- MBTI
- INTP
Maybe I'm a little cynical, but ultimately, I think it'll be largely a fear-based decision on both sides of the aisle.
i'm going to vote for the least derpy candidate probably
Maybe I'm a little cynical, but ultimately, I think it'll be largely a fear-based decision on both sides of the aisle.
Makei'm going to vote for the least derpy candidate probably
Make
America
Less
Derpy
Again
Unless the article I read a while ago was incorrect, New York reduced its police budget by 1 billion dollars recently. Isn't that a Democrat administration?Abolishing police is not a part of democratic platform. It's a pretty far left idea. Biden has even come out and said he doesn't support it. You can actually look right at his platform where it states his focus is on prevention and rehabilitation through education, mental health and social services. You can really look into it if actually interested in more than sharing dishonest right wing talking points, because Biden's campaign even mentions his work on the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program....which would actually HIRE more officers and train them lol. Omg the anarchy!
On a scale of one to ten, how much will its entertainment value improve my schnitzel?Anyone else listen to the dystopian hysteria of the RNC last night?
You never mentioned NY.Unless the article I read a while ago was incorrect, New York reduced its police budget by 1 billion dollars recently. Isn't that a Democrat administration?
And for your information, I vote liberal in my country. They don't have crazy policies.
I literally mentioned New York in the post you just quoted. I will not continue a dialogue with you. You seem to be looking for people to insult or attack, and I'm really not interested in facilitating you.You never mentioned NY.
You commented on a "major political platform." Which I took to mean Biden's platform. Because local governments determine their funding for police. And it's not part of a platform. But one side likes to pretend it is.
This is what my post was referring to. Then you responded something about an article you read about NY.I'm not American, but as an outsider it just seems inconceivable that people could consider electing people who toy with the idea of doing away with the police.
Perhaps there's anarchists around who believe they won't be victims of crime, or who perhaps wish to victimise others, but what normal person, who cannot afford private security, wants there to be no assistance if someone is breaking into their house?
It just seems so bizzare to me, that a major political platform could somehow get itself to actually think this can be a policy.
I'm not American, but as an outsider it just seems inconceivable that people could consider electing people who toy with the idea of doing away with the police.
Perhaps there's anarchists around who believe they won't be victims of crime, or who perhaps wish to victimise others, but what normal person, who cannot afford private security, wants there to be no assistance if someone is breaking into their house?
It just seems so bizzare to me, that a major political platform could somehow get itself to actually think this can be a policy.
You really didn't mention New York in the top post though.I literally mentioned New York in the post you just quoted. I will not continue a dialogue with you. You seem to be looking for people to insult or attack, and I'm really not interested in facilitating you.
I mentioned it in the second post. Is there confusion about this?You really didn't mention New York in the top post though.
I mentioned it in the second post. Is there confusion about this?
I don’t know dude. I’ve seen few well thought out ideas on how to tackle the issue of police brutality and racial profiling. Most of what I see out there are reductionist thinking and arguments. It’s not as simple as “defunding” the police or throwing money at them. I’m fact, I’ve seen both things happen to the department of where I grew up, the Detroit Police Department. Defunded because of steep losses in tax revenue from people moving out in droves to throwing money at the department after exiting bankruptcy.From New York Post:
In a statement last month, his folks insisted: “Biden does not believe that police should be defunded.”
Later, though, asked if money should be “redirected” away from cops, he replied, “Yes, absolutely.” And the charter for his alliance with Bernie Sanders vows to “reinvigorate community policing . . . and make smart investments to incentivize departments to build effective partnerships with social workers and mental-health and substance-use counselors” — which aligns with the #Defunders’ goals.
Yet, then on Wednesday, as a poll showed 81 percent of blacks want as much, or more, police presence, Biden — lo and behold! — called for more funding for cops, to handle the “God-awful problems” they face.
None of these statements was a gaffe. It’s just that even on a subject as vital as cops, Biden wants it both ways. Who knows where he really stands?
It won't. It's actually not funny now that I think about it. I'm laughing because of how abysmally dysfunctional and sad it all is.On a scale of one to ten, how much will its entertainment value improve my schnitzel?
I just happened to go back a few pages and seen you pointing out that one guy as just being wrong for suggesting that defunding the police was an official position of the Democrats. I can’t believe he threw a fit and said that you were attacking and insulting him which it didn’t seem like you were to me at all.It won't. It's actually not funny now that I think about it. I'm laughing because of how abysmally dysfunctional and sad it all is.
Ok KarenYou have to mention it in the first, otherwise it doesn't count.