disadvantages for commanders.
He said: “Firstly there's a real loss of control over the battlefield for commanders. Secondly, if a mistake is made there's a real problem with accountability."
 
driverless car

[video=youtube;K-oO3VKRMG4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-oO3VKRMG4[/video]
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...troubles-bbc-documentary-claims-10282251.html

[h=1]Britain 'protected state-sponsored serial killers' on both sides during Irish Troubles, BBC documentary claims[/h]
The-Troubles-Getty.jpg








[h=3]Britain’s Secret Terror Deals claims it is the first time the scale of the UK’s counter-intelligence efforts have been revealed
[/h]
Paul Gallagher
plus.png




Friday 29 May 2015

The security forces protected “state sponsored serial killers” on both sides of Northern Ireland’s paramilitary groups who are responsible for some of the most notorious unsolved murders of The Troubles, according to a BBC Panorama documentary.

Britain’s Secret Terror Deals claims it is the first time the scale of the UK’s counter-intelligence efforts have been revealed.
The murder of Sunday World reporter Martin O’Hagan in 2001 and two massacres, at Sean Graham bookmaker’s in 1992 where five people died, and the killings of nine Protestant men returning from work in Kingsmill village in 1976, are among the cases where state and paramilitary collusion is alleged to have been covered up.
Panorama also revealed an assault rifle used in the Sean Graham massacre, which police said had been disposed of, ended up on display in the Imperial War Museum.
The programme also said the state paid an agent who helped develop a new IRA bomb that killed 34-year-old married RUC officer Colleen McMurray, before all the evidence surrounding her murder in 1992 went missing. The ombudsman’s report into Mrs McMurray’s death is yet to come out. It is one of dozens of ongoing investigations surrounding unsolved murders where state collusion with paramilitary groups is alleged.
George Hamilton, Chief Constable of the PSNI, told Panorama he “entirely refuted” the suggestion that officers colluded with Mr O’Hagan’s killers and that the police pursued many people within “the terrorist organisation… and locked many of them up”.
The Police Ombudsman’s report into Mr O’Hagan’s death was delayed because the Police Service of Northern Ireland refused to release “crucial” intelligence files. In total, police refused to hand over documents relating to 60 murders – the state has been accused of involvement in all of them.
Panorama said it had uncovered “extraordinary evidence” to show how the victims were killed and their killers protected.
Baroness Nuala O’Loan, the former Police Ombudsman Northern Ireland, said: “When I first heard about it I didn’t think that could be possible. [The state] were running informants and they were using them and the argument was that by so doing they were saving lives. But hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of people died because those people were not brought to justice and weren’t stopped in their tracks… Many of them were killers and some of them serial killers.”
Only when the current Ombudsman Dr Michael Maguire, threatened to take the police to court did the PSNI release the files. His investigation into Mr O’Hagan’s death has been ongoing for eight years.
[h=5]Read more: Ireland: British Army committed torture during Troubles
How Britain's treatment of Irish suspects inspired US 'torture'
Blair warns Cameron: Don't pursue ex-IRA terrorists[/h]Raymond White, retired RUC Assistant Chief Constable and former Special Branch Officer, admitted to the programme the state “recruited people with blood on their hands” in order to save lives.
He said: “That’s what we were employed to do, to get information and the best information comes from within organisations. That’s the reality of the life in which we lived.”
The Government told the programme the “vast majority” of those who served with the security forces “did so with distinction”. It has previously apologised for previous cases where collusion has been proven.



Amnesty International’s Northern Ireland Programme Director Patrick Corrigan said: “The breadth and depth of collusion being alleged here is truly disturbing. Killing people targeted by the state, using intelligence provided by the state and shooting them with guns provided by the state - if all this is proven, we’re not talking about a security policy we’re talking about a murder policy.
“There must now be a full, independent investigation into the scale of the policy where the police, army and MI5 worked with illegal paramilitary groups, resulting in the deaths of perhaps hundreds of people.”
 
