Approximately 2.4 billion are Christian worldwide and this why everything we believe about Christianity seems so self-evident.
I don't think this is a valid argument Yoh. We might as well say that homo erectus had little to do with the evolution of modern man because we actually came from a species of ape several million years earlier, and that is the real foundation - both are true, assuming the paleontology is right. Of course our culture is descended from lots of precursor cultures, going back into this mists of time, each one building on what preceded them. Like
@Wyote says, every one is adapted from and built on its predecessors, and they are all rooted in a blend of predecessors.
You're misunderstanding my point. Pseudo morphisms have their own nature of organic activity like cultures; I don't believe Christianity has little to do with the evolution of western cultures quite the contrary I think it has been the most influential driver for the past 2,000 years, but like Jung does with the individual conscious, I segregate the cultural conscious into levels of social-ego, cultural-shadow, historical unconscious, and collective unconscious and, quite frankly, Christianity simply does not go as deep as Indo-European and Pagan cultural and mythological norms do. No, we cannot make the comparison, because cultures and genes evolve and mutate differently, cultures being much more sensitive and evolving with greater rapidity and influenced by a wider number of variables. I disagree, all cultures are distinct in their forms as evident in their art, religion, fashion, customs, values, language, and norms with general family resemblances being shared between cultures that have the same evolutionary lineage. Like all contemporary Indian and European cultures descend from Indo-Europeans such that it's myths, language, and conscious structures are embedded within these cultures and evolve in their forms and in phases overtime such that archeologist, geneticist, and linguist can reliably trace the Indo-European migration and spread around Euro-Aisa. For instance, the Crusades happened because Indo-Eurppean were warring pastoralist people, thus Europe has fought the bloodiest wars in human history and have a penchant for colonization like Indo-Europeans conquering and colonizing Euro-Asia, because again we descend from a group of conquering warring people which is why European Christians would wage wars against one another that were not observed in African and or Persia strands of Christianity, because cultures are fairly distinct, because they arise from stable breeding populations that emerged within distinct general geographical regions for about 30,000 to 10,000 years within a given local region like The Steppes. Your view is a gross over generalization. Our culture meaning our languages, art forms, norms, and myths descend from Indo-Europeans. The accurate analogy is that your ancestors stretch back to at least the early paleolithic but only the ancestors you've had within the last 1,000 years actually influence your genome, the way you look, your emotions, and behavior as can be reliably correlated with genetics. I think cultures have a 10,000 year influence band. I Like him and you, but
@Wyote is inaccurate and you are inaccurate, not all stretches of time are equal in influence, and not all events are equal in influence, and not all predecessors bare the same level of influence on a person or a culture to think so is just an over generalization. For instance, even your genes aren't actually evenly shared by both sides of your parents' relatives, some genes are more dominant than others in your formation which is why you are generally different than your siblings if you're not a twin even though you share parents or the same set of genes. In fact, you look more like certain relatives than others because genes are not equal in their influence and propagation. Ultimately, European cultures come from Indo-Europeans, and this is where our greatest shared strengths and our greatest shared problems arise.