the climate change scam

who says it is directed at the banking elites?

DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENT REVEALS KNIGHT OF MALTA KISSINGER WORKING TO REDUCE FERTILITY IN THE POPULATION:

National Security Study Memorandum
NSSM 200
Implications of Worldwide Population Growth
For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests
(THE KISSINGER REPORT)
December 10, 1974
CLASSIFIED BY Harry C. Blaney, III
SUBJECT TO GENERAL DECLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 11652 AUTOMATICALLY DOWNGRADED AT TWO YEAR INTERVALS AND DECLASSIFIED ON DECEMBER 31, 1980.
This document can only be declassified by the White House.
Declassified/Released on 7/3/89
under provisions of E.O. 12356
by F. Graboske, National Security Council
n Section II Action to Create Conditions for Fertility Decline: Population and a Development Assistance Strategy, we see under B, “Functional Assistance Programs to Create Conditions for Fertility Decline.”
https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pcaab500.pdf
Is it just me that sees the irony that the report is called KISSINGER and its about fertility decline? I'm sorry but that made me lol.
Other than that.. Why where they taking that action? Why is it a bad thing? Is it a good thing? I haven't read it but maybe they just wanted to preach contraception and say that the stork doesn't exist :nomouth:
 
Is it just me that sees the irony that the report is called KISSINGER and its about fertility decline? I'm sorry but that made me lol.
Other than that.. Why where they taking that action? Why is it a bad thing? Is it a good thing? I haven't read it but maybe they just wanted to preach contraception and say that the stork doesn't exist :nomouth:
Wait, if the stork isn't real, does that mean we're all test tube babies?
 
Dude the Sun isn't even real. Neither are birds.

Army: Sun, Not Man, Is Causing Climate Change (Updated)

Noahh Shachtman Security
Date of Publication: 06.03.08. 06.03.08
Time of Publication: 11:46 am. 11:46 am

The Army is weighing in on the global warming debate, claiming that climate change is not entirely man-made. Instead, Dr. Bruce West, with the Army Research Office, argues that "changes in the earth’s average surface temperature are directly linked to … the short-term statistical fluctuations in the Sun’s irradiance and the longer-term solar cycles."

In an advisory to bloggers entitled "Global Warming: Fact of Fiction [sic]," an Army public affairs official promoted a conference call with West about "the causes of global warming, and how it may not be caused by the common indicates [sic] some scientists and the media are indicating."

In the March, 2008 issue of Physics Today, West, the chief scientist of the Army Research Office’s mathematical and information science directorate, wrote that "the Sun’s turbulent dynamics" are linked with the Earth’s complex ecosystem. These connections are what is heating up the planet. "The Sun could account for as much as 69 percent of the increase in Earth’s average temperature," West noted.

It’s a position that puts West at odds with nearly every major scientific organization on the planet. "The American Meteorological Society, the American Geophysical Union, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science all have issued statements in recent years concluding that the evidence for human modification of climate is compelling," Science magazine observes. So has the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore, for their work on global warming. [UPDATE: West himself said during a Thursday conference call that global warming is at least partially man-made — and maybe as much as "70 percent" due to human intervention.]

West faults the IPCC and other scientific groups have "conclude[d] that the contribution of solar variability to global warming is negligible." He argues that these groups have done a poor job modeling the Sun’s impact, however, and that’s why they have "significantly over-estimated" the "anthropogenic contribution to global warming."

In recent days, the science and politics of climate change have once again taken center stage. NASA’s Inspector General just issued a report, acknowledging that political appointees "reduced, marginalized or mischaracterized climate change science made available to the general public." Yesterday, the Senate began debating a bill that would cap carbon dioxide emissions — considered one of the leading causes of man-made global warming.

UPDATE: "The Army does not have a position on global warming. Dr. West is an Army chief scientist, and is presenting one alternative theory to the cause of global warming," Army spokesperson Lindy Dinklage tells Danger Room. "This research is just some amongst thousands of studies being conducted by Army Scientists across the globe."

Okay. But the Army’s Office of the Chief of Public Affairs chose to promote just this one study. And when Army public affairs rolls out research from an Army chief scientist — with no clarifications that these are just his private views — I think it’s fair to call that an official endorsement.

After the jump: the Army’s full press release.


———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Dinklage, Lindy J. Ms OCPA <XXXXXX@XXXXXXXX.mil>
Date: Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:21 PM
Subject: Army Blogger’s Roundtable: Global Warming (UNCLASSIFIED)
To:



Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Caveats: NONE

Army Blogger’s Roundtable

Global Warming: Fact of Fiction

11 AM Thursday, June 5

Is global warming really caused by humans, or is it simply the result of different aspects of the sun’s dynamics?

Dr. Bruce West, Chief Scientist, Mathematical & Information Science Directorate, Army Research Office, will discuss the causes of global warming, and how it may not be caused by the common indicates some scientists and the media are indicating. Research conducted by Dr. West contends that the changes in the earth’s average surface temperature are directly linked to two distinctly different aspects of the sun’s dynamics: the short-term statistical fluctuations in the Sun’s irradiance and the longer-term solar cycles.