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/05/conspiracy-theorists-vindicated-haarp.html

[h=3]Conspiracy Theorists Vindicated: HAARP Confirmed Weather-manipulation Tool[/h]
[TABLE="class: tr-caption-container"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: tr-caption, align: center"]image Wikipedia Commons[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Catherine J. Frompovich
Activist Post

The most damning aspersion that can be lobbed against any person, or the exposure of “secret government activity,” overwhelmingly is “Conspiracy Theorist.” That pejorative ‘handle’ is equated with imbecile mind-activity with aspersions often suggested as ‘tin hat wearers’. Well, step aside all you doubters and listen up carefully to what took place in the halls of Congress on May 14, 2014 regarding the weather modification system known as HAARP.

In the YouTube below Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) asks some pointed questions about HAARP. However, readers may not be surprised at the answers, but the mainstream media ought to be wiping oodles of egg yolk from its collective face.

[video=youtube;RX3IOHpe6sY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RX3IOHpe6sY[/video]

In the report “Air Force Admits Weather Control via HAARP and New Tech,” David Walker, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Science, Technology and Engineering, very-matter-of-factly states that they took over from the Navy and will be moving on
to managing the ionosphere, what the HAARP was really designed to do, to inject energy into the ionosphere to be able to actually control it… [CJF emphasis added]​



Furthermore, the U.S. Air Force intends to dismantle the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) in Gakona, Alaska, by or during the summer of 2014! [1]
Built at a cost of more than $290 million, the site has 180 antennas on 30 acres that are used to direct energy into the ionosphere, which is 55 miles to 370 miles above the Earth, and monitor changes in the flow of charged particles. Stevens was the godfather of HAARP, which he helped start two decades ago with annual earmarks slipped into the defense budget. [1]​
It seems that no research facility can be found to take over the HAARP Alaska facility. Could that be an indication that the weather modification system is regarded unfavorably? I find that as a possibility and extremely interesting, especially in view of all the technology that was invested and built into it. If no one wants to continue operating HAARP, will the State of Alaska be interested in it for education research purposes? But then, maybe HAARP-at-sea-ships, i.e., the Tesla Weapon Platform SBX-1, probably will be the most effective ‘on-site’ HAARP facility rather than one remotely stationary on land.

[video=youtube;JqhME0dD5Ds]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqhME0dD5Ds[/video]

However, there are numerous HAARP facilities in other countries around the globe that the Tesla Weapon Platform SBX-1 possibly could interact with. But then, we have to wonder what Assistant Secretary Walker was referring to when he stated that they got out of HAARP Alaska what they wanted and were moving on…moving on to what?

May 2nd, 2014, I published “What’s With the Weather and Chemtrails?” Readers may want to review in light of the latest “bombshell” acknowledgement by Walker at a Congressional hearing.

Conspiracy theories and theorists truly have been vindicated about HAARP.

Knowing the dogged research we, who are proclaimed ‘tin hat theorists’, perform and circulate, this writer feels extremely confident that other information regarded as ‘conspiracy theories’ about vaccines and other ‘sacred cow’ secrets also will be vindicated at some forthcoming date—just when, who knows—since it all depends upon who has the integrity to stand up and tell the facts of what’s been going on that the U.S. media, press, TV, and controllers won’t permit be made public until it’s too late to get objection going to stop the destruction of the planet and humankind.

For those still inclined to deny the facts, here are TV weather persons talking about, showing and admitting to weather geoengineering, plus dramatic statements.

[video=youtube;54YX5o4yfLM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54YX5o4yfLM[/video]

It’s graduation time, theorists. Throw your tin hats into the air and let them fall wherever they may land. Hopefully, they will land on some mainstream media journalists’ heads so they can wear them and become empowered to tell the facts of what’s really going on.

Notes:

[1] http://www.adn.com/2014/05/14/3470442/air-force-prepares-to-dismantle.html?sp=/99/100/&ihp=1

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008).
 
