I don't have an issue with what you've said, it's more about the first post in this thread. And I explained the facts and the conclusions in my last thread. If this isn't clear enough, I can still show you the passages in the first post that I think are exaggerated, but I don't particularly like puzzling such tiny details.
Actually, I did watch a lot of them. Maybe I didn't watch the particular ones you talked about, the ones that are supposedly offensive towards INFJs. But as I already said, even if there are such videos and even if EJarendee doesn't have a high opinion of INFJs, this doesn't mean that our society will develop in the same direction.
Yes, I understand what you mean. I don't want to understate the significance of that UDSSR socionics thing. I just mean that in my experience (could be that you have had a different experience), socionics isn't such a big thing in comparison to MBTI. I don't say that it's completely irrelevant, but as I've experienced it there are far more people who know something about MBTI than about socionics. Actually, I don't know what it's like in other cultures today, I live in Western culture and don't have enough information about the others. But in my environment - in my experience - I cannot see that coming storm against INFJs. Most of the people that I know don't even know about MBTI, let alone socionics, and 99% of the people who know about it don't have anything against INFJs, INFPs or whatever. There are always some people who are ignorant about certain things, there is for example much bias concerning the S/N dichotomy, but this is not the majority. As I said, there is certainly some truth in the first post, I never said anything else. But I think it's exaggerated.
Here's a post i made in another related thread looking at the wider implications of all this (eg psychometric testing)
Sadly there is a void of understanding in our society due to engineered ignorance
There most certainly IS a bias agaisnt introversion
Further to this it is part of a coherent policy formulated by people in power due to the influence of pervasive schools of thought such as the Frankfurt School
This group came out of nazi germany across to the US and was studying the psychology of society and of authority
After the second world war our leaders conducted the biggest psychological study the world had seen due to their concerns over a number of things. One concern was over how the vast majority of troops coming home unfit for service where not coming back due to physical injury but mental injury.
Of course the elites denied the various psychological effects of warfare on people for example denying 'shell shock' during WWI even going as far as shooting young lads (who had lied about their age to join up) for desertion
In the second wiorld war they denied the existence of post traumatic stress disorder and in the recent gulf war (the first one) they denied the existence of gulf war syndrome (caused by injections they gave to their troops)
So this psychological study was conducted and the elites tried to figure out the best way to keep control of society. They believed due to the work of Sigmund Freud that beneath the veneer of civilisation was a boiling mess of violence just waiting to burst out (on them in revolutionary form)
If you are interested in this please don't take my opinion on it. A very good documentary by BBC journalist Adam Curtis covers this; its called 'The Century of the Self' and you can watch it here:
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-century-of-the-self/
The result of this huge study was the creation of a categorisation system called the DSM which lists whatever the elites deem to be a 'disorder'
The importantn thing to bare in mind is that the agenda of the elites is not to keep everyone healthy and happy (cos if it were they would share the wealth around) the agenda of the elite is to keep everyone down and themselves on top.
So if they see behaviours which they deem a threat to their control for example they see people protesting for better safety conditions at work then they can deem the behavioural traits of that person(s) a 'disorder' and this gives them the ability under their own laws to then lock up that person and medicate them to shut them up
An example of this occuring was when the authorities locked up the writer Ezra Pound because he was speaking out against the elite that is running the banking system. Whilst incarcerated Pound (who edited and assisted with the works of famous writers such as T.S.Eliot and Ernst Hemingway) commissioned a man called Eustice Mullins to look into who runs the Federal reserve bank and therefore who is exerting massive influence over the US economy
Mullins can be heard speaking on youtube
The people who are running the Federal Reserve are also controlling the education system and the psychiatric system as well. They created the DSM system of categorisation. if you doubt this then use the incredible resource that is the internet and research it for yourself. A good place to start would be the Rockefeller family (eg Rockefeller foundation, Rockefeller university, london school of economics, standard oil, chase manhatten bank etc etc)
One trait that the elites have found occurs often in the people (and leaders of movements) who challenge the system is INTROVERSION
They are deeply threatened by introversion
This is why they have sought to make introversion and the behavioural traits associated with it as negative or as 'disorders'. They recently tried to expand the DSM categorisation to count shyness as a mental illness:
http://www.bps.org.uk/news/dsm-5-shyness-mental-illness
So why is this a problem?
The problem is that they are creating a system in which many introverts don't feel they can be themselves (it becomes easier with age to resists that)
Further to that it gives them wide powers to suppress dissent to their rule
Why changes to the law that undermine civil liberties are dangerous for freedom lovers is because even if there isn't a problem initially then there might be one as the situation changes. An example of this would be:
The recent NDAA which authorised the detention without trial and torture of US citiznes by the military. That might be ok at the moment but what happens if the elites then change labour laws and insist on a 14 hour working day without holidays (like they did in the industrial revolution)? When people protest against that they can be called 'terrorists' and locked up or they can be deemed to have a 'mental disorder' and can be silenced with detention and medication
The NDAA has been opposed in court by the US journalist and INTROVERT Chris Hedges, among others. It has been blocked by Judge Forrest otherwie it would have come into being
So when people say things like 'there's no bias against introverts' or 'that's just introvert whining' then ask them if they have ever heard of the Frankfurt School and what they are about.
