Do you seriously think i'm sitting here going "Yaaaay serial killers!" and then someone tells me he's gay and I say "oh... guess I don't like that serial killer anymore..." WTF are you talking about?
Snowflakes
- Thread starter Eventhorizon
- Start date
- Status
So, your okay with changing who a person is as long as they are bad?
No i'm okay with treating mental illness that is infinitely beyond drugs and therapy.
My point is you're okay with changing who a person is, as long as the are bad people
Right, but your point is wrong because I never said that, I said:
Happy Phantom
Well-known member
Please make the “your” stop. Once I get it, but it keeps happening.
You said you would remove a serial killers, serial killerness which he was quite happy being... because he was a serial killer...
That changes what makes him who he is a without a second thought you wrote legislation to change him against his will.
Because he was killing people, and chopping them up into little pieces and writing notes to the family of the victim and all the other serial killer shit that serial killers love to do...
But gay people don't do those things necessarily. They could, in theory just like any one of us could, but it's not an established fact that most gay or transgendered people act like that.
Your not getting my point, you are okay with changing who people are as long as they are bad people... according to what you said.
No, I never said that, you said that. I wouldn't crack into someone's head if they killed their spouse for the insurance money or robbed a bank- even though I accept that it is wrong to do these things. Serial killers are a different scenario.
EDIT: There are in fact large swaths of "bad people" who I would not have their brains operated on.
I don't know what you were going for with this hypothetical but it has explained nothing about your point of view.
Now we
Okay, so now we are haggling over just how bad they have to be... oh and whose definition of bad we we are going to use... hope your in the majority...
Okay, so now we are haggling over just how bad they have to be... oh and whose definition of bad we we are going to use... hope your in the majority...
It's not about "badness" it's about reform, people who do wrong can be reformed UNLESS they're too insane to be reformed, hence incarceration for life in a mental institution or in this particular case your dumb hypothetical brain changey thingy
Last edited:
Happy Phantom
Well-known member
Oy.
Question. Why gay? What if he were black, Hispanic or Muslim, Jewish, etc.
To answer this question no I would not take his “serial killerness” (lolz) away. Lobotomies aren’t an option anymore, not to say that would even fix his killerness problem.
Is this woman trans? Not that it matters because your argument is invalid.
No.
No because it’s her choice to do what she feels will make her happy.
And?
That's cool... I'm sure reasonable people will at least see the point I was trying to make... You don't have to agree...
What, that's it? @Lady Jolanda asked you to explain your point of view, you came up with this dumb hypothetical that went nowhere, no one knows what you believe except for your belief that I believe something I don't so.... No, nobody is going to know what you mean.
Yeah... as I said before I used a real guy as a model... one person already chose to change the serial killer and then it was bargaining how bad and definition of good...
I don't even think serial killers are bad people, I mean they're sick. Perhaps unsympathetically so, but I mean... still sick.
- Status