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=15497

TEXAS DELUGE: Was it a geoengineered weather event to enforce compliance with Agenda 21?

Posted on May 27, 2015 by State of the Nation

Flood of the Millennium Hits Austin, Houston, Dallas, San Marcos and other Texas cities

Major Metro Areas Paralyzed In Texas Just Before Jade Helm 15 Begins — A Coincidence?

Michael Thomas
State of the Nation
The timing of the extraordinary May 2015 rain events in Texas, occurring just prior to the July 15th commencement of the unparalleled military exercise JADE HELM 15, cannot be coincidental. As the 1000-year flood slowly makes its way across the state, one question emerges — was it a manmade or natural weather event?
If the satellite imagery* has anything to say about this freakish statewide deluge, it is that something is very wrong with this picture, as well as with the following images.
* All satellite images are from Sunday, May 24th — the day of the first deluge in Texas
The black ‘column’, which protrudes through northern Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Nebraska on the image above is not natural in any way, shape or form. It’s very squared off, much too angular, and straight-lined. Also, this rain event pattern is unusually vertical in its development and has been exhibiting unnatural shapes and abnormal dynamics along the way.
What is perhaps the most distinguishing feature of this apparently geoengineered weather event is that it maintained its structural integrity over several days. The longevity of any cohesive meteorological phenomenon is relatively short. In this particular case, highly unusual weather dynamics and geometries persisted over days when they would normally have morphed into new shapes and sizes, or dissolved altogether. Simply put, these kinds of weather patterns and dynamics do not exist in nature.

The following screenshot reveals the extraordinary south to north movement of the entire weather system. In other words if you click on the reference video below, the line of rainstorms is seen moving from the extreme south in the Gulf of Mexico all the way to the northern Midwest in Minnesota. The typical east to west migration of the whole storm front was not observed for a relatively prolonged period of time. The storm system just sat there training over the same areas in the blue-green areas shown below. It actually functioned like a ‘well-constructed’ conveyor belt moving massive amounts of water from the Gulf, south of Texas, right through the nation’s midsection as precipitation.

The two preceding images also capture a large T right smack in the middle of the country. While anything can happen in the meteorological sphere of life, this shape is quite uncommon, especially over a protracted time frame. Likewise, the constantly changing geometry exhibited features which are not natural, especially in their sequence of manifestation. As follows:


Screen-Shot-2015-05-27-at-8.09.26-AM.png

Austin has been bumping up against Washington since Obama took office

Both ex-Governor Rick Perry, and now current Governor Greg Abbott of Texas, have been a HUGE thorn in President Obama’s side ever since he took up residence in the White House. You name the issue — Gun control, Obamacare, Illegal immigrants, Gay Marriage, JADE HELM[1]. The list goes on and on, but there are enough in the aggregate for the geoengineers in the West Wing Situation Room to rain on a Texas parade whenever possible.
The Obama Administration has already demonstrated no reluctance whatsoever in commencing purely political prosecutions as they have against potential presidential candidate Rick Perry. Using their Austin-based proxy prosecutor to file a patently false indictment against Perry shows just how far Obama & Company will go to force the state into complete submission. Likewise, the complete lack of immigration law enforcement along the south Texas border has caused the number of illegal aliens to literally explode, further straining Texas’ finances and budgets across the state.
Texas by its very nature has always staked out its fierce independence from the U.S. Federal Government. The Lone Star State began as a republic in 1836 as its flag illustrates. It also operates frequently as a lone ranger policing the federal government as it attempts to compel Washington to do its job. Not only has the White House not performed its constitutionally-mandated responsibilities, it has repeatedly broken federal statues and prevented states like Texas from enforcing them, especially the longstanding and necessary immigration laws.
However, it is Jade Helm 15 and the deliberate utilization of Texas as a staging area which has shifted this ongoing feud into a new and volatile phase. Gov. Greg Abbott went so far as to write a letter to the Texas National Guard requesting that they closely monitor the JADE HELM military exercise. Such a gubernatorial initiative is practically unheard of in the 50 states and underscores the level of profound distrust that currently exists between Washington and Austin.
Weather Warfare Has Been Conducted For Decades, Globalists Are Loyal To No One
It’s important to understand that anyone, anywhere, anytime can become the victim of the incessant weather warfare that is being waged across the earthly realm 24/7. There is no city or state, nation or continent that is protected from such meteorological weaponry. Nor is there any jurisdiction that is free from the dictates of the globalists who have been painstakingly establishing the New World Order (NWO) over centuries.
The United Nations is but one organ of the coming One World Government and it will not be thwarted in implementing its agenda across the planet. Independent states like Texas and California have been used as examples of what can and will go awry when compliance with that agenda is not forthcoming. The current World Shadow Government (WSG) has many means at its disposal by which to enforce its covert agenda, particularly those vital components of illegal immigration and gay marriage, systematic geoengineering and mandatory vaccination.
Flooding hit Dallas: Downtown Dallas can be seen from the Sylvan Avenue Bridge on Monday as the Trinity River spilled over its banks