Please reply to this message if you are interested in participating.

Lindy Kyzer

Public Affairs Specialist

Media Relations Division

Office of the Chief of Public Affairs

Department of the Army

703.XXXXXXXXX (w)

202.XXXXXXXXX (c)

XXXXXXXX@XXXXXX.mil

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Caveats: NONE

https://www.wired.com/2008/06/army-vs-global/
 
i think the suns activities affect climate

Let me add something to that though which is that i DO believe man is affecting weather but not through carbon dioxide but through weather modification programmes

This is the most revealing post here for me.

You have trouble believing in anthropogenic climate change if the mechanism is openly known and widely believed.

You have no trouble believing in anthropogenic climate change if the purported mechanism is neither openly known nor widely believed.

Most of this simply comes down to your orientation towards what is 'secret' and what is not, or rather, your membership of a particular epistemic community.

In fact, I think that if anthropogenic climate change via the mechanism of CO2 overproduction were not widely known, and was discredited by governments and scientists, I think you would probably believe it.
 
you're wrong there as most high frequency trading is now done algorithymically

but anyway banking ties into the technocracy because by controlling the currency you can control the population

currency is now going digital and the big banks are creating their own closed ended blockchains

once currency is digital and there is no physical cash your every transaction can be monitored and if you protest anything they are doing they can simply shut off your access to digital currency
Then I'm just wrong.
Okay, what about bitcoin? Y'know the banks want to create their own so funds can be traced etc.
Why do you think that is?

Isn't China doing the whole social points or something - you get points for whatever and gain points or get points taken away.
You know... China restricts social media. They've their own WhatsApp, Instagram etc. Kind of like brainwashing. Do you really think other countries would get away with that? Do you think that we all will be like: 'oh okay just take my moneyz away it's not like I'm gonna riot or something'.
 
In fact, I think that if anthropogenic climate change via the mechanism of CO2 overproduction were not widely known, and was discredited by governments and scientists, I think you would probably believe it.

Definitely
 
Is it just me that sees the irony that the report is called KISSINGER and its about fertility decline? I'm sorry but that made me lol.
Other than that.. Why where they taking that action? Why is it a bad thing? Is it a good thing? I haven't read it but maybe they just wanted to preach contraception and say that the stork doesn't exist :nomouth:

Sperm counts in the West plunge by 60% in 40 years as ‘modern life’ damages men’s health
Pesticides, hormone-disrupting chemicals, diet, stress, smoking and obesity have all been suggested as possible reasons behind the dramatic declines but experts say more research is urgently needed


Sperm counts have plunged by nearly 60 per cent in just 40 years among men living in the West, according to a major review of scientific studies that suggests the modern world is causing serious damage to men’s health.

Pesticides, hormone-disrupting chemicals, diet, stress, smoking and obesity have all been “plausibly associated” with the problem, which is associated with a range of other illnesses such as testicular cancer and a generally increased mortality rate.

The researchers who carried out the review said the rate of decline had showed no sign of “levelling off” in recent years.

The same trend was not seen in other parts of the world such as South America, Africa and Asia, although the scientists said fewer studies had been carried out there.

One expert commenting on the study said it was the “most comprehensive to date”, and described the figures as “shocking” and a “wake-up call” for urgent research into the reasons driving the fall.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...p-60-per-cent-years-modern-life-a7859491.html
 
i think trumps biggest donor is sheldon adelson the zionist billionaire

his right hand man is kushner a zionist

he was helped into power by zionist secret intelligence

israel has its own undisclosed nuclear weapons programme and i think trumps push to come out of the treaty over short range nuclear missles might have something to do with israeli ambitions to tackle iran

Okay.
US has alliance with Saudi.
Saudi hates Iran.
US likes Israel.
Israel dislikes Iran.

Ok I get the picture. How about you just tweet Trump and ask him?
 
So then you admit climate change is occurring

please go back over the thread and you'll see that i believe that climate changes over time due to the suns activities

i also believe that many of the weather patterns we are seeing now are down to weather modification programmes

what i don't believe is that manmade carbon dioxide is driving climate change
 
Okay.
US has alliance with Saudi.
Saudi hates Iran.
US likes Israel.
Israel dislikes Iran.

Ok I get the picture. How about you just tweet Trump and ask him?

the ruling family in saudi arabia is zionist that's why saudi funded wahhabists in syria never attack israel:

