- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 295ish
You, an INTP?INTP vibe online
You, an INTP?![]()
Then let me tell you bluntly (though not unkindly) that the impressions we have of the impressions we give are rarely accurate. But the more we learn about who we are, and also accept who we are, the more secure we become in our self-imageI'm going to cautiously reply "at least that's my impression of the impression I give."![]()
Then let me tell you bluntly (though not unkindly) that the impressions we have of the impressions we give are rarely accurate. But the more we learn about who we are, and also accept who we are, the more secure we become in our self-image![]()
Nah, no Ne. If I did, then I hadn't got that yet.Completely agree.
Strange though, I could have sworn you wondered about whether I might be INTP for a while. Anyway, wrong impression![]()
Nah, no Ne. If I did, then I hadn't got that yet.
Ne and Ni have the same capabilities, but Ni focuses deeper on a smaller range, while Ne notices the whole spectrum. Learned that recently.I would agree with that, yes. I don’t use Ne very much/often. I think it's a quick way to determine that I'm not a P.
This leads to an interesting question, linked to the OP. @Free and @jkxx in particular mentioned this tendency that Ni can have of bouncing around and derailing in its own way. Does that suggest that it could be confused for Ne in real life – by people who maybe only have a casual interest in MBTI?
This could maybe explain the ENFP mistype.
While ENTPs use Ti (for example) to jump around in the spectrum, Ni users jump around on their own using their individually wired association chains.
I guess I've gotten a decent bit of INTP...but really whether you take my persona or my thinking style, neither seems to me to fit that.
Even my caution in thinking doesn't seem T-dom-ish at all. It's much more free-spirited bouncing around, making different people's cases for them just to build up the strongest version of each argument, not dismissing views too quickly, making sure I hit the main idea conceptually, and so on.
And my persona is stereotypically nervous, warm, long analytical rants, easily distracted. Manifestly terrible sensation/walking around with low awareness of surroundings. Grossly impractical + can only do what interests me at the moment.
This makes perfect sense. :]Edit: While ENTPs use Ti (for example) to jump around in the spectrum, Ni users jump around on their own using their individually wired association chains
Ren said:It's clear that you do not prioritise adhering to a particular "Ti framework" in your thinking
I must say that it makes for very pleasant intellectual discussions.
You sound like a fun person to hang out with, and I mean this without the least irony![]()
This leads to an interesting question, linked to the OP. @Free and @jkxx in particular mentioned this tendency that Ni can have of bouncing around and derailing in its own way. Does that suggest that it could be confused for Ne in real life – by people who maybe only have a casual interest in MBTI?
This could maybe explain the ENFP mistype.
Ne and Ni have the same capabilities, but Ni focuses deeper on a smaller range, while Ne notices the whole spectrum. Learned that recently.
Edit: While ENTPs use Ti (for example) to jump around in the spectrum, Ni users jump around on their own using their individually wired association chains.
This instantly evokes many Skype conversations with @Lady Jolanda![]()
Manifestly terrible sensation/walking around with low awareness of surroundings.
Same here about you! My pet peeve is people who don't really take the effort to try to discuss/clarify/represent others' views fairly especially if having a kind of dogmatic thinking.
Spaced* coyote sometimes