The WSG’s primary means of enforcement is weather manipulation since the weather can now be easily engineered to fabricate a drought or deluge, a derecho or downpour. Welcome to the 1200-year California drought of 2015, as well as the Texas flood of the millennium. Not only did this apocalyptic rain event begin over the greater Austin area — the state capital — the state’s other major metro areas have likewise suffered the greatest consequences of this geoengineered onslaught.
San Marcos, just south of the capital, took the initial hit followed by the Austin, Dallas and Houston. Rain is still falling as of this writing, rivers will continue to overflow and communities all across the region are inundated as never before in recorded Texas history.
Why does the Mainstream Media always fail to tell the inconvenient truths and report the frightening facts?
The mainstream news reports (MSM), which are supposed to represent the facts on the ground (or in the water), have significantly understated the gravity of this manufactured rainfall catastrophe. The MSM virtually never portrays the seriousness of these kinds of events which are essentially designed to shock and awe a specific audience. In this case the targeted audience resides in Austin, as well as Houston and Dallas. All that matters is that those folks get the message:​
“DO NOT RESIST THE NWO’S AGENDA 21!”

As a result of the globalist’s MO, much of the real destruction which accompanies their many engineered superstorms and cat 5 hurricanes, derechos and downbursts is not fully or accurately reported. They certainly do not want to scare the common man into a panic since uncontrolled chaos is what they want to avoid at all costs. However, staging a big enough drama to get everyone’s attention is all they desire. For these reasons the many shocking and terrible consequences of their handiwork will never be known … except, of course, to the authorities in Austin, Houston and Dallas.
Truly, come hell or high-water, the NWO Agenda 21 will be executed, especially by the key U.S. states of California and Texas, New York and Florida. Not to comply with any orders issued by the globalists will bring certain downfall, often in the form of rainfall, or lack thereof. The hydrological cycle is by far the easiest to manipulate and can wreak havoc which is not so easily forgotten. Who ever wants to find their vehicle parked in the middle of a river … 20 miles from home?!
Sunk: Interstate 45 outside Houston looks like a river following massive rainfalls and flash flooding on Monday night

Talks Of Secession Have Only Fueled The Fires Of Revolutionary Fervor
Then there’s the little matter of Texas seceding from the Union. Although this notion has been mocked by the MSM, if there is a state that has all the right stuff to secede, it’s Texas. Texas really does want to secede from the United States, just as Scotland wants to leave the United Kingdom. The federal governments in the eyes of both are big and bloated beyond belief, and therefore inexcusably unresponsive to state needs. They are also thoroughly corrupt and despotic, and relentlessly seek to undermine state sovereignty.
In the case of Texas, the Obama Administration was completely AWOL during their disastrous multi-year drought, just as they will likely be OUT TO LUNCH throughout the current flooding catastrophe. Has anyone heard so much as a peep out of Washington during California’s ongoing catastrophic drought?[2] Just like the BP Gulf oil spill calamity, there’s NOBODY HOME at the White House when they’re supposed to be there working, not golfing.
Instead of supporting the state governments during dire emergencies, Washington takes full advantage of them, holding them hostage before declaring a federal disaster area. Funds immediately needed to deal with the emergency in real time are then not received expeditiously or are parceled out in woefully insufficient amounts.
This White House takes every opportunity to lord it over any state that tries to spread its wings or perform its governmental duties with high integrity. In so doing the state governments routinely outshine the D.C. federal fiasco that fraudulently refers to itself as a democratic government the world over.