How Zionism Helped Create Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

On the propaganda level, the British served the Wahhabi takeover of Hijaz on three fronts. Firstly, they portrayed and argued that Ibn Saud’s invasion of Hijaz was motivated by religious fanaticism rather than by British imperialism’s geo-political considerations.[20] This deception is propounded to this day, most recently in Adam Curtis’s acclaimed BBC “Bitter Lake” documentary, whereby he states that the “fierce intolerant vision of wahhabism” drove the “beduins” to create Saudi Arabia.[21] Secondly, the British portrayed Ibn Saud’s Wahhabi fanatics as a benign and misunderstood force who only wanted to bring Islam back to its purest form.[22] To this day, these Islamist jihadis are portrayed in the most benign manner when their armed insurrections is supported by Britain and the West such as 1980’s Afghanistan or in today’s Syria, where they are referred to in the western media as “moderate rebels.” Thirdly, British historians portray Ibn Saud as an independent force and not as a British instrument used to horn away anyone perceived to be surplus to imperial requirements. For example, Professor Eugene Rogan’s recent study on the history on Arabs claims that “Ibn Saud had no interest in fighting” the Ottoman Empire. This is far from accurate as Ibn Saud joined the war in 1915. He further disingenuously claims that Ibn Saud was only interested in advancing “his own objectives” which fortuitously always dovetailed with those of the British Empire.
http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13941019000294
Therefore, it is very clear that the British Empire’s drive to impose Zionism in Palestine is embedded in the geographical DNA of contemporary Saudi Arabia. There is further irony in the fact that the two holiest sites in Islam are today governed by the Saudi clan and Wahhabi teachings because the Empire was laying the foundations for Zionism in Palestine in the 1920s. Contemporaneously, it is no surprise that both Israel and Saudi Arabia are keen in militarily intervening on the side of “moderate rebels” i.e. jihadis, in the current war on Syria, a country which covertly and overtly rejects the Zionist colonisation of Palestine.
 
Sperm counts in the West plunge by 60% in 40 years as ‘modern life’ damages men’s health
Pesticides, hormone-disrupting chemicals, diet, stress, smoking and obesity have all been suggested as possible reasons behind the dramatic declines but experts say more research is urgently needed


Sperm counts have plunged by nearly 60 per cent in just 40 years among men living in the West, according to a major review of scientific studies that suggests the modern world is causing serious damage to men’s health.

Pesticides, hormone-disrupting chemicals, diet, stress, smoking and obesity have all been “plausibly associated” with the problem, which is associated with a range of other illnesses such as testicular cancer and a generally increased mortality rate.

The researchers who carried out the review said the rate of decline had showed no sign of “levelling off” in recent years.

The same trend was not seen in other parts of the world such as South America, Africa and Asia, although the scientists said fewer studies had been carried out there.

One expert commenting on the study said it was the “most comprehensive to date”, and described the figures as “shocking” and a “wake-up call” for urgent research into the reasons driving the fall.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...p-60-per-cent-years-modern-life-a7859491.html
You do realise that that applies to them people that implemented the whole fertility ka-boom too! You know... the Kissinger:smirk:
 
i also believe that many of the weather patterns we are seeing now are down to weather modification programmes

All part of the suppression of the human population etc etc, otherwise they'd be doing a really shitty job huh! Things just keep warming up. Those bastards.
 
How Zionism Helped Create Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Basically, Zionism and Communism are the greatest threats to all of humanity.

ef5Vsto.jpg
 
the ruling family in saudi arabia is zionist that's why saudi funded wahhabists in syria never attack israel:

How Zionism Helped Create Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

On the propaganda level, the British served the Wahhabi takeover of Hijaz on three fronts. Firstly, they portrayed and argued that Ibn Saud’s invasion of Hijaz was motivated by religious fanaticism rather than by British imperialism’s geo-political considerations.[20] This deception is propounded to this day, most recently in Adam Curtis’s acclaimed BBC “Bitter Lake” documentary, whereby he states that the “fierce intolerant vision of wahhabism” drove the “beduins” to create Saudi Arabia.[21] Secondly, the British portrayed Ibn Saud’s Wahhabi fanatics as a benign and misunderstood force who only wanted to bring Islam back to its purest form.[22] To this day, these Islamist jihadis are portrayed in the most benign manner when their armed insurrections is supported by Britain and the West such as 1980’s Afghanistan or in today’s Syria, where they are referred to in the western media as “moderate rebels.” Thirdly, British historians portray Ibn Saud as an independent force and not as a British instrument used to horn away anyone perceived to be surplus to imperial requirements. For example, Professor Eugene Rogan’s recent study on the history on Arabs claims that “Ibn Saud had no interest in fighting” the Ottoman Empire. This is far from accurate as Ibn Saud joined the war in 1915. He further disingenuously claims that Ibn Saud was only interested in advancing “his own objectives” which fortuitously always dovetailed with those of the British Empire.
http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13941019000294
Therefore, it is very clear that the British Empire’s drive to impose Zionism in Palestine is embedded in the geographical DNA of contemporary Saudi Arabia. There is further irony in the fact that the two holiest sites in Islam are today governed by the Saudi clan and Wahhabi teachings because the Empire was laying the foundations for Zionism in Palestine in the 1920s. Contemporaneously, it is no surprise that both Israel and Saudi Arabia are keen in militarily intervening on the side of “moderate rebels” i.e. jihadis, in the current war on Syria, a country which covertly and overtly rejects the Zionist colonisation of Palestine.
Okay but nobody likes Saudis now. They killed a journalist and then 2weeks later go: 'oh.. forgot.. there might have been a fight'. = Saudis are in big trouble with Germany, France and UK.
Zionism also helped create Israel.........
There could possibly become a big boom, but hasn't that always been a factor? The reasons for it just change. Now, what are you going to do about it??
 
Back
Top