[video=youtube;aFV4j5Fi0Y0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFV4j5Fi0Y0[/video]
Conclusion
Of all the tricks of the trade available to the man behind the NWO curtain, none is so dramatic and compelling as weather warfare. Together with their false flag terrorist attacks like the staged shootings at the Garland, Texas[3] cartoon contest on May 3rd, and their false flag shootouts such as the biker massacre by the ATF in Waco, Texas[4] on May 18th, the globalists are well equipped to effectuate an order change wherever they choose to.
“It’s just too coincidental that this Jade Helm thing is going on with TX the stated target, the biker shooting in Waco involved the Banditos gang which a year ago Eric Holder’s (criminal) Justice Dept released a report about that gang and stated concern that they have many active and retired millitary, police and other federal government personnel as members (one of their “red list” targets that now they can portray as criminals)….”[5]
Clearly the closer we come to the start of JADE HELM 15 on July 15th, the more that Texas and other ‘non-compliant’ states are likely to be the victims of weather warfare and the like. JADE HELM is about one thing and one thing only — exercising total command and control over the entire nation, and beyond. After all, the motto of the JADE HELM pseudo-military exercise is:
“Master the Human Domain”


As for the real purpose behind JADE HELM 15, there can be only one reason for their determination to hold this unprecedented domestic military operation just before the Shemitah Jubilee that begins in mid-September. The following essay explains in stark detail both the significance of the timing as well as the enormity of the coming events this September. It also contains critical links which present a much deeper understanding of what will occur during the September and October time frame of 2015.
Internet On Fire With ‘September 2015 Collapse’ Narrative:
How are Jade Helm 15 and the Baltimore riots connected to the coming collapse?
State of the Nation
May27, 2015
Author’s Note
There was a recent post at an alternative new website titled: Bastrop TX Stood Up Against the Jade Helm Exercise AND LOOK WHAT HAPPENED — DEADLY WEATHER WARFARE.
We thought the same about the Texas county that’s located between Austin and San Marcos — look at the wild and wacky weather they’re getting in return. The Bastrop County Commission had the JADE HELM PR officer from Fort Bragg NC appear before the residents to answer their excellent questions and address their legitimate concerns about the upcoming military intrusion. A lot more happened there that probably piqued the globalists.

Editor’s Note
Anyone who doubts the seriousness of this geoengineered weather event might take a look at the following video. The Midlothian Dam, located just south of Dallas Fort Worth, is breaching today and under threat of collapsing tomorrow. There are many emergencies just like this that continue to occur throughout Texas as this “weather war” saga unfolds.
Endnotes
[1] JADE HELM 15: US Special Forces Exercise Conducted Over 2 Months In 7 States
[2] Was the California drought geoengineered to pass future ‘climate change’ legislation?
[3] Garland, Texas Shooting: Yet another false flag operation blamed on and claimed by ‘Islamic Jihadists’
[4] Was the Waco TX biker massacre perpetrated by the ATF?
[5] Is Texas Under Attack By The U.S. Government For Resisting Jade Helm? “Weather Warfare Right Before Our Very Eyes”
References
The Lone Star State Runs Interference On Obama’s Jade Helm
The Government-Corporate Complex Takes Complete Control Of The USA
Video Resources
Texas Oklahoma Storms Flooding GeoEngineered Weather Warfare In Jade Helm Theatre
Why in the World are They Spraying?
 
Back